ALGEMENE MEDEDELING

In de loop van januari 2025 wordt deze online omgeving geïntegreerd in Boomportaal (www.boomportaal.nl), waarna deze omgeving wordt opgeheven. Vanaf dat moment linkt deze URL automatisch door naar Boomportaal.

DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072021006001042

European Employment Law CasesAccess_open

Pending Cases

Case C-660/20, Part Time Work

MK – v – Lufthansa CityLine GmbH, reference lodged by the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) on 4 December 2020

Trefwoorden Part Time Work
DOI
Toon PDF Toon volledige grootte
Statistiek Citeerwijze
Dit artikel is keer geraadpleegd.
Dit artikel is 0 keer gedownload.
Aanbevolen citeerwijze bij dit artikel
, "Case C-660/20, Part Time Work", European Employment Law Cases, 1, (2021):81-81

Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in

      MK – v – Lufthansa CityLine GmbH, reference lodged by the Bundesarbeitsgericht (Germany) on 4 December 2020

      1. Does a national statutory provision treat part-time workers in a less favourable manner than comparable full-time workers within the meaning of Clause 4.1 of the Framework Agreement on part-time work annexed to Directive 97/81/EC if it permits additional remuneration for part-time and full-time workers to be uniformly contingent on the same number of working hours having been exceeded, and therefore allows account to be taken of the overall remuneration, and not of the component of the remuneration that comprises the additional remuneration?

      2. If Question 1 is answered in the affirmative: Is a national statutory provision which allows an entitlement to additional remuneration to be made conditional on the same number of working hours being exceeded uniformly in the case of both part-time and full-time workers compatible with Clause 4.1 and the principle of pro rata temporis in Clause 4.2 of the Framework Agreement on part-time work annexed to Directive 97/81/EC if the purpose of the additional remuneration is to compensate for a particular workload?


Print dit artikel