Zoekresultaat: 48 artikelen

x
Artikel

Gezamenlijke reflectie op de werkalliantie in het reclasseringstoezicht

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 1 2020
Trefwoorden Werkalliantie, Cliëntfeedback, Reclassering, gezamenlijke reflectie
Auteurs Widya de Bakker MSc, Dr. Andrea Donker, Barbara Keuning e.a.
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Joint reflection of practitioners and clients appears beneficiary for the effectiveness of their working alliance in, for instance, psychotherapy. This study aims to find out whether a similar beneficiary effect is experienced by practitioners and clients in probation supervision, a mandated setting. Over thirty dyads of Dutch probation officers and probationers participated into structured joint reflection, using the working alliance monitor, specifically designed for this purpose. The majority of probation officers reported the reflection as useful. Probationers reported a more mixed experience. Probationers with an intellectual disability more often needed help to understand the working alliance monitor.


Widya de Bakker MSc
Widya de Bakker MSc is docent-onderzoeker.

Dr. Andrea Donker
Dr. Andrea Donker is lector bij het lectoraat Kennisanalyse Sociale Veiligheid aan het Kenniscentrum Sociale Innovatie, Hogeschool Utrecht.

Barbara Keuning
Barbara Keuning is policy advisor bij Reclassering Nederland en tevens gastdocent bij de Hogeschool Utrecht.

Drs. Anneke Menger
Drs. Anneke Menger is lector bij het lectoraat Werken in Justitieel Kader van de Hogeschool Utrecht.
Ten geleide

Uitgelachen

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 1 2020
Auteurs Mr. dr. Sigrid van Wingerden
Auteursinformatie

Mr. dr. Sigrid van Wingerden
Mr. dr. Sigrid van Wingerden is als universitair docent Criminologie verbonden aan het Instituut voor Strafrecht & Criminologie van de Universiteit Leiden. Zij is tevens voorzitter van de redactie van PROCES.
Discussie

Aanknopingspunten en handreikingen voor slachtofferbewust werken bij de reclassering

Enige reflecties en aanvullingen

Tijdschrift Tijdschrift voor Herstelrecht, Aflevering 2 2019
Trefwoorden reclassering, slachtoffers, herstel, schuld, schaamte, slachtofferschap van cliënten
Auteurs Jiska Jonas-van Dijk PhD en Sven Zebel
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    In recent years, measures have been taken to involve victims in the Netherlands more in the criminal proceedings of their offenses. This development, has led the three Dutch probation organizations (together 3RO) to aim for a more victim focused and restorative oriented approach with their clients. Two reports have been written to aid this victim-oriented approach within probation services. This contribution reflects on these reports and provides additions based on scientific literature. Both reports offer a good overview of existing practices and approaches to work in a more victim focused and restorative way, which can help to increase awareness among probation workers. The additions concern research about the positive outcomes of organizing contact between offenders and victims from unrelated crimes and new research findings concerning the role of feelings of guilt and shame. In addition, consciously talking and acknowledging clients’ victimization is presented as an essential mechanism to create willingness among them to consider the experiences of (their) victims, especially for those who are initially unwilling to do so.


Jiska Jonas-van Dijk PhD
Jiska Jonas-van Dijk is als PhD student verbonden aan de vakgroep Psychologie van Conflict, Risico en Veiligheid, Universiteit Twente en aan de vakgroep Strafrecht en Criminologie van de Faculteit der Rechtsgeleerdheid, Universiteit Maastricht.

Sven Zebel
Sven Zebel is als hoofddocent verbonden aan de vakgroep Psychologie van Conflict, Risico en Veiligheid, Universiteit Twente.
Artikel

Slachtofferbewust en herstelgericht werken in de reclasseringspraktijk

Tijdschrift Tijdschrift voor Herstelrecht, Aflevering 2 2019
Trefwoorden slachtofferbewust werken, herstelgerichte detentie, gevangenis, reclassering
Auteurs Jacqueline Bosker en Vivienne de Vogel
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    The last years victim awareness has received special attention in the Dutch probation service. Three goals are central: respecting the rights and interests of the victim, mapping and increasing victim awareness of the probation client, and working towards the possibilities for recovery. Based on discussions with probation officers, this contribution sketches a picture of how this takes shape in practice. Experience shows that good results are achieved, but that more training and attention to the subject is needed to give it a full place in the probation work.


Jacqueline Bosker
Jacqueline Bosker is lector Werken in Justitieel Kader bij Hogeschool Utrecht.

Vivienne de Vogel
Vivienne de Vogel is lector Werken in Justitieel Kader bij Hogeschool Utrecht en onderzoeker bij De Forensische Zorgspecialisten.
Artikel

Controle of begeleiding? Ervaringen met reclasseringstoezicht tijdens de voorwaardelijke invrijheidstelling

Tijdschrift Justitiële verkenningen, Aflevering 3 2019
Trefwoorden parole, desistance, supervision, Re-entry, risk management
Auteurs Jennifer Doekhie MSc, Dr. Esther van Ginneken, Dr. Anja Dirkzwager e.a.
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Little is known about how ex-prisoners’ parole supervision experiences relate to desistance. The aim of this article therefore is to gain insight into the nature of release conditions and parole supervision of ex-prisoners and parolees’ perceptions of their supervision related to the desistance process. A total of 23 Dutch parolees were interviewed in depth at three waves starting in prison up to one year after their release, and the 69 interviews were combined with their parole files containing information about conditions, violations and sanctions. Parole files revealed the practice of highly engaged parole officers, who worked with parolees to strengthen factors known to foster desistance. However, the interviews showed that most parolees found their parole experience predominantly surveillance-oriented and not very helpful for desistance. Parole was experienced as most beneficial when parole officers used their discretionary power to adjust conditions creating ‘space’ for trial-and-error.


Jennifer Doekhie MSc
J.V.O.R. Doekhie MSc is als docent Criminologie verbonden aan de Universiteit Leiden.

Dr. Esther van Ginneken
Dr. E.F.J.C. van Ginneken is als docent Criminologie verbonden aan de Universiteit Leiden.

Dr. Anja Dirkzwager
Dr. A.J.E. Dirkzwager is als senior onderzoeker verbonden aan het Nederlands Studiecentrum Criminaliteit en Rechtshandhaving.

Prof. dr. Paul Nieuwbeerta
Prof. dr. P. Nieuwbeerta is als hoogleraar Criminologie verbonden aan de Universiteit Leiden.
Peer reviewed

Collectief leren van professionals zorg en strafrecht

Betekenisvol interdisciplinair samenwerken bij huiselijk geweld

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 4 2018
Trefwoorden collectief leren professionals, strafrecht en zorg, huiselijk geweld, Good Work
Auteurs Dr. Sietske Dijkstra
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    This article concerns an experiment involving three learning communities of professionals cooperating across institutional boundaries to address domestic violence cases in multiple complementary ways. Providers of social services interacted with law enforcement in a juridical context to achieve an integrated approach. This alliance indicates the potential for values-based Good Work based on safety, professional care, and compassionate treatment. Playing with time and capacity can be a strategy, and each professional can benefit from multiple viewpoints for recognising and anticipating patterns of domestic violence before it (re)occurs.
    A lack of funding has suspended embedding this Good Work, slowing progress toward achieving long-term goals and making this interdisciplinary approach to assuring sustainable safety unavailable to prevent repeated outbreaks of domestic violence.


Dr. Sietske Dijkstra
Dr. Sietske Dijkstra is als senior onderzoeker verbonden aan het KSI van de Hogeschool Utrecht en werkzaam als onderzoeker, adviseur en docent bij Bureau Dijkstra (www.sietske-dijkstra.nl). Zij dankt haar co-onderzoekers Lous Krechtig en Anneke Menger voor de samenwerking in dit project.
Artikel

De reclassering en de lokale samenwerking

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 2 2017
Trefwoorden Reclassering, sociaal domein,, samenwerken in het sociaal domein, frontlinie werker
Auteurs Drs. Lous Krechtig en Drs. Mirjam Wildeboer
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Recently the Dutch probation is faced with changes in the local situation: new forms of cooperation and networks have emerged, due to the transformation of the social domain. The probation officers participate on different levels in these networks. They can no longer simply deliver their ‘products’, but have to ‘do what is necessary. A lot of decisions have to be made on the operational level.
    Examples of the changes are given. Recent research on cooperation in the social domain show that ‘cooperation’ is easier sad then done. These changes ask for a new set of competences.


Drs. Lous Krechtig
Drs. Lous Krechtig is senior ontwikkelaar en onderzoeker bij het lectoraat Werken in Justitieel Kader bij het Kenniscentrum Sociale Innovatie van de Hogeschool Utrecht.

Drs. Mirjam Wildeboer
Mirjam Wildeboer is kwaliteitsfunctionaris voor de regio zuid-west van Reclassering Nederland en neemt deel aan de Master Forensisch Sociale Professional.

Drs. Ellen Verbeem
Drs. Ellen Verbeem heeft een landelijke rol bij het Openbaar Ministerie, Parket Generaal, Den Haag.
Artikel

Ontstaan en ontwikkeling van de reclassering in vogelvlucht: 1823-heden

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 2 2017
Trefwoorden Probation service, History of social work, history of pprobation, Solitary confinement, professionalization, Volunteer work, state control, social casework, resocialization, Alternative sanctions, What Works-debate
Auteurs Dr. Maarten van der Linde
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    In the last decade history of social work gained a growing interest among social professionals, teachers, students and policy makers. They want to know more about the contributions the social work professions made to social welfare, community building and public safety. A website was launched, which today in 2017 presents the history of fifteen fields of social work: www.canonsociaalwerk.eu/.
    Part of this is the history of Probation. In this article this history is told, following highlights as the inspiration from Great Britain, the start in 1823 and the first decades of volunteer work. Probation tried to compensate the negative effects of solitary confinement. Since the early twentieth century the role of the state was growing (Probationcharter 1910) leading to 100% financial support in 1965 and 100% control in the 1980s. The probation service was integrated in the juridicial system, but became not an stateservice. Performance was delegated to relative independant institutions, heirs of the private probation associations of the past, with strong traditions of work ethic. This history of probation shows the influence of social casework methods since the 1950s, the search for a balance between dependance and independance from the state, and the balance between punishment and resocializing. Since the 1990s the role of probation in alternative sanctions, the contribution of volunteer work to a highly professionalized probation service and the What Works-debate brought innovation and new inspiration to the field of probation service.


Dr. Maarten van der Linde
Dr. Maarten van der Linde is emeritus lector Geschiedenis van sociaal werk aan de Hogeschool Utrecht.
Redactioneel

Reclassering: professionalisering en samenwerking

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 2 2017
Auteurs Drs. Jacqueline Bosker en Dr. Jaap A. van Vliet
Auteursinformatie

Drs. Jacqueline Bosker
Dr. Jacqueline Bosker is hogeschoolhoofddocent bij het Instituut voor Recht en onderzoeker bij het lectoraat Werken in Justitieel Kader van Hogeschool Utrecht. Tevens is zij redacteur van PROCES.

Dr. Jaap A. van Vliet
Dr. Jaap A. van Vliet is zelfstandig gevestigd adviseur en onderzoeker. Hij is tevens redacteur van PROCES.
Artikel

Hoe slachtofferbewust werkt de reclassering?

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 2 2017
Trefwoorden Probation, victim consciousness, Offenders, Recidivism, professional standards
Auteurs Debbie J.M. Mollen en Dr. Jaap A. van Vliet
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    The probation in the Netherlands works more victim conscious since last year. Victim conscious working in probation is defined as: involving the perspective and interests of the victim when working with offenders. This broadly and to the extent it is justifiable from the primary task of the probation to reduce recidivism and promote the re-integration of probation clients/offenders. With this justification is both the moral level (right action) as being involved professional standards (effective action).
    The article describes, among other, a study on how the victim consciously work has been implemented within the Salvation Army Probation Service in the Netherlands.


Debbie J.M. Mollen
Debbie J.M. Mollen is werkzaam op de afdeling Executie bij het Ressortsparket Arnhem-Leeuwarden.

Dr. Jaap A. van Vliet
Dr. Jaap A. van Vliet is zelfstandig adviseur en onderzoeker en tevens redacteur van PROCES.
Artikel

Ruim baan voor het reclasseringswerk: doen wat nodig is

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 2 2017
Trefwoorden Probation, court advice, custom made, professional discretion
Auteurs Drs. Jacqueline Bosker en Mr. dr. Katinka Lünnemann
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Since 2016 advices the probation service delivers to the public prosecution office or prison service are no longer financed by counting the number of advices produced, but by a lump sum budget. That should give probation officers the much needed room to do what is necessary in an individual case, instead of following strict protocols. This article describes the changes in the work of probation officers and their co-operation with public prosecutors, as a result of this change. Findings are based on ongoing research, and describe the practice at the end of 2016.


Drs. Jacqueline Bosker
Drs. Jacqueline Bosker is hogeschoolhoofddocent bij het Instituut voor Recht en onderzoeker bij het lectoraat Werken in Justitieel Kader van Hogeschool Utrecht. Tevens is zij redacteur van PROCES.

Mr. dr. Katinka Lünnemann
Mr. dr. Katinka Lünnemann is onderzoeker bij het Verwey-Jonker Instituut en bij het lectoraat Werken in Justitieel Kader van Hogeschool Utrecht.
Artikel

Professionaliteit als norm in het reclasseringswerk

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 2 2017
Trefwoorden Professionaliteit, praktijkgericht onderzoek, master Forensisch sociale professional, beroepsregister reclasseringswerkers
Auteurs Drs. Anneke Menger
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    New demands require probation to invest in high standards of professionalism. Probation officers can nowadays build their professionalism on common values, scientific knowledge, professional discretion and public accountability. Collaboration with universities of applied sciences results in a common research agenda, new degree programs and well-structured post-initial training. Questions yet to answer are how to guarantee professionalism in a context of large professional discretion. Probation seeks answers in facilitating their professionals to do the master degree program forensic social professional, in developing peer audits based on new quality standards and in initiating a professional register.


Drs. Anneke Menger
Drs. Anneke Menger is lector bij het lectoraat Werken in Justitieel Kader van Hogeschool Utrecht.
Article

Access_open Legal Constraints on the Indeterminate Control of ‘Dangerous’ Sex Offenders in the Community: The Dutch Perspective

Tijdschrift Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 2 2016
Trefwoorden Dutch penal law, preventive supervision, dangerous offenders, human rights, social rehabilitation
Auteurs Sanne Struijk en Paul Mevis
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    In the Netherlands, the legal possibilities for post-custodial supervision have been extended considerably in recent years. A currently passed law aims to further increase these possibilities specifically for dangerous (sex) offenders. This law consists of three separate parts that may all result in life-long supervision. In the first two parts, the supervision is embedded in the conditional release after either a prison sentence or the safety measure ‘ter beschikking stelling’ (TBS). This paper focuses on the third part of the law, which introduces an independent supervisory safety measure as a preventive continuation of both a prison sentence and the TBS measure. Inevitably, this new independent sanction raises questions about legitimacy and necessity, on which this paper reflects from a human rights perspective. Against the background of the existing Dutch penal law system, the content of the law is thoroughly assessed in view of the legal framework of the Council of Europe and the legal principles of proportionality and less restrictive means. In the end, we conclude that the supervisory safety measure is not legitimate nor necessary (yet). Apart from the current lack of (empirical evidence of) necessity, we state that there is a real possibility of an infringement of Article 5(4) ECHR and Article 7 ECHR, a lack of legitimising supervision ‘gaps’ in the existing penal law system, and finally a lack of clear legal criteria. Regardless of the potential severity of violent (sex) offenses, to simply justify this supervisory safety measure on the basis of ‘better safe than sorry’ is not enough.


Sanne Struijk
Sanne Struijk, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor at the Erasmus School of Law.

Paul Mevis
Paul Mevis is a Professor at the Erasmus School of Law.
Redactioneel

Hoe vullen we de gevangeniscellen?

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 4 2016
Auteurs Mr. dr. Sigrid van Wingerden
Auteursinformatie

Mr. dr. Sigrid van Wingerden
Mr. dr. Sigrid van Wingerden is als universitair docent Criminologie verbonden aan het Instituut voor Strafrecht & Criminologie van de Universiteit Leiden. Zij is tevens voorzitter van de redactie van PROCES.
Artikel

Werkplaatsen ZSM: samenwerken bij betekenisvol sanctioneren

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 4 2016
Trefwoorden Zorgvuldig Selectief Maatwerk (Tailor-made, selective sanctioning), Betekenisvol sanctioneren (Meaningful sanctioning), Kernexpertise reclassering (Key-expertise of probation), Toekomstbestendige professionals (Sustainable professionals)
Auteurs Drs. Anneke Menger en Drs. Lous Krechtig
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    In the Netherlands two experiments are conducted with a new kind of collaboration between probation and prosecution. The experiments aimed for the development of meaningful, contextual and tailor-made sanctioning. As a result, the experiments reached a new group of citizens that probation nor social services ever reached before, people who commit very light offenses, but struggle with heavy social problems. The new method of working resembles short intensive case management (hit and run) and includes commitment of social context and close collaboration with social work and care. Based on the results, probation and prosecution decided to implement this method in all Dutch regions and the Ministry of Safety and Justice adapted their financing structure.


Drs. Anneke Menger
Drs. Anneke Menger is lector Werken in Justitieel Kader bij het Kenniscentrum Sociale Innovatie van de Hogeschool Utrecht.

Drs. Lous Krechtig
Drs. Lous Krechtig is senior ontwikkelaar en onderzoeker bij het lectoraat Werken in Justitieel Kader bij het Kenniscentrum Sociale Innovatie van de Hogeschool Utrecht.
Toont 1 - 20 van 48 gevonden teksten
« 1 3
U kunt door de volledige tekst zoeken naar alle artikelen door uw zoekterm in het zoekveld in te vullen. Als u op de knop 'Zoek' heeft geklikt komt u op de zoekresultatenpagina met filters, die u helpen om snel bij het door u gezochte artikel te komen. Er zijn op dit moment twee filters: rubriek en jaar.