The article analyses the jurisprudence of international tribunals on the education and housing of Roma and Travellers to understand whether positive obligations can change the hearts and minds of the majority and promote minority identities. Case law on education deals with integration rather than cultural specificities, while in the context of housing it accommodates minority needs. Positive obligations have achieved a higher level of compliance in the latter context by requiring majorities to tolerate the minority way of life in overwhelmingly segregated settings. Conversely, little seems to have changed in education, where legal and institutional reform, as well as a shift in both majority and minority attitudes, would be necessary to dismantle social distance and generate mutual trust. The interlocking factors of accessibility, judicial activism, European politics, expectations of political allegiance and community resources explain jurisprudential developments. The weak justiciability of minority rights, the lack of resources internal to the community and dual identities among the Eastern Roma impede legal claims for culture-specific accommodation in education. Conversely, the protection of minority identity and community ties is of paramount importance in the housing context, subsumed under the right to private and family life. |
Zoekresultaat: 23 artikelen
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Roma, Travellers, positive obligations, segregation, culturally adequate accommodation |
Auteurs | Lilla Farkas en Theodoros Alexandridis |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
Upperdogs Versus UnderdogsJudicial Review of Administrative Drug-Related Closures in the Netherlands |
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Eviction, War on drugs, Party capability, Empirical legal research, Drug policy |
Auteurs | Mr. Michelle Bruijn en Dr. Michel Vols |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In the Netherlands, mayors are entitled to close public and non-public premises if drug-related activities are being conducted there. Using data from the case law of Dutch lower courts, published between 2008 and 2016, this article examines the relative success of different types of litigants, and the influence of case characteristics on drug-related closure cases. We build on Galanter’s framework of ‘repeat players’ and ‘one-shotters’, to argue that a mayor is the stronger party and is therefore more likely to win in court. We categorise mayors as ‘upperdogs’, and the opposing litigants as ‘underdogs’. Moreover, we distinguish stronger mayors from weaker ones, based on the population size of their municipality. Similarly, we distinguish the stronger underdogs from the weaker ones. Businesses and organisations are classified as stronger parties, relative to individuals, who are classified as weaker parties. In line with our hypothesis, we find that mayors win in the vast majority of cases. However, contrary to our presumptions, we find that mayors have a significantly lower chance of winning a case if they litigate against weak underdogs. When controlling for particular case characteristics, such as the type of drugs and invoked defences, our findings offer evidence that case characteristics are consequential for the resolution of drug-related closure cases in the Netherlands. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Boom Strafblad, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Kinderrechten, Adolescentie, Jongvolwassenen, Leeftijdsgrenzen |
Auteurs | E.P. (Eva) Schmidt LLM, BSc |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Internationale kinderrechten genieten enerzijds vrijwel universele erkenning maar worden anderzijds ook stevig bekritiseerd. Vooral kinderrechten binnen het strafrecht worden als controversieel gezien. Tegelijkertijd is op dit gebied sprake van toenemende aandacht voor de ontwikkeling gedurende de adolescentie die door lijkt te lopen na de dominante leeftijdgrens van achttien jaar, alsmede de implicaties daarvan voor de positie van jongvolwassenen in het strafrecht. Deze bijdrage gaat nader in op de toepasselijkheid, en toegevoegde waarde, van het kinderrechtenperspectief voor jongvolwassenen in het strafrecht. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 3 2019 |
Trefwoorden | Representation, Lawyers, European Court of Justice, Preliminary References, Relational Expertise |
Auteurs | Jos Hoevenaars PhD |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Research on the significance of representation indicates that lawyers contribute to positive outcomes of legal procedures not only by their substantive expertise but also by the relational expertise they bring. The latter involves understanding how to navigate the relationships involved in getting work done. In this paper these insights are used to investigate the highly specific and atypical practise of the preliminary reference procedure in the European legal system in order to reveal how lawyers deal with such an unexpected change of (legal) context. The empirical data, collected through semi-structured interviews with twenty-eight lawyers with past experience with the procedure, reveals the significant ways in which lawyers’ positive contribution to such cases is undermined by their lack of both substantive and relational expertise in pleading a case before the European Court of Justice. The fact that such cases do not necessarily fall into the hands of the professionals best equipped to plead such disputes before the Court, and the inability of the less well-off parties in particular to hire further expertise, points in the direction of a disadvantaged position for this group of litigants in having their interest represented effectively at the European level. |
Werk in uitvoering |
The alternative war on drugs: drug evictions and the (re)regulation of cannabis |
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 3 2019 |
Trefwoorden | Drug eviction, Drug policy, Culture of Control, Empirical legal research |
Auteurs | L. Michelle Bruijn LLM Ph.D. |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
As a reaction to the perceived enforcement deficit of criminal law in the field of drug control, several countries implemented alternative regulatory strategies. One such strategy is the reregulating drugs, especially cannabis. Another strategy is the use of civil or administrative law to address drug-related crime. Especially the use of eviction to combat drug activities has become increasingly popular. |
Artikel |
Empiricism as an ethical enterprise. On the work of Erhard Blankenburg |
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 3 2018 |
Trefwoorden | Empiricism, Erhard Blankenburg, mobilization of law, legal instruments, problems and disputes |
Auteurs | Prof. dr. Pieter Ippel |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article gives an interpretation of the empirical work of the well-known sociologist of law Erhard Blankenburg, who passed away in the Spring of 2018. He conducted interesting and intelligent research on the process of ‘mobilization of law’. The thesis of this article is that Blankenburg’s empirical approach is actually guided and stimulated by normative considerations. A complete and coherent picture of the concrete utilization of legal instruments shows that ‘alternative’ ways of dealing with problems and disputes are often morally preferable as they are inspired by a realistic assessment of persons-in-a-social-context. |
Artikel |
De ontwikkeling van de Wet Damocles: burgemeesters trekken zwaard in de strijd tegen drugs |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Bijzonder Strafrecht & Handhaving, Aflevering 3 2018 |
Trefwoorden | 13b Opiumwet, Drugscriminaliteit, Empirical legal research, Hennepteelt, Drugshandel |
Auteurs | Mr. L.M. Bruijn |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Op grond van artikel 13b Opiumwet sluiten burgemeesters elk jaar honderden panden vanwege drugshandel en hennepteelt. Dit artikel geeft een zo volledig mogelijk overzicht van de ontwikkeling, uitleg en toepassing van deze sluitingsbevoegdheid. Allereerst wordt onderzocht hoe vaak de bevoegdheid wordt toegepast. Daarna vindt een kwantitatieve jurisprudentieanalyse plaats, waarbij o.a. wordt gekeken naar de winkans van belanghebbenden. Deze resultaten worden vervolgens verklaard aan de hand van een meer kwalitatieve jurisprudentieanalyse. Door gebruik van verschillende onderzoeksmethoden en de uitvoerige jurisprudentiebespreking levert dit onderzoek een wetenschappelijke bijdrage aan de discussie over de toepassing en uitbreiding van artikel 13b Opiumwet. |
Artikel |
Het zwaard van Damocles: burgemeesters wil is wetOver het punitieve karakter van een bestuursrechtelijke herstelsanctie |
Tijdschrift | Justitiële verkenningen, Aflevering 4 2018 |
Trefwoorden | Mayor’s powers, house eviction, public order, hemp nursery, administrative sanction |
Auteurs | Mr. Maartje Schaap |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Under Article 13b (1) of the Dutch Opium Act, the mayor is authorized to impose an order under administrative coercion when drugs are sold, delivered, supplied or present in houses or premises This much-discussed article, also cited as the ‘Damocles Law’, gives the mayor the power to close drug shelters even before the suspect’s guilt has been established in legal proceedings. It is not necessary to show that the interests of public policy are at stake. Moreover, the means of defense against the closure are very limited. The author argues that the current application of Article 13b is exclusively punitive in nature, whereby in case of criminal prosecution, there is also a violation of the ne bis in idem principle. |
Artikel |
The Dual-use of Drones |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Veiligheid, Aflevering 1-2 2018 |
Trefwoorden | Drones, Dual use, Responsible design, Ethiek van technologisch innovatie |
Auteurs | Peter Novitzky, Ben Kokkeler en Peter-Paul Verbeek |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Drones en drone-gerelateerde cybertechnologieën nemen een vlucht in het veiligheidsdomein in de vorm van toepassingen door het leger, de politie, brandweer, private beveiligingsbedrijven, en ook deurwaarders, agrariërs en burgerinitiatieven. Drones werden in eerste instantie ontwikkeld voor militaire doeleinden. Hun aanpassingsvermogen als universele platforms voor beeldregistratie en goederenvervoer leidt tot hoge verwachtingen rond toepassing in het civiele domein. Dit artikel onderzoekt de ethische aspecten van “dual use” van drones en gerelateerde technologieën. Verschillende dimensies van dual use worden verkend: de technologisch ontwikkeling, maar ook de ontwikkeling van wet- en regelgeving in Amerika en Europa. Voor het Nederlandse veiligheidsdomein is relevant dat dit artikel bijdraagt aan het signaleren van de noodzaak om de ontwikkeling en toepassing van drones in breder perspectief te bezien. Drones en hun toepassingen maken deel uit van de internationale markt van militaire organisaties en van veiligheidsorganisaties in het publieke en private domein. Bovendien maken ze veelal deel uit van geïntegreerde systemen en van wereldwijde platforms voor consumentenelektronica. Dit artikel is een van de resultaten uit het door NWO gefinancierde project 'Responsible Design of Drones and Drone Services: Towards an Ethical and Juridical Tool For Drone Design and Risk Assessment' (Project no. 313-99-318). Het project was gericht op het ontwikkelen van een instrument voor ontwikkeling en gebruik van dronetoepassingen uitgaande van methoden als Responsible Research & Innovation (RRI) en Value Sensitive Design (VSD). |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 1 2018 |
Auteurs | Lucy Claridge |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In May 2017, the Ogiek indigenous community of Kenya successfully challenged the denial of their land and associated rights before the African Court of Human and Peoples Rights (‘the Court’). In the first indigenous peoples’ rights case considered the Court, and by far the largest ever case it has had to consider, the Court found violations of Articles 1, 2, 8, 14, 17 (2) and (3), 21 and 22 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (‘the African Charter’). It therefore created a major legal precedent. In addition, the litigation itself and Ogiek’s participation in the various stages of the legal process provided a model for community engagement, through which the Ogiek were empowered to better understand and advocate for their rights. This article will first explain the history of the case and the Court’s findings, and then move on to examine in further detail methods employed to build the Ogiek’s capacity throughout, and even beyond, the litigation. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 1 2018 |
Auteurs | Dr. Beatriz Barreiro Carril |
Auteursinformatie |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 1 2018 |
Auteurs | Jeremie Gilbert PhD en Ben Begbie-Clench |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In the process of adjudication and litigation, indigenous peoples are usually facing a very complex and demanding process to prove their rights to their lands and ancestral territories. Courts and tribunals usually impose a very complex and onerous burden of proof on the indigenous plaintiffs to prove their rights over their ancestral territories. To prove their rights indigenous peoples often have to develop map of their territories to prove their economic, cultural, and spiritual connections to their territories. This article reflects on the role played by the mapping of indigenous territories in supporting indigenous peoples’ land claims. It analyses the importance of mapping within the process of litigation, but also its the impact beyond the courtroom. |
Artikel |
Huurachterstand, huisuitzetting en rechterlijke besluitvorming |
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 2 2016 |
Trefwoorden | Eviction, rent arrears, home interests, systematic content analysis |
Auteurs | Michel Vols en Nathalie Minkjan |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Recent developments in the field of housing law have led to a renewed interest in eviction and the legal protection against homelessness. Because of European case law, courts need to apply a contextual approach in which tenants’ home interests and personal circumstances are taken into account more seriously. This paper explores the ways in which home interests and personal circumstances play a role in Dutch litigation concerning eviction because of rent arrears. Based on a quantitative systematic content analysis of nearly 100 written judgments of courts of first instance, it is found that tenants frequently advance various types of proportionality defences and refer to home interests and personal circumstances. Although Dutch courts do take these defences, home interests and personal circumstances into account, the vast majority of landlords’ claims are allowed. In one third of the analysed cases, the court dismisses the landlord’s claim and most of the time minimises the breach of the lease or refers to the disproportional effects of eviction or a tenant’s promise to change his behaviour. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Law and Method, december 2015 |
Auteurs | Mark Van Hoecke |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this paper, an attempt is made to work out a methodology for comparative legal research, which goes beyond the ‘functional method’ or methodological scepticism. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 4 2015 |
Trefwoorden | Israel, austerity, civil procedure, simplified procedures, small claims |
Auteurs | Ehud Brosh |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Israel was spared the worst of the world financial crisis of 2008-2009. However, austerity concerns are by no means invisible in the developments in the field of civil procedure. These concerns correlate heavily with the long-standing Israeli preoccupation with ‘speeding up’ justice. An array of simplified procedural tracks, aimed at addressing the perceived inadequacy of ‘standard’ procedure, have been developed in Israel over the years. The importance of simplified procedures in the Israeli system cannot be overestimated. Their development illustrates the dialectical tension between the values of ‘efficiency’ and ‘quality’ in the administration of justice. During periods of austerity, the scales are easily (or easier) tipped in favour of efficiency and general or particular simplification of procedure. In times of prosperity, on the other hand, concerns over ‘quality’, access to justice, and truth discovery predominate, and attempts at promoting efficiency and/or simplification at their expense tend to be bogged down. Such attempts also tend to lose their extrinsic legitimacy and are widely viewed as ‘cutting corners’. This is evident in the recent Israeli experience with civil procedure reform. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 4 2015 |
Trefwoorden | judiciary, judge-made justice, court fees, legal aid, ADR-methods |
Auteurs | Laura Carballo Piñeiro en Jordi Nieva Fenoll |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The Spanish justice system has been shaken by the economic downturn as many other institutions have. This article addresses in the first place some statistical data that shed light as regards to the number of judges and the costs and length of the procedure in Spain. These figures help to understand, in the second place, the impact of austerity measures on the judiciary, namely, the freeze on the hiring of judges and the establishing of high court fees. While they mainly concern the supply side of justice services, others such cost reductions in legal aid have had, in the third place, an impact on the demand side, driving many citizens to social exclusion and to resorting to self-defence mechanisms. The final part of this article addresses some remedies that may alleviate judiciary’s workload, but that fall short of doing it. All in all, the Spanish justice system seems to require a holistic approach to patch up edges, but one in which the role of judge-made justice in a democratic society has to be central again. |
Artikel |
Tenant vs. owner: deriving access to justice from the right to housing |
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 3 2015 |
Trefwoorden | tenants’ rights, adequate housing, discrimination, effectiveness of law |
Auteurs | Nico Moons |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The right to adequate housing has since long been established in international and European human rights law and has been (constitutionally) incorporated into many domestic legal systems. This contribution focuses on the extent to which this fundamental right influences rental law and the horizontal relationship between tenant and landlord and how it contributes to the tenant’s access to justice. The right to housing certainly accounts for tenant’s rights, but since international and European human rights law evidently centres around state obligations, any possible impact on the position of tenants remains indirect. This is of course different on the national plane. In Belgium, the constitutional right to housing has been implemented through regional Housing Codes, complementing private law measures and creating additional protection to tenants. Nonetheless, many challenges still remain in increasing access to justice for tenants, both top-down and bottom-up: lack of knowledge and complexity of law, imbalance in power and dependency, discrimination, etc. |
Artikel |
Een eerste statistische analyse van de toepassing van artikel 13b Opiumwet |
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Administrative Law Library, oktober 2015 |
Auteurs | Mr. dr. Michel Vols en Michelle Bruijn LLB |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Dutch local authorities are entitled to close down a building because of drug-related crime. After closure, occupiers are not allowed to live there for a while. The number of closures because of drug-related crime increases. Although the closure of a home is a most serious interference with the right to respect for one’s private life and home, the procedure has not been analyzed systematically. This paper provides the first statistic empirical analysis of litigation concerning drug-related closures of homes in the Netherlands. The paper contains some first conclusions about the characteristic features of cases about drug-related closures, based on the statistical analysis. The results show, inter alia, the relation between the type of drugs and the judicial decision. Moreover, the results provide insight in the line of reasoning of the mayor, occupiers and judge with regard to the closure of a home. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 2 2015 |
Auteurs | Theunis Robert Roux |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The seriousness of the incorporation problem in interdisciplinary legal research, this article argues, depends on how legal research is understood. If legal research is understood as a single, inherently interdisciplinary discipline, the problem largely falls away. On this view, the incorporation of other disciplines into legal research is what legal academics have for the last 40 years already successfully been doing. If, on the other hand, legal research is best conceived as a multi-disciplinary field, consisting of a core discipline – doctrinal research – and various other types of mono-disciplinary and interdisciplinary research, the incorporation of other disciplines presents real difficulties. For legal academics engaged in socio-legal research, in particular, two problems arise: the practical problem of trying to address a legal professional and academic audience at the same time and the philosophical problem of trying to integrate the internal perspective of doctrinal research with the external perspective of other disciplines. In the final part of the article, these practical and philosophical difficulties are illustrated by reference to the author’s research on the politics of judicial review in new democracies. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Law and Method, 2012 |
Trefwoorden | fact/value separation, vulnerability, relational jurisprudence, empirical methodology, normative methodology |
Auteurs | Maksymilian Del Mar |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Relational jurisprudence is an approach to law that situates it in five relational contexts: (1) relations between individuals; (2) relations between individuals and communities; (3) relations between communities; (4) relations between individuals or communities on the one hand, and institutions on the other; and (5) relations between institutions. Thus, part of what makes relational jurisprudence distinctive is its object: the study of law in the context of certain relations, including investigating what factors affect and influence the quality of those relations. Relational jurisprudence is also distinctive, however, in its method. One of its methodological commitments is to avoid the dichotomy, without losing the benefits of a distinction, between facts and values. In trying to avoid this dichotomy, the approach identifies and uses devices that have both factual and evaluative dimensions, called here ‘factual-evaluative complexes’. These devices are then used to investigate the quality of different relations. One such device is ‘vulnerability’. The argument of this paper is that at least some of law can be profitably understood as managing vulnerability, i.e. recognising some vulnerabilities as worthy of protection and others not, or balancing the protection of different vulnerabilities in different relational contexts. Avoiding the dichotomy while retaining the usefulness of the distinction between facts and values in the above-outlined way means that we ought to employ a mix of empirical and normative methodology in the study of law. |