%PDF-1.6
%
1 0 obj
<<
/FormType 1
/Subtype /Form
/Resources
<<
/Font
<<
/F1.0 2 0 R
>>
/ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI]
/ExtGState
<<
/Tr1 3 0 R
>>
>>
/Type /XObject
/BBox [0 0 447 685]
/Length 462
/Matrix [1 0 0 1 0 0]
>>
stream
q
q
/Tr1 gs
/DeviceRGB cs
0.000 0.000 0.000 scn
0.000 669.450 447.000 15.550 re
f
Q
BT
50.69999999999999 675.692 Td
/F1.0 6 Tf
[<446974206172> -40 <74696b> 20 <656c20756974204e6574686572> -15 <6c616e6473204a6f7572> -25 <6e616c206f66204c6567616c205068696c6f736f7068> 30 <79206973206765707562> 20 <6c69636565726420646f6f7220426f6f6d206a7572> -15 <69646973636820656e2069732062657374656d642076> 25 <6f6f7220616e6f6e69656d652062657a> 15 <6f656b> 20 <6572>] TJ
ET
Q
endstream
endobj
2 0 obj
<<
/Encoding /WinAnsiEncoding
/Subtype /Type1
/Type /Font
/BaseFont /Helvetica
>>
endobj
3 0 obj
<<
/ca 0.1
/CA 1
/Type /ExtGState
>>
endobj
4 0 obj
<<
/Filter /FlateDecode
/Length 10
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
5 0 obj
<<
/Filter /FlateDecode
/Length 50
>>
stream
xS**T0T0 B ghhjjkg
ɹ
.
\\ ޖ
endstream
endobj
6 0 obj
<<
/Filter /FlateDecode
/Length 10
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
7 0 obj
<<
/Filter /FlateDecode
/Length 50
>>
stream
xS**T0T0 B ghhjjkg
ɹ
.
\\ ލ
endstream
endobj
8 0 obj
<<
/Filter /FlateDecode
/Length 10
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
9 0 obj
<<
/Filter /FlateDecode
/Length 50
>>
stream
xS**T0T0 B ghhjjkg
ɹ
.
\\ ބ
endstream
endobj
10 0 obj
<<
/Filter /FlateDecode
/Length 10
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
11 0 obj
<<
/Filter /FlateDecode
/Length 50
>>
stream
xS**T0T0 B ghhjjkg
ɹ
f
.
\\ {
endstream
endobj
12 0 obj
<<
/Filter /FlateDecode
/Length 10
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
13 0 obj
<<
/Filter /FlateDecode
/Length 50
>>
stream
xS**T0T0 B ghhjjkg
ɹ
.
\\ r
endstream
endobj
14 0 obj
<<
/Filter /FlateDecode
/Length 10
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
15 0 obj
<<
/Filter /FlateDecode
/Length 50
>>
stream
xS**T0T0 B ghhjjkg
ɹ
&
.
\\ i
endstream
endobj
16 0 obj
<<
/Filter /FlateDecode
/Length 10
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
17 0 obj
<<
/Filter /FlateDecode
/Length 50
>>
stream
xS**T0T0 B ghhjjkg
ɹ
.
\\ `
endstream
endobj
18 0 obj
<<
/Filter /FlateDecode
/Length 10
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
19 0 obj
<<
/Filter /FlateDecode
/Length 50
>>
stream
xS**T0T0 B ghhjjkg
ɹ
F
.
\\ W
endstream
endobj
20 0 obj
<<
/Filter /FlateDecode
/Length 10
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
21 0 obj
<<
/Filter /FlateDecode
/Length 50
>>
stream
xS**T0T0 B ghhjjkg
ɹ
.
\\ N
endstream
endobj
22 0 obj
<<
/Filter /FlateDecode
/Length 10
>>
stream
x+ |
endstream
endobj
23 0 obj
<<
/Filter /FlateDecode
/Length 50
>>
stream
xS**T0T0 B ghhjjkg
ɹ
.
\\ E
endstream
endobj
24 0 obj
<<
/AcroForm 25 0 R
/Metadata 26 0 R
/Type /Catalog
/Pages 27 0 R
>>
endobj
27 0 obj
<<
/Kids [28 0 R 29 0 R 30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R 33 0 R 34 0 R 35 0 R 36 0 R 37 0 R]
/Type /Pages
/MediaBox [-28.3465 -28.3465 476.22 714.331]
/Count 10
>>
endobj
26 0 obj
<<
/Subtype /XML
/Type /Metadata
/Length 6264
>>
stream
2009-12-10T14:06:25+01:00
2009-12-10T13:56:48+01:00
2009-12-10T14:06:25+01:00
XSL Formatter V4.3 MR6b (4,3,2009,0204) for Windows
application/pdf
Soeteman, A.
Artikel: Wetenschappelijke rechtsgeleerdheid: Commentaar op het preadvies van Carel Smith
R&R 2009/03/03
This article is a comment on Carel Smith's paper. Smith rightly argues that the study of law has a hermeneutic character. But his interpretation of legal hermeneutics includes the thesis that in hard cases there is no right or true legal decision. This seems to have negative implications for the scholarly character of the study of law: in hard cases any solution goes. This paper argues
against Smith
that the study of law defends right answers for hard cases. It is also normative in another sense: legal answers
in easy cases as well as in hard cases
always presuppose a normative interpretation of the legal sources. This contributes to the differences of opinion under lawyers. But it is no obstacle to the scholarly character of the study of law
as long as a rational debate about these legal answers and the underlying values and principles is possible. Smith's rejection of the right answer thesis
however
prevents the possibility of such a rational debate
uuid:cedf32e8-78e6-44de-a7b9-d0f9584f0fdd
uuid:aa325859-d929-4d1e-bf12-a666623b9b36
Antenna House PDF Output Library 2.6.0 (Windows)
This article is a comment on Carel Smith's paper. Smith rightly argues that the study of law has a hermeneutic character. But his interpretation of legal hermeneutics includes the thesis that in hard cases there is no right or true legal decision. This seems to have negative implications for the scholarly character of the study of law: in hard cases any solution goes. This paper argues, against Smith, that the study of law defends right answers for hard cases. It is also normative in another sense: legal answers, in easy cases as well as in hard cases, always presuppose a normative interpretation of the legal sources. This contributes to the differences of opinion under lawyers. But it is no obstacle to the scholarly character of the study of law, as long as a rational debate about these legal answers and the underlying values and principles is possible. Smith's rejection of the right answer thesis, however, prevents the possibility of such a rational debate
endstream
endobj
37 0 obj
<<
/Resources
<<
/Font
<<
/F1 38 0 R
/F0 39 0 R
>>
/ProcSet [/PDF /Text /ImageB /ImageC /ImageI]
/XObject
<<
/Xi9 1 0 R
>>
>>
/TrimBox [-0.0000457764 -0.0000457764 447.874 685.985]
/Type /Page
/Contents [4 0 R 40 0 R 5 0 R]
/Parent 27 0 R
/ArtBox [-0.0000457764 -0.0000457764 447.874 685.985]
/MediaBox [-28.3465 -28.3465 476.22 714.331]
/CropBox [-0.0000457764 -0.0000457764 447.874 685.985]
/BleedBox [-0.0000457764 -0.0000457764 447.874 685.985]
>>
endobj
38 0 obj
<<
/Encoding
<<
/Type /Encoding
/Differences [1 /ellipsis 2 /adieresis 3 /eacute 4 /edieresis 5 /Euro 6 /endash 7 /quoteright 8 /quoteleft 9 /idieresis 10 /odieresis 11 /udieresis 12 /quotedblleft 13 /quotedblright 14 /egrave 15 /hungarumlaut 16 /aacute 17 /ccedilla]
>>
/ToUnicode 41 0 R
/Widths [794 454 445 445 524 500 202 202 266 505 528 357 357 445 333 454 403 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 220 273 0 524 0 760 712 0 328 328 357 0 245 315 245 392 524 524 524 524 524 524 524 524 524 524 245 245 524 524 524 426 623 606 574 585 691 555 531 665 731 324 493 631 523 869 716 718 547 718 600 492 567 669 624 880 589 562 583 323 0 323 0 500 0 454 509 403 521 445 334 466 545 266 244 499 256 812 558 505 522 507 375 401 358 528 473 680 474 462 441 0 0 0 524]
/Subtype /Type1
/Type /Font
/FirstChar 1
/LastChar 126
/FontDescriptor 42 0 R
/BaseFont /QTPEMW+ChaparralPro-Regular
>>
endobj
41 0 obj
<<
/Filter /FlateDecode
/Length 351
>>
stream
xUn0