Within the past half century, a market in adoptable children has emerged. The imbalance between the demand for and the supply of adoptable children, combined with the large sums of Western money, incite greedy actors in poor countries to illegally obtain children for adoption. This renders intercountry adoption conducive to abuses. Private adoptions are particularly prone to abusive and commercial practices. Yet, although they violate both international and national law, German and Dutch family courts commonly recognize them. They argue that removing the child from the illegal adopters would not be compatible with the rights and best interests of the individual child concerned. In 2017, the ECtHR rendered a ground-breaking judgement in Campanelli and Paradiso v. Italy. In this case, the Court dealt with the question as to whether removing a child from the care of an Italian couple that entered into a surrogacy agreement with a Russian clinic, given that surrogacy is illegal in Italy, violated Article 8 ECHR. Contrary to previous case law, in which the ECtHR placed a strong emphasis on the best interests of the individual child concerned, the Court attached more weight to the need to prevent disorder and crime by putting an end to the illegal situation created by the Italian couple and by discouraging others from bypassing national laws. The article argues that considering the shifting focus of the ECtHR on the prevention of unlawful conduct and, thus, on the best interests of children in general, the German and Dutch courts’ failure to properly balance the different interests at stake in a private international adoption by mainly focusing on the individual rights and interests of the children is difficult to maintain. --- In de afgelopen halve eeuw is er een markt voor adoptiekinderen ontstaan. De disbalans tussen de vraag naar en het aanbod van adoptiekinderen, in combinatie met grote sommen westers geld, zet hebzuchtige actoren in arme landen ertoe aan illegaal kinderen te verkrijgen voor adoptie. Dit maakt interlandelijke adoptie bevorderlijk voor misbruik. Particuliere adoptie is bijzonder vatbaar voor misbruik en commerciële praktijken. Ondanks het feit dat deze privé-adopties in strijd zijn met zowel internationaal als nationaal recht, worden ze door Duitse en Nederlandse familierechtbanken doorgaans wel erkend. Daartoe wordt aangevoerd dat het verwijderen van het kind van de illegale adoptanten niet verenigbaar is met de rechten en belangen van het individuele kind in kwestie. In 2017 heeft het EHRM een baanbrekende uitspraak gedaan in de zaak Campanelli en Paradiso t. Italië. In deze zaak behandelde het Hof de vraag of het verwijderen van een kind uit de zorg van een Italiaans echtpaar dat een draagmoederschapsovereenkomst met een Russische kliniek is aangegaan, in strijd is met artikel 8 EVRM, daarbij in ogenschouw genomen dat draagmoederschap in Italië illegaal is. In tegenstelling tot eerdere jurisprudentie, waarin het EHRM sterk de nadruk legde op de belangen van het individuele kind, hechtte het Hof meer gewicht aan de noodzaak om de openbare orde te bewaken en criminaliteit te voorkomen door een einde te maken aan de illegale situatie die door het Italiaanse echtpaar was gecreëerd door onder andere het omzeilen van nationale wetten. Het artikel stelt dat, gezien de verschuiving in de focus van het EHRM op het voorkomen van onwettig gedrag en dus op het belang van kinderen in het algemeen, de Duitse en Nederlandse rechtbanken, door met name te focussen op de individuele rechten en belangen van de kinderen, er niet in slagen om de verschillende belangen die op het spel staan bij een particuliere internationale adoptie goed af te wegen. |
Zoekresultaat: 161 artikelen
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Family & Law, januari 2021 |
Trefwoorden | Private intercountry adoptions, surrogacy, ECHR, UNCRC, the best interests of the child |
Auteurs | dr. E.C. Loibl |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 2 2021 |
Trefwoorden | Habeas corpus, common law, detainee, Consitution, liberty |
Auteurs | Chuks Okpaluba en Anthony Nwafor |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Long before the coming of the Bill of Rights in written Constitutions, the common law has had the greatest regard for the personal liberty of the individual. In order to safeguard that liberty, the remedy of habeas corpus was always available to persons deprived of their liberty unlawfully. This ancient writ has been incorporated into the modern Constitution as a fundamental right and enforceable as other rights protected by virtue of their entrenchment in those Constitutions. This article aims to bring together the various understanding of habeas corpus at common law and the principles governing the writ in common law jurisdictions. The discussion is approached through a twelve-point construct thus providing a brief conspectus of the subject matter, such that one could have a better understanding of the subject as applied in most common law jurisdictions. |
Case Reports |
2020/49 Employing the former employees of a former service provider represents transfer of undertakings (RO) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 4 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Transfer of Undertakings |
Auteurs | Andreea Suciu en Teodora Manaila |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
|
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 4 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Applicable Law, Posting of Workers |
Auteurs | Gautier Busschaert en Pieter Pecinovsky |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article focuses on the posting of workers in the aviation industry. The main problem is that it is not clear in which situations the Posting of Workers Directive should be applied to aircrew (i.e. cabin crew and pilots). The aviation sector is characterised by a very mobile workforce in which it is possible for employees to provide services from different countries in a very short timeframe. This makes it, to a certain extent, easier for employers to choose the applicable social legislation, which can lead to detrimental working conditions for their aircrew. This article looks into how the Posting of Workers Directive can prevent some air carriers from unilaterally determining the applicable social legislation and makes some suggestions to end unfair social competition in the sector. This article is based on a research report which the authors drafted in 2019 with funding from the European Commission (hereafter the ‘Report’) |
Case Reports |
2020/48 Norwegian parental benefits provisions disadvantaging men found outside the scope of Equal Treatment Directive (NO) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 4 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Parental Leave, Gender Discrimination |
Auteurs | Jonas Thorsdalen Wik en Dag Sørlie Lund |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
On 13 December 2019 the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) Court held that a national provision that renders a father’s entitlement to parental benefits during a shared period of leave dependent on the mother’s situation, but not vice versa, fell outside the scope of Directive 2006/54/EC (the Equal Treatment Directive) since it did not concern “employment and working conditions” within the meaning of Article 14(1)(c) of that Directive. The action brought by the EFTA Surveillance Authority (ESA) was thus dismissed. The Court consequently did not consider whether the Norwegian rules amounted to unlawful discrimination under the Directive. Furthermore, no assessment was made as to the potential breach with the general principle of equality of gender under EEA law, as this had not been pleaded by ESA. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 4 2020 |
Trefwoorden | final criminal conviction, revision procedure, grounds for revision, Court of Cassation, Commission for revision in criminal matters |
Auteurs | Katrien Verhesschen en Cyrille Fijnaut |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The Belgian Code of criminal procedure provides the possibility to revise final criminal convictions. This procedure had remained more or less untouched for 124 years, but was finally reformed by the Act of 2018, after criticism was voiced in legal doctrine concerning its narrow scope and possible appearances of partiality and prejudice. The Act of 2018 therefore broadened the third ground for revision, the so-called novum, and defined it as an element that was unknown to the judge during the initial proceedings and impossible for the convicted person to demonstrate at that time and that, alone or combined with evidence that was gathered earlier, seems incompatible with the conviction, thus creating a strong suspicion that, if it had been known, it would have led to a more favourable outcome. Thereby, this ground for revision is no longer limited to factual circumstances, but also includes changed appreciations by experts. To counter appearances of partiality and prejudice, the Act of 2018 created the Commission for revision in criminal matters, a multidisciplinary body that has to give non-binding advice to the Court of Cassation on the presence of a novum. However, the legislature also introduced new hurdles on the path to revision, such as the requirement for the applicant to add pieces that demonstrate the ground for revision in order for his or her request to be admissible. For that reason, the application in practice will have to demonstrate whether the Act of 2018 made the revision procedure more accessible in reality. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 4 2020 |
Trefwoorden | wrongful conviction, revision, extraordinary appeal, rescission of final judgment, res judicata |
Auteurs | Luca Lupária Donati en Marco Pittiruti |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The Italian Constitution expressly contemplates the possibility of a wrongful conviction, by stating that the law shall determine the conditions and forms regulating damages in case of judicial error. Therefore, it should come as no surprise that many provisions of the Italian Code of Criminal Procedure (CCP) deal with the topic. The aim of this article is to provide an overview of the post-conviction remedies in the Italian legal system by considering the current provisions of the CCP, on the one hand, and by exploring their practical implementation, on the other. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 4 2020 |
Trefwoorden | wrongful convictions, extraordinary legal remedy, exoneration, exoneration in Sweden |
Auteurs | Dennis Martinsson |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article reviews exoneration in Sweden, with a focus on the procedure of applying for exoneration. First, it highlights some core features of Swedish criminal procedural law, necessary to understand exoneration in the Swedish context. Secondly, it outlines the possibilities in Swedish law to apply for exoneration, both in favour of a convicted person and to the disadvantage of a previously acquitted defendant. Thirdly, it identifies some challenges with the current Swedish model of administering applications for exoneration. Fourthly, it argues that the current system should be reformed by introducing into Swedish law a review committee that administers applications for exoneration. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 4 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Final criminal conviction, revision procedure, grounds for revision, preparatory investigative measures, Cour de révision et de réexamen |
Auteurs | Katrien Verhesschen en Cyrille Fijnaut |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The French ‘Code de procédure pénale’ provides the possibility to revise final criminal convictions. The Act of 2014 reformed the procedure for revision and introduced some important novelties. The first is that it reduced the different possible grounds for revision to one ground, which it intended to broaden. The remaining ground for revision is the existence of a new fact or an element unknown to the court at the time of the initial proceedings, of such a nature as to establish the convicted person’s innocence or to give rise to doubt about his guilt. The legislature intended judges to no longer require ‘serious doubt’. However, experts question whether judges will comply with this intention of the legislature. The second is the introduction of the possibility for the applicant to ask the public prosecutor to carry out the investigative measures that seem necessary to bring to light a new fact or an unknown element before filing a request for revision. The third is that the Act of 2014 created the ‘Cour de révision et de réexamen’, which is composed of eighteen judges of the different chambers of the ‘Cour de cassation’. This ‘Cour de révision et de réexamen’ is divided into a ‘commission d’instruction’, which acts as a filter and examines the admissibility of the requests for revision, and a ‘formation de jugement’, which decides on the substance of the requests. Practice will have to show whether these novelties indeed improved the accessibility of the revision procedure. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Bijzonder Strafrecht & Handhaving, Aflevering 6 2020 |
Trefwoorden | uit- en overlevering, kartelverbod, mededingingswet, lijstfeiten, dubbele strafbaarheid |
Auteurs | Mr. W.W. Geursen en Mr. J. Boonstra-Verhaert |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In Nederland wordt het mededingingsrecht (nog steeds) bestuursrechtelijk afgedaan. De strafrechtelijke handhaving van dit rechtsgebied heeft de laatste jaren in andere landen een opmars gemaakt; ook in verschillende lidstaten van de Europese Unie. Hoewel in Nederland het mededingingsrecht een ‘strafrechtelijk verleden’ kent, werd deze handhavingsvorm weinig benut en/of was deze weinig succesvol en is hiervan afscheid genomen. Dat Nederland overtredingen van de mededingingswet nu niet strafrechtelijk sanctioneert, wil echter niet zeggen dat aan mededingingsrechtelijke overtredingen voor Nederlanders geen strafrechtelijke risico’s kleven. Indien dergelijke overtredingen door Nederlandse onderdanen in het buitenland effect hebben, omdat daar bijvoorbeeld de klanten van een kartel zijn gevestigd, kunnen Nederlanders alsnog – zij het in het buitenland – tegen strafrechtelijke vervolging en een veroordeling aanlopen. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Law and Method, oktober 2020 |
Trefwoorden | comparative legal studies, legal education, pragmatism |
Auteurs | Alexandra Mercescu |
Auteursinformatie |
Case Reports |
2020/26 Entitlement to allowance in lieu of untaken paid annual leave had lapsed because of garden leave (NL) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Paid Leave |
Auteurs | Lisa de Vries en Jan-Pieter Vos |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Applying the ECJ’s Maschek judgment, the Zutphen subdistrict court has found that an employee was not entitled to an allowance in lieu of untaken paid annual leave at the end of the employment relationship, as she had already received special leave. Moreover, the obligation to inform the employee concerning the right to (exercise) paid annual leave did not rest upon the employer. |
Case Reports |
2020/19 Relationship between time of notification of collective redundancies and time of notice of termination (GE) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Collective Dismissal |
Auteurs | Marcus Bertz |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The notice of collective redundancies required to be given to an employment agency pursuant to Section 17(1) of the German Protection Against Unfair Dismissal Act (Kündigungsschutzgesetz, ‘KSchG’) can only be effectively submitted if the employer has already decided to terminate the employment contract at the time of its receipt by the employment agency. Notices of termination in collective redundancy proceedings are therefore effective – subject to the fulfilment of any other notice requirements – if the proper notice is received by the competent employment agency before the employee has received the letter of termination. |
Case Reports |
2020/22 Works council’s right to inspect remuneration lists (GE) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Information and Consultation, Privacy |
Auteurs | Robert Pacholski |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The Federal Labour Court (Bundesarbeitsgericht, “BAG”) has held that a works council must be provided with the documents necessary for carrying out its duties at any time on request. A works committee or another committee of the works council formed in accordance with the provisions of the Works Constitution Act (Betriebsverfassungsgesetz, “BetrVG”) is entitled to inspect the lists of gross wages. This right to inspect is not limited to anonymized gross pay lists. Data protection considerations do not dictate that the right is limited to anonymized gross payrolls. The processing of personal data associated with the right of inspection is permitted under the European General Data Protection Regulation (“GDPR”) and the German Federal Data Protection Act (Bundesdatenschutzgesetz, “BDSG”). |
Case Reports |
2020/34 Challenge to validity of Workplace Relations Act 2015 unsuccessful (IR) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Unfair Dismissal, Fair Trial, Miscellaneous |
Auteurs | Orla O’Leary |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
A recent challenge to the constitutionality of the Irish Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) has failed. The applicant in the case at hand argued that the WRC was unconstitutional for two reasons: (a) that the WRC carries out the administration of justice in breach of the general constitutional rule that only the courts may administer justice; and (b) several of the statutory procedures of the WRC were so deficient that they failed to vindicate the applicant’s personal constitutional rights. The High Court of Ireland dismissed both arguments. |
Case Reports |
2020/36 Employer must pay compensation to an employee for violation of employee’s privacy due to GPS system in company car (AT) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Privacy |
Auteurs | Lukas Disarò |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The Austrian Supreme Court has confirmed that an employer must pay compensation to an employee due to a violation of the employee’s privacy. The employer implemented a GPS system in its company cars without the employee’s knowledge and without legal basis. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Boom Strafblad, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Milieustrafrecht, Klimaatverandering, Handhaving klimaatwetgeving, Broeikasgas, Co2 |
Auteurs | Mr. S.J. (Sjoerd) Lopik en Mr. S.H. (Seppe) Stax |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Klimaatverandering is niet meer weg te denken uit het publieke debat. In het afgelopen jaar stond het onderwerp vaak op de politieke agenda, werd Greta Thunberg uitgeroepen tot Time Person of the Year en was het Urgenda-arrest een van de meest besproken gerechtelijke uitspraken van het jaar. Binnen het strafrecht wordt nog weinig aandacht aan klimaatverandering besteed, maar dat zal op korte termijn veranderen. Dit artikel bevat een verkenning naar de strafrechtelijke aansprakelijkheid van partijen die bijdragen aan klimaatverandering en de strafrechtelijke handhaving van klimaatwetgeving. |
Artikel |
Over hulp bij zelfdodingEnkele gedachten naar aanleiding van de recente uitspraak van het Bundesverfassungsgericht |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidsrecht, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | hulp bij zelfdoding, euthanasiewetgeving, BVerfG, zelfbeschikkingsrecht, voltooid leven |
Auteurs | Prof. mr. J.K.M. Gevers |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Recent heeft het Duitse constitutionele hof een baanbrekende uitspraak gedaan waarin een wettelijke bepaling die het verlenen van hulp bij zelfdoding aan banden legt, met een beroep op het zelfbeschikkingsrecht nietig wordt verklaard. Volgens het hof zijn de mogelijkheden voor de wetgever op dit gebied grenzen te stellen zeer beperkt. Naar aanleiding van de uitspraak wordt ingegaan op de rol van de rechter, het oprukkend zelfbeschikkingsrecht en de positie van hulp bij zelfdoding ten opzichte van euthanasie. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Maandblad voor Ondernemingsrecht, Aflevering 5-6 2020 |
Trefwoorden | FDI, screening, veiligheid, bescherming |
Auteurs | Mr. L. Gasseling |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Op 19 maart 2019 is de Screeningverordening aangenomen, waarmee een kader verschaft is voor coördinatie en samenwerking tussen lidstaten en de Europese Commissie ten aanzien van de screening van FDI. In dit artikel bespreekt de auteur investeringsscreening in de EU en VS, en of de Screeningverordening een stap is in de richting van een Europese CFIUS. |
Artikel |
Sharia in het Westen (II) |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Religie, Recht en Beleid, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Trefwoorden | sharia in the West, Islamic law, religious law, comparative law, legal pluralism |
Auteurs | Prof. dr. Maurits Berger |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This is the second part of the revised translation of ‘Understanding sharia in the West’ that was published in the Journal of Law, Religion and State 2018, 6, p. 236-273. The first part of the translation appeared in Tijdschrift voor Religie, Recht en Beleid 2019, 3, p. 17-31. |