This article engages in a comparison of the regulation of PR in the Netherlands and the UK (specifically England and Wales). The latter is a good comparator as it operates a similar regulatory approach to the Netherlands, that of conditional acceptance of PR, the condition being (prior) consent. Furthermore, the UK boasts a more detailed and mature legal framework that continues to be tested through caselaw, and thus offers insight into how a regulatory approach conditional upon the (prior) consent of the deceased can fare.
I begin with a brief exposition of the new Dutch guidelines and the current legislative position in the Netherlands vis-à-vis posthumous reproduction (part II). Likewise, I summarize the relevant UK guidelines and legislative position (part III). I draw out the similarities and differences between the two regimes, as well as engaging in a critical analysis of the regulations themselves. I then look at how the UK regime has been challenged in recent years through caselaw in anticipation of the issues that might confront the Netherlands in future (part IV). I conclude (part V) that the key lesson to be drawn from the UK experience is that clarity and consistency is crucial in navigating this ethically, emotionally, and time sensitive area. Further, that both the UK and the Netherlands can expect demand for more detailed and precise regulatory guidance as requests for the procedure increase, and within evermore novel circumstances

Tegen de achtergrond van de reeds aangekondigde integrale herziening en modernisering van de zedenmisdrijven in het Wetboek van Strafrecht en in relatie tot recente en in voorbereiding zijnde strafbaarstellingen op zedengebied brengt de auteur in deze bijdrage een aantal ‘zorgen om zeden’ voor het voetlicht. De auteur wil de wetgever daarmee handvatten aanreiken om de zedentitel inhoudelijk en systematisch tot een helder en werkbaar geheel om te vormen