Tetty Havinga (to be published by Edward Elgar, 2015).
Citaties in dit artikel
Bernauer, CaduffAnsell, Vogel
What’s the beef? The contested governance of European food safety , 2006
Bex, Berg, van den, Marinkovic
Levensmiddelenhygiëne in vier EU lidstaten. Voedselveiligheid in nationale regelgeving en gidsen voor ongekoelde presentatie van bederfelijke producten en gekoelde opslag van zelfbereide producten. Eindrapportage 1.0 , 2012
Bourblanc, Crabbe, Liefferink, Wiering
‘The marathon of the hare and the tortoise: implementing the EU Water Framework Directive’
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management , 2013
Braithwaite
‘Enforced Self-Regulation: A New Strategy for Corporate Crime Control’
Michigan Law Review , 1982
Fairman, Yapp
‘Enforced Self-Regulation, Prescription, and Conceptions of Compliance within Small Businesses: The Impact of Enforcement’, Law and Policy , 2005
Falkner, Hartlapp, Treib
‘Worlds of compliance: Why leading approaches to European Union implementation are only “sometimes-true theories”’
European Journal of Political Research , 2007
Fielding, Ellis, Clayton, Peters
‘An evaluation of process specific information resources, aimed at hazard analysis, in Small and Medium Enterprises in food manufacturing’
Food control , 2011
Green, Kane
‘The effective enforcement of HACCP based food safety management systems in the UK’
Food control , 2014
Haverland, Steunenberg, Waarden, van
‘Sectors at different speeds: analyzing transposition deficits in the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies , 2010
Hawkins
The Uses of Discretion , 1992
Hutter
Managing Food Safety and Hygiene. Governance and Regulation as Risk Management , 2011
Liefferink, Wiering, Uitenboogaart
‘The EU Water Framework Directive: A multi-dimensional analysis of implementation and domestic impact’
Land Use Policy , 2011
Vervaele
Compliance and enforcement of European Community Law, The Hague/ , 1999
Mastenbroek
‘Surviving the deadline: The transposition of EU directives in the Netherlands’
European Union Politics , 2003
Panke
‘The European Court of Justice as an agent of Europeanization? Restoring compliance with EU law’
Journal of European Public Policy , 2007
Sabel, ZeitlinLevi-Faur
The Oxford Handbook of Governance , 2012
Shapiro
J.A.E. Vervaele et al. (eds.), Compliance and enforcement of European Community Law, The Hague/ , 1999
Strik
Besluitvorming over asiel- en migratierichtlijnen. De wisselwerking tussen nationaal en Europees niveau , 2011
Verbruggen
Enforcing Transnational Private Regulation: A Comparative Analysis of Advertising and Food Safety , 2014
Verbruggen, Havinga
‘Metatoezicht op voedselveiligheid’
Tijdschrift voor Toezicht , 2014
Versluis
‘Even Rules, Uneven Practices: Opening the ‘Black Box’ of EU law in action’
West European Politics , 2007
Vogel
National styles of regulation: Environmental policy in Great Britain and the United States , 1986
Vos
‘EU Food Safety regulation in the aftermath of the BSE crisis’, Journal of Consumer Policy , 2000
Waarden, van der
J.A.E. Vervaele et all (eds), Compliance and enforcement of European Community Law, The Hague/ , 1999
Wilson, Petersen, Holl
‘EU member states responses to Agri-Environment Regulation , 2078
Zeitlin
‘Towards Governance-Based Regulation?’
Tijdschrift voor Toezicht , 2013
ZimmermanHansen
Explorations in Society and Counseling , 1969
Zwaan
The Qualification Directive : Central themes, problem issues, and implementation in selected member states , 2007
Zwaan
The Procedures Directive. Central Themes, Problem Issues, and Implementation in Selected Member States , 2008
Zwaan
The Returns Directive. Central themes, problem issues, and implementation in selected member states , 2011
food regulation, official controls, EU food law, implementation, enforcement
Onderwerpen
Juridisch > Metajuridica
Samenvatting
Over the course of time the European Union has increased its powers considerably. Currently, almost all food safety regulations in the member states rest on European law. Despite this common legal base, several differences between member states still exist. This article compares the way Scottish and Dutch authorities deal with a particular item of European food law: the development of national guides to good practice for hygiene and for the application of HACCP principles by the food industry. The results of this investigation are consistent with the conclusion of Falkner et al. that the implementation of EU law in both the Netherlands and the UK depends on domestic issues. The dominant issue in Scotland (and the UK) is the FSA objective to bring consistent food controls and independency from industry which results in the development of governmental guidance. The prevailing issue in the Netherlands is making industry responsible for food safety which helps explain the extensive use of industry guides. This study shows that in order to understand what happens on the ground it is important to look beyond transposition or direct effect and also to investigate the implementation of regulations and to dig deeper than just their transposition.
U heeft geen toegang tot deze publicatie Beste bezoeker, om de inhoud te raadplegen heeft u een abonnement nodig op deze publicatie of de collectie waar deze publicatie deel van uitmaakt. Neem contact op met klantenservice@boomportaal.nl voor meer informatie over de mogelijkheden en prijzen.
Kopen in de webshop Deze publicatie is ook te vinden in onze webshop. Sommige publicaties hebben ook de mogelijkheid om direct toegang te kopen tot het online boek.