-
Question
Must Articles 49 and 56 TFEU and Directive 2014/24 be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which limits to 30% the share of the contract which the tenderer is permitted to subcontract to third parties?
-
Ruling
Directive 2014/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on public procurement and repealing Directive 2004/18/EC, as amended by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/2170 of 24 November 2015, must be interpreted as precluding national legislation, such as that at issue in the main proceedings, which limits to 30% the share of the contract which the tenderer is permitted to subcontract to third parties.
DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072019004004021
European Employment Law Cases |
|
| Rulings | ECJ 26 September 2019, case C-63/18 (Vitali), Other forms of free movementVitali SpA – v – Autostrade per l’Italia SpA, Italian case |
| Trefwoorden | Other forms of free movement |
| DOI | 10.5553/EELC/187791072019004004021 |
|
Toon PDF Toon volledige grootte Samenvatting Statistiek Citeerwijze |
| Dit artikel is keer geraadpleegd. |
| Dit artikel is 0 keer gedownload. |
Aanbevolen citeerwijze bij dit artikel
, "ECJ 26 September 2019, case C-63/18 (Vitali), Other forms of free movement", European Employment Law Cases, 4, (2019):278-278
, "ECJ 26 September 2019, case C-63/18 (Vitali), Other forms of free movement", European Employment Law Cases, 4, (2019):278-278
|
|
Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in
Inhoud