De websites van Boom uitgevers maken gebruik van cookies. Wat betekent dit voor u? Klik hier voor meer info.
Janneke Gerards, Elif Erken, Claire Loven
The Expanding Methodological Toolbox of the ECHR Scholar
Special Issue Progress in Legal Scholarship, Marnix Snel, Sanne Taekema & Gijs van Dijck (eds.)
Janneke Gerards, Elif Erken, Claire Loven
Gepubliceerd op 01-02-2023
DOI: 10.5553/REM/.000072
206
13
0
0
1
Onderwerpen
Juridisch > Metajuridica
Download citeerwijze bij dit artikel
Auteursinformatie
Prof. mr. Janneke Gerards is Professor of Fundamental Rights Law, Montaigne Centre for Rule of Law and Administration of Justice, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Elif Erken is PhD candidate, Montaigne Centre for Rule of Law and Administration of Justice, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Dr. Claire Loven is Assistant Professor, Montaigne Centre for Rule of Law and Administration of Justice, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
Citaties in dit artikel
Lambrecht
For a historical account of, but a different perspective, 2022
Arnardóttir
; Gerards, 2020). Usually they also make use of tools that are offered by the Court’s Registry to facilitate the selection of potentially relevant cases, in particular the classification system developed to indicate the ‘importance level’ of a judgment, 2017
Mol
; see further e.g. Schreier, 2014). QCA has a tendency to be deductive, especially when a codebook with a set of coding instructions is drafted based, 2021
Arnardóttir
The ‘procedural turn’ under the European Convention, 2017
Aust, Demir-Gürsel
The European Court of Human Rights: Current challenges in historical perspective, 2021
Beijer
The limits of fundamental rights protection by the EU. The scope for the development of positive obligations, 2017
Bianchi
International law theories. An inquiry into different ways of thinking, 2016
Brems, Lavrijsen
Don’t use a sledgehammer to crack a nut’: Less restrictive means in the case law of the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review, 15(1, 2015
Buijse
Why attacks, 2019
Cliquennois, Champetier
The economic, judicial and political influence exerted by private foundations, 2016
Dzehtsiarou
European consensus and the legitimacy of the European Court of Human Rights, 2015
Donald, Speck
The European Court of Human Rights’ remedial practice and its impact, 2019
Duranti
The conservative human rights revolution. European identity, transnational politics, and the origins of the European Convention, 2017
Erken
Non-governmental organisations and national human rights institutions monitoring the execution of, 2021
Fikfak
Against settlement before the European Court of Human Rights. International Journal of Constitutional Law, doi:10.1093/icon/moac087, 2022
Gerards
Procedural review by the ECtHR – a typology. In J. H. Gerards, 2017
Gerards
Dealing with divergence. Margin of appreciation and Incrementalism in the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights. Human Rights Law Review, 18, 495-515. doi:10.1093/hrlr/ngy017, 2018
Glas
The European Court of Human Rights’ use of non-binding and standard-setting Council of Europe documents. Human Rights Law Review, 17(1), 2017
Hall, Wright
Systematic content analysis of judicial opinions
California Law Review, 2008
Helfer, Voeten
Walking back human rights in Europe
European Journal of International Law, 2020
Helfer, Voeten
Walking back dissents, 2021
Héri
Responsive human rights. Vulnerability, ill-treatment and the ECtHR, 2021
Hirsch Ballin
Advanced introduction to legal research methods, 2020
Hodson
NGOs and the struggle for human rights in Europe, 2011
Hutchinson, Duncan
Defining and describing what we do: doctrinal legal research. Deakin Law Review, 17(1), 83. doi:10.21153/dlr2012vol17no1art70, 2012
Jaremba, Mak
Interviewing judges in the transnational context. Law and Method, 2014
Kindt
The pilot judgment procedure at the European Court of Human Rights: An evaluation in the light of procedural efficiency and access to justice (Doctoral dissertation), 2018
Lieblich
How to do research in international law? A, 2021
Loven
Fundamental rights violations by private actors and the procedure before the European Court of Human Rights. A study of verticalised cases, 2022
McInerney-Lankford
Legal methodologies and human rights research: challenges and opportunities. In B. A. Andreassen, H. O. Sano, 2017
Medvedeva
Identification, categorisation and forecasting of court decisions (Doctoral dissertation), 2022
Medvedeva, Vols, Wieling
Using machine learning to predict decisions of the European Court of Human Rights. Artificial Intelligence and the Law, 28, 237-266. doi:10.1007/s10506-019-09255-y, 2019
Medvedeva, Xu, Wieling, Vols
Legal Knowledge and Information Systems: JURIX 2020: The Thirty-third Annual Conference, Brno, 2020
Minow
Archetypal legal scholarship: a field guide
Journal of Legal Education, 2013
Murraij
Righting wrongs: The dynamics of implementing international human rights decisions (Special issue). Journal of Human Rights Practice, 12(1), 2020
Scheinin
The art and science of interpretation in human rights law. In B. A. Andreassen, H-O. Sano, 2017
Senden
Interpretation of fundamental rights in a multilevel legal system. An analysis of the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union, 2011
Smet
Resolving conflicts between human rights. The judge’s dilemma, 2017
Taekema
Theoretical and normative frameworks for legal research: putting theory into practice. Law and Method, 2018
Taekema, Burg, van der
Legal philosophy as an enrichment of doctrinal research part I: introducing three philosophical methods. Law and Method, 2020
Taekema, Burg, van der
Legal philosophy as an enrichment of doctrinal research part II: the purposes of including legal philosophy. Law and Method, 2022
Theilen
European consensus. Between strategy and principle. The uses of vertically comparative legal reasoning in regional human rights adjudication, 2021
Hoecke, van
Methodology of comparative legal research. Law and Method, 2015
Webley
Qualitative approaches to empirical legal research. In P. Cane, 2010
Westerman