Long before the coming of the Bill of Rights in written Constitutions, the common law has had the greatest regard for the personal liberty of the individual. In order to safeguard that liberty, the remedy of habeas corpus was always available to persons deprived of their liberty unlawfully. This ancient writ has been incorporated into the modern Constitution as a fundamental right and enforceable as other rights protected by virtue of their entrenchment in those Constitutions. This article aims to bring together the various understanding of habeas corpus at common law and the principles governing the writ in common law jurisdictions. The discussion is approached through a twelve-point construct thus providing a brief conspectus of the subject matter, such that one could have a better understanding of the subject as applied in most common law jurisdictions. |
Zoekresultaat: 54 artikelen
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 2 2021 |
Trefwoorden | Habeas corpus, common law, detainee, Consitution, liberty |
Auteurs | Chuks Okpaluba en Anthony Nwafor |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Migration, EU migration law, time |
Auteurs | Gerrie Lodder |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
States apply different material conditions to attract or restrict residence of certain types of migrants. But states can also make use of time as an instrument to design more welcoming or more restrictive policies. States can apply faster application procedures for desired migrants. Furthermore, time can be used in a more favourable way to attract desired migrants in regard to duration of residence, access to a form of permanent residence and protection against loss of residence. This contribution makes an analysis of how time is used as an instrument in shaping migration policy by the European Union (EU) legislator in the context of making migration more or less attractive. This analysis shows that two groups are treated more favourably in regard to the use of time in several aspects: EU citizens and economic- and knowledge-related third-country nationals. However, when it comes to the acquisition of permanent residence after a certain period of time, the welcoming policy towards economic- and knowledge-related migrants is no longer obvious. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | PROCES, Aflevering 5 2020 |
Trefwoorden | reoffending, foreign detention, returning prisoners |
Auteurs | Matthias van Hall MSc en Laura Cleofa-van der Zwet MSW |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Worldwide, at least 1,900 Dutch prisoners are housed in foreign detention every year. Although previous research describes this group of prisoners and the conditions of their detention, it is unknown to what extent they reoffend after returning to the Netherlands. A unique dataset with data of 690 Dutch people has been used. They are supervised during their foreign detention by the International Office, part of the Dutch Probation Service. The results show that 23% of this group reoffended within two years. Furthermore, the probability of reoffending differs for the country of detention, age, way of return and prior incarcerations. |
Artikel |
Trials in absentia of foreign terrorist fighters in the Netherlands and Belgium |
Tijdschrift | Crimmigratie & Recht, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Trefwoorden | the right to be present, trials in absentia, foreign terrorist fighters, The Netherlands, Belgium |
Auteurs | Mr. Zoë Heij |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Judgements rendered in the accused’s absence form a special category of criminal judgements that undoubtedly do not provide for the same safeguards that would be in place when a judgement is rendered in the accused’s presence. Nonetheless, provided that strict conditions are adhered to, trials in absentia can be compatible with the accused’s right to be present. This article examines the standards that have been developed under international human rights law, providing for the normative framework, to see to what extent the trials in absentia of foreign terrorist fighters in the Netherlands and Belgium comply therewith. By pointing to analogies and contrasts, this article wishes to contribute to finding answers to this dilemma. |
Case Law |
2020/1 EELC’s review of the year 2019 |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Auteurs | Ruben Houweling, Daiva Petrylaitė, Peter Schöffmann e.a. |
Samenvatting |
Various of our academic board analysed employment law cases from last year. However, first, we start with some general remarks. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2019 |
Trefwoorden | Individualism, EU Citizenship, Depoliticisation, Mobile Individualism, Citizenship and Form of Life |
Auteurs | Aristel Skrbic |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The central aim of this article is to analyse the manner in which the legal structure of EU citizenship subjectifies Union citizens. I begin by explicating Alexander Somek’s account of individualism as a concept which captures EU citizenship and propose to update his analysis by coining the notion of mobile individualism. By looking at a range of CJEU’s case law on EU citizenship through the lens of the purely internal rule and the transnational character of EU citizenship, I suggest that movement sits at the core of EU citizenship. In order to adequately capture this unique structure of citizenship, we need a concept of individualism which takes movement rather than depoliticisation as its central object of analysis. I propose that the notion of mobile individualism can best capture the subjectivity of a model EU citizen, a citizen who is a-political due to being mobile. |
Law Review |
2019/1 EELC’s review of the year 2018 |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 1 2019 |
Auteurs | Ruben Houweling, Catherine Barnard, Filip Dorssemont e.a. |
Samenvatting |
For the second time, various of our academic board analysed employment law cases from last year. However, first, we start with some general remarks. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Family & Law, februari 2019 |
Auteurs | Sara Lembrechts LLM, Marieke Putters LLM, Kim Van Hoorde e.a. |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article examines the hearing of children in Belgian and Dutch courts in return proceedings following an international child abduction. The analysis is based on the experience, insights and needs of both children who have experienced an abduction by one of their parents, and family judges. In this sensitive and often highly conflicted family context, hearing children in court is not self-evident. Challenges of both a judicial-institutional and communicative-relational nature can hinder the effective implementation of children’s right to be heard. This contribution seeks to answer the question of how to better support judges and children in addressing these challenges, with the aim of enabling children to fully and effectively participate in return procedures. Building on the interviews with children and judges, supplemented with findings from Belgian and Dutch case law and international literature, three key recommendations are formulated: 1) explore and evaluate opportunities for judges and children to experience support during the return procedure, for example via the figure of the guardian ad litem; 2) invest in training and opportunities for specialisation of judges with a view to strengthen their expertise in taking the best interests of the child into account; and 3) systematically pay attention to feedback to the children involved on how the final decision about their return is made – and this before, during and after the procedure. |
Artikel |
Interventions in High-conflict Divorce Cases: The Parenting Examination |
Tijdschrift | Nederlands-Vlaams tijdschrift voor mediation en conflictmanagement, Aflevering 4 2018 |
Trefwoorden | Parenting examination, high-conflict divorce, child custody, child access, forensic expert |
Auteurs | Esther Kluwer en Cees van Leuven |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The Parenting examination (in Dutch: ouderschapsonderzoek) is a method that is used in high-conflict divorces in the Netherlands since 2008, whereby the court appoints a forensic expert who uses mediation and coaching techniques to support the parents to find a solution for their dispute. When parents fail to reach agreement, the forensic expert reports to the judge who can use this information to make a decision. This article discusses the results of two studies that have been conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of the Parenting examination in practice. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 4 2018 |
Trefwoorden | German maritime security, private armed security, privately contracted armed security personnel, anti-piracy-measures, state oversight |
Auteurs | Tim R. Salomon |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Germany reacted to the rise of piracy around the Horn of Africa not only by deploying its armed forces to the region, but also by overhauling the legal regime concerning private security providers. It introduced a dedicated licensing scheme mandatory for German maritime security providers and maritime security providers wishing to offer their services on German-flagged vessels. This legal reform resulted in a licensing system with detailed standards for the internal organisation of a security company and the execution of maritime security services. Content wise, the German law borrows broadly from internationally accepted standards. Despite deficits in state oversight and compliance control, the licensing scheme sets a high standard e.g. by mandating that a security team must consist of a minimum of four security guards. The lacking success of the scheme suggested by the low number of companies still holding a license may be due to the fact that ship-owners have traditionally been reluctant to travel high-risk areas under the German flag. Nevertheless, the German law is an example of a national regulation that has had some impact on the industry at large. |
Rulings |
ECJ 20 September 2018, case C-466/17 (Motter), Fixed-term work, other forms of discriminationChiara Motter – v – Provincia autonoma di Trento, Italian case |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 3 2018 |
Trefwoorden | Fixed-term work, Other forms of discrimination |
Samenvatting |
A system, as exists in Italy, that only-partially counts service under fixed-term contracts for the purpose of classifying staff in grades, is compatible with the Framework Agreement on fixed-term work, as there was an objective justification. |
Case Reports |
2018/33 Availability periods: working hours or rest periods? (PO) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 3 2018 |
Trefwoorden | Working time |
Auteurs | Dora Joana |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The Oporto Court of Appeal held that the employee’s availability 24 hours per day, 6 days per week, breaches the employee’s right to rest. However, such breach does not qualify the availability periods as overtime. The Court also found that the continuous use of a GPS system breached the employee’s right to privacy. |
Case Reports |
2018/22 What is a collective agreement? Part two (DK) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 3 2018 |
Trefwoorden | Collective agreements |
Auteurs | Christian K. Clasen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The Danish Supreme Court has upheld the decision from the Danish Eastern High Court (reported in EELC 2017/26) on the implementation of the Working Time Directive to the effect that an ‘intervention act’ can be deemed to be a collective agreement within the meaning of Article 18 of the Working Time Directive. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Crimmigratie & Recht, Aflevering 2 2018 |
Trefwoorden | article 1F, Refugee Convention, exclusion clauses, migrant smuggling, serious non-political crimes |
Auteurs | Anne Aagten LLL.M. |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In 2015, deadly incidents of migrant smuggling in the Mediterranean were daily covered by everyday newspapers. Empirical research has shown that migrants themselves may be involved in these smuggling operations. If they apply for refugee protection, they may be excluded from refugee status under Article 1F of the Refugee Convention. Article 1F(b) excludes asylum seekers from international protection if serious reasons exist to consider that they have committed serious non-political crimes. This contribution discusses whether migrant smuggling can be considered as such and whether various forms of participation in smuggling operations give rise to individual responsibility and trigger application of article 1F(b). |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Law and Method, oktober 2018 |
Trefwoorden | imagination, artefact, active learners, metaphors |
Auteurs | Maksymilian Del Mar |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This paper presents a basic model of the imagination and offers pedagogical resources and activities for educating three related abilities to imagine. The basic model is that to imagine is to combine the process of awareness, framing and distancing, and the process of, simultaneously actively participate, by doing things with and thanks to artefacts. Artefacts, in turn, are fabricated forms (here, forms of language) that signal their own artifice and invite us to do things with them, across a spectrum of sensory, kinetic, and affective abilities. Modelled in this way, imagination plays a crucial role in legal reasoning, and is exemplified by the following kinds of artefacts in legal discourse: fictions, metaphors, hypothetical scenarios and figuration. These artefacts and their related processes of imagination are vital to legal reasoning at many levels, including the level of the individual lawyer or judge, the level of interaction in courtrooms, and the level of legal language over time. The paper offers nine learning activities corresponding to educating three abilities in the legal context: 1) to take epistemic distance and participate; 2) to generate alternatives and possibilities; and 3) to construct mental imagery. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2018 |
Trefwoorden | Citizenship, Political Membership, Citizenship Rights |
Auteurs | Chiara Raucea |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This paper examines how the distribution of social goods within a political community relates to decisions on membership boundaries. The author challenges two renowned accounts of such a relation: firstly, Walzer’s account according to which decisions on membership boundaries necessarily precede decisions on distribution; secondly, Benhabib’s account, according to which membership boundaries can be called into question on the basis of universalist claims. Departing from both accounts, the author concludes that actual changes in the pool of participants in practices of creation and exchange of social goods pressure a political community to redefine its distributive patterns and, accordingly, the boundaries of its formal political membership. This claim will be supported by the analysis of threshold cases decided by the EU Court of Justice, in which EU citizenship is invoked with the atypical purpose of granting rights to a specific group of non-formal members. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 3 2017 |
Trefwoorden | same-sex marriage, gay marriage, European consensus, margin of appreciation, consensus-based analysis by the ECtHR |
Auteurs | Masuma Shahid |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This contribution assesses the consensus-based analysis and reasoning of the European Court of Human Rights in recent judgments concerning equal marriage rights and compares it to the Court’s past jurisprudence on European consensus and the margin of appreciation awarded to Member States regarding the issue of equal marriage rights. The contribution aims to analyse whether there is a parallel to be seen between the rapid global trend of legalisation of same-sex marriage and the development or evolution of the case law of the ECtHR on the same topic. Furthermore, it demonstrates that the Court’s consensus-based analysis is problematic for several reasons and provides possible alternative approaches to the balancing of the Court between, on the one hand, protecting rights of minorities (in this case same-sex couples invoking equal marriage rights) under the European Convention on Human Rights and, on the other hand, maintaining its credibility, authority and legitimacy towards Member States that might disapprove of the evolving case law in the context of same-sex relationships. It also offers insights as to the future of European consensus in the context of equal marriage rights and ends with some concluding remarks. |
Artikel |
Too much of a good thing: Alternative Dispute Resolution in Italy |
Tijdschrift | Nederlands-Vlaams tijdschrift voor mediation en conflictmanagement, Aflevering 4 2017 |
Trefwoorden | Case law, Italy, Negotiation, Consumer ADR |
Auteurs | Elisabetta Silvestri |
Auteursinformatie |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Law and Method, oktober 2017 |
Auteurs | Stefanus Hendrianto |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The nexus between religion and law is an important subject of comparative law. This paper, however, finds that the majority of comparative theorists rely on the immanent frame; that legal legitimacy can and should be separated from any objective truth or moral norm. But the fact of the matter is many constitutional systems were founded based on a complicated mixture between the transcendent and immanent frame. Whereas in the immanent frame, human actions are considered self-constituting, in the transcendent frame, human actions were judged in light of their correspondence to higher, divine laws and purposes. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Law and Method, september 2017 |
Auteurs | Arie-Jan Kwak |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Both H.L.A. Hart and John Searle repeatedly refer to games in their work on the concept of law and the construction of social reality respectively. We can argue that this is not a coincidence, Hart’s analysis of law as a system of primary and secondary rules bears close resemblances to Searle’s analysis of social reality as a system of regulative and constitutive rules and the comparison to games leads to interesting insights about the ontology of law and legal epistemology. The present article explores both the institutional theory of law that can be devised on the basis of the work of Hart and Searle, the method of analytical philosophy they employ and the particular consequences that can be deduced for legal research from the resulting legal theory. |