The global financial crisis of 2008 and the following public uproar over offshore tax evasion and corporate aggressive tax planning scandals gave rise to unprecedented international cooperation on tax information exchange and coordination on corporate tax reforms. At the behest of the G20, the OECD developed a comprehensive package of ‘consensus-based’ policy reform measures aimed to curb base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) by multinationals and to restore fairness and coherence to the international tax system. The legitimacy of the OECD/G20 BEPS Project, however, has been widely challenged. This paper explores the validity of the legitimacy concerns raised by the various stakeholders regarding the OECD/G20 BEPS Project. |
Zoekresultaat: 237 artikelen
De zoekresultaten worden gefilterd op:Tijdschrift Erasmus Law Review x
Editorial |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 2 2017 |
Auteurs | Arnaud de Graaf |
Auteursinformatie |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 2 2017 |
Trefwoorden | base erosion and profit shifting, OECD, G20, legitimacy, international tax reform |
Auteurs | Sissie Fung |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 2 2017 |
Trefwoorden | Global Forum on Transparency and Exchange of Information, exercise of regulatory authority, due process requirements, peer review reports, legitimacy |
Auteurs | Leo E.C. Neve |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The Global Forum on transparency and exchange of information for tax purposes has undertaken peer reviews on the implementation of the global standard of exchange of information on request, both from the perspective of formalities available and from the perspective of actual implementation. In the review reports Global Forum advises jurisdictions on required amendments of regulations and practices. With these advices, the Global Forum exercises regulatory authority. The article assesses the legitimacy of the exercise of such authority by the Global Forum and concludes that the exercise of such authority is not legitimate for the reason that the rule of law is abused by preventing jurisdictions to adhere to due process rules. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 2 2017 |
Trefwoorden | World Bank, legality, legitimacy, global tax governance, tax policy and tax administration reforms |
Auteurs | Uyanga Berkel-Dorlig |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The emergence of global tax governance was triggered by common tax problems, which are now still being faced by international society of nation-states. In the creation of this framework, international institutions have been playing a major role. One of these institutions is the World Bank (Bank). However, those who write about the virtues and vices of the main creators of the framework usually disregard the Bank. This article, therefore, argues that this disregard is not justified because the Bank has also been playing a prominent role. Since two informal decisions taken in the past have contributed to this position of the Bank, the article gives in addition to it answers to the following two related questions: whether these informal decisions of the Bank were legal and if so, what implications, if any, they have for the Bank’s legitimacy. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 3 2017 |
Trefwoorden | same-sex marriage, gay marriage, European consensus, margin of appreciation, consensus-based analysis by the ECtHR |
Auteurs | Masuma Shahid |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This contribution assesses the consensus-based analysis and reasoning of the European Court of Human Rights in recent judgments concerning equal marriage rights and compares it to the Court’s past jurisprudence on European consensus and the margin of appreciation awarded to Member States regarding the issue of equal marriage rights. The contribution aims to analyse whether there is a parallel to be seen between the rapid global trend of legalisation of same-sex marriage and the development or evolution of the case law of the ECtHR on the same topic. Furthermore, it demonstrates that the Court’s consensus-based analysis is problematic for several reasons and provides possible alternative approaches to the balancing of the Court between, on the one hand, protecting rights of minorities (in this case same-sex couples invoking equal marriage rights) under the European Convention on Human Rights and, on the other hand, maintaining its credibility, authority and legitimacy towards Member States that might disapprove of the evolving case law in the context of same-sex relationships. It also offers insights as to the future of European consensus in the context of equal marriage rights and ends with some concluding remarks. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 3 2017 |
Trefwoorden | access to justice, procedural law, courts, civil justice reform, comparative law |
Auteurs | Catherine Piché |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Canada has a complex system of courts that seek to serve Canadians in view of the traditional objectives of civil justice – principally accessibility, efficiency, fairness, efficacy, proportionality and equality. The Canadian court system is generally considered by its users to work well and to have legitimacy. Yet, researchers have found that ‘there is a tendency for people involved in a civil case to become disillusioned about the ability of the system to effect a fair and timely resolution to a civil justice problem’. This article will discuss the ways in which reforms of procedural law and civil justice have originated and continue to be made throughout Canada, both nationally and provincially, as well as the trends and influences in making these reforms. With hundreds of contemporary procedural reforms having been discussed, proposed and/or completed since the first days of Canadian colonisation on a national basis and in the Canadian provinces and territory, providing a detailed analysis will prove challenging. This article will nonetheless provide a review of civil justice and procedural reform issues in Canada, focusing principally, at the provincial level, on the systems of Ontario and Quebec. Importantly, I will seek to reconcile the increasing willingness to have an economically efficient civil justice and the increased power of judges in managing cases, with our court system’s invasion of ADR and its prioritisation of informal modes of adjudication. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 3 2017 |
Trefwoorden | ECtHR, UNHRC, religious manifestations, religious minorities, empirical analysis |
Auteurs | Fabienne Bretscher |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Confronted with cases of restrictions of the right to manifest religious beliefs of new religious minorities formed by recent migration movements, the ECtHR and the UNHRC seem to opt for different interpretations and applications of this right, as recent conflicting decisions show. Based on an empirical legal analysis of the two bodies’ decisions on individual complaints, this article finds that these conflicting decisions are part of a broader divergence: While the UNHRC functions as a protector of new minorities against States’ undue interference in their right to manifest their religion, the ECtHR leaves it up to States how to deal with religious diversity brought by new minorities. In addition, a quantitative analysis of the relevant case law showed that the ECtHR is much less likely to find a violation of the right to freedom of religion in cases brought by new religious minorities as opposed to old religious minorities. Although this could be a hint towards double standards, a closer look at the examined case law reveals that the numerical differences can be explained by the ECtHR’s weaker protection of religious manifestations in the public as opposed to the private sphere. Yet, this rule has an important exception: Conscientious objection to military service. By examining the development of the relevant case law, this article shows that this exception bases on a recent alteration of jurisprudence by the ECtHR and that there are similar prospects for change regarding other religious manifestations in the public sphere. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 3 2017 |
Trefwoorden | sentencing, retribution, just deserts, punishment, Malawi |
Auteurs | Esther Gumboh |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The theory of retribution is a central tenet in Malawian sentencing jurisprudence. Courts have given expression to retribution in various ways, most conspicuously through the recognition of the principle of proportionality as the most important principle in sentencing. Retribution has permeated courts’ consideration of certain sentencing factors such as the seriousness of the offence, family obligations and public opinion. Overall, retribution rightly plays a pivotal role in Malawian sentencing jurisprudence by elevating the principle of proportionality to the most important principle in sentencing. Malawian courts have also noted that whether in pursuit of retribution or utilitarianism, the ultimate objective is to arrive at a sentence that is just and fair in relation to the crime and the offender. This also ensures that the sentence imposed does not offend the prohibition of cruel, inhuman and degrading punishment. |
Editorial |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 3 2017 |
Auteurs | Kristin Henrard |
Auteursinformatie |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 3 2017 |
Trefwoorden | voting pattern, ICJ judges, empirical research |
Auteurs | Xuechan Ma en Shuai Guo |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The Statute of the International Court of Justice stipulates that judges shall exercise their powers impartially. We question the practicability of this statement and examine whether the voting pattern of the judges are biased. In this light, empirical research is conducted on cases adjudicated from 2005 to 2016. We find strong evidence that (1) judges favour their home States or appointing States; and (2) judges favour States that speak same majority language with their home States. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 1 2017 |
Trefwoorden | tax avoidance, tax evasion, benefits principle |
Auteurs | Reuven S. Avi-Yonah en Haiyan Xu |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article evaluates the recently completed Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) project of the G20 and OECD and offers some alternatives for reform. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 1 2017 |
Trefwoorden | GAAR, abuse, tax avoidance, BEPS, principal purpose test, legal certainty |
Auteurs | Dennis Weber |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The OECD BEPS Action 6 report contains a principal purpose test rule (PPT rule) for the purpose of combating abuse of tax treaties. This PPT rule is also included in the OECD Multilateral Instrument. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 1 2017 |
Trefwoorden | flawed legislation, tax privileges, tax planning, corporate social responsibility, tax professionals |
Auteurs | Hans Gribnau |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The international tax system is the result of the interaction of different actors who share the responsibility for its integrity. States and multinational corporations both enjoy to a certain extent freedom of choice with regard to their tax behaviour – which entails moral responsibility. Making, interpreting and using tax rules therefore is inevitably a matter of exercising responsibility. Both should abstain from viewing tax laws as a bunch of technical rules to be used as a tool without any intrinsic moral or legal value. States bear primary responsibility for the integrity of the international tax system. They should become more reticent in their use of tax as regulatory instrument – competing with one another for multinationals’ investment. They should also act more responsibly by cooperating to make better rules to prevent aggressive tax planning, which entails a shift in tax payments from very expert taxpayers to other taxpayers. Here, the distributive justice of the tax system and a level playing field should be guaranteed. Multinationals should abstain from putting pressure on states and lobbying for favourable tax rules that disproportionally affect other taxpayers – SMEs and individual taxpayers alike. Multinationals and their tax advisers should avoid irresponsible conduct by not aiming to pay a minimalist amount of (corporate income) taxes – merely staying within the boundaries of the letter of the law. Especially CSR-corporations should assume the responsibility for the integrity of the tax system. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 1 2017 |
Trefwoorden | BEPS, value creation, tax structuring, international taxation |
Auteurs | Paul Lankhorst en Harmen van Dam |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The international tax landscape is changing and it is changing fast. The political perception is that taxation of multinational enterprises is not aligned with the ‘economic activity’ that produces their profits (i.e. not aligned with ‘value creation’). The perception links ‘value creation’ with ‘employees and sales’. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 1 2017 |
Trefwoorden | Fairness, international tax, legitimacy, BEPS, developing countries |
Auteurs | Irene Burgers en Irma Mosquera |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The aim of this article is to examine the differences in perception of ‘fairness’ between developing and developed countries, which influence developing countries’ willingness to embrace the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) proposals and to recommend as to how to overcome these differences. The article provides an introduction to the background of the OECD’s BEPS initiatives (Action Plan, Low Income Countries Report, Multilateral Framework, Inclusive Framework) and the concerns of developing countries about their ability to implement BEPS (Section 1); a non-exhaustive overview of the shortcomings of the BEPS Project and its Action Plan in respect of developing countries (Section 2); arguments on why developing countries might perceive fairness in relation to corporate income taxes differently from developed countries (Section 3); and recommendations for international organisations, governments and academic researchers on where fairness in respect of developing countries should be more properly addressed (Section 4). |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 1 2017 |
Auteurs | Maarten Floris de Wilde |
Auteursinformatie |
Editorial |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 2 2016 |
Trefwoorden | social control, folk devils, moral panic, dangerousness, sex offenders |
Auteurs | Michiel van der Wolf (Issue Editor) |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This paper provides first of all the introduction to this special issue on ‘Legal constraints on the indeterminate control of “dangerous” sex offenders in the community: A European comparative and human rights perspective’. The issue is the outcome of a study that aims at finding the way legal control can not only be an instrument but also be a controller of social control. It is explained what social control is and how the concept of moral panic plays a part in the fact that sex offenders seem to be the folk devils of our time and subsequently pre-eminently the target group of social control at its strongest. Further elaboration of the methodology reveals why focussing on post-sentence (indeterminate) supervision is relevant, as there are hardly any legal constraints in place in comparison with measures of preventive detention. Therefore, a comparative approach within Europe is taken on the basis of country reports from England and Wales, France, Germany, The Netherlands and Spain. In the second part of the paper, the comparative analysis is presented. Similar shifts in attitudes towards sex offenders have led to legislation concerning frameworks of supervision in all countries but in different ways. Legal constraints on these frameworks are searched for in legal (sentencing) theory, the principles of proportionality and least intrusive means, and human rights, mainly as provided in the European Convention on Human Rights to which all the studied countries are subject. Finally, it is discussed what legal constraints on the control of sex offenders in the community are (to be) in place in European jurisdictions, based on the analysis of commonalities and differences found in the comparison. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 2 2016 |
Trefwoorden | Dangerous, sex offenders, human rights, community supervision, punishment |
Auteurs | Nicola Padfield |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article explores the legal constraints imposed on the rising number of so-called ‘dangerous’ sex offenders in England and Wales, in particular once they have been released from prison into the community. The main methods of constraint are strict licence conditions, Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements and civil protective orders such as Sexual Harm Prevention Orders. ‘Control’ in the community is thus widespread, but is difficult to assess whether it is either effective or necessary without a great deal more research and analysis. Post-sentence ‘punishment’ has been largely ignored by both academic lawyers and criminologists. The article concludes that financial austerity might prove to be as important as the human rights agenda in curbing the disproportionate use of powers of control. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 2 2016 |
Trefwoorden | Supervised release, supervision, sex offenders, dangerousness, safety measures, societal upheaval, proportionality |
Auteurs | Lucía Martínez Garay en Jorge Correcher Mira |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article presents an overview of the legal regime provided in the Spanish system of criminal sanctions regarding the control of dangerous sex offenders in the community. It focuses on the introduction, in 2010, of a post-prison safety measure named supervised release. We describe the context of its introduction in the Spanish Criminal Code, considering the influence of societal upheaval concerning dangerous sex offenders in its development, and also the historical and theoretical features of the Spanish system of criminal sanctions. We also analyse the legal framework of supervised release, the existing case law about it and how the legal doctrine has until now assessed this measure. After this analysis, the main aim of this article consists in evaluating the effectiveness and the proportionality of the measure, according to the principle of minimal constraints and the rehabilitative function of the criminal sanctions in Spanish law, stated in Article 25.2 of the Spanish Constitution. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 2 2016 |
Trefwoorden | Supervision, twin track system, principle of proportionality, human rights, violent and sex offenders |
Auteurs | Bernd-Dieter Meier |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
After release from prison or a custodial preventive institution, offenders may come under supervision in Germany, which means that their conduct is controlled for a period of up to five years or even for life by a judicial supervising authority. Supervision is terminated if it can be expected that even in the absence of further supervision the released person will not commit any further offences. From the theoretical point of view, supervision is not considered a form of punishment in Germany, but a preventive measure that is guided by the principle of proportionality. After a presentation of the German twin track system of criminal sanctions and a glimpse at sentencing theory, the capacity of the principle of proportionality to guide and control judicial decisions in the field of preventive sanctions is discussed. The human rights perspective plays only a minor role in the context of supervision in Germany. |