Do the principle of equal treatment guaranteed by Article 45 TFEU and by Article 7(2) of Regulation (EU) No 492/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on freedom of movement for workers within the Union and the provisions of Article 67 of Regulation (EC) No 883/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 29 April 2004 on the coordination of social security systems and Article 60 of Regulation (EC) No 987/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 laying down the procedure for implementing Regulation No 883/2004 on the coordination of social security systems preclude provisions enacted by a Member State under which frontier workers may not receive a family allowance associated with their employment in that Member State for children placed in care with them under a court order, whereas any child placed in care under a court order and living in that Member State is entitled to receive that allowance which is paid to the natural or legal person who has custody of the child and with whom the child is officially resident and actually lives on a continuous basis? Does the answer to that question depend on whether the frontier worker provides for the upkeep of that child?
DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072023008001032
European Employment Law Cases |
|
Pending Cases | Case C-27/23, Social InsuranceFV – v – Caisse pour l’avenir des enfants, reference lodged by the Cour de cassation du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg (Luxembourg) on 23 January 2023 |
Trefwoorden | Social Insurance |
DOI | 10.5553/EELC/187791072023008001032 |
Toon PDF Toon volledige grootte Statistiek Citeerwijze |
Dit artikel is keer geraadpleegd. |
Dit artikel is 0 keer gedownload. |
Aanbevolen citeerwijze bij dit artikel
, "Case C-27/23, Social Insurance", European Employment Law Cases, 1, (2023):70-70
, "Case C-27/23, Social Insurance", European Employment Law Cases, 1, (2023):70-70