ALGEMENE MEDEDELING

In de loop van januari 2025 wordt deze online omgeving geïntegreerd in Boomportaal (www.boomportaal.nl), waarna deze omgeving wordt opgeheven. Vanaf dat moment linkt deze URL automatisch door naar Boomportaal.

DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072021006004023

European Employment Law CasesAccess_open

Pending Cases

Case C-680/21, Free Movement

UL, SA Royal Antwerp Football Club – v – Union royale belge des sociétés de football association ASBL, reference lodged by the Tribunal de première instance francophone de Bruxelles (Belgium) on 11 November 2021

Trefwoorden Free Movement
DOI
Toon PDF Toon volledige grootte
Statistiek Citeerwijze
Dit artikel is keer geraadpleegd.
Dit artikel is 0 keer gedownload.
Aanbevolen citeerwijze bij dit artikel
, "Case C-680/21, Free Movement", European Employment Law Cases, 4, (2021):230-230

Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in

      1. Is Article 101 TFEU to be interpreted as precluding the plan relating to “HGPs” adopted on 2 February 2005 by UEFA’s Executive Committee, approved by UEFA’s 52 member associations at the Tallinn Congress on 21 April 2005 and implemented by means of regulations adopted both by UEFA and by its member federations?

      2. Are Articles 45 and 101 TFEU to be interpreted as precluding the application of the rules on the inclusion on the match sheet and the fielding of locally trained players, as formalised by Articles P335.11 and P.1422 of the URBSFA’s federal regulation and reproduced in Articles B4.1[12] of Title 4 and B6.109 of Title 6 of the new URBSFA regulation?


Print dit artikel