Verfijn uw zoekresultaat

Zoekresultaat: 366 artikelen

x
Artikel

Het initiatiefvoorstel Wet verantwoord en duurzaam internationaal ondernemen in internationale context

Tijdschrift Maandblad voor Ondernemingsrecht, Aflevering 3-4 2022
Trefwoorden duurzaamheid, internationaal maatschappelijk verantwoord ondernemen, ketenaansprakelijkheid
Auteurs Mr. O.J.W. Schotel en Mr. J.M. Schepel
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Internationaal maatschappelijk ondernemen, in het bijzonder door corporate sustainability due diligence, staat hoog op de (internationale) agenda. In het voetspoor van enkele andere landen in Europa is in Nederland een voorstel gedaan voor een wettelijk raamwerk dat niet op specifieke hoogrisicosectoren van toepassing is, maar op een veel grotere groep ondernemingen. De auteurs plaatsen het Nederlandse wetsvoorstel in internationale context en bespreken de kritiek in de literatuur daarop.


Mr. O.J.W. Schotel
Mr. O.J.W. Schotel is advocaat bij De Roos Advocaten in Amsterdam en redacteur van dit tijdschrift.

Mr. J.M. Schepel
Mr. J.M. Schepel is advocaat bij Stibbe in Amsterdam.
Artikel

Het Monitoring Rapport Corporate Governance Code over boekjaar 2020

Kwaliteit van toelichting andermaal (maar dan anders) centraal

Tijdschrift Maandblad voor Ondernemingsrecht, Aflevering 3-4 2022
Trefwoorden Code 2016, ESG, beursvennootschap, Monitoring Rapport 2020, Monitoring Commissie
Auteurs Mr. S. Rietveld
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    In deze bijdrage bespreekt de auteur het op 15 december 2021 gepubliceerde Rapport monitoring boekjaar 2020 van de Monitoring Commissie Corporate Governance Code. In dit rapport wordt verslag gedaan over de Corporate Governance Code en de naleving daarvan over boekjaar 2020. De nadruk ligt op betekenisvolle verslaggeving binnen vijf kernthema’s: langetermijnwaardecreatie, risicobeheersing, cultuur, diversiteit en bezoldiging van bestuurders.


Mr. S. Rietveld
Mr. S. Rietveld is Senior Staff Associate bij Stibbe te Amsterdam.
Artikel

Kroniek Privacyrecht 2021

Tijdschrift Advocatenblad, Aflevering 3 2022
Auteurs Christiaan Alberdingk Thijm, Vita Zwaan, Marieke Berghuis e.a.

Christiaan Alberdingk Thijm

Vita Zwaan

Marieke Berghuis

Silvia van Schaik

Caroline de Vries

Jacob van de Velde

Sarah Stapel
Artikel

Access_open Kan de wetgever de werknemers een vaccinatieplicht opleggen?

Tijdschrift Tijdschrift voor Ontslagrecht, Aflevering 1 2022
Trefwoorden Arbeidsrecht, Corona, Vaccinatieplicht, Grondrechten, Lichamelijke integriteit
Auteurs dr. Roland Pierik en prof. mr. Evert Verhulp
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Kan een werkgever zonder nadere wetgeving de werknemer verplichten zich te laten vaccineren tegen Corona, of is daarvoor specifieke wetgeving noodzakelijk?


dr. Roland Pierik
Roland Pierik is UHD rechtsfilosofie bij de Universiteit van Amsterdam.

prof. mr. Evert Verhulp
Evert Verhulp is hoogleraar Arbeidsrecht bij de Universiteit van Amsterdam.
Artikel

Access_open Experimental Regulations and Regulatory ­Sandboxes – Law Without Order?

Special Issue Experimental Legislation in Times of Crisis, Sofia Ranchordás & Bart van Klink (eds.)

Tijdschrift Law and Method, december 2021
Trefwoorden experimental regulations, regulatory sandboxes, methodology, regulatory quality
Auteurs Sofia Ranchordás
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    This article discusses the key methodological shortcomings of experimental regulations and regulatory sandboxes. I argue that the poor design and implementation of these experimental legal regimes have both methodological and legal implications. The deficient design of experimental regulations and regulatory sandboxes can have three adverse effects: First, the internal validity of experimental legal regimes is limited because it is unclear whether the verified results are the direct result of the experimental intervention or other circumstances. The limited external validity of experimental legal regimes impedes the generalizability of the experiment. Second, experimental legal regimes that are not scientifically sound make a limited contribution to the advancement of evidence-based lawmaking and the rationalization of regulation. Third, methodological deficiencies may result in the violation of legal principles which require that experimental regulations follow objective, transparent, and predictable standards. I contribute to existing comparative public law and law and methods literature with an interdisciplinary framework which can help improve the design of experimental regulations and regulatory sandboxes. I draw on social science literature on the methods of field experiments to offer novel methodological insights for a more transparent and objective design of experimental regulations and regulatory sandboxes.


Sofia Ranchordás
Sofia Ranchordás is Full Professor of EU and Comparative Public Law at the Faculty of Law of the University of Groningen, The Netherlands & Associate Professor of Public Law, Innovation, and Sustainability at the Faculty of Law, LUISS Guido Carli, Italy.

    In recent years, big data technology has revolutionised many domains, including policing. There is a lack of research, however, exploring which applications are used by the police, and the potential benefits of big data analytics for policing. Instead, literature about big data and policing predominantly focuses on predictive policing and its associated risks. The present paper provides new insights into the police’s current use of big data and algorithmic applications. We provide an up-to-date overview of the various applications of big data by the National Police in the Netherlands. We distinguish three areas: uniformed police work, criminal investigation, and intelligence. We then discuss two positive effects of big data and algorithmic applications for the police organization: accelerated learning and the formation of a single police organization.


Marc Schuilenburg
Marc Schuilenburg is bijzonder hoogleraar Digital Surveillance aan de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam en universitair docent aan Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam. m.b.schuilenburg@vu.nl.

Melvin Soudijn
Melvin Soudijn is senior onderzoeker bij de afdeling Analyse & Onderzoek van de Landelijke Eenheid Nationale Politie en research fellow bij het Nederlands Studiecentrum Criminaliteit en Rechtshandhaving.
Artikel

Access_open Global Solidarity and Collective Intelligence in Times of Pandemics

Tijdschrift Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2021
Trefwoorden Global solidarity, Pandemics, Global Existential Threats, Collective Intelligence, CrowdLaw
Auteurs José Luis Martí
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Some of the existential threats we currently face are global in the sense that they affect us all, and thus matter of global concern and trigger duties of moral global solidarity. But some of these global threats, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, are global in a second, additional, sense: discharging them requires joint, coordinated global action. For that reason, these twofold global threats trigger political – not merely moral – duties of global solidarity. This article explores the contrast between these two types of global threats with the purpose of clarifying the distinction between moral and political duties of global solidarity. And, in the absence of a fully developed global democratic institutional system, the article also explores some promising ways to fulfill our global political duties, especially those based on mechanisms of collective intelligence such as CrowdLaw, which might provide effective solutions to these global threats while enhancing the democratic legitimacy of public decision-making.


José Luis Martí
José Luis Martí is Associate Professor of Legal and Political Philosophy, Department of Law, Pompeu Fabra University of Barcelona.
Artikel

Access_open Populism, the Kingdom of Shadows, and the Challenge to Liberal Democracy

Tijdschrift Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2021
Trefwoorden Populism, Liberal democracy, Political representation, Société du spectacle, Theatrocracy
Auteurs Massimo La Torre
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Populism is a somehow intractable notion, since its reference is much too wide, comprising phenomena that are indeed in conflict between them, and moreover blurred, by being often used in an instrumental, polemical way. Such intractability is then radicalized through the two alternative approaches to populism, one that is more or less neutral, rooting in the political science tradition, and a second one, fully normative, though fed by political realism, founding as it does on a specific political theory and project. In the article an alternative view is proposed, that of populism as the politics that is congruent with the increasing role played by ‘screens’, icons, and images in social relationships and indeed in political representation. In this way populism is approached as the specific way politics is done within the context of a digitalized société du spectacle.


Massimo La Torre
Massimo La Torre is Professor of Philosophy of Law, ‘Magna Graecia’ University of Catanzaro, Italy, and Visiting Professor of European Law, University of Tallinn, Estonia.
Artikel

Access_open Living with Others in Pandemics

The State’s Duty to Protect, Individual Responsibility and Solidarity

Tijdschrift Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2021
Trefwoorden SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, The state’s duty to protect, Duty to rescue, Responsibility, Solidarity
Auteurs Konstantinos A Papageorgiou
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    The article discusses a range of important normative questions raised by anti-COVID-19 measures and policies. Do governments have the right to impose such severe restrictions on individual freedom and furthermore do citizens have obligations vis-à-vis the state, others and themselves to accept such restrictions? I will argue that a democratic state may legitimately enforce publicly discussed, properly enacted and constitutionally tested laws and policies in order to protect its citizens from risks to life and limb. Even so, there is a natural limit, factual and normative, to what the state or a government can do in this respect. Citizens will also need to take it upon themselves not to harm and to protect others and in the context of a pandemic this means that endorsement of restrictions or other mandatory measures, notably vaccination, is not to be seen as a matter of personal preference concerning the supposedly inviolable sovereignty of one’s own body.


Konstantinos A Papageorgiou
Konstantinos A Papageorgiou is Professor of the Philosophy of Law at the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Law.
Artikel

Access_open Suffering from Vulnerability

On the Relation Between Law, Contingency and Solidarity

Tijdschrift Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2021
Trefwoorden Vulnerability, Contingency, Freedom and Anxiety, Solidarity, Legal concept of inclusion
Auteurs Benno Zabel
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    The COVID-19 crisis has produced or amplified disruptive processes in societies. This article wants to argue for the fact that we understand the meaning of the COVID-19 crisis only if we relate it to the fundamental vulnerability of modern life and the awareness of vulnerability of whole societies. Vulnerability in modernity are expressions of a reality of freedom that is to some extent considered contingent and therefore unsecured. It is true that law is understood today as the protective power of freedom. The thesis of the article, however, boils down to the fact that the COVID-19 crisis has resulted in a new way of thinking about the protection of freedom. This also means that the principle of solidarity must be assigned a new social role. Individual and societal vulnerability refer thereafter to an interconnectedness, dependency, and a future perspective of freedom margins that, in addition to the moral one, can also indicate a need for legal protection. In this respect, law has not only a function of delimitation, but also one of inclusion.


Benno Zabel
Benno Zabel is Professor of Criminal Law and Philosophy of Law at the University of Bonn.
Article

Access_open Ruled by Fear or Safety-Related Empowerment

The Experience and Meaning of Penal Protection Orders in Intimate Partner Violence in the Netherlands

Tijdschrift Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 3 2021
Trefwoorden intimate partner violence, stalking, protection orders, empowerment, safety, well-being
Auteurs Irma W.M. Cleven
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    This study uses a novel approach to understand the experience and meaning of unsafety and the contribution of penal protection orders to victim empowerment in cases of intimate partner violence (IPV). In ten in-depth interviews, IPV survivors reflect on their relationship with their ex-partner and the previous years in which the order against their ex-partner was issued, including its role within the wider process of coming to terms with IPV victimisation and moving on. Depending on expectations of protection orders (POs) enforcement and deterrence, POs enhance one’s safety-related self-efficacy and result in a sense of empowerment. Its meaning can be understood in terms of one’s power from the ex-partner, power to act, status vis-à-vis the offender and the wider community, care/help of the CJS, and unity/togetherness with the wider community. Several implications for theoretical and empirical research and practice are discussed.


Irma W.M. Cleven
Irma W.M. Cleven, MSc, is PhD Candidate at the Department of Criminology of the Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Artikel

Over schade en schande

Shaming en stigmatisering van ondernemingen

Tijdschrift Tijdschrift over Cultuur & Criminaliteit, Aflevering 3 2021
Trefwoorden naming and shaming, organisatiecriminaliteit, stigma, reputatie, Shell
Auteurs Judith van Erp
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Naming-and-shaming campaigns, in which civil society groups publicly call upon corporations to end harmful behavior via social media, are a powerful mechanism for social control of corporations. This article investigates naming and shaming in modern, global markets through a case study of Shell - one of the most stigmatized corporations of our time. First, the perspective of organizational sociology is used to answer the question why Shell is receiving such significant attention. Next, the article addresses how shaming manifests itself in global markets. The example of Shell illustrates reintegrative shaming, aiming to end harmful activities, as well as stigmatizing shaming that undermines a corporation’s license to operate.
    Finally, this article discusses the potential consequences of naming and shaming for corporate reputations. In the case of Shell, Goffman’s concept of courtesy stigma appears to form the greatest reputational risk, as stigmatization of Shells business partners will create status anxiety and will limit opportunities to develop business.


Judith van Erp
Prof. dr. Judith van Erp bekleedt de leerstoel ‘Regulatory Governance’ aan de Universiteit Utrecht, binnen het departement Bestuurs- en Organisatiewetenschap. j.g.vanerp@uu.nl
Artikel

Dismissal protection in Denmark

Tijdschrift Tijdschrift voor Ontslagrecht, Aflevering 4 2021
Trefwoorden protection against dismissal, flexicurity, industrial relations, social security, dynamic and adjustable labour market
Auteurs mr. dr. Natalie Munkholm
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    The article gives an overview of the protection against dismissal according to Danish statutory acts and collective agreements.


mr. dr. Natalie Munkholm
Natalie Munkholm is werkzaam als associate professor Labour Law aan de Aarhus Universiteit, Denemarken.
Artikel

Dubai zet ongemoeid advocaten vast

Tijdschrift Advocatenblad, Aflevering 9 2021
Auteurs Trudeke Sillevis-Smitt

Trudeke Sillevis-Smitt
Artikel

De strijd tegen racisme op en naast het voetbalveld

Tijdschrift Voetbal- & Sportjuridische Zaken, Aflevering 2 2021
Trefwoorden voetbal, racisme, antidiscriminatierecht, tuchtrecht, specificiteit van de sport
Auteurs Frea De Keyzer
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    In deze bijdrage wordt de waardenoverlap inzake racisme tussen voetbal en samenleving verduidelijkt, welke een basis en verklaring vormt voor een repressief optreden van zowel de overheid als de sportwereld binnen een voetbalcontext. De verscheidene (Europese, Belgische en Nederlandse) handhavingsinstrumenten en hun tekortkomingen en uitdagingen komen hierbij aan bod.


Frea De Keyzer
F. (Frea) De Keyzer is doctoraatsonderzoekster en onderwijsassistent sportrecht aan de Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Instituut voor Arbeidsrecht. Daarnaast is zij zetelend lid van de Disciplinaire Raad voor het profvoetbal bij de Koninklijke Belgische Voetbalbond.
Article

Access_open The Common Law Remedy of Habeas Corpus Through the Prism of a Twelve-Point Construct

Tijdschrift Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 2 2021
Trefwoorden Habeas corpus, common law, detainee, consitution, liberty
Auteurs Chuks Okpaluba en Anthony Nwafor
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Long before the coming of the Bill of Rights in written Constitutions, the common law has had the greatest regard for the personal liberty of the individual. In order to safeguard that liberty, the remedy of habeas corpus was always available to persons deprived of their liberty unlawfully. This ancient writ has been incorporated into the modern Constitution as a fundamental right and enforceable as other rights protected by virtue of their entrenchment in those Constitutions. This article aims to bring together the various understanding of habeas corpus at common law and the principles governing the writ in common law jurisdictions. The discussion is approached through a twelve-point construct thus providing a brief conspectus of the subject matter, such that one could have a better understanding of the subject as applied in most common law jurisdictions.


Chuks Okpaluba
Chuks Okpaluba, LLB LLM (London), PhD (West Indies), is a Research Fellow at the Free State Centre for Human Rights, University of the Free State, South Africa. Email: okpaluba@mweb.co.za.

Anthony Nwafor
Anthony O. Nwafor, LLB, LLM, (Nigeria), PhD (UniJos), BL, is Professor at the School of Law, University of Venda, South Africa. Email: Anthony.Nwafor@univen.ac.za.
Case Reports

2021/32 Grand Chamber confirms no double punishment for illegal employment (SK)

Tijdschrift European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 3 2021
Trefwoorden Other Fundamental Rights
Auteurs Dušan Nitschneider en Danica Valentová
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    The Grand Chamber of the Slovakian Supreme Court has unanimously decided that employers cannot be penalised by two different agencies for one violation of employment law rules and that the ne bis in idem principle also applies to two administrative breaches of the law.


Dušan Nitschneider
Dušan Nitschneider is a partner at Nitschneider & Partners.

Danica Valentová
Danica Valentová is a senior associate at Nitschneider & Partners.
Artikel

De asset freeze in sanctieregimes: verstrekkend maar nog onvoldoende bekend

Tijdschrift Tijdschrift voor Bijzonder Strafrecht & Handhaving, Aflevering 6 2021
Trefwoorden sancties, asset freeze, bevriezingsmaatregel, Sanctiewet, sanctieregelgeving
Auteurs Mr. T. Kodrzycki, mr. S. Verkerk en F. van Til
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    De asset freeze, oftewel bevriezingsmaatregel, is een van de meest ingrijpende maatregelen die de (internationale) sanctieregimes kennen. Tegelijkertijd blijkt dat deze nog niet heel bekend is en soms over het hoofd wordt gezien. Dat kan verstrekkende gevolgen hebben, ook strafrechtelijke. In dit artikel willen wij deze vreemde eend in de bijt aan een nadere beschouwing onderwerpen.


Mr. T. Kodrzycki
Mr. T. Kodrzycki is advocaat-partner bij BenninkAmar te Amsterdam.

mr. S. Verkerk
Mr. S. Verkerk is advocaat bij BenninkAmar te Amsterdam.

F. van Til
F. Til is juridisch medewerker bij BenninkAmar te Amsterdam.
Artikel

Criminele netwerken achter orgaanhandel: een sociale netwerkanalyse van de Medicus-zaak

Tijdschrift Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, Aflevering 3 2021
Trefwoorden organ trafficking, social network analysis, organized crime
Auteurs Henrieke Doosje, Frederike Ambagtsheer en Arjan Blokland
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Though less well-known than for instance the narcotics or weapons trade, illegal organ trade is a lucrative business with yearly revenues estimated between 840 million and 1.7 billion USD. The most commonly reported form of organ trade is the trade in living donor kidneys. The current study maps the criminal network behind the illegal organ trade that took place in the Medicus clinic in Kosovo based on police files, indictments, transcripts of suspect and victim statements, court rulings and interviews. The Medicus case involved at least 27 living kidney donations. Operations were performed by eleven actors in teams of varying composition. The total criminal network consisted of 107 individuals and is characterized by a low density and features a number of central actors.


Henrieke Doosje
M.H. Doosje MSc LLB is criminoloog en masterstudente Straf- en strafprocesrecht aan de Universiteit Leiden. Zij was ten tijde van het onderzoek masterstudente Forensische Criminologie aan de Universiteit Leiden en stagiaire bij het Nederlands Studiecentrum Criminaliteit en Rechtshandhaving (NSCR) in Amsterdam.

Frederike Ambagtsheer
Dr. F. Ambagtsheer LLM is Universitair Docent bij het Transplantatie Instituut van het Erasmus MCin Rotterdam.

Arjan Blokland
Prof. dr. mr. A.A.J. Blokland is senior onderzoeker bij het Nederlands Studiecentrum Criminaliteit en Rechtshandhaving (NSCR) in Amsterdam en bijzonder hoogleraar Criminology & Criminal Justice bij het Instituut voor Strafrecht & Criminologie van de Universiteit Leiden.

    Ethnic profiling by governments unfortunately has a worldwide interest. If we look at the Dutch situation, it turns out that the problem is not limited to the police. Serious problems also arise when it comes to checking the legality of tax benefits and detecting benefit fraud. In this contribution, the authors draw attention to racial discrimination due to the use of profiles by government institutions in the Netherlands. It seems that our anti-discrimination legislation is in good order and that raises the question of whether legal refinement is needed or whether solutions should be sought outside the legal sphere. The authors think the latter strategy and make suggestions for a more holistic solution direction.


Peter Rodrigues
Prof. mr. P.R. Rodrigues is hoogleraar Immigratierecht bij de Universiteit Leiden en voorzitter van de redactie van dit tijdschrift.

Maartje van der Woude
Prof. mr. dr. M.A.H. van der Woude is hoogleraar Rechtssociologie bij het Van Vollenhoven Instituut voor Recht, Bestuur & Samenleving bij Universiteit Leiden en lid van de redactie van dit tijdschrift.
Toont 1 - 20 van 366 gevonden teksten
« 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 18 19
U kunt door de volledige tekst zoeken naar alle artikelen door uw zoekterm in het zoekveld in te vullen. Als u op de knop 'Zoek' heeft geklikt komt u op de zoekresultatenpagina met filters, die u helpen om snel bij het door u gezochte artikel te komen. Er zijn op dit moment twee filters: rubriek en jaar.