Samenvatting

This research describes the experiences, views and attitudes of participants of mediation dialogue groups involving <i>non-related</i> traffic accidents regarding their participation and related topics such as responsibility, rehabilitation, and restoration. They collected the data through individual semi-structured in-depth interviews with participants of two mediation dialogue groups. The data were analyzed through a reflexive thematic analysis. The authors identified three categories: (a) the importance of shared stories, (b) blurred boundaries, and (c) opportunities and obstacles for repair. Overall, the analysis suggests that mediation involving similar but non-­related incidents may provide the participants with valuable knowledge and insights about the lives and thoughts of one another, as well as lead to mutual understanding and support. For some, it may even involve a transformative experience. Importantly, the analysis reveals that the presence of a ‘shared story’ is pivotal to achieving a sense of connection and resonance that allows for such mutual understanding and support. Feeling safe and respected are also key to establishing a constructive group dynamic.