In 1932 the court room of the Juvenile Judge in Amsterdam was redesigned and this work was marked as 'spadework'. In 2021 in a joined project of law student and art students ‘Design of Justice’ a concept for a court room of the future is developed. Again 'spadework'? In this article the author reflects on this and other current developments in the field child-friendly justice in criminal youth cases. |
Zoekresultaat: 588 artikelen
Artikel |
‘Zittingzaal van den Kinderrechter’Pionierswerk in het jeugdstrafrecht |
Tijdschrift | PROCES, Aflevering 1-2 2021 |
Trefwoorden | juvenile judge, court room, childfriendly justice, youth detention, police station |
Auteurs | Mr. Coosje Peterse |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
Detentie als proces van beschavingVan abolitionisme naar herstel |
Tijdschrift | PROCES, Aflevering 1-2 2021 |
Trefwoorden | Abolitionism, restorative justice, prison system, Detention, community boards |
Auteurs | Dr. Gert Jan Slump, Veronique Aicha Achoui, Frans Douw e.a. |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In 1985 the Second International Congress on (Prison) Abolitionism took place. The organizers wanted to denounce the formalistic-legal approach to crime and revise the criminal pretensions. The aim was to develop a non-repressive process of conflict regulation. This contribution addresses the question of whether or to what extent the development of restorative justice in recent decades is an extension of the abolitionist perspective. Among other things, the developments in punishment and restorative detention and restorative justice in The Netherlands are discussed. It is concluded that restorative justice in a broad sense- and the introduction of small-scale, tailor-made detention are a realistic, at this time appropriate continuation of the efforts to find solutions for resolving conflicts outside criminal law. |
Artikel |
Van marxisme naar economisch strafrechtOver een persoonlijke, autobiografische band met een bijzonder rechtsgebied |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Bijzonder Strafrecht & Handhaving, Aflevering 1 2021 |
Trefwoorden | Economisch strafrecht, Karl Marx, scientific occupation with e. cr. law, professional occupation with e. cr. law, sanctions in e. cr. Law. |
Auteurs | Em. prof. mr. Th.A. de Roos |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
De auteur presenteert autobiografische bronnen van zijn speciale aandacht voor, en professionele toewijding aan het terrein van economisch strafrecht. Hij werd op dat spoor gezet door de werken van Karl Marx, maar uiteindelijk ontdekte hij dat Marx maar weinig te bieden had als het om het recht gaat. Niettemin bleef zijn fascinatie voor de relatie tussen economie en (straf)recht. De auteur behandelt enkele – tegenwoordig belangrijke en intrigerende – voorbeelden die die fascinatie kunnen rechtvaardigen. |
Werk in uitvoering |
Herstelrecht op het terrein van verkeersongevallen. |
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | restorative justice, motor vehicle accidents, victimology, personal injury settlement |
Auteurs | Iris Becx MSc |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Those involved in a motor vehicle accident often have emotional needs that are not being met within the current framework of personal injury settlement. These needs include sharing one’s (side of the) story, getting in touch with the other person(s) involved and offering or receiving apologies. Following Nils Christie’s theory of ‘stolen’ conflicts, the fact that the people involved are often represented by lawyers or insurance companies is problematic because it alienates them from each other and it thwarts proper recovery. Incorporating restorative justice could offer a solution to this ‘theft’ of conflict, as it focuses on bringing all involved together to restore any of the harm done by concentrating on their needs. The central question to this dissertation is: how can restorative justice play a role in the sustainable resolution of conflicts after motor vehicle accidents so that the current insurance and liability system can better meet the immaterial needs of victims and perpetrators? Via several projects, the role of lawyers and insurance companies is studied. How beneficial or adversarial are their influences on victims and offenders? And can they incorporate restorative justice in their practice? The first publication is expected at the end of this year. |
Redactioneel |
(Ruim) veertig jaar Recht der Werkelijkheid: verleden, heden en toekomst |
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Auteurs | Dr. Nienke Doornbos en Dr. Paulien de Winter |
Auteursinformatie |
Recent |
Gezien |
Tijdschrift | Advocatenblad, Aflevering 10 2020 |
Auteurs | Kees Pijnappels |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Boom Strafblad, Aflevering 6 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Innovaties, Slachtoffers, Strafdoelen, Georganiseerde misdaad, Effectiviteit |
Auteurs | Prof. dr. J.M. (Maurits) Barendrecht en M. (Maurits) Chabot |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In Het Papieren Paleis laten wij zien dat het strafrecht volgens de spelregels van de wetboeken vaak niet doet wat nodig is. De zoektocht naar betere manieren om de strafdoelen te bereiken is volop aan de gang. Hier een voorproefje van waar het volgens het boek heen gaat. |
Artikel |
Alsof slachtofferschap een verhaal is: de narratieve victimologie en haar grenzen |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift over Cultuur & Criminaliteit, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | victimology, narrative criminology, cultural criminology, Susan Brison, Hans Vaihinger |
Auteurs | Prof. dr. Antony Pemberton |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article adopts German philosopher Hans Vaihinger’s Philosophy of “as if” as a vehicle to sketch the main features of the emerging research domain of narrative victimology, as well as address some of its limitations. Vaihinger emphasizes the importance of useful untruths, i.e. things we know to be untrue, but nevertheless behave as if they are not, if that strengthens their use as instruments for us to find our way more easily in the world. This applies to our daily lives, but also to our societal institutions and the models and metaphors that underlie our approaches to (social) science. The paper argues that the narrative metaphor of the historical event is often more apt to enhance our understanding of victimological phenomena than that of the mechanism, which is the default metaphor of (social) science. The paper subsequently describes four areas of inquiry of narrative victimology: victimisation’s impact on (life) stories; narratives in the aftermath of victimization; narratives of victim’s experiences with justice processes and the coincidence and juxtaposition of the victims’ narrative with narratives of other significant parties. For all its merits however, the narrative metaphor is also a “useful untruth”, equipped with its own limitations, for instance the difficulty of language in describing first hand experiences of victims and the possibility that narrative structures will be imposed upon victim experiences. |
Praktijkberichten |
‘Eigenlijk doen we voortdurend aan intervisie met elkaar’Een dubbelinterview over landsgrensoverschrijdende zaken |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Herstelrecht, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Auteurs | Mieke Wouters |
Auteursinformatie |
Artikel |
Mediation in strafzaken: de werkstijl is de methodeReflecties op de praktijk |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Herstelrecht, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | strafzaken, mediation, mediatorprofiel, mediationproces, psychologische veiligheid |
Auteurs | Makiri Mual |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Since the beginning of 2020 mediation in penal cases (mediation in strafzaken) has officially become the preferred intervention for victim-offender mediation in the criminal procedure in the Netherlands. Although mediation in general has a sound theoretical framework, the methodological elaboration appears pluriform and somewhat limited. In practice mediators in penal cases operate conform their own personal and professional standards and preferences, apparently without tailor made methodology. This article describes the current methodological directions such as transformative or narrative mediation and seeks for useful references. As a part of restorative practice, mediation in penal cases seems to remain secluded from insights and methodology developed in the domain of restorative justice practices. Educational institutes providing trainings for mediators barely refer to this theoretical framework. Besides a methodological reconnaissance this article offers a fundamental comparison of mediation styles and interventions, but is above all an incentive to further methodological research and development. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Herstelrecht, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | institutioneel misbruik en geweld, responsmodellen, rooms-katholieke kerk, Centrum voor Arbitrage inzake seksueel misbruik, Permanente Arbitragekamer |
Auteurs | Ivo Aertsen en Martien Schotsmans |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this article, an analysis is made of two response models for different forms of abuse and violence that occurred in the past on children in institutional settings. Two programmes are compared, as they operated during last 10 years in Belgium: on the one hand the Centre of Arbitration for sexual abuse and violence in the Catholic Church at the national level, on the other hand the Commission for Recognition and Mediation for various types of abuse and violence in youth and educational institutions and other organisational contexts in the Flemish Community. Both models are analysed and compared at the conceptual and empirical level from a restorative justice approach, looking at the elements that may reveal a certain form of restorative justice and/or may contain lessons for the further development of restorative justice. The background and origins of both programmes are presented into detail, followed by a comparison with respect to the political options on the basis of their creation, the composition of their boards, their scope of application and their procedures. Some numbers and characteristics of cases dealt with are presented. |
Redactioneel |
Over methodieken in het herstelrecht |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Herstelrecht, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Auteurs | Annemieke Wolthuis en Ivo Aertsen |
Auteursinformatie |
Artikel |
Twintig jaar groei van herstelrechtelijke programma’sReflecties op basis van de tweede editie van het UNODC Handboek |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Herstelrecht, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | UNODC handbook, Restorative Justice programmes, Basic Principles, cases of serious crime, community |
Auteurs | Jee Aei Lee en Yvon Dandurand |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this contribution, the authors take stock of the many diverse restorative justice programs that have been implemented in many countries, worldwide, over the past twenty years, and that have involved a number of problems. They also discuss a number of new developments and areas of concern, including victim participation, the relationship with common law, cases of serious crime and the role of the community. The authors hope the new UNODC Handbook on Restorative Justice Programmes to be as successful as the previous edition in promoting new ways to apply restorative justice principles in criminal matters and helping practitioners benefit from each other’s experience. |
Discussie |
Welke toekomst voor herstelrecht in Brussel? |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Herstelrecht, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | CONRAD, participatief actieonderzoek, Brussel, radicalisering, Marokkaanse jongeren |
Auteurs | Ali Moustatine, Tom Flachet en Erik Claes |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article critically examines the prospects of restorative justice in Brussels from the perspective of urban youth work. The insights issue from action research on the topic of ‘radicalisation’. The authors develop two arguments. The first tempers restorative optimism. It shows how restorative interventions are not necessarily the most adequate response to tensions and conflicts in urban settings. The second argument points out that resistance from urban youth workers regarding the implementation of restorative interventions should not be seen as a regrettable obstacle for academics who are eager to experiment with these interventions. Such a resistance can lead to new insights and fresh opportunities to radically rethink Restorative Justice. One of the ideas that the article brings to the surface comes down to this. In a city like Brussels, characterised by superdiversity, and clearly marked by social inequalities, academic researchers only gain credibility in initiating restorative interventions if they undeniably denounce these inequalities and fully express their engagement for social justice. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Strafrecht, Aflevering 5 2020 |
Trefwoorden | jeugdstrafrecht, jeugdstrafprocesrecht, IVRK, rechtsbijstand, tenuitvoerlegging |
Auteurs | Mr. drs. M. (Marije) Jeltes |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In deze bijdrage worden de belangrijkste ontwikkelingen vanaf juni 2019 met betrekking tot het jeugdstraf(proces)recht uit de doeken gedaan. Zo worden de wijziging van het Wetboek van Strafvordering na implementatie van Richtlijn 2016/800/EU en de Wet USB besproken. Daarnaast zal inzicht worden gegeven in beleid over onder meer DNA-afname, verblijf in politiecellen en de reprimande. Ook een nieuw General Comment van het VN-Kinderrechtencomité en een mondiaal onderzoek naar vrijheidsbeneming komen aan de orde. Vervolgens worden wetsvoorstellen besproken, gevolgd door een korte reflectie op deze ontwikkelingen in het licht van het Internationale Verdrag inzake de Rechten van het Kind. |
Redactioneel |
|
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Herstelrecht, Aflevering 4 2020 |
Auteurs | Bas van Stokkom, Jacques Claessen en Ivo Aertsen |
Auteursinformatie |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Herstelrecht, Aflevering 4 2020 |
Trefwoorden | maximalistisch herstelrecht, subsidiariteitsbeginsel, elektronische thuisdetentie, taakstraf, schadevergoedingsmaatregel |
Auteurs | Jacques Claessen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article contains a plea for a further operationalization of the subsidiarity principle (penal law and punishment as ultimum remedium) through a maximalist restorative justice, i.e. a restorative justice that not only offers space for ‘voluntary processes’ and agreed restoration, but also for ‘compulsory procedures’ and imposed restoration. An attempt is made to make the maximalist arsenal of restorative sanctions as concrete as possible. Two examples of sanctions that are ‘constructed’ in a restorative way in this article, are restorative community service and restorative electronic home detention. This article is based on work by John Blad and Lode Walgrave that has previously appeared in Tijdschrift voor Herstelrecht. |
Artikel |
Is herstelrecht voor jeugdigen volwassen geworden? |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Herstelrecht, Aflevering 4 2020 |
Trefwoorden | jeugdstrafrecht, jeugdherstelrecht, binding, kinderrechten, herstelrechtelijk jeugdsanctierecht |
Auteurs | Annemieke Wolthuis |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The 20th anniversary of this journal is a good reason to glance back at developments with restorative justice for children and young people. Can we say that restorative youth justice has become mature? Some core events and articles about developments in Belgium, the Netherlands and elsewhere are discussed, paying attention to young suspects as well as victims. Subsequently, the embedding of restorative justice in youth laws is discussed. Finally, the article focuses on the question what should be done to improve the implementation into an effective, child friendly and ‘rights based’ youth sanction model. |
Artikel |
Constructieve vergelding revisitedDe grondslag van de straf vanuit herstelrechtelijk perspectief |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Herstelrecht, Aflevering 4 2020 |
Trefwoorden | constructieve vergelding, communicatie, retributivisme, strafverlangens, ervaren erkenning |
Auteurs | Renée Kool |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Is the concept of ‘retribution’ compatible with restorative justice? Starting from the perspective that retribution is an imperative given and that restorative justice should be a preferent option in coping with crime, the concept of retribution needs to be redesigned. Rethinking retribution needs to take into account the hypersensitive nature and complexity of modern society. Apparently incompatible interests need to be reconciled, paying tribute to the citizenship of both the victim and the perpetrator. Notwithstanding censure to be in place, implying the infliction of ‘pain’, the aim must lie in a reconstruction of civil relationships affirming the victim and the perpetrator to be part of the community. Standards applied must reflect objectivity, implying proportionate punishment, with a preference towards restorative justice because it is the more subsidiary option. Thus, retribution notwithstanding the imperative and painful nature of retribution, the execution should pursue the reconstruction of (civil) relationships. |
Artikel |
Welke samenleving in het herstelrecht?Uitdagingen voor burgerschap en samenlevingsopbouw |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Herstelrecht, Aflevering 4 2020 |
Trefwoorden | burgerschap, samenlevingsopbouw, samenleving als actor, Vreedzame Wijk, Eigen Kracht-conferentie |
Auteurs | Ivo Aertsen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article discusses the concepts of society and community involvement as they appeared in the articles of the Dutch-Flemish Tijdschrift voor Herstelrecht (Journal of Restorative Justice) during last 20 years. It shows how the journal from its very beginning adopted a strong focus on criminal justice reform, although restorative practices within the community occupied a considerable space in the consecutive volumes as well. Studies on restorative justice programmes in Belgium and The Netherlands, such as victim-offender mediation and family-group conferences, revealed a predominant orientation on interpersonal relationships stressing the role of the community of care. In the same sense, also community mediation and other community oriented restorative practices focus on the personal well-being of people and the improvement of personal and social relationships. Hence, both theory and practice face two important challenges in developing restorative justice: (1) which role to give to a larger community and how to operationalize its involvement, and (2) how to deal with underlying causes of crime and social-structural injustices? Referring to European action-research projects and to conceptual models developed outside Europe, a case is made for designing restorative justice methodologies and programmes involving civil society in a more encompassing way and linking micro to macro societal levels. Developing strategic alliances with new social movements could be the way forward. |