Is the effect of an E 101 certificate issued, in accordance with Articles 11(1) and Article 12a(1a) of Regulation (EEC) No 574/72 of 21 March 1972 fixing the procedure for implementing Regulation (EEC) No 1408/71 by the institution designated by the competent authority of the Member State whose social security legislation remains applicable to the situation of the employee, binding, first, on the institutions and authorities of the host Member State and, secondly, on the courts of that Member State, where it is found that the conditions under which the employee carries out his activity clearly do not fall within the material scope of the exceptions set out in Article 14(1) and (2) of Regulation No 1408/71?
DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072016001001036
European Employment Law Cases |
|
ECJ Court Watch | Case C-620/15. Free Movement – Social InsuranceA-Rosa Flusschif GmbH –v– Union de recouvrement des cotisations de sécurité sociale et d’allocations familiales d’Alsace, Sozialsversicherungsanstalt des Kantons Graubünden, reference lodged by the French Cour de cassation on 23 November 2015 |
Trefwoorden | free movement – social insurance |
DOI | 10.5553/EELC/187791072016001001036 |
Toon PDF Toon volledige grootte Statistiek Citeerwijze |
Dit artikel is keer geraadpleegd. |
Dit artikel is 0 keer gedownload. |
Aanbevolen citeerwijze bij dit artikel
, "Case C-620/15. Free Movement – Social Insurance", European Employment Law Cases, 1, (2016):72-72
, "Case C-620/15. Free Movement – Social Insurance", European Employment Law Cases, 1, (2016):72-72