Zoekresultaat: 20 artikelen

x
Law Review

2019/1 EELC’s review of the year 2018

Tijdschrift European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 1 2019
Auteurs Ruben Houweling, Catherine Barnard, Filip Dorssemont e.a.
Samenvatting

    For the second time, various of our academic board analysed employment law cases from last year. However, first, we start with some general remarks.


Ruben Houweling

Catherine Barnard

Filip Dorssemont

Jean-Philippe Lhernould

Francesca Maffei

Niklas Bruun

Anthony Kerr

Jan-Pieter Vos

Luca Ratti

Daiva Petrylaite

Andrej Poruban

Stein Evju
Article

Access_open Evidence-Based Regulation and the Translation from Empirical Data to Normative Choices: A Proportionality Test

Tijdschrift Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 2 2018
Trefwoorden evidence-based, regulation, proportionality, empirical law studies, law and society studies
Auteurs Rob van Gestel en Peter van Lochem
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Studies have shown that the effects of scientific research on law and policy making are often fairly limited. Different reasons can be given for this: scientists are better at falsifying hypothesis than at predicting the future, the outcomes of academic research and empirical evidence can be inconclusive or even contradictory, the timing of the legislative cycle and the production of research show mismatches, there can be clashes between the political rationality and the economic or scientific rationality in the law making process et cetera. There is one ‘wicked’ methodological problem, though, that affects all regulatory policy making, namely: the ‘jump’ from empirical facts (e.g. there are too few organ donors in the Netherlands and the voluntary registration system is not working) to normative recommendations of what the law should regulate (e.g. we need to change the default rule so that everybody in principle becomes an organ donor unless one opts out). We are interested in how this translation process takes place and whether it could make a difference if the empirical research on which legislative drafts are build is more quantitative type of research or more qualitative. That is why we have selected two cases in which either type of research played a role during the drafting phase. We use the lens of the proportionality principle in order to see how empirical data and scientific evidence are used by legislative drafters to justify normative choices in the design of new laws.


Rob van Gestel
Rob van Gestel is professor of theory and methods of regulation at Tilburg University.

Peter van Lochem
Dr. Peter van Lochem is jurist and sociologist and former director of the Academy for Legislation.
Article

Access_open Post-BEPS Tax Advisory and Tax Structuring from a Tax Practitioner’s View

Tijdschrift Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 1 2017
Trefwoorden BEPS, value creation, tax structuring, international taxation
Auteurs Paul Lankhorst en Harmen van Dam
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    The international tax landscape is changing and it is changing fast. The political perception is that taxation of multinational enterprises is not aligned with the ‘economic activity’ that produces their profits (i.e. not aligned with ‘value creation’). The perception links ‘value creation’ with ‘employees and sales’.
    In the BEPS Project of the OECD, the OECD attempts to combat base erosion and profit shifting and to align taxation with value creation. In this article, the authors discuss the impact they expect BEPS to have on tax advisory and tax planning. The focus goes to BEPS Actions 7, 8-10 and 13.
    By maintaining the separate entity approach under BEPS for the taxation of multinationals, has the OECD been forced to ‘stretch’ existing rules beyond their limits? Will the created uncertainty lead to a shift from ‘aggressive tax planning’ by multinationals to ‘aggressive tax collection’ by tax administrations? Will the role of tax advisory change from advising on the lowest possible effective tax rate to a broader advice including risk appetite and public expectations?


Paul Lankhorst
Paul Lankhorst, MSc LLM, is tax adviser at Loyens & Loeff.

Harmen van Dam
Harmen van Dam, LLM, is tax partner at Loyens & Loeff.
Article

Access_open A Theoretical Framework to Study Variations in Workplace Violence Experienced by Emergency Responders

Integrating Opportunity and Vulnerability Perspectives

Tijdschrift Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 3 2016
Trefwoorden Workplace aggression, workplace violence, emergency responders, blaming the victim, victimology
Auteurs Lisa van Reemst
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Emergency responders are often sent to the front line and are often confronted with aggression and violence in interaction with citizens. According to previous studies, some professionals experience more workplace violence than others. In this article, the theoretical framework to study variations in workplace violence against emergency responders is described. According to criminal opportunity theories, which integrate the routine activity theory and lifestyle/exposure theory, victimisation is largely dependent on the lifestyle and routine activities of persons. Situational characteristics that could be related to workplace violence are organisational or task characteristics, such as having more contact with citizens or working at night. However, they do not provide insight in all aspects of influence, and their usefulness to reduce victimisation is limited. Therefore, it is important to consider the role of personal characteristics of the emergency responders that may be more or less ‘attractive’, which is elaborated upon by the victim precipitation theory. Psychological and behavioural characteristics of emergency responders may be relevant to reduce external workplace violence. The author argues that, despite the risk of being considered as blaming the victim, studying characteristics that might prevent victimisation is needed. Directions for future studies about workplace violence are discussed. These future studies should address a combination of victim and situation characteristics, use a longitudinal design and focus on emergency responders. In addition, differences between professions in relationships between characteristics and workplace violence should be explored.


Lisa van Reemst
Lisa van Reemst, M.Sc., is a Ph.D. candidate at the Erasmus University Rotterdam.
Artikel

Opinio juris as epistème: A constructivist approach to the use of contested concepts in legal doctrine

Tijdschrift Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 3 2016
Trefwoorden Opinio juris, Interpretive concepts, Customary law, Constructivism, Pierre Bourdieu, Peter Berger & Thomas Luckmann
Auteurs Associate Professor Olaf Tans
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Seeing that the role of opinio juris in the identification of customary international law is essentially contested, this contribution seeks to explain how this concept plays a fruitful role in legal doctrine despite of, or perhaps even due to, this essential contestedness. To that effect the paper adopts a constructivist perspective, primarily drawing from Bourdieu’s theory of practice and Berger & Luckmann’s ideas about institutionalization. In this perspective, contested concepts such as opinio juris are conceived of as multifaceted tools of knowledge production in the hands of members of epistemic communities.


Associate Professor Olaf Tans
Olaf Tans works as legal philosopher and political scientist at Amsterdam University College and the Centre for the Politics of Transnational Law. His contribution to this special issue is part of a research line focusing on the social construction of normativity in legal doctrine. He has also published about constitutionalism, citizenship, democracy, and most recently (e.g. in Ratio Juris and Law & Literature) about the use of foundational narratives in public deliberation and law-finding.
Diversen: Artikelen

De Externe Monitor Tbs en de behandelduur van tbs-gestelden: waardevolle kennis vanuit het tbs-traject

Tijdschrift Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, Aflevering 3 2016
Trefwoorden forensic psychiatry, disposal on behalf of the state (‘tbs-order’), treatment trajectory, length of stay, digital databases
Auteurs Dr. Marleen Nagtegaal, Dr. Ruud van der Horst, Drs. José Buisman e.a.
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    The External Monitor of Forensic Psychiatric Patients (EMT) aims to increase the knowledge of forensic psychiatric patients and the effectiveness of mandatory forensic treatment. In the EMT, five judicial organizations merged their anonymized digital data on (ex-)patients for research purposes. Data originated from the databases of the NIFP, DJI, AVT, 3RO and WODC. By merging this data, a larger part of the trajectory of a forensic psychiatric patient becomes known. Results show that it is possible to combine data from the digital databases of separate organizations for research and analysis purposes. To illustrate the opportunities of the use of merged data, an explorative study was conducted into a current subject. In this study, 218 ‘tbs-patients’ were included and several characteristics of patients of whom the mandatory forensic treatment has ended were compared with those of patients still under mandatory treatment. Suggestions are made for merging data files and for future research.


Dr. Marleen Nagtegaal
Dr. M.H. Nagtegaal is wetenschappelijk onderzoeker bij de afdeling Criminaliteit, Sancties en Rechtshandhaving van het Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek- en Documentatiecentrum (WODC) van het Ministerie van Veiligheid en Justitie.

Dr. Ruud van der Horst
Dr. R.P. van der Horst is wetenschappelijk adviseur bij het Expertisecentrum Forensische Psychiatrie (EFP) te Utrecht.

Drs. José Buisman
Drs. J. Buisman is wetenschappelijk onderzoeker bij het Nederlands Instituut voor Forensische Psychiatrie en Psychologie (NIFP).

Drs. Marleen Spaans
Drs. M. Spaans is wetenschappelijk onderzoeker bij het Nederlands Instituut voor Forensische Psychiatrie en Psychologie (NIFP).
Artikel

Van hoofdbehandelaar naar regiebehandelaar en kwaliteitsstatuut in de GGZ

Tijdschrift Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidsrecht, Aflevering 7 2015
Trefwoorden hoofdbehandelaar, regiebehandelaar, kwaliteitsstatuut
Auteurs Mr. dr. E. Plomp
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Op 18 mei 2015 presenteerde de Commissie Hoofdbehandelaarschap GGZ, bestaande uit prof. dr. P.L. Meurs (voorzitter), prof. dr. J. Legemaate en prof. dr. W.A.B. Stalman, haar advies ‘Hoofdbehandelaarschap GGZ als Noodgreep’. Dit artikel bespreekt de belangrijkste onderdelen van het advies en auteur plaatst er enkele kritische kanttekeningen bij.


Mr. dr. E. Plomp
Emke Plomp is werkzaam als psychiater en als zelfstandig adviseur en onderzoeker op het gebied van gezondheidsrecht. Reacties zijn welkom via.
Artikel

Als de inspecteurs slapen

Mysteryshoppen door jongvolwassenen bij handhaving tabak- en alcoholwetgeving en de casus van overtredingen van het rookverbod in cafés in de avond en nacht

Tijdschrift Tijdschrift voor Toezicht, Aflevering 3 2014
Trefwoorden rookverbod, horeca, naleving, mysteryshop, Nederland
Auteurs Dr. Gera Nagelhout, Prof. dr. Marc Willemsen, Dr. Joris van Hoof e.a.
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Mysteryshoppen is de standaard bij onderzoek naar naleving van tabak- en alcoholwetgeving. Vaak worden jongvolwassenen ingezet, zodat verkopers of eigenaren minder snel vermoeden dat een inspectie of observatie gaande is. In twee pilotstudies hebben we gebruikgemaakt van de mysteryshopmethode om te onderzoeken in hoeverre naleving van het rookverbod samenhangt met het tijdstip van het cafébezoek. Beide pilotstudies lieten zien dat het aantal overtredingen verdubbelde na 23.00 uur. Bij het gebruik van de mysteryshopmethode voor onderzoeks- of handhavingsdoeleinden moet daarom rekening gehouden worden met het feit dat de steekproef van bezoekmomenten bepalend kan zijn voor de uitkomsten.


Dr. Gera Nagelhout
Dr. G.E. Nagelhout is post-doc onderzoeker bij de Universiteit Maastricht (CAPHRI) en tevens werkzaam bij de Alliantie Nederland Rookvrij.

Prof. dr. Marc Willemsen
Prof. dr. M.C. Willemsen is hoogleraar tabaksontmoediging bij de Universiteit Maastricht (CAPHRI) en tevens werkzaam bij de Alliantie Nederland Rookvrij.

Dr. Joris van Hoof
Dr. J.J. van Hoof is universitair docent aan de Universiteit Twente, faculteit Gedragswetenschappen.

Dr. Marcel Pieterse
Dr. M.E. Pieterse is universitair hoofddocent aan de Universiteit Twente, faculteit Gedragswetenschappen.
Article

Access_open A Turn to Legal Pluralism in Rule of Law Promotion?

Tijdschrift Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 3/4 2013
Trefwoorden legal pluralism, rule of law promotion, legal reform, customary law, non-state legal systems, donor policy
Auteurs Dr.mr Ronald Janse
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Over the past 25 years, international organizations, NGOs and (mostly Western) states have spent considerable energy and resources on strengthening and reforming legal systems in developing countries. The results of these efforts have generally been disappointing, despite occasional successes. Among donors, one of most popular explanations of this failure in recent years is that rule of law promotion has wrongly focused almost exclusively on strengthening the formal legal system. Donors have therefore decided to 'engage' with informal justice systems. The turn to legal plu‍ra‍lism is to be welcomed for various reasons. But it is also surprising and worrisome. It is surprising because legal pluralism in developing countries was a fact of life before rule of law promotion began. What made donors pursuing legal reform blind to this reality for so long? It is worrisome because it is not self-evident that the factors which have contributed to such cognitive blindness have disappeared overnight. Are donors really ready to refocus their efforts on legal pluralism and 'engage' with informal justice systems? This paper, which is based on a review of the literature on donor engamenet with legal pluralism in so-called conflict affected and fragile states, is about these questions. It argues that 7 factors have been responsible for donor blindness regarding legal pluralism. It questions whether these factors have been addressed.


Dr.mr Ronald Janse
Ronald Janse is Associate Professor of Law, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Artikel

Van stoornis naar neurocognitie in de behandeling van tbs-patiënten

Tijdschrift Justitiële verkenningen, Aflevering 4 2013
Trefwoorden disordered offenders, neurocognition, DSM-V, risk taxation, Good Lives Model
Auteurs K. von Borries, E. Bulten en Th. Rinne
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Psychology, psychiatry, criminology and sociology provide scientific knowledge for the forensic psychiatry about disorders, the behaviour of offenders, offenses and the influence of the environment. In recent decades the What Works principles (risk, need, responsivity) became theoretical cornerstones of forensic psychiatry. However, additional theories have gained popularity: models addressing protective factors and the well-being of the delinquent. As in general psychiatry neurobiological research about the relationship between the brain and behaviour is influencing forensic psychiatry more and more. The translation of these results into regular assessment and treatment seems a matter of time. The development of a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery is an attempt to bridge the gap between this basic neurobiological-neurocognitive research and forensic psychiatric practice. This article describes the influence of the neurocognitive, neuropsychological knowledge in general and in particular the construction of this battery and its usefulness in daily practice. Whether this development is the beginning of a fundamental paradigm shift or an addition to the current approach, remains to be seen.


K. von Borries
Drs. Katinka von Borries is verbonden aan de Pompestichting in Nijmegen.

E. Bulten
Dr. Erik Bulten is verbonden aan de Pompestichting in Nijmegen.

Th. Rinne
Dr. Thomas Rinne is werkzaam bij het Pieter Baan Centrum van het Nederlands Instituut voor Forensische Psychiatrie in Utrecht.
Article

Access_open Between a Rock and a Hard Place: Treaty-Based Settlement of Terrorism-Related Disputes in the Era of Active United Nations Security Council Involvement

Tijdschrift Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 2 2013
Trefwoorden Terrorism, inter-state dispute, international treaties, the United Nations Security Council, the International Court of Justice
Auteurs Nathanael Tilahun Ali LL.M.
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    The United Nations Security Council has become a crucial actor in international counterterrorism by not only spurring the taking of preventive and suppressive measures against terrorist individuals and groups, but also by taking actions against states that are said to stand in the way. The Security Council's actions against such states invariably arise from accusations by other states, such as accusations of refusal to extradite suspects of terrorism or responsibility for supporting terrorists. Meanwhile, most such issues of dispute are covered under international treaties relating to terrorism, which provide for political (negotiation) and judicial (arbitration and adjudication) mechanisms of dispute settlement. The Security Council's actions against states in connection with terrorism, therefore, involve (explicit or implicit) factual and legal determinations that affect the legal positions of the disputing states under the applicable international treaties relating to terrorism. The point of departure of this paper is that, in this respect, the Security Council effectively becomes an alternative to the treaty-based dispute-settlement mechanisms. The article centrally contends that the Security Council effectively acts as a more attractive alternative to treaty-based dispute-settlement mechanisms for pursuing terrorism-related (legal) disputes between states, without providing a meaningful platform of disputation that is based on equality of the parties. And the Security Council's relative attractiveness, arising from the discursive and legal superiority its decisions enjoy and the relative convenience and expediency with which those decisions are delivered, entails the rendering of resort to treaty-based dispute-settlement mechanisms of little legal consequence. The point of concern the article aims to highlight is the lack of platform of disputation some states are faced with, trapped between a hostile Security Council that makes determinations and decisions of legal consequence and an unhelpful treaty-based dispute-settlement mechanism.


Nathanael Tilahun Ali LL.M.
PhD Candidate in public international law, Erasmus School of Law. E: ali@law.eur.nl. I would like to thank Prof. Xandra Kramer and Prof. Ellen Hey for their valuable comments on an earlier draft of this article. The usual disclaimer applies.
Artikel

Het internationaal recht en de gesloten jeugdzorg

Adviezen voor de praktijk

Tijdschrift Justitiële verkenningen, Aflevering 6 2012
Trefwoorden closed youth care, International Child Rights Convention, freedom of expression, standard of living, education
Auteurs S.J. Höfte, G.H.P. van der Helm en G.J.J.M. Stams
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    During childhood, a child is entitled to receive special care and assistance. The child’s best interest should be a primary objective. The Dutch government has an obligation to guarantee the children rights. But do the closed youth care accommodations meet the requirements as stated in the International Child Rights Convention, as far as deprivation of liberty and treatment under coercion are concerned? The study concluded that some closed youth care institutions do not meet the requirements as stated in the above mentioned Convention. There is often no possibility of free expression, physical complaints may not be taken seriously, an adequate standard of living is not always provided and the level of education is often too low. Most of the minors indicate that they are bored during their stay in the accommodations. On this basis, limiting the fundamental rights of these youngsters is currently surrounded with inadequate guarantees.


S.J. Höfte
Mr. Susanne Höfte is jurist. Zij studeerde recent af aan de Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen met een scriptie over de gesloten jeugdzorg.

G.H.P. van der Helm
Dr. Peer van der Helm is werkzaam bij het lectoraat Jeugdzorg en Jeugdbeleid van de Hogeschool Leiden.

G.J.J.M. Stams
Prof. dr. Geert Jan Stams is hoogleraar Forensische Orthopedagogiek aan de Faculteit der Maatschappij- en Gedragswetenschappen van de Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Artikel

Door een gekleurde bril?

Bespreking van een verkennend onderzoek naar de percepties en ervaringen van allochtone en autochtone jongeren ten aanzien van oneigenlijk selectief politiewerk

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 6 2011
Trefwoorden racial profiling, actuarial justice, discretionairy powers, police
Auteurs Mr. dr. drs. Maartje van der Woude, Prof. dr. Joanne van der Leun, Fleur van Barneveld e.a.
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    By expanding preventive powers, the Dutch criminal justice system is increasingly aimed at detecting risky people and groups as soon as possible. This so-called actuarial justice is accompanied by a great deal of discretionary power in the hands of those who have to enforce the law, bearing the risk that such powers may be carried out (in part) on the basis of generalizations relating to race, ethnicity, religion or nationality instead of on the basis of individual behavior and/or objective evidence. By presenting the results of an exploratory study into the perceptions of minorities with regard to racial profiling, the main conclusion of this article is that there is a clear necessity for further empirical research into this area.


Mr. dr. drs. Maartje van der Woude
Mr. dr. Maartje van der Woude is universitair docent bij het Instituut voor Strafrecht en Criminologie van de Universiteit Leiden.

Prof. dr. Joanne van der Leun
Prof. dr. Joanne van der Leun is hoogleraar Criminologie bij het Instituut voor Strafrecht en Criminologie van de Universiteit Leiden.

Fleur van Barneveld
Fleur van Barneveld is masterstudent Criminologie aan de Universiteit Leiden.

Yannick van Eijk
Yannick van Eijk is masterstudent Criminologie aan de Universiteit Leiden.

Roel Holman
Roel Holman is masterstudent Criminologie aan de Universiteit Leiden.

Madelin Mooijer
Madelin Mooijer is masterstudent Criminologie aan de Universiteit Leiden.
Artikel

Verstandelijke beperking in de forensische psychiatrie

Overzicht en presentatie van een onderzoek naar het effect van langdurende klinische behandelingen

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 5 2011
Trefwoorden learning disabilitie, clinical treatment, evaluation, Routine Outcome Monitoring
Auteurs Dr. Klaus Drieschner, Isabel Marrozos en Drs. Brenda Hesper
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    The first part of the article provides a review of the literature concerning the prevalence of people with learning disabilities in forensic settings, the treatment programs for this population, and the evidence for the effectiveness of these programs. In the second part, a large prospective study into the effectiveness of long-term inpatient treatment in a Dutch treatment center is reported. Preliminary results indicate that the percentage of improved patients in terms of reduction of criminogenic needs increases steadily, and that about half of the patients significantly improve within the first two years of the treatment. In addition, patients are released to settings which are less restrictive than the pre-treatment settings.


Dr. Klaus Drieschner
Klaus Drieschner werkt als senior wetenschappelijk onderzoeker voor het Trajectum Kenniscentrum en is projectleider van het multicenter effectevaluatieonderzoek van het SGLVG expertisecentrum De Borg.

Isabel Marrozos
Isabel Marrozos is werkzaam als onderzoekscoördinator bij het Trajectum Kenniscentrum.

Drs. Brenda Hesper
Brenda Hesper is als wetenschappelijk onderzoeker verbonden aan het Trajectum Kenniscentrum.
Artikel

De evidence base van zorgprogramma’s in de tbs: een visie op therapie-effectonderzoek

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 5 2010
Trefwoorden zorgprogramma, evidence base, evaluatie, tbs
Auteurs Edwin de Beurs en Marko Barendregt
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Voor zorgprogramma’s in de tbs-sector ontbreekt vooralsnog de evidence base, een empirische onderbouwing van wat werkt bij wie onder welke omstandigheden. Doel van dit artikel is te schetsen hoe zo’n evidence base tot stand kan komen.Ten eerste kunnen in een quasi-experimenteel design interventies worden geëvalueerd met behulp van Routine Outcome Monitoring (ROM). Daarnaast zijn studies met een waarlijk experimenteel design (Randomised Clinical Trials of RCT’s en single case-studies) een noodzakelijke aanvulling. Ten slotte wordt responsiviteitsonderzoek aanbevolen, dat zich richt op interne (behandelinggerelateerde) en externe (patiëntgerelateerde) factoren die samenhangen met een gunstige behandeluitkomst.


Edwin de Beurs
Edwin de Beurs is hoofd van het Bureau Onderzoek en Ontwikkeling, Nederlands Instituut voor Forensische Psychiatrie en Psychologie (NIFP), en inhoudelijk directeur van het Kenniscentrum Zorg Nederland (KZN).

Marko Barendregt
Marko Barendregt is senior onderzoeker bij het Kenniscentrum Zorg Nederland (KZN).
Artikel

Objectiviteit of schijnzekerheid?

Kwaliteit, mogelijkheden en beperkingen van instrumenten voor risicotaxatie

Tijdschrift Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, Aflevering 1 2010
Trefwoorden Risicotaxatieinstrumenten, Meta-evaluatie, Risicotaxatie
Auteurs Dr. Joke Harte en MSc Minke Breukink
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Increasingly, instruments for risk assessment have been used for the assessment of future violence. This article provides an overview of the risk assessment instruments that are used in the Netherlands for the prediction of criminal recidivism. The quality of these instruments is regarded by examining studies on the interrater reliability and the predictive validity. The benefits as well as the limitations of risk assessment instruments are discussed. It is concluded that these instruments can be valuable, especially for research on treatment effects in the field of forensic psychiatry. On the other hand, it has to be acknowledged that with risk assessment instruments, the possibility to predict criminal recidivism on individual level is still limited. Psychologist and psychiatrists, presenting a mental health assessment to the court, have to inform the judge correctly about these limitations.


Dr. Joke Harte
Dr. J.M. Harte is senior onderzoeker bij het Nederlands Studiecentrum Criminaliteit en Rechtshandhaving (NSCR) en universitair docent Criminologie, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, jharte@nscr.nl.

MSc Minke Breukink
M.D. Breukink MsC was student criminologie aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam en participeerde in dit onderzoek in het kader van haar afstudeerproject, minkebreukink@live.nl.
Artikel

Herstelrecht: internationaal evaluatieonderzoek: Methodologie en tendensen

Tijdschrift Tijdschrift voor Herstelrecht, Aflevering 02 2006
Trefwoorden Delinquent, Slachtoffer, Recidive, Kwaliteit, Misdrijf, Bemiddeling, Herstel, Aansprakelijkheid, Optie, Schade
Auteurs Walgrave, L.

Walgrave, L.
Artikel

Access_open Collective Criminal Responsibility: Unfair or Redundant

Tijdschrift Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2009
Trefwoorden collective criminal responsibility;, individual responsibility
Auteurs dr. Govert den Hartogh
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    This paper argues, against Pettit’s thesis about the incorporation of responsibility, that holding collective agents criminally responsible is necessarily either redundant or unfair: redundant if responsibility can be distributed without remainder over individual persons; unfair if it cannot. It should be the task of legal systems to create chains of individual criminal responsibility encompassing executives, officials, and members of corporate agents.


dr. Govert den Hartogh
Govert den Hartogh is Professor of Ethics at the Department of Philosophy of the University of Amsterdam.
Artikel

De stand van de professionalisering van de milieuhandhaving

Tijdschrift Tijdschrift voor Omgevingsrecht, Aflevering 1 2009
Trefwoorden kwaliteitseisen handhaving, Wet handhavingsstructuur, interbestuurlijk toezicht, regionale omgevingsdienst
Auteurs Dr. A.R. Neerhof, Dr. K.F. van der Woerd en Mr. dr. N.M. van der Grijp
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Ter verbetering van de kwaliteit van de milieuhandhaving zijn in 2005 in de Wet milieubeheer toezichtsinstrumenten ingevoerd en is een amvb met kwaliteitseisen voor handhaving vastgesteld (het BKHM). Planmatigheid, transparantie en voortvarendheid van de milieuhandhaving zijn toegenomen. Toch zijn problemen van versnippering en gebrekkige kwaliteit niet opgelost. Het is nodig geavanceerde risicoanalyses te ontwikkelen, de monitoring te verbeteren en audits in te voeren. De toezichtinstrumenten zijn nuttige stokken achter de deur. Het kabinet wil ze echter afschaffen en de klassieke toezichtsinstrumenten - schorsing, vernietiging en de taakverwaarlozingsregeling – revitaliseren. De ingrepen zijn eerst verantwoord als het informatiemanagement wordt verbeterd, (nog) meer geïnvesteerd wordt in horizontale controle en een kwaliteitsslag wordt gemaakt. Het belang van kwaliteitseisen voor handhaving op grond van de Wabo is relatief. De schaal van de organisaties is vaak niet toereikend. De vraag is of een verplichte regionale omgevingdienst de aangewezen oplossing is.


Dr. A.R. Neerhof
Dr. A.R. Neerhof is als universitair hoofddocent verbonden aan de Afdeling staats- en bestuursrecht, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (a.r.neerhof@rechten.vu.nl).

Dr. K.F. van der Woerd
Dr. K.F. van der Woerd is als senior-onderzoeker verbonden aan het Instituut voor Milieuvraagstukken (IVM), Vrije Univeristeit, Amsterdam (frans.van.der.woerd@ivm.falw.vu.nl).

Mr. dr. N.M. van der Grijp
Mr. dr. N.M. van der Grijp is als senior-onderzoeker verbonden aan het Instituut voor Milieuvraagstukken (IVM), Vrije Univeristeit, Amsterdam (nicolien.van.der.grijp@ivm.falw.vu.nl).
Boekbespreking

Waar we misschien beter niet heel snel in volgen

Forensische psychologie over behandelen, opsluiten

Tijdschrift Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, Aflevering 1 2009
Auteurs Prof. dr. Stef Decoene
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Stef Decoene reviews Ik heb niets beters te doen written by C. de Ruiter and B(l)ooming Business? written by R.R.J.M. Vermeiren.


Prof. dr. Stef Decoene
Prof. dr. S. Decoene is docent forensische psychologie, vakgroep criminologie, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Stef.Decoene@vub.ac.be.
Interface Showing Amount
U kunt door de volledige tekst zoeken naar alle artikelen door uw zoekterm in het zoekveld in te vullen. Als u op de knop 'Zoek' heeft geklikt komt u op de zoekresultatenpagina met filters, die u helpen om snel bij het door u gezochte artikel te komen. Er zijn op dit moment twee filters: rubriek en jaar.