Verfijn uw zoekresultaat

Zoekresultaat: 330 artikelen

x
ECJ Court Watch

Case C-620/15. Free Movement – Social Insurance

A-Rosa Flusschif GmbH –v– Union de recouvrement des cotisations de sécurité sociale et d’allocations familiales d’Alsace, Sozialsversicherungsanstalt des Kantons Graubünden, reference lodged by the French Cour de cassation on 23 November 2015

Tijdschrift European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 1 2016
Trefwoorden free movement – social insurance
ECJ Court Watch

Case C-566/15. Nationality Discrimination

Konrad Erzberger –v– TUI AG, reference lodged by the German Kammergericht Berlin on 3 November 2015

Tijdschrift European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 1 2016
Trefwoorden nationality discrimination
ECJ Court Watch

Case C-508/15. Free Movement

Sidika Ucar –v– Land Berlin, reference lodged by the German Verwaltungsgericht Berlin on 24 September 2015

Tijdschrift European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 1 2016
Trefwoorden free movement
ECJ Court Watch

ECJ 3 March 2016, case C-12/14. Free Movement – Social Insurance

European Commission –v– Republic of Malta

Tijdschrift European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 1 2016
Trefwoorden free movement – social insurance
ECJ Court Watch

Case C-569/15. Free Movement – Social Insurance

X –v– Staatssecretaris van Financiën, reference lodged by the Dutch Hoge Raad on 5 November 2015

Tijdschrift European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 1 2016
Trefwoorden free movement – social insurance

    In accordance with EU law, the prohibition against gender-based discrimination (in this case: dismissal relating to pregnancy) cannot be limited to employment relationships as defined in national law: it must also apply to other types of legal relationship, where one party provides services to another party for consideration, for an open-ended period of time under the supervision of a principal.


Gabriella Ormai
Gabriella Ormai is a partner and

Péter Bán
Péter Bán is senior counsel with CMS Cameron McKenna LLP, www.cms-cmck.com.
ECJ Court Watch

ECJ 25 February 2016, case C-292/14. (Stroumpoulis), Insolvency

Elleniko Dimosio –v– Stefanos Stroumpoulis and six others, Greek case

Tijdschrift European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 1 2016
Trefwoorden insolvency
ECtHR Court Watch

ECtHR 12 January 2016, application 61496/08. (Bărbulescu), Fundamental Rights

Bărbulescu –v– Romania, Romanian case

Tijdschrift European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 1 2016
Trefwoorden Fundamental Rights
ECJ Court Watch

ECJ 17 December 2015, joined cases C-25/14 and C-26/14. (UNIS), Free Movement – Social Insurance

Union des syndicats de l’immobilier (UNIS) –v– Ministre du Travail, de l’Emploi, de la Formation professionnelle et du Dialogue social, Syndicat national des résidences de tourisme (SNRT) and Others and Beaudout Père et Fils SARL –v– Ministre du Travail, de l’Emploi, de la Formation professionnelle et du Dialogue social, Confédération nationale de la boulangerie et boulangerie-pâtisserie française, Fédération générale agroalimentaire FGA – CFDT and Others, French case

Tijdschrift European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 1 2016
ECJ Court Watch

Case C-570/15. Free Movement – Social Insurance

X –v– Staatssecretaris van Financiën, reference lodged by the Dutch Hoge Raad on 5 November 2015

Tijdschrift European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 1 2016
Trefwoorden free movement – social insurance
ECJ Court Watch

Case C-509/15. Free Movement

Recep Kilic –v– Land Berlin, reference lodged by the German Verwaltungsgericht Berlin on 24 September 2015

Tijdschrift European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 1 2016
Trefwoorden free movement
Artikel

Moving beyond the other

A critique of the reductionist drugs discourse

Tijdschrift Tijdschrift over Cultuur & Criminaliteit, Aflevering 1 2016
Trefwoorden drug use, drug users, drug policy, drug reform, media, discourse, the other
Auteurs Stuart Taylor
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    This paper uses the UK as a vehicle through which to argue that a dominant reductionist drugs discourse exists which simplifies understandings of drug use and drug users leading to socio-cultural misrepresentations of harm, risk and dangerousness. It contends that at the centre of this discourse lies the process of othering – the identification of specific substances and substance users as a threat to UK society. Interestingly, within the wider context of global drug policy reform this othering process appears to be expanding to target a wider variety of factors and actors – those policies, research findings and individuals which contest normative notions, resulting in the marginalisation of ‘alternative voices’ which question the entrenched assumptions associated with drug prohibition. The paper concludes that there is a need for collective action by critical scholars to move beyond the other, calling for academics to be innovative in their research agendas, creative in their dissemination of knowledge and resolute despite the threat of being othered themselves.


Stuart Taylor
Stuart Taylor is senior lecturer in criminal justice in the School of Law at Liverpool John Moores University, UK.
Artikel

Othering refugees: exclusion, containment and spaces of hope

Tijdschrift Tijdschrift over Cultuur & Criminaliteit, Aflevering 1 2016
Trefwoorden refugee camp, space, foreigner dispositif, fieldwork
Auteurs Lynn Musiol MA
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    The article examines mechanisms of othering the refugees illustrated on one refugee camp in Germany. Based on the theoretical strand of the foreigner dispositif, I analyze spatial and architectural compositions of the camp to outline the differentiation of ‘we’ (nation state) and ‘others’ (refugees). In the process of othering space excludes, controls and identifies refugees as ‘others’. However, being identified as the other, space can also be conceived as a specific space of hope. The findings shed some light on the link between othering, space and identity.


Lynn Musiol MA
Lynn Musiol is a master student Interna­tional Criminology at the University of Hamburg.
Artikel

Can I sit?

The use of public space and the ‘other’

Tijdschrift Tijdschrift over Cultuur & Criminaliteit, Aflevering 1 2016
Trefwoorden public space, built environment, other, social control
Auteurs CalvinJohn Smiley PhD
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Newark Penn Station is the most frequented train station in New Jersey, United States. Two distinct groups occupy this public space. First are the commuters who travel by the trains to reach destinations for work or pleasure. Second are the transient who do not use the trains but instead remain in and around the station for various reasons, otherwise known as the ‘other.’ The latter population is closely monitored and controlled by law enforcement through a variety of written and unwritten laws and codes of conduct, which are based on broken windows theory and crime prevention through environment design (CPTED). The primary focus is how the ‘other’ seemingly navigates and occupies public space. Through ethnographic research, this paper reflects and reveals the ways in which the station is a living social organism that simultaneously marginalizes and incorporates those defined as the ‘other’ into this space. This complex and contradictory dynamic illustrates the interactions between public spaces and its occupiers and regulators.


CalvinJohn Smiley PhD
Dr CalvinJohn Smiley is currently working at the Sociology Department of Hunter College at the City University of New York.

    In het arrest Alimanovic staat de vraag centraal of een Zweedse onderdaan die onvrijwillig werkloos is geworden nadat ze enige tijd in Duitsland had gewerkt, uitgesloten mag worden van een Duitse premievrije publieke bijstandsuitkering. Zonder een individuele afweging te maken oordeelt het Hof van Justitie dat artikel 24 Richtlijn 2004/38/EG een dergelijke uitsluiting toestaat. Na het eerder gewezen arrest Dano bevestigt het Hof van Justitie met dit arrest dat het is overgegaan tot een ruimere uitleg van de toegestane beperkingen op het vrij verkeer van personen. Ook werkzoekende Unieburgers met een recent arbeidsverleden in een gastlidstaat mogen categoriaal worden uitgesloten van het recht op een bijstandsuitkering in deze lidstaat.
    HvJ 15 september 2015, zaak C-67/14, Alimanovic, ECLI:EU:C:2015:597


Mr. dr. A. Eleveld
Mr. dr. A. (Anja) Eleveld is universitair docent Sociaal Recht aan de Vrije Universiteit.
Artikel

You can talk the talk but can you walk the walk?

Niet-mededingingsrechtelijke nationale belemmerende maatregelen met betrekking tot fusies en buitenlandse investeringen en het recht van de Europese Unie

Tijdschrift Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht, Aflevering 10 2015
Trefwoorden Fusies en buitenlandse investeringen, publieke belangen, bevoegdheidsverdeling nationaal-supranationaal
Auteurs Mr. P. Jansen
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Een nieuwe golf van economisch patriottisme doet de vraag rijzen in hoeverre het Unierecht een keurslijf vormt voor publieke belangen die, in het kader van fusies en buitenlandse investeringen, kunnen worden ingeroepen ter onttrekking van nationale regelingen aan de vrije mededinging. In dit artikel zal deze kwestie benaderd worden vanuit het perspectief van het internemarktrecht. Daarbij zal worden ingegaan op de vraag of – en zo ja, wanneer – lidstaten op grond van het Unierecht nationale mechanismen mogen instellen en/of toepassen.


Mr. P. Jansen
Mr. P. (Pim) Jansen is als wetenschappelijk onderzoeker verbonden aan het instituut Consument, Concurrentie en Markt van de Faculteit Rechtsgeleerdheid aan de KU Leuven, België.
Article

Access_open Brazilian Civil Procedure in the ‘Age of Austerity’?

Effectiveness, Speed, and Legal Certainty: Small Claims, Uncontested Claims, and Simplification of Judicial Decisions and Proceedings

Tijdschrift Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 4 2015
Trefwoorden austerity, civil procedure, access to justice, Brazil, small claims
Auteurs Antonio Gidi en Hermes Zaneti, Jr.
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    The current debate in Brazilian Civil Procedure revolves around efficiency, legal certainty, and access to justice, not austerity. As a matter of fact, the debate over austerity is nonexistent in Brazil so far. By expanding the access to justice to a broader portion of the society, the legal system increased the number of cases and the costs associated with the judicial system. But the excess litigation and expense associated with the expansion of access to justice has contradictorily curtailed access to justice. This new situation demands new efforts to increase efficiency and legal certainty, while still increasing access to justice.


Antonio Gidi
Antonio Gidi is Visiting Assistant Professor at the Syracuse University. SJD, University of Pennsylvania Law School; LLM and PhD, PUC-SP University; LLB, Federal University of Bahia.

Hermes Zaneti, Jr.
Hermes Zaneti, Jr. is Professor of Law at the Universidade Federal do Espirito Santo and Prosecutor. PhD in Philosophy and Theory of Law, Università degli Studi di Roma Tre; LLM and PhD in Civil Procedure, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRS).
Artikel

Access_open Religion Ain’t Sacrosanct

How to Fight Obsolete Accounts of Religious Freedom

Tijdschrift Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 3 2015
Trefwoorden Hobby Lobby, Hosanna-Tabor, tolerance-leaning liberalism, equality-leaning liberalism
Auteurs Roland Pierik
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    This paper is largely an endorsement and a further elaboration of Cohen’s critical discussion of the Hobby Lobby and Hosanna-Tabor cases and the conceptual overstretch of religious freedom they embody. I disagree with Cohen, however, on the proper interpretation of this debate. Cohen construes the ominous Court cases as an anti-liberal attack on the liberal state order. My main thesis is that the root of this dispute can be traced back to a fault line within liberalism between a more tolerance-leaning and a more equality-leaning tradition. I argue that the ominous cases are instances of the tolerance-leaning tradition in liberalism, which once was characteristic of the liberal tradition. Still, I agree with Cohen that this tradition should be rejected because it reverts to an obsolete interpretation of religious freedom that defends unwarranted privileges for certain groups that are out of sync with the egalitarian underpinnings of contemporary liberal political orders.


Roland Pierik
Roland Pierik is Associate Professor of Legal Philosophy at the University of Amsterdam Law School.
Artikel

The legacy and current relevance of Cappelletti and the Florence project on access to justice

Tijdschrift Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 3 2015
Trefwoorden definition and dimensions access to justice, recommendations, historic context access to justice, current context access to justice
Auteurs Bernard Hubeau
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    This contribution explains what access to justice can encompass and how the ideals about access to justice have developed in time. The way to do this is going back to the work of the famous scholars Cappelletti and Garth, who were responsible for a worldwide project on access to justice in the 1970s. Their main issue was to explain access to justice is more than the access to a judge and the organization of courts. Primarily, the system must be equally accessible to all, irrespective of social or economic status or other incapacity. But it also must lead to results that are individually and socially just and fair. Equal access and effective access are the central notions. Their work is put in perspective. The importance of their legacy and the question how we can get along with their work are stressed. Their definition is compared to a few other authoritative definitions. The waves in the history of access to justice are described and putting them in the current context illustrates why a fourth waved can be observed. The major question to be answered is how one can assess the challenges and obstacles of access to justice in the current context. Therefore, some recent dimensions and developments within access to justice are presented: the democratic dimension, the effectiveness of new social rights, the attention for poor and vulnerable people, further juridification, expanding frontiers of and monitoring access to justice, e-justice, and self-help. Finally, a few building blocks for reforms are presented.


Bernard Hubeau
Bernard Hubeau is a full-time Professor in Sociology and Sociology of Law at the Faculty of Law of the University of Antwerp. He also teaches at the Faculty of Social Sciences of the University of Antwerp and the Faculty of Law and Criminology of the University of Brussels. He is the former ombudsman of the city of Antwerp and of the Flemish Parliament.
Artikel

Social security and social welfare: barriers and retrograde policies, but cause for optimism?

Tijdschrift Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 3 2015
Trefwoorden social security, legal representation, means-testing, Britain, fees
Auteurs Amir Paz-Fuchs
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    This contribution addresses the limits placed on access to justice in the context of social services, with a particular, but not exclusive, focus on the UK, across five central platforms: legal representation, the financial barriers, the structure of the programme, the attitude of the bureaucracy, and the personal attributes of the client. The contribution finds that there exist, for decades, problematic elements that constitute barriers to justice in this area: the means-tested element in the programmes and the bureaucracy’s double role as provider of services and detector of fraud. But to them, in recent years, significant barriers were added: recent cuts in legal aid and the imposition of tribunal fees in the UK are retrograde steps, reverting 40 years of impressive achievements in the field.


Amir Paz-Fuchs
Amir Paz-Fuchs (D. Phil Oxford) is a Senior Lecturer at the School of Law, University of Sussex, where he teaches employment law, public law, and legal theory. In addition, he is a Visiting Research Fellow at the Centre for Socio-Legal Studies and a Research Associate at Wolfson College, both at the University of Oxford. He is also Co-Director of the ‘The Limits of Privatization’ research project, based at the Van Leer Institute in Jerusalem. He also served on the board of several human rights and social justice NGOs.
Toont 141 - 160 van 330 gevonden teksten
1 2 3 4 5 6 8 10 11 12 16 17
U kunt door de volledige tekst zoeken naar alle artikelen door uw zoekterm in het zoekveld in te vullen. Als u op de knop 'Zoek' heeft geklikt komt u op de zoekresultatenpagina met filters, die u helpen om snel bij het door u gezochte artikel te komen. Er zijn op dit moment twee filters: rubriek en jaar.