Is a national understanding of a rule under which outstanding salary claims which were deposited with the employer in order to be paid over to a pension fund by a particular date but which were not paid by that employer into a separate account and therefore did not come within the scope of a right to have those claims excluded from insolvency proceedings in respect of the employer’s assets (Aussonderungsrecht) pursuant to Paragraph 47 of the German Insolvency Regulation contrary to Article 8 of Directive 2008/94/EC (on the protection of employees in the event of the insolvency of their employer) or to other EU law?
DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072016001001026
European Employment Law Cases |
|
ECJ Court Watch | Case C-454/15. Insolvency ProtectionJürgen Webb-Sämann –v– Christopher Seagon acting as liquidator in the insolvency of Baumarkt Praktiker DIY GmbH, reference lodged by the German Hessisches Landesarbeitsgericht on 24 August 2015 |
Trefwoorden | insolvency protection |
DOI | 10.5553/EELC/187791072016001001026 |
Toon PDF Toon volledige grootte Statistiek Citeerwijze |
Dit artikel is keer geraadpleegd. |
Dit artikel is 0 keer gedownload. |
Aanbevolen citeerwijze bij dit artikel
, "Case C-454/15. Insolvency Protection", European Employment Law Cases, 1, (2016):70-70
, "Case C-454/15. Insolvency Protection", European Employment Law Cases, 1, (2016):70-70