In this article, we analyze which aspects of performance theory and the procedural justice-based model are explaining the trust of shopkeepers in the police and local government. Utilizing a survey of 156 shopkeepers and 94 semi-constructed interviews with shopkeepers, which are located at the South Shopping Boulevard in Rotterdam (The Netherlands), the study finds that shopkeepers have a relatively high trust in the police and local government. This is surprising because various attempts in the past 30 years to revive the high street by the government have failed to improve its bad image, as dwindling visitor numbers, poor turnover, limited range of retailers, empty shops and high crime and offence levels show only too plainly. The findings also highlight that ethnic minority respondents have more trust in local government than Dutch shopkeepers. The explanation therefor is sought in the dual frame of reference theory. |
Zoekresultaat: 210 artikelen
Artikel |
Boulevard Zuid in Rotterdam: een onderzoek naar het vertrouwen van winkeliers in politie en gemeente |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Veiligheid, Aflevering 4 2020 |
Trefwoorden | shopkeepers, procedural justice, the Netherlands, ethnic minorities, performance theory |
Auteurs | Marc Schuilenburg, Laura Messie en Darnell de Vries |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
Niet-preferent concurrent, ofwel lager in rang maar niet achtergesteld |
Tijdschrift | Maandblad voor Vermogensrecht, Aflevering 11 2020 |
Trefwoorden | preferent-concurrent, non-preferred senior, senior non-preferred, BRRD, MREL |
Auteurs | Mr. W.J. Horsten |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Naar aanleiding van een wijziging van een Europese richtlijn kent ons recht sinds eind 2018 voor banken een bijzondere categorie concurrente schulden, aangeduid als ‘niet-preferente concurrente’ schuld. Dit betreft een (sub)categorie concurrente schulden, die in faillissement na gewone concurrente (dan ‘preferent-concurrente’) schulden wordt betaald zonder als ‘achtergesteld’ te worden aangemerkt. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 4 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Final criminal conviction, revision procedure, grounds for revision, preparatory investigative measures, Cour de révision et de réexamen |
Auteurs | Katrien Verhesschen en Cyrille Fijnaut |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The French ‘Code de procédure pénale’ provides the possibility to revise final criminal convictions. The Act of 2014 reformed the procedure for revision and introduced some important novelties. The first is that it reduced the different possible grounds for revision to one ground, which it intended to broaden. The remaining ground for revision is the existence of a new fact or an element unknown to the court at the time of the initial proceedings, of such a nature as to establish the convicted person’s innocence or to give rise to doubt about his guilt. The legislature intended judges to no longer require ‘serious doubt’. However, experts question whether judges will comply with this intention of the legislature. The second is the introduction of the possibility for the applicant to ask the public prosecutor to carry out the investigative measures that seem necessary to bring to light a new fact or an unknown element before filing a request for revision. The third is that the Act of 2014 created the ‘Cour de révision et de réexamen’, which is composed of eighteen judges of the different chambers of the ‘Cour de cassation’. This ‘Cour de révision et de réexamen’ is divided into a ‘commission d’instruction’, which acts as a filter and examines the admissibility of the requests for revision, and a ‘formation de jugement’, which decides on the substance of the requests. Practice will have to show whether these novelties indeed improved the accessibility of the revision procedure. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | law and society, social change, discrimination, non-discrimination law, positive action |
Auteurs | Anita Böcker |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
A question that has preoccupied sociolegal scholars for ages is whether law can change ‘hearts and minds’. This article explores whether non-discrimination law can create social change, and, more particularly, whether it can change attitudes and beliefs as well as external behaviour. The first part examines how sociolegal scholars have theorised about the possibility and desirability of using law as an instrument of social change. The second part discusses the findings of empirical research on the social working of various types of non-discrimination law. What conclusions can be drawn about the ability of non-discrimination law to create social change? What factors influence this ability? And can non-discrimination law change people’s hearts and minds as well as their behaviour? The research literature does not provide an unequivocal answer to the latter question. However, the overall picture emerging from the sociolegal literature is that law is generally more likely to bring about changes in external behaviour and that it can influence attitudes and beliefs only indirectly, by altering the situations in which attitudes and opinions are formed. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Dehumanisation, International Human Rights Law, Positive State obligations, Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities, International Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination |
Auteurs | Stephanie Eleanor Berry |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
International human rights law (IHRL) was established in the aftermath of the Second World War to prevent a reoccurrence of the atrocities committed in the name of fascism. Central to this aim was the recognition that out-groups are particularly vulnerable to rights violations committed by the in-group. Yet, it is increasingly apparent that out-groups are still subject to a wide range of rights violations, including those associated with mass atrocities. These rights violations are facilitated by the dehumanisation of the out-group by the in-group. Consequently, this article argues that the creation of IHRL treaties and corresponding monitoring mechanisms should be viewed as the first step towards protecting out-groups from human rights violations. By adopting the lens of dehumanisation, this article demonstrates that if IHRL is to achieve its purpose, IHRL monitoring mechanisms must recognise the connection between dehumanisation and rights violations and develop a positive State obligation to counter dehumanisation. The four treaties explored in this article, the European Convention on Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities and the International Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination, all establish positive State obligations to prevent hate speech and to foster tolerant societies. These obligations should, in theory, allow IHRL monitoring mechanisms to address dehumanisation. However, their interpretation of the positive State obligation to foster tolerant societies does not go far enough to counter unconscious dehumanisation and requires more detailed elaboration. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | prejudice, soft paternalism, empathy, liberalism, employment discrimination, access to goods and services |
Auteurs | Ioanna Tourkochoriti |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article argues that it is legitimate for the state to practice soft paternalism towards changing hearts and minds in order to prevent behaviour that is discriminatory. Liberals accept that it is not legitimate for the state to intervene in order to change how people think because ideas and beliefs are wrong in themselves. It is legitimate for the state to intervene with the actions of a person only when there is a risk of harm to others and when there is a threat to social coexistence. Preventive action of the state is legitimate if we consider the immaterial and material harm that discrimination causes. It causes harm to the social standing of the person, psychological harm, economic and existential harm. All these harms threaten peaceful social coexistence. This article traces a theory of permissible government action. Research in the areas of behavioural psychology, neuroscience and social psychology indicates that it is possible to bring about a change in hearts and minds. Encouraging a person to adopt the perspective of the person who has experienced discrimination can lead to empathetic understanding. This, can lead a person to critically evaluate her prejudice. The paper argues that soft paternalism towards changing hearts and minds is legitimate in order to prevent harm to others. It attempts to legitimise state coercion in order to eliminate prejudice and broader social patterns of inequality and marginalisation. And it distinguishes between appropriate and non-appropriate avenues the state could pursue in order to eliminate prejudice. Policies towards eliminating prejudice should address the rational and the emotional faculties of a person. They should aim at using methods and techniques that focus on persuasion and reduce coercion. They should raise awareness of what prejudice is and how it works in order to facilitate well-informed voluntary decisions. The version of soft paternalism towards changing minds and attitudes defended in this article makes it consistent with liberalism. |
Titel |
Innovatie en betere regelgeving |
Tijdschrift | RegelMaat, Aflevering 5 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Experimenteerregelgeving, Toekomstbestendigheid, Innovatiebeginsel, Innovatiebeleid |
Auteurs | Prof. mr. dr. S.H. Ranchordas |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Het innovatiebeginsel is tegenwoordig onderdeel van de geïntegreerde aanpak van de Europese Commissie voor betere regelgeving. Het innovatiebeginsel waarborgt dat bij de ontwikkeling van beleid en wetgeving de gevolgen voor innovatie volledig worden beoordeeld. De impact van nieuwe regels op innovatie wordt ook in Nederland geanalyseerd in het IAK en in het kader van de mkb-toets. Toch blijft de betekenis van het innovatiebeginsel ondoorgrondelijk. De literatuur is tevens terughoudend ten opzichte van de invoering van innovatie als een rechtsbeginsel. Dit artikel geeft aan de hand van interdisciplinaire literatuur een genuanceerd beeld van innovatievriendelijke regelgeving en het innovatiebeginsel. Het gaat in op de juiste interpretatie van het innovatiebeginsel en hoe dit principe kan bijdragen aan het realiseren van betere regelgeving. |
Artikel |
Hoe kan sport bijdragen aan het re-integreren van delinquenten? |
Tijdschrift | PROCES, Aflevering 5 2020 |
Trefwoorden | sport, delinquency, desistance, probation, prison |
Auteurs | Dr. Lianne Kleijer-Kool, Dr. Jacqueline Bosker en Mr. Moniek Zuurbier |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The contribution of sport to reintegrating offenders receives limited attention, both in science and in the practice of probation and the prison system. From the perspective of desistance, this literature study concluded that sport can contribute to the development of individual capital, social capital and an alternative identity. However, the effect of sport is not necessarily positive. There are risks of negative influence or the reinforcement of problem behaviour. In counselling offenders, sport should be combined with other interventions to reduce recidivism. A personalized approach is required, based on the risk-need-responsivity model. |
Case Reports |
2020/21 Employer not liable for misuse of personal data by ‘rogue’ employee (UK) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Privacy |
Auteurs | Richard Lister |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The Supreme Court has allowed an appeal by one of the UK’s major supermarket chains, overturning a finding that it was vicariously liable for a rogue employee’s deliberate disclosure of payroll data related to some 100,000 co-workers, of whom 10,000 brought a group claim for damages. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Urgenda, Miller v. Secretary of State, Norm of judicial apoliticality, Ronald Dworkin, Judicial restraint |
Auteurs | Maurits Helmich |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Few legal theorists today would argue that the domain of law exists in isolation from other normative spheres governing society, notably from the domain of ‘politics’. Nevertheless, the implicit norm that judges should not act ‘politically’ remains influential and widespread in the debates surrounding controversial court cases. This article aims to square these two observations. Taking the Miller v. Secretary of State and Urgenda cases as illustrative case studies, the article demonstrates that what it means for judges to adjudicate cases ‘apolitically’ is itself a matter of controversy. In reflecting on their own constitutional role, courts are forced to take a stance on substantive questions of political philosophy. Nevertheless, that does not mean that the ‘norm of judicial apoliticality’ should therefore be rejected. The norm’s coherence lies in its intersocial function: its role in declaring certain modes of judicial interpretation and intervention legitimate (‘legal’/‘judicial’) or illegitimate (‘political’). |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Judicial independence, Rule of law, Judicial ethics, Hungary, Criminalization of homelessness |
Auteurs | Petra Gyöngyi |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article examines the tension between the constitutional obligation of judges to uphold rules of positive law and possibly conflicting standards of conduct arising from professional-ethical values. The theoretical analysis will be illustrated by the case of Hungary, an EU member state experiencing rule of law challenges since 2010 and where the 2018-2019 criminalization of homelessness exemplifies the studied tension. Inspired by the theories of Philip Selznick and Martin Krygier, rule of law will be viewed as a value that requires progressive realization and context-specific implementation. By contextualizing the relevant Hungarian constitutional framework with the content of the judicial code of ethics and judicial practice, it will be shown how the legitimate space for Hungarian judges to distance themselves from legislation possibly in conflict with rule of law values is reduced. Theoretical suggestions for addressing such rule of law regressions will be made. |
Discussie en debat |
Aandeelhouderskapitalisme en excessieve beloningen wakkeren fraude aan |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift over Cultuur & Criminaliteit, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Trefwoorden | shareholder capitalism, excessive rewards, fraude, shareholder idealism, long-term value creation |
Auteurs | Prof. dr. mr. Marcel Pheijffer |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This contribution examines shareholder capitalism and shareholder idealism. It is also argued that excessive rewards – often a result of shareholder capitalism – fuel fraud. Supervisory directors and shareholders should therefore act as a counterforce and fulfil a corrective role. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Trefwoorden | age discrimination, age equality, health care |
Auteurs | Rachel Horton |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Age limits, minimum and maximum, and both explicit and ‘covert’, are still used in the National Health Service to determine access to a range of health interventions, including infertility services and cancer screening and treatment. Evidence suggests that chronological age is used as a proxy for a host of characteristics in determining access to healthcare: as a proxy for the capacity of an individual to benefit from an intervention; for the type of harm that may result from an intervention; for the likelihood of such benefit or harm occurring; and, in some cases, for other indicators used to determine what may be in the patient’s interest. Age is used as a proxy in this way in making decisions about both individual patients and wider populations; it may be used where no better ‘marker’ for the relevant characteristic exists or – for reasons including cost, practicality or fairness – in preference to other available markers. This article reviews the justifications for using age in this way in the context of the existing legal framework on age discrimination in the provision of public services. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Trefwoorden | age boundaries, right to be heard, child’s autonomy, civil proceedings, neuropsychology |
Auteurs | Mariëlle Bruning en Jiska Peper |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In the last decade neuropsychological insights have gained influence with regard to age boundaries in legal procedures, however, in Dutch civil law no such influence can be distinguished. Recently, voices have been raised to improve children’s legal position in civil law: to reflect upon the minimum age limit of twelve years for children to be invited to be heard in court and the need for children to have a stronger procedural position. |
Artikel |
Moral injury en herstelEen existentiële verkenning |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Herstelrecht, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | moral injury, PTSS, verantwoordelijkheid, vertrouwen, veiligheid |
Auteurs | Joachim Duyndam |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This paper examines moral injury, in relation to recovery from this kind of psychic damage and to restorative justice. In recent research the concept is developed in distinction from the psychiatric diagnosis PTSD. Whereas PTSD is rooted in anxiety, as it occurs during or after life-threatening situations, people suffering from moral injury are disruptively affected by guilt and shame, in the slipstream of which they may be tormented by remorse, self-loathing, anger and self-disgust – with symptoms similar to PTSD. Unlike PTSD, however, the risk of moral injury is part of ordinary life. It may happen to anyone. Therefore, this paper takes an ‘existential’ perspective by relating moral injury to the fundamental human condition of relationality. Moral injury is interpreted as the disturbance of the responsibility, the confidence and the security that fundamentally sustain the human relationships to the world, to each other, and to oneself. One way of recovering from moral injury is through empathy, primarily performed by caregivers or chaplains who guide the morally injured, and consequently accomplished by the injured themselves, in a narrative way. |
Artikel |
Privaatrecht en publiekrecht in de consumentenbescherming |
Tijdschrift | RegelMaat, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Private regulering, duaal stelsel WHC, consumentenrecht, publiekrechtelijk toezicht, strooischade |
Auteurs | Mr. E. Verviers |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
De verhouding tussen bestuursrecht en privaatrecht, onderwerp van dit themanummer, speelde onder andere bij de totstandkoming van de Wet handhaving consumentenbescherming. Aan de hand van de relevante openbare documenten wordt aangetoond dat de vraag of het wenselijk is om op het privaatrechtelijke terrein van het consumentenrecht een publiekrechtelijke toezichthouder in te schakelen, zonder theoretische discussie bevestigend werd beantwoord. Met betrekking tot de vraag welke instrumenten de publiekrechtelijke toezichthouder daarbij ter beschikking staan, was er een gestage ontwikkeling van ‘zo min mogelijk publiekrechtelijke instrumenten, want het gaat om privaatrecht’ naar ‘volledig publiekrechtelijk handhaven, omdat er effectief toezicht moet zijn’. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Basel Accords, EU Law, shadow banking, financial stability, prudential regulation |
Auteurs | Katarzyna Parchimowicz en Ross Spence |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In the aftermath of the 2007 global financial crisis, regulators have agreed a substantial tightening of prudential regulation for banks operating in the traditional banking sector (TBS). The TBS is stringently regulated under the Basel Accords to moderate financial stability and to minimise risk to government and taxpayers. While prudential regulation is important from a financial stability perspective, the flipside is that the Basel Accords only apply to the TBS, they do not regulate the shadow banking sector (SBS). While it is not disputed that the SBS provides numerous benefits given the net credit growth of the economy since the global financial crisis has come from the SBS rather than traditional banking channels, the SBS also poses many risks. Therefore, the fact that the SBS is not subject to prudential regulation is a cause of serious systemic concern. The introduction of Basel IV, which compliments Basel III, seeks to complete the Basel framework on prudential banking regulation. On the example of this set of standards and its potential negative consequences for the TBS, this paper aims to visualise the incentives for TBS institutions to move some of their activities into the SBS, and thus stress the need for more comprehensive regulation of the SBS. Current coronavirus crisis forced Basel Committee to postpone implementation of the Basel IV rules – this could be perceived as a chance to complete the financial regulatory framework and address the SBS as well. |
Artikel |
Het verlies van geld, geluk en gezichtRomance scams, datingfraude en ‘sweetheart swindles’ |
Tijdschrift | Justitiële verkenningen, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | cybercrime, victimization, romance scam, dating fraud, cybervictimology |
Auteurs | Raoul Notté MSc |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Romance scams have seen a worldwide increase and are one of the most financially damaging forms of cybercrime. In addition, victims suffer strong emotional impact and are confronted with victim blaming. Research shows how the combination of various emotional and financial impact can induce a ‘double-hit’ on victims. Knowledge and possibilities for law enforcement are insufficient, which leads to a lack of financial compensation and support for victims. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Veiligheid, Aflevering 2-3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | reporting behavior, crime, citizen participation, psychological drivers, response efficacy |
Auteurs | Wendy Schreurs |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Reports by citizens are a great source of information for the police. Local residents often know well what is going on in their neighborhood and which situations are suspicious. In this study, an online survey was conducted to investigate what drives citizens to report to the police. A wide range of individual, social and institutional drivers were explored. The results show that the more often people have reported anything to the police in the past, the higher their risk perception, self-efficacy, citizen participation and police legitimacy. Furthermore, participants with a higher degree of self-efficacy, response efficacy, trust in the police and police legitimacy appeared to be more willing to report in the future. An open question regarding what motivates people the most to report show that response efficacy (the idea to what extent reporting has an effect on increasing safety and reducing crime) and altruistic values (justice, to help society and punish the perpetrators) were mentioned most frequently. |
Artikel |
Upperdogs Versus UnderdogsJudicial Review of Administrative Drug-Related Closures in the Netherlands |
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Eviction, War on drugs, Party capability, Empirical legal research, Drug policy |
Auteurs | Mr. Michelle Bruijn en Dr. Michel Vols |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In the Netherlands, mayors are entitled to close public and non-public premises if drug-related activities are being conducted there. Using data from the case law of Dutch lower courts, published between 2008 and 2016, this article examines the relative success of different types of litigants, and the influence of case characteristics on drug-related closure cases. We build on Galanter’s framework of ‘repeat players’ and ‘one-shotters’, to argue that a mayor is the stronger party and is therefore more likely to win in court. We categorise mayors as ‘upperdogs’, and the opposing litigants as ‘underdogs’. Moreover, we distinguish stronger mayors from weaker ones, based on the population size of their municipality. Similarly, we distinguish the stronger underdogs from the weaker ones. Businesses and organisations are classified as stronger parties, relative to individuals, who are classified as weaker parties. In line with our hypothesis, we find that mayors win in the vast majority of cases. However, contrary to our presumptions, we find that mayors have a significantly lower chance of winning a case if they litigate against weak underdogs. When controlling for particular case characteristics, such as the type of drugs and invoked defences, our findings offer evidence that case characteristics are consequential for the resolution of drug-related closure cases in the Netherlands. |