In the Internet era, banking fraud has become a common way of stealing money. According to victim surveys, this offense has already led to significant numbers of victims. In this article, the authors focus on illegal bank account withdrawals, which are an indication of identity fraud. For this they use data on 636 victims who were surveyed in the LISS panel. Using the concept of ‘capability to act’, as used in the WRR report Why knowing what to do is not enough (2017), the authors model which type of victim takes action to get the stolen amount reimbursed and which type of victim succeeds in doing so. They expect that the less educated and people with low self-control more often refrain from contact with authorities (bank, police) and therefore more often receive no compensation and remain with higher residual damage. The results show that approximately four in five victims of unauthorized bank debits are fully compensated. For the group of victims for whom this is not the case – remaining with residual damage – most of the hypotheses are confirmed. |
Zoekresultaat: 1301 artikelen
Artikel |
Wie krijgt zijn geld terug?Acties van slachtoffers tot schadevergoeding bij bankfraude |
Tijdschrift | Justitiële verkenningen, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | banking fraud, victimization, crime reporting, reimbursement, capability to act |
Auteurs | Dr. Johan van Wilsem, Dr. Take Sipma en Dr. Esther Meijer-van Leijsen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
Vissen met een nieuwe hengel: een onderzoek naar betaalverzoekfraude |
Tijdschrift | Justitiële verkenningen, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | payment request fraud, online advertisement platforms, modus operandi, cybercrime, spearphishing |
Auteurs | Joke Rooyakkers MSc. en Dr. Marleen Weulen Kranenbarg |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Online fraudsters seem to adapt to new digital opportunities. While the academic literature about phishing mainly focuses on phishing through emails, fraudsters also appear to use new means of communication and platforms to find and deceive their victims. Based on analysis of 728 police reports from the period from June 20th to August 20th 2019, this article provides a descriptive study on the new phenomenon of payment request fraud on the Dutch advertisement platform Marktplaats.nl (similar to eBay). The article will provide a thorough description of the crime script and its success factors. As fraudsters now use new means of communication, it will also be assessed to what extent they use new persuasion techniques, and to what extent victims may have different characteristics. The research, therefore, focuses on the modus operandi, persuasion techniques used by the fraudsters, and victim characteristics. |
Covid-19 |
|
Tijdschrift | Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht, Aflevering 3-4 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Schengen, vrij verkeer personen, EU burgerschap, covid-19, binnengrenzen, Europees Recht |
Auteurs | Mr. dr. H. van Eijken en Prof. dr. mr. J.J. Rijpma |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
De razendsnelle verspreiding van covid-19 binnen de EU leidde ertoe dat lidstaten afzonderlijk een groot aantal maatregelen namen om de verspreiding van het virus in te dammen. Deze vormden een belangrijke beperking van het vrij reizen binnen de EU, als ook van de mogelijkheden om van buiten Europa in te reizen. In deze bijdrage verkennen wij het (ontbreken van een) juridisch kader op EU-niveau voor de herinvoering van controles aan de binnengrenzen en het verbieden van niet-essentiële reizen op grond van de volksgezondheid. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Veiligheid, Aflevering 2-3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | reporting behavior, crime, citizen participation, psychological drivers, response efficacy |
Auteurs | Wendy Schreurs |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Reports by citizens are a great source of information for the police. Local residents often know well what is going on in their neighborhood and which situations are suspicious. In this study, an online survey was conducted to investigate what drives citizens to report to the police. A wide range of individual, social and institutional drivers were explored. The results show that the more often people have reported anything to the police in the past, the higher their risk perception, self-efficacy, citizen participation and police legitimacy. Furthermore, participants with a higher degree of self-efficacy, response efficacy, trust in the police and police legitimacy appeared to be more willing to report in the future. An open question regarding what motivates people the most to report show that response efficacy (the idea to what extent reporting has an effect on increasing safety and reducing crime) and altruistic values (justice, to help society and punish the perpetrators) were mentioned most frequently. |
Artikel |
De invloed van technologische ondersteuning op burgerzoekacties naar vermiste personen |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Veiligheid, Aflevering 2-3 2020 |
Auteurs | Jerôme Lam, Nicolien Kop en Celest Houtman |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In former times, citizens themselves were responsible for ensuring and protecting their own safety. Over the years, this responsibility largely shifted to the government, partly due to the establishment of an institutionalized police force. In recent years, citizens have increasingly reestablishing themselves in domain of social security. Citizens are engaged in tasks that are traditionally seen as primarily the responsibility of the police, such as law enforcement, criminal investigation and immediate in case of emergencies. |
Artikel |
Digitale coproductie van preventie en opsporing met burgersEen verkenning naar de contouren van een nieuw beleidsregime |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Veiligheid, Aflevering 2-3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Digitale coproductie, digitaal burgerschap, digitale buurtpreventie, digitale opsporing, Technologieregime |
Auteurs | Steven van den Oord en Ben Kokkeler |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Over the years, the use of data and digital technology in neighbourhood watch groups for prevention and detection of crime and citizens initiatives to enhance public safety has increased due to social and technological changes of citizen participation in coproduction of safety and digitization of economy and society. This causes a transition towards a new technology regime, a shift from a ‘closed’ information and communication technology regime owned by governmental organizations towards (inter)national ‘open’ platforms, which in turn challenges the current policy regime. This transition creates new societal expectations and challenges, often with contrasting dynamics. For instance, citizens are becoming the so-called ‘eyes and ears’ for government in prevention and detection of crime in neighbourhoods, while professionals are increasingly expected to coproduce safety with citizens through new forms of prevention and detection. With the rise of data and digital technology such as platforms and applications citizens are increasingly enabled to take the lead and initiate collaboration and organize new forms of prevention and surveillance in their own neighbourhoods. |
Artikel |
Is digitale buurtpreventie een goed instrument voor burgeropsporing? |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Veiligheid, Aflevering 2-3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | digital neighborhood watch, community crime prevention, crime reduction, surveillance, social control |
Auteurs | Jossian Zoutendijk en Krista Schram |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
It is often assumed that digital neighbourhood watch groups lead to more emergency calls and more arrests by the police. This article revolves around the question whether or not these groups actually contribute to reducing crime in the Netherlands. It does so by looking at recent studies and the results of researchers’ own ‘realist evaluation’ of the city of Rotterdam’s policy on digital neighbourhood watch. The latter includes a reconstruction of the program theory and ten case studies with different types of groups. The reconstruction of program theory revealed two main routes to crime reduction: 1) more emergency calls and more arrests by the police and 2) more social control. Chat histories have been studied and moderators, participants, non-participants and professionals were interviewed on their perception of active mechanisms and on the efficacy of their group. None of the respondents believed their group led to an increased number of arrests, but interviews and chat histories show that crime can be reduced by means of social control. Social control by neighbours limits the opportunity for crime and disturbs criminal acts. Other studies in the Netherlands support this finding. The article closes by putting digital neighbourhood watch in a citizen’s perspective with suggestions to improve the efficacy of digital neighbourhood watch groups and the notion that for citizens, crime reduction is not the only or principal goal. |
Werk in uitvoering |
The role of attitudes in the professional judicial decision-making progress: a work in progress |
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Professional judicial decision-making process, Attitudes, Impartiality, Semi-structured interviews, Scenario-survey |
Auteurs | Mr. Elke Olthuis |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In our daily decision-making processes, attitudes play an important role. An attitude is an evaluative judgement of a person, object or an issue on a scale of favorability. A large amount of research has been done on the role of attitudes in our daily decision-making processes. There is, however, a gap in empirical knowledge when it concerns the role of attitudes in the professional judicial decision-making process. It has been accepted that the professional judicial decision-making process has a subjective element, but this subjective element remains unexplained. Attitudes are inherently personal and subjective, and they can make our decision-making process easier. They can, however, also be the basis for biases and prejudices. Herein lies a potential risk, especially in the professional judicial decision-making process. If attitudes play a role in the decision-making process of judges there is a possibility that impartiality, one of the judiciary’s core professional values, might be unobtainable. To see whether attitudes play a role in the professional judicial decision-making process semi-structured interviews will be conducted among judges, who will also be asked to fill in a scenario survey. Hopefully the obtained data will lead to a start in filling this gap in empirical knowledge. |
Recensies en signalementen |
‘De sok wint van de snor’Handhavingspraktijken in de sociale zekerheid |
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Auteurs | Dr. Robert Knegt |
Auteursinformatie |
Artikel |
Upperdogs Versus UnderdogsJudicial Review of Administrative Drug-Related Closures in the Netherlands |
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Eviction, War on drugs, Party capability, Empirical legal research, Drug policy |
Auteurs | Mr. Michelle Bruijn en Dr. Michel Vols |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In the Netherlands, mayors are entitled to close public and non-public premises if drug-related activities are being conducted there. Using data from the case law of Dutch lower courts, published between 2008 and 2016, this article examines the relative success of different types of litigants, and the influence of case characteristics on drug-related closure cases. We build on Galanter’s framework of ‘repeat players’ and ‘one-shotters’, to argue that a mayor is the stronger party and is therefore more likely to win in court. We categorise mayors as ‘upperdogs’, and the opposing litigants as ‘underdogs’. Moreover, we distinguish stronger mayors from weaker ones, based on the population size of their municipality. Similarly, we distinguish the stronger underdogs from the weaker ones. Businesses and organisations are classified as stronger parties, relative to individuals, who are classified as weaker parties. In line with our hypothesis, we find that mayors win in the vast majority of cases. However, contrary to our presumptions, we find that mayors have a significantly lower chance of winning a case if they litigate against weak underdogs. When controlling for particular case characteristics, such as the type of drugs and invoked defences, our findings offer evidence that case characteristics are consequential for the resolution of drug-related closure cases in the Netherlands. |
Artikel |
‘Private enforcement’ van nalatigheid bij financieel-economische criminaliteit |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Bijzonder Strafrecht & Handhaving, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | financieel-economische criminaliteit, private enforcement, aansprakelijkheid, nalatigheid, risicomanagement |
Auteurs | F.J. Erkens FFE MEWI LLM |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Nederland heeft, net als ieder ander land, groot belang bij goed werkende, gereguleerde handelsplatformen. De aantrekkelijkheid van handelsplatformen is mede afhankelijk van de kwaliteit van ‘public and private enforcement’ en juridische mogelijkheden om geschillen te beslechten. De afgelopen periode hebben grote Nederlandse ondernemingen de voorpagina’s van de kranten gehaald door hun (mogelijke) betrokkenheid bij financieel-economische criminaliteit. In deze bijdrage wordt de vraag beantwoord of ‘private enforcement’ van financieel-economische criminaliteit bij ondernemingen wel voldoende resultaat kan opleveren om effectief te zijn en om benadeelde partijen te ondersteunen bij het verhalen van hun schade. |
Artikel |
Eichmanns verdediging in Jeruzalem |
Tijdschrift | Boom Strafblad, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Tweede Wereldoorlog, Gehoorzame dader, Internationale misdrijven, Adolf Eichmann |
Auteurs | Mr. dr. N. (Klaas) Rozemond |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Adolf Eichmann is het duidelijkste voorbeeld van het prototype van de verdachte die zich als gehoorzame dader presenteerde. In dit artikel wordt een overzicht gegeven van het daderperspectief zoals Eichmann dat op de zitting in Jeruzalem schetste. Betoogd wordt dat in het licht van het vonnis van de Rechtbank Jeruzalem uit 1961 en de kennis van nu, dat perspectief als een vorm van misleiding kan worden beschouwd. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Law and Method, mei 2020 |
Trefwoorden | legal education, blended learning, Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, student learning |
Auteurs | Mr.dr. Emanuel van Dongen en Dr. Femke Kirschner |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Education should be aimed at supporting student learning. ICT may support student learning. It also may help students to learn and increase their involvement and thus their efforts. Blended learning has the potential to improve study behaviour of students, thus becoming an indispensable part of their education. It may improve their preparation level, and as a result, face-to-face education will be more efficient and more profound (e.g. by offering more challenging tasks), lifting the learning process to a higher level. Moreover, the interaction between students and teachers may be improved by using ICT. A necessary condition to lift students’ learning to a higher (better: deeper) learning level is that all students acquire basic knowledge before they engage in face-to-face teaching. In a First-Year Course Introduction to Private Law, we recently introduced a Scalable Learning environment. This environment allows the acquiring and testing of factual knowledge at individual pace, in a modern and appealing way (independent of time and place). The link between offline and online education during face-to-face teaching is made by using Learning Analytics, provided by the Scalable Learning environment. After the implementation of Scalable Learning, a survey on its effect on learning has been performed by means of questionnaires. The results were compared at the beginning and at the end of the course, related to the approaches taken by teachers as well as to the exam results. This article presents the outcomes of this study. |
Artikel |
Misverstanden over traumaEen illustratie aan de hand van ervaringen van professionals |
Tijdschrift | PROCES, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Trauma, Professionals |
Auteurs | Dr. mr. Elisa van Ee en Prof. dr. Janine Janssen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Previously we have published an article about misunderstandings regarding trauma and PTSS. In this contribution we deal with other popular beliefs regarding trauma. We focus on trauma among professionals as a consequence of their work. It is explained that a professional does not have to witness violence or another severe case directly in order to develop some form of trauma. Next to that we focus on the misconception that professionals suffering from trauma can receive treatment without support of their loved ones and social network. It is explained that social support is not only relevant but necessary in treating trauma effectively. |
Artikel |
Bezoek in Nederlandse gevangenissenDe stand van zaken |
Tijdschrift | PROCES, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Bezoek Visitation, Detentie Imprisonment, Leefklimaat Prison climate, Detentie-ervaringen prison experiences |
Auteurs | Maria Berghuis MSc, Dr. Hanneke Palmen en Prof. dr. Paul Nieuwbeerta |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Prison visitation is important for protecting against social isolation during imprisonment. It is also essential for maintaining contacts that are important for life in prison and after release. It is therefore not surprising that both nationally and internationally important policy measures and scientific research have been undertaken on the topic. Nationally, however, limited scientific research is available regarding how many, how often and from whom prisoners receive visits, how visits are experienced and the possible effects of visitation, thus leaving many questions unanswered. Meanwhile, in the past ten years great changes have been made to visitation in Dutch prison policy and practice. Given these recent developments, both scientists and practitioners could benefit from an overview of the current state of affairs of visitation. This article aims to bridge the gap between research, policy and practice by summarizing findings from the Life in Custody study. This study includes a description of how visitation is organized legally, at the policy level and in practice, a thorough review of prior research on visitation and an analysis of the most recent national data on the prevalence and frequency of visitation, while considering important differences between prisoners and prisons. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Auteurs | Leni Franken en François Levrau |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this article we elaborate on the place of religion in the workplace. Does the individual freedom of religion imply that employers must always accommodate the religious claims of employees or can they boast a number of arguments allowing them to legitimately limit that freedom? And, conversely, do employers not also have a right to freedom of religion and a right to formulate certain religious expectations for their employees? In this contribution, we deal with these and related questions from a legal-philosophical perspective. The overall aim is to illustrate the extent to which univocal answers are jeopardized because of conceptual ambiguities. We first make a normative distinction between two strategies (i.e. difference-blind approach and difference-sensitive approach) and subsequently illustrate and elaborate on how and why these strategies can lead to different outcomes in legal cases. We illustrate the extent to which a contextual and proportional analysis can be a way out in theoretical and practical conundrums. |
Book Review |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Vervreemding, Naleving van wetten, Legitimiteit, Rule of Law |
Auteurs | Irawan Sewandono |
Auteursinformatie |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Trefwoorden | national identity, historical narratives, universal values, equal citizenship |
Auteurs | Tamar de Waal |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Increasingly often, it is stated that the universal values underpinning Western liberal democracies are a product of a ‘Judeo-Christian’ tradition. This article explores the legitimacy of this claim from the perspective of liberal-democratic theory. It argues that state-endorsed claims about the historical roots of liberal-democratic values are problematic (1) if they are promoted as though they are above democratic scrutiny and (2) if they insinuate that citizens who belong to a particular (majority) culture remain the ‘cultural owners’ of the core values underpinning the state. More pragmatically, the paper suggests that the claim carries the risk of failing to facilitate all citizens becoming or remaining committed to nurturing fundamental rights and a shared society based on norms of democratic equality. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Concepts, Contextualism, Essentially Contested Concepts, Legal Theory, Freedom |
Auteurs | Dora Kostakopoulou |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Socio-political concepts are not singularities. They are, instead, complex and evolving contextures. An awareness of the latter and of what we need to do when we handle concepts opens up space for the resolution of political disagreements and multiplies opportunities for constructive dialogue and understanding. In this article, I argue that the concepts-as-contextures perspective can unravel conceptual connectivity and interweaving, and I substantiate this by examining the ‘contexture’ of liberty. I show that the different, and seemingly contested, definitions of liberty are the product of mixed articulations and the development of associative discursive links within a contexture. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Auteurs | Vincent Dupont |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Ever since it was published in 2015, the judgment of the The Hague court in the so-called Urgenda-case, and the subsequent decisions of the appellate and cassation courts confirming it, have been met with repeated and vivid critiques. By recognizing the necessity of the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions, and furthermore imposing a certain reduction level on the Dutch state, the judgments in the cases at hand gave rise to many questions concerning the position of the judiciary in the matter, and in Dutch society as a whole. This article attempts in the first place to situate the positions of the different actors intervening in the Urgenda-case within a legal-theoretical framework. The contribution subsequently explores the strategic possibilities that an alternative understanding of law could offer to the judges, focusing specifically on the use of legal instruments stemming from international law, brought into the reasoning of the national judge. |