De context van een zorgaanbieder speelt een rol bij de afweging of de IGJ vertrouwen heeft in een zorgaanbieder. Afhankelijk van het vertrouwen kiest de inspectie voor een meer op leren gerichte, dan wel een meer disciplinerende interventie. In de praktijk is de uitdaging voor inspecteurs te expliciteren wat die context is en hoe die te wegen in het bepalen van de interventie om daarmee toezicht op maat te kunnen leveren. Dit onderzoek beantwoordt de vraag: ‘Wat zijn de belangrijkste contextfactoren die de kwaliteit van de zorg van een zorgaanbieder kunnen beïnvloeden?’. Het onderzoek had een kwalitatieve opzet en was een combinatie van conceptanalyse, literatuuronderzoek, interviews met experts, focusgroepdiscussies en toetsing van contextfactoren door inspecteurs en onderzoek van inspectierapporten. Het resultaat hiervan is het kader ‘Context van een zorgaanbieder’ met vier categorieën: Toezichtgeschiedenis, Organisatorische context, Bestuurlijke context en Maatschappelijke context. |
Zoekresultaat: 1398 artikelen
Artikel |
Hoe het toezicht rekening kan houden met de context van een zorgaanbiederContext matters |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Toezicht, Aflevering 3-4 2020 |
Trefwoorden | context, contextfactoren, vertrouwen, afwegingskader, gezondheidszorg |
Auteurs | Corry Ketelaars, Sandra Spronk en Ian Leistikow |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
Wereldwijd en divers |
Tijdschrift | Advocatenblad, Aflevering 9 2020 |
Auteurs | Erik Jan Bolsius en Martijn Gijsbertsen |
Auteursinformatie |
Artikel |
Italiaanse toestandenInterne en externe deelneming aan een criminele (maffia-)organisatie |
Tijdschrift | Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Strafrecht, Aflevering 5 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Italiaans recht, deelneming aan een criminele maffiaorganisatie, strafrechtelijke aansprakelijkheid, facilitators, externe en interne deelneming |
Auteurs | Mr. dr. L.J.J. (Laura) Peters |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In Italië kunnen faciliterende beroepsbeoefenaars als louche notarissen, advocaten en rechters, en ook andere facilitators die een maffiaorganisatie ondersteunen zonder daarvan lid te zijn, worden vervolgd wegens ‘externe deelneming aan een criminele maffiaorganisatie’. Die strafrechtelijke aansprakelijkheid is controversieel en leidt al decennialang tot debatten in de rechtspraak en literatuur. Deze bijdrage bespreekt de ontwikkeling van de Italiaanse strafrechtelijke aansprakelijkheid wegens externe en ook interne deelneming aan een maffiaorganisatie, en vervolgens de vraag of facilitators van criminele organisaties naar Nederlands recht vervolgd (zouden kunnen) worden wegens algemene deelneming aan deelneming aan een criminele organisatie. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | company takeovers, mandatory offers, minority shareholders, equal treatment, acquisition procedure |
Auteurs | Paul Nkoane |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
A firm intention announcement must be made when the offeror is able and willing to acquire securities, and when a mandatory offer must be made. When the firm intention announcement is implemented, some sort of a contract is created. This rule has helped to determine the particular time the offeror should be liable to minorities. The question of when the offeror should bear the obligation to implement mandatory offers in aborted takeovers is thus no more problematic. Previously, the courts wrestled with this issue, but delivered what appears to be unsatisfactory decisions. This article will discuss the effect of a firm intention announcement and the responsibility that attends the making of that announcement. It intends to illustrate the extent of liability the offeror must bear in the event of a lapsed takeover, before and after the making of the firm intention announcement. The article examines the manner in which takeover rules can be enforced, and whether the current measures afford minorities proper protection. This brings to light the issue of equal treatment in takeovers and the fallacy thereof. A minor appraisal of the takeover rules in two jurisdictions in Europe (the United Kingdom and the Netherlands) is conducted to assess how equal treatment for minorities is promoted. Due to the difficulty minorities may experience in enforcing equal treatment in company takeovers, the article advocates for the alteration of the current South African takeover procedure for the promotion of minorities’ interests and for establishing rules that provide the offeror adequate information. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Law and Method, oktober 2020 |
Trefwoorden | comparative legal studies, legal education, pragmatism |
Auteurs | Alexandra Mercescu |
Auteursinformatie |
Wetenschap |
Related party transactions, de tegenstrijdigbelangregeling en het voorkomen van belangenverstrengeling in de Nederlandse Corporate Governance Code: waar zijn we nu aan toe? |
Tijdschrift | Onderneming en Financiering, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | belangenconflicten, tegenstrijdig belang, Herziene Europese Aandeelhoudersrichtlijn, transactiecommissie, corporate governance |
Auteurs | Mr. A.C. Jansen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In Boek 2 van het Burgerlijk Wetboek (BW) is een nieuwe regeling voor related party transactions geïmplementeerd. De nieuwe regeling is een aanvulling op de bestaande tegenstrijdigbelangregeling in Boek 2 van het BW en hetgeen met betrekking tot belangenverstrengeling is geregeld in principe 2.7 van de Nederlandse Corporate Governance Code. Deze bijdrage bespreekt de onderlinge verhoudingen tussen deze regelingen en geeft het gebruik van een speciale overnamecommissie, zoals in de Verenigde Staten van toepassing, als mogelijke oplossing voor ook de Nederlandse praktijk om met belangenverstrengeling bij gevoelige transacties en deze drie regelingen om te kunnen gaan. |
Case Reports |
2020/23 The Supreme Court reiterates the importance of retention of an organizational and functional link between the business factors transferred, a prerequisite in the existence of a transfer of undertaking (GR) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Transfer of undertakings, Transfer |
Auteurs | Effie Mitsopoulou |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The Greek Supreme Court, in a case about the transfer of a business and the obligation on the transferee to continue employing the transferred employees, underlined the importance of a thorough and genuine control on all factors to be taken into consideration in order to conclude on the existence of a transfer of undertaking or not: the business transferred must retain an autonomous economic identity, in the sense that the functional link between the different factors transferred is retained, thus allowing the new entity to use them in order to exercise an economic activity identical or similar to the previous one. |
Case Reports |
2020/18 Prohibition of dismissal of pregnant employee (RO) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Gender discrimination |
Auteurs | Andreea Suciu en Teodora Mănăilă |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Analysing the national legal framework in relation to the protection of pregnant employees and employees who have recently given birth or are breastfeeding, provisions which transposed the regulations of Directive 92/85/EEC and of the conclusions in case C-103/16, Jessica Porras Guisado – v – Bankia S.A. and Others, the Constitutional Court of Romania ascertained that the dismissal prohibition of a pregnant employee is strictly restricted to reasons that have a direct connection with the employee’s pregnancy status. As for other cases where the termination of the employment contract is the result of disciplinary misconduct, unexcused absence from work, non-observance of labour discipline, or termination of employment for economic reasons or collective redundancies, the employer must submit in writing well-reasoned grounds for dismissal. |
Case Reports |
2020/21 Employer not liable for misuse of personal data by ‘rogue’ employee (UK) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Privacy |
Auteurs | Richard Lister |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The Supreme Court has allowed an appeal by one of the UK’s major supermarket chains, overturning a finding that it was vicariously liable for a rogue employee’s deliberate disclosure of payroll data related to some 100,000 co-workers, of whom 10,000 brought a group claim for damages. |
Case Reports |
2020/20 Dismissal unfair where decision-maker was not given accurate information (UK) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Unfair Dismissal |
Auteurs | Ludivine Gegaden |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The dismissal of an employee for gross misconduct was unfair because the investigating officer failed to share significant new information with the manager conducting the disciplinary hearing who decided to dismiss, the Employment Appeal Tribunal has ruled. |
Case Reports |
2020/19 Relationship between time of notification of collective redundancies and time of notice of termination (GE) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Collective Dismissal |
Auteurs | Marcus Bertz |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The notice of collective redundancies required to be given to an employment agency pursuant to Section 17(1) of the German Protection Against Unfair Dismissal Act (Kündigungsschutzgesetz, ‘KSchG’) can only be effectively submitted if the employer has already decided to terminate the employment contract at the time of its receipt by the employment agency. Notices of termination in collective redundancy proceedings are therefore effective – subject to the fulfilment of any other notice requirements – if the proper notice is received by the competent employment agency before the employee has received the letter of termination. |
Case Reports |
2020/16 Nature and extent of ‘reasonable accommodation’ to be provided to employees with disabilities (IE) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Disability Discrimination |
Auteurs | Orla O’Leary |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In a recent Supreme Court decision, it was held by a 4-1 majority that there is no reason, in principle, why the provision of ‘reasonable accommodation’ for an employee with a disability should not involve the redistribution of duties. |
Artikel |
Over autonome auto’s, een bestuurderloze toekomst en nieuwe risico’s |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Bijzonder Strafrecht & Handhaving, Aflevering 5 2020 |
Trefwoorden | bestuurder, autonome auto, hacken, cybersecurity, zelfrijdende auto |
Auteurs | Mr. dr. N.E. Vellinga |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
De komst van volledig zelfrijdende of autonome auto’s doet vele juridische vragen rijzen doordat zelfrijdende auto’s geen bestuurder hebben. Deze vragen rijzen onder meer ten aanzien van de toepassing van bepalingen van het RVV 1990 en de WVW 1994 die de bestuurder als normadressaat hebben. Daarnaast komen aspecten van cybersecurity aan bod in dit artikel. Er wordt in deze bijdrage onder meer een voorstel tot wijziging van artikel 6 WVW 1994 gedaan, om zo te voorzien in een bestuurderloze toekomst. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Urgenda, Miller v. Secretary of State, Norm of judicial apoliticality, Ronald Dworkin, Judicial restraint |
Auteurs | Maurits Helmich |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Few legal theorists today would argue that the domain of law exists in isolation from other normative spheres governing society, notably from the domain of ‘politics’. Nevertheless, the implicit norm that judges should not act ‘politically’ remains influential and widespread in the debates surrounding controversial court cases. This article aims to square these two observations. Taking the Miller v. Secretary of State and Urgenda cases as illustrative case studies, the article demonstrates that what it means for judges to adjudicate cases ‘apolitically’ is itself a matter of controversy. In reflecting on their own constitutional role, courts are forced to take a stance on substantive questions of political philosophy. Nevertheless, that does not mean that the ‘norm of judicial apoliticality’ should therefore be rejected. The norm’s coherence lies in its intersocial function: its role in declaring certain modes of judicial interpretation and intervention legitimate (‘legal’/‘judicial’) or illegitimate (‘political’). |
Case Reports |
2020/35 Employment contract for an indefinite term with exclusion of work and remuneration for a certain period is valid and does not conflict with the law on fixed-term work (GE) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Fixed-Term Work |
Auteurs | Othmar K. Traber |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The Federal Labour Court of Germany (Bundesarbeitsgericht, ‘BAG’) had to decide on a case in which an employee argued that his contract was not terminated by a provision that restricted the mutual duties to a certain time period for the yearly season within his contract and that the employer had to employ him during the off season. However, his lawsuit was unsuccessful as the Court found that, even though he did have an indefinite contract, the employer was not obliged to employ and pay him during the off season due to the valid provision of fixed-term employment for the time from April to October during the time of the season. |
Case Reports |
2020/34 Challenge to validity of Workplace Relations Act 2015 unsuccessful (IR) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Unfair Dismissal, Fair Trial, Miscellaneous |
Auteurs | Orla O’Leary |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
A recent challenge to the constitutionality of the Irish Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) has failed. The applicant in the case at hand argued that the WRC was unconstitutional for two reasons: (a) that the WRC carries out the administration of justice in breach of the general constitutional rule that only the courts may administer justice; and (b) several of the statutory procedures of the WRC were so deficient that they failed to vindicate the applicant’s personal constitutional rights. The High Court of Ireland dismissed both arguments. |
Case Reports |
2020/37 Can the exception clause of Article 8 Rome I save a Turkish airline company from the application of Dutch dismissal law in a dispute with an Amsterdam home-based co-pilot? (NL) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Private International Law, Applicable Law |
Auteurs | Amber Zwanenburg en Jan-Pieter Vos |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The central question in this case was what was the objectively applicable law to an employment contract concluded between a Turkish airline and a Dutch co-pilot, in accordance with Article 8 Rome I. The ruling is particularly interesting for the relation between the habitual place of work and the exception clause and points to the elements that should be taken into account. |
Case Reports |
2020/39 Termination of franchise arrangement and entering into subsequent arrangement constitute a transfer of undertaking (IR) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Transfer of undertakings |
Auteurs | Orla O’Leary |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The Irish Workplace Relations Commission has found that the termination of a franchise arrangement between a post office and a retail partner and a subsequent arrangement with another retail partner constituted a transfer of undertaking. |
Article |
2020/29 Legal status of electronic forms of employment |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Employment status |
Auteurs | Andrzej Świątkowski |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The UK Employment Tribunals and England and Wales Court of Appeal (case [2018] EWCA Civ 2748) have ruled that any Uber driver who has the Uber App switched on, is in the territory where he/she is authorised to work, and is able and willing to accept assignments, is working for Uber under a worker contract. The UK courts disregarded some of the provisions of Uber’s driver agreement. They had been entitled to do so because the relevant provisions of the driver agreement did not reflect the reality of the bargain made between the parties. The fact that Uber interviews and recruits drivers, controls the key information, requires drivers to accept trips, sets the route, fixes the fare, imposes numerous conditions on drivers, determines remuneration, amends the driver’s terms unilaterally, and handles complaints by passengers, makes it a transportation or passenger carrier, not an information and electronic technology provider. Therefore the UK courts resolved the central issue of for whom (Uber) and under a contract with whom (Uber), drivers perform their services. Uber is a modern business phenomenon. Regardless of its special position in business, Uber is obliged to follow the rules according to which work is neither a commodity nor an online technology. |
Artikel |
Pracademia: a personal account of a mediation clinic and its development |
Tijdschrift | Nederlands-Vlaams tijdschrift voor mediation en conflictmanagement, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | mediation clinic, students, practicing, Circle of engagement, Susskind |
Auteurs | Charlie Irvine |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article tells the story of University of Strathclyde Mediation Clinic through the eyes of its founder. Taking its first case in 2012, by the start of 2021 it will be providing a free mediation service in 16 of Scotland’s 39 sheriff courts, covering more than half the country’s population. Yet it started with no plan, no budget and a few volunteers. The article makes the case that mediation clinics, like mediation itself, call for improvisation, coining the term ‘pracademia’ to describe how such clinics straddle the two worlds of practice and theory. |