Zoekresultaat: 17 artikelen

x
De zoekresultaten worden gefilterd op:
Tijdschrift PROCES x Rubriek Article x
Artikel

Hoe kan sport bijdragen aan het re-integreren van delinquenten?

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 5 2020
Trefwoorden sport, delinquency, desistance, probation, prison
Auteurs Dr. Lianne Kleijer-Kool, Dr. Jacqueline Bosker en Mr. Moniek Zuurbier
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    The contribution of sport to reintegrating offenders receives limited attention, both in science and in the practice of probation and the prison system. From the perspective of desistance, this literature study concluded that sport can contribute to the development of individual capital, social capital and an alternative identity. However, the effect of sport is not necessarily positive. There are risks of negative influence or the reinforcement of problem behaviour. In counselling offenders, sport should be combined with other interventions to reduce recidivism. A personalized approach is required, based on the risk-need-responsivity model.


Dr. Lianne Kleijer-Kool
Dr. Lianne Kleijer-Kool is onderzoeker bij het lectoraat Werken in Justitieel Kader en hogeschoolhoofddocent bij het Instituut voor Veiligheid van Hogeschool Utrecht.

Dr. Jacqueline Bosker
Dr. Jacqueline Bosker is lector Werken in Justitieel Kader van Hogeschool Utrecht en lid van de redactie van PROCES.

Mr. Moniek Zuurbier
Mr. Moniek Zuurbier is onderzoeker bij het lectoraat Werken in Justitieel Kader en hogeschooldocent bij het Instituut voor Recht van Hogeschool Utrecht.
Artikel

Samenwerken in de forensische keten

De investering waard

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 3 2020
Trefwoorden samenwerken, forensische zorg, interprofessioneel, continuïteit van zorg, interprofessional collaboration, forensic mental health care, continuity mental care
Auteurs Dr. Vivienne de Vogel, Dr. Petra Schaftenaar en Drs. Ellen van den Broek
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Interprofessional collaboration in the treatment and supervision of clients in forensic mental health care is of great importance. However, collaboration between professionals within and between settings is not always easy. In this article, different forms of collaboration within the forensic mental health care system are described as well as the most important pitfalls and success factors. Finally, some recommendations are provided for practitioners, organizations and policy-makers to design and facilitate collaboration in forensic mental health care.


Dr. Vivienne de Vogel
Dr. Vivienne de Vogel is lector Werken in justitieel kader, Hogeschool Utrecht, en onderzoeker bij De Forensische Zorgspecialisten, Utrecht.

Dr. Petra Schaftenaar
Dr. Petra Schaftenaar is opleider en projectmanager in de forensische ggz en eigenaar van Metis Zorg.

Drs. Ellen van den Broek
Drs. Ellen van den Broek is gz-psycholoog, in opleiding tot specialist, en hoofd behandeling Van der Hoeven Kliniek, De Forensische Zorgspecialisten.
Artikel

Access_open Een complexe doelgroep en integraal samenwerken: hoe doe je dat?

Een cruciale mix van randvoorwaarden en competenties

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 3 2020
Trefwoorden multidisciplinary practice, multiproblems, integrated-personalized-approach, local government
Auteurs Lisette Bitter, Dr. Violaine Veen en Dr. Carmen Paalman
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Professionals from various organisations within Dutch local governments are working together in an integrated-personalized-approach in order to prevent disturbing and criminal behavior in multi problem young adults. The Startbaan study, which focused on the collaboration within such local integrated-approaches, shows that multidisciplinary collaboration is hard to reach because of the amount and versatility of organisations involved as well as the complexity of problems in multi problem young adults. Results from the Startbaan study combined with findings from literature show that a functional mix of organizational conditions and specific professional abilities is needed in order to work together successfully.


Lisette Bitter
Lisette Bitter is junior onderzoeker en projectcoördinator ‘Startbaan’ bij het lectoraat Kennisanalyse Sociale Veiligheid.

Dr. Violaine Veen
Dr. Violaine Veen is hogeschooldocent bij het Instituut voor Social Work en senior onderzoeker bij het lectoraat Kennisanalyse Sociale Veiligheid.

Dr. Carmen Paalman
Dr. Carmen Paalman is hogeschooldocent bij het Instituut voor Social Work, senior onderzoeker bij het lectoraat Kennisanalyse Sociale Veiligheid en projectleider ‘Startbaan’.
Artikel

Het opzettelijk groeimodel van het jeugdstrafrecht

Hoe jeugdigen de klos zijn van bewust onbekwame politici

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 6 2019
Trefwoorden Jeugdzorg, Jeugdbeleid, Jeugdstrafrecht, Onbekwame politici
Auteurs Prof. dr. René Clarijs
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    The Dutch youth policy limits itself to children who have or cause problems. Our Youth Law is even only related to youth care.
    The consequences are disastrous: the results are extremely poor, especially in comparison with other countries. Scandinavian and Eastern European countries have a comprehensive infrastructure to offer children a useful, relaxed and pleasant leisure time. The motto of these leisure time organisations is inclusion. They choose for dilution (some criminal or civil law children are placed together with normal children), while we organise compaction of the problems (we put them all together in one institution).
    The Netherlands prefers an unbalanced youth policy, where anything has been professionalized, whereby we look at children through worrying glasses. We do not see chances for development, but worrisome developments.
    Politicians do not want to be informed about a better solution. They are consciously incompetent. Criminal law should look at that situation.


Prof. dr. René Clarijs
Prof. dr. René Clarijs is hoogleraar aan de Universiteit Sint-Petersburg in Rusland, hoofdredacteur van Jeugdbeleid, auteur, en zelfstandig gevestigd beleidsadviseur.
Artikel

Aanstaande professionals in de veiligheidszorg: wat komt er op hen af en hoe maken we hen weerbaar?

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 4 2019
Trefwoorden Sociale professional, Weerbaarheid
Auteurs Mustapha Aoulad Hadj, Rob Straver en Prof. dr. Janine Janssen
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    In this exploratory contribution, the central question is what will happen to students when they leave school and start looking for a job in security care. Three developments are addressed in this context: firstly, there are organizational changes: the municipal level has become increasingly important; in the second place, the complexity of the casuistry with which professionals are confronted is highlighted, and in the third place attention is paid to undesirable behavior with which professionals may be confronted while performing their work. What do these aspects mean for the resilience of the upcoming professional and the preparation for working life during training?


Mustapha Aoulad Hadj
Mustapha Aoulad Hadj is vanaf 1999 als docent verbonden aan de opleiding Social Studies van Avans Hogeschool in Den Bosch en tevens lid van de kenniskring bij het lectoraat Veiligheid in Afhankelijkheidsrelaties. Vóór die tijd is hij werkzaam geweest als gezinsvoogd in regio Utrecht.

Rob Straver
Rob Straver is vanaf 2013 als docent verbonden aan de opleiding Social Studies van Avans Hogeschool in Den Bosch en tevens lid van de kenniskring bij het lectoraat Veiligheid in Afhankelijkheidsrelaties. Vóór die tijd is hij werkzaam geweest in de jeugdzorg als jeugdreclasseringswerker.

Prof. dr. Janine Janssen
Prof. dr. Janine Janssen is hoofd onderzoek van het Landelijk Expertise Centrum Eer Gerelateerd Geweld van de Nationale Politie, lector Veiligheid in Afhankelijkheidsrelaties aan Avans Hogeschool, bijzonder hoogleraar Rechtsantropologie aan de Open Universiteit en voorzitter van de redactie van PROCES.
Artikel

Access_open Vertrouwen in toezichtsactoren in uitgaansgebieden: een vergelijking tussen politie, portiers en cameratoezicht

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 2 2019
Trefwoorden vertrouwen, Toezicht, plural policing, Legitimiteit
Auteurs Dr. Janne van Doorn en Dr. Jelle Brands
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    While studies on trust in the police are numerous, this is much less the case for other policing actors. It is important to examine this in the light of the increasing number and diversification of policing actors and their legitimacy. Using a survey, 894 youngsters were asked to evaluate their trust in actors involved in the policing of urban nightlife areas: the police, door staff, and CCTV. Results showed that people tend to trust human actors of surveillance more compared to technological actors, however different (demographic and contextual) factors nuance this pattern.


Dr. Janne van Doorn
Dr. Janne van Doorn is universitair docent aan het Instituut voor Strafrecht & Criminologie van de Universiteit Leiden.

Dr. Jelle Brands
Dr. Jelle Brands is universitair docent aan het Instituut voor Strafrecht & Criminologie van de Universiteit Leiden.
Peer reviewed

Collectief leren van professionals zorg en strafrecht

Betekenisvol interdisciplinair samenwerken bij huiselijk geweld

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 4 2018
Trefwoorden collectief leren professionals, strafrecht en zorg, huiselijk geweld, Good Work
Auteurs Dr. Sietske Dijkstra
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    This article concerns an experiment involving three learning communities of professionals cooperating across institutional boundaries to address domestic violence cases in multiple complementary ways. Providers of social services interacted with law enforcement in a juridical context to achieve an integrated approach. This alliance indicates the potential for values-based Good Work based on safety, professional care, and compassionate treatment. Playing with time and capacity can be a strategy, and each professional can benefit from multiple viewpoints for recognising and anticipating patterns of domestic violence before it (re)occurs.
    A lack of funding has suspended embedding this Good Work, slowing progress toward achieving long-term goals and making this interdisciplinary approach to assuring sustainable safety unavailable to prevent repeated outbreaks of domestic violence.


Dr. Sietske Dijkstra
Dr. Sietske Dijkstra is als senior onderzoeker verbonden aan het KSI van de Hogeschool Utrecht en werkzaam als onderzoeker, adviseur en docent bij Bureau Dijkstra (www.sietske-dijkstra.nl). Zij dankt haar co-onderzoekers Lous Krechtig en Anneke Menger voor de samenwerking in dit project.
Artikel

ERM-Vroegsignalering opent de deur naar risicomanagementobservaties en dialoog met gedetineerden

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 1 2018
Trefwoorden Risicomanagement, Vroegsignalering, Agressiehantering, Incidentpreventie
Auteurs Dr. Frans Fluttert en Gunnar Eidhammer MSc
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Prison staff is exposed to aggression of prisoners which evokes work stress. In forensic psychiatry risk management principles, such as the Risk-Needs-Responsivity-model (RNR), assist staff to manage aggression by means applying risk management strategies. The Early Recognition Method (ERM) is such an evidence based strategy, developed and tested in forensic psychiatry. In ERM, staff gradually try to attune to aggressive behavior by means of the identification of early warning signs of aggression and systematically evaluated these in predetermined intervals. In this article it is explained and discussed how ERM could be applied meaningfully in prison services.


Dr. Frans Fluttert
Dr. Frans Fluttert is senior onderzoeker bij FPC Dr. S. van Mesdag, Associate Professor aan zowel de Molde University College in Noorwegen als de University of Southern Denmark, en Research Supervisor bij het Centre for Research and Education in Forensic Psychiatry, Oslo University Hospital, Noorwegen.

Gunnar Eidhammer MSc
Gunnar Eidhammer MSc is onderzoeker bij het Centre for Research and Education in Forensic Psychiatry, Oslo University Hospital in Noorwegen, en verpleegkundige en onderzoeker bij de Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Trust Vestre Viken Hospital, Drammen, Noorwegen.
Artikel

Veilige resocialisatie van zedendaders met inzet van vrijwilligers

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 6 2017
Trefwoorden COSA, Zedendelinquenten, Resocialisatie, Vrijwilligers
Auteurs Dr. Mechtild Höing en Audrey Alards
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Circles of Support and Accountability (COSA) is a method in which volunteers support and monitor a convicted sex offender during his or her re-entry into society in order to prevent new sex offences. COSA was developed in Canada in 1994 as a grass roots approach to an acute crisis in a small town near Toronto, and since then has spread throughout Canada. In 2002, the COSA model was introduced and further developed in England, and from there the approach found its way to the Netherlands, where circle projects are provided by the Dutch Probation Organization since 2010. Until now, more than one hundred sex offenders (‘core members’ in a circle) have participated in a circle in the Netherlands. Although the COSA model predates the Good Lives Model, it’s basic principles align very well to the Good Lives Model. In COSA, a group of three to five volunteers form a surrogate social network, that offers social inclusion, practical and moral support in all kinds of daily challenges the core member faces, and that monitors risk and risk behavior. The volunteers are supervised by a professional circle-coordinator and supported by professionals who are involved in the core members’ after care arrangements. The COSA intervention model describes a number of conditions and strategies that support its effectiveness. Canadian, American and English case-control studies into the effectiveness of COSA shows a substantial reduction of offending behavior in core members compared to controls. Since the international proliferation of the COSA model is ever increasing, protecting the program integrity is a growing concern, and stresses the need for international cooperation between COSA providers.


Dr. Mechtild Höing
Dr. Mechtild Höing is socioloog aan het Expertisecentrum Veiligheid van de Avans Hogeschool en projectleider en lid van de kenniskring lectoraat Veiligheid in afhankelijkheidsrelaties.

Audrey Alards
Audrey Alards is werkzaam bij Reclassering Nederland; als cirkelcoördinator is zij sinds 2009 werkzaam voor COSA.
Artikel

Hoe werkt vroegsignalering door lokale jongerenwerkers in de strijd tegen terrorisme?

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 4 2017
Trefwoorden Radicalisering, Gewelddadig extremisme, Jongerenwerker, Subjectieve oordeelsvorming
Auteurs Annemarie van de Weert MSc en Mr. dr. Quirine Eijkman
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    This article analyses whether the local youth worker can operate on the intersection of social welfare and signalling of extremism. Although it is a rare phenomenon, there is a clear message from the government to watch out for the first signs of deviant behavior and unacceptable behavior. However, shouldn’t we ask ourselves whether youth workers are adequately equipped at local level to signal threat? The qualitative results show that in daily practice there is a lack of clear standards which make terminology for social professionals not easily distinguished. In addition their opinion depends largely on their own intuition regarding the issues. This can create side effects which form a risk that the local terrorism policy does not have the intended effect.


Annemarie van de Weert MSc
Annemarie van de Weert MSc is onderzoeker Toegang tot het recht aan het Kenniscentrum Sociale Innovatie (KSI), Hogeschool Utrecht.

Mr. dr. Quirine Eijkman
Mr. dr. Quirine Eijkman is lector Toegang tot het recht aan het Kenniscentrum Sociale Innovatie (KSI), Hogeschool Utrecht.
Artikel

Nog niet effectief genoeg: het huisverbod in perspectief

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 3 2017
Trefwoorden huisverbod, huiselijk geweld, effectiviteit, integrale aanpak
Auteurs Drs. Katrien de Vaan
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    In 2009 the Dutch temporary restraining order Act came into being. The order is a much used instrument in the fight against domestic violence. However, it’s effectivity has yet to be proven beyond doubt. There are signs the order can be effective, but it is unknown what influences this effect: which choices in its implementation, which characteristics of violence and those involved, which characteristics of the care that is provided.
    This article claims that the temporary restraining order can be more effective if we collect more data on what it is that makes it effective, and use this data to mirror the order against other instruments that are available in the fight against domestic violence. In that way, we can choose the instrument that best suits the situation, instead of picking the temporary restraining order simply because it is most readily available. This means the following is necessary: 1) more knowledge about the types of situations in which the order can be most effective; 2) more knowledge about the effects of choices that are being made in the implementation of the instrument; 3) an overview of all available instruments for intervening in situations of serious and immediate threat of domestic violence and the effects that can be reached with those instruments; and 4) a better use of available knowledge about the effects of care and assistance to victims and perpetrators of domestic violence to improve the trajectories that accompany temporary restraining orders. This will enable a more balanced choice between these orders and other interventions and will improve the effects of the orders and the care and assistance that accompanies them.


Drs. Katrien de Vaan
Drs. K.B.M. de Vaan werkt als expert sociaal domein bij Regioplan. Zij is sinds de testfase van het huisverbod met onderzoek en advies betrokken bij de ontwikkeling daarvan, en schreef onder andere een handreiking voor de uitvoering en een advies over doorontwikkeling van het instrument.
Artikel

De reclassering en de lokale samenwerking

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 2 2017
Trefwoorden Reclassering, sociaal domein,, samenwerken in het sociaal domein, frontlinie werker
Auteurs Drs. Lous Krechtig en Drs. Mirjam Wildeboer
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Recently the Dutch probation is faced with changes in the local situation: new forms of cooperation and networks have emerged, due to the transformation of the social domain. The probation officers participate on different levels in these networks. They can no longer simply deliver their ‘products’, but have to ‘do what is necessary. A lot of decisions have to be made on the operational level.
    Examples of the changes are given. Recent research on cooperation in the social domain show that ‘cooperation’ is easier sad then done. These changes ask for a new set of competences.


Drs. Lous Krechtig
Drs. Lous Krechtig is senior ontwikkelaar en onderzoeker bij het lectoraat Werken in Justitieel Kader bij het Kenniscentrum Sociale Innovatie van de Hogeschool Utrecht.

Drs. Mirjam Wildeboer
Mirjam Wildeboer is kwaliteitsfunctionaris voor de regio zuid-west van Reclassering Nederland en neemt deel aan de Master Forensisch Sociale Professional.
Artikel

‘Buurt Bestuurt Niet’

Empirisch onderzoek naar burgerparticipatie in een Rotterdamse achterstandswijk

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 1 2017
Trefwoorden CLEAR-Model, security and safety management, CAPS, Rotterdam
Auteurs Marc Schuilenburg
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    In this article, I report on an ethnographic research project conducted in 2013-2015 in Rotterdam’s neighbourhood Hillesluis on ‘Community Governs’, a community-based program which goal is to solve neighbourhood crime and disorder problems. By making use of the CLEAR model, the article focuses on three factors of effective participation of citizens: ‘Enabled to’, ‘Asked to’, and ‘Responded to’. The results indicate that making residents of a deprived neighbourhood responsible for the governing of safety and security issues is extremely difficult. It also becomes clear that the participants don’t believe that their involvement is making a difference in the neighbourhood. An importantly explanation for this is that the participants are not provided enough information to make the right decisions about which safety problems need to be tackled.


Marc Schuilenburg
Marc Schuilenburg is universitair docent Strafrecht en Criminologie aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Artikel

Weerbaarder door reflectie

Ervaringen in PI Vught

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 6 2016
Trefwoorden Gevangenispersoneel, Werkstress, Weerbaarheid, Reflectie
Auteurs Marie-José Geenen, Frank Stolzenbach, Diana Tedeschi e.a.
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    This article discusses the importance of reflection for prison staff. Their work is both physical and emotionally incriminating. That increases risk on turnover, burn-out, psychosomatic diseases and negative experiences with prisoners. To render all challenges in their work it’s important to build up resiliency. One of the means to stimulate resilience is organized reflection. It is described how guided by experts, reflecting on own experiences can contribute to resilience of prison employees and strengthen their learning capacity. That is done by literature study and a description of experiences with organized reflection in PI Vught.


Marie-José Geenen
Marie-José Geenen is docent-onderzoeker aan de Hogeschool Utrecht.

Frank Stolzenbach
Frank Stolzenbach is supervisor bij de PI Vught.

Diana Tedeschi
Diana Tedeschi is supervisor bij de PI Vught.

Camiel van der Roest
Camiel van der Roest is supervisor bij de PI Vught.

Dr. Janine Jansen
Dr. Janine Jansen is lector Veiligheid in Afhankelijkheidsrelaties aan het Expertisecentrum Veiligheid van de Avans Hogeschool. Tevens is zij voorzitter van de redactie van PROCES.

Prof. dr. Emile Kolthoff
Prof. dr. Emile Kolthoff is lector Veiligheid, Openbare orde en Recht aan het Expertisecentrum Veiligheid van de Avans Hogeschool.
Artikel

Samen voor de jeugd: hoe wetenschap, onderwijs en praktijk samenwerken aan de preventie van seksueel misbruik in de residentiële jeugdzorg

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 5 2016
Trefwoorden Seksualiteit, Jeugdzorg, Preventie, Implementatie, co-creatie
Auteurs Drs. Michelle Wismans, Drs. Anne Boer, Dr. Mechtild Höing e.a.
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Young people in residential health care are experimenting with sexual behavior and sexual boundaries just like other young people do. But unlike youth in ‘normal’ circumstances, they often face an increased risk of becoming victims or perpetrators of sexual problematic behavior. Professionals often find it difficult to deal adequately with sexual behavior. The ‘Flag system’ is a method that helps them to assess sexual behavior adequately by applying six criteria, and rate satiation with four different ‘flags’ (green = normal behavior, yellow = risky behavior, red = mildly sexual abusive behavior, black = severely sexual abusive behavior). It provides guidelines to react in a way that supports normal behavior and addresses problematic behavior. A set of drawings illustrate situations that range from normal sexual behavior to severely abusive behavior, which can be used to discuss with young people or with colleagues. The original Flag system was developed by Sensoa, a Belgian experts center on sexuality. The original version was developed for use with children from 0 to 18, and therefore an adaptation was necessary to fit the needs of adolescents in residential youth care.
    In a 4-year project, a partnership of researchers, program developers and professional educators, all experts in sexual health, develops an adapted version of the Flag system. The project provided a theoretical underpinning for the method, and a conceptual framework of goals and activities for the training program that is mandatory for those who want to work with the Flag system in a professional context. Also, drawings and guidelines were adapted to the context of residential youth care. This version is currently piloted in twelve institutions for residential youth care. Also, schools for higher professional education in social work are involved in a number of project activities to enhance their training programs in order to improve knowledge, skills and comfort of future youth workers to discuss sexual matters with young people.


Drs. Michelle Wismans
Drs. Michelle Wismans is ontwikkelingspsycholoog aan het Expertisecentrum Veiligheid van de Avans Hogeschool en lid van de kenniskring lectoraat Veiligheid in Afhankelijkheidsrelaties.

Drs. Anne Boer
Drs. Anne Boer is sociaal geograaf aan het Expertisecentrum Veiligheid van de Avans Hogeschool en lid van de kenniskring lectoraat Veiligheid in Afhankelijkheidsrelaties.

Dr. Mechtild Höing
Dr. Mechtild Höing is socioloog aan het Expertisecentrum Veiligheid van de Avans Hogeschool en projectleider en lid van de kenniskring lectoraat Veiligheid in Afhankelijkheidsrelaties.

Drs. Remy Vink
Drs. Remy Vink is als socioloog werkzaam bij TNO en is onderzoeker Child Health.
Artikel

Sociaaleconomische ongelijkheid en het strafrecht: aanzet tot discussie

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 5 2015
Trefwoorden Ongelijkheid, Selectiviteit, sociaaleconomische status, strafrechtelijke beslissingen
Auteurs Dr. Gwen van Eijk
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Recent sociological research and socio-political debates about socioeconomic inequality and social divisions urge legal scholars, criminologists, policy makers and practitioners to have a renewed discussion about the role of socioeconomic status of suspects and offenders in judicial decisions. If social divisions in Dutch society are deepening, we need to look anew at the possibility that injustices of the social structure affect legal rights and decisions about prosecution, sentencing and probation. This article intends to offer various starting points for debate and research.


Dr. Gwen van Eijk
Dr. Gwen van Eijk is als universitair docent Criminologie verbonden aan het Instituut voor Strafrecht & Criminologie van de Universiteit Leiden.
Artikel

Recht doen aan alternatieve scenario’s

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 1 2015
Trefwoorden alternatieve scenario’s, Geloofwaardigheid, Aannemelijkheid
Auteurs Drs. Berber Lettinga
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    This article presents how criminal court handle with stories alternative to the accusative story. By analysing verdicts it is showed that reasonable doubt is not merely caused by the simple possibility of an alternative scenario. Under condition of sufficient evidence for conviction criminal courts will reject alternative stories which are without likely indications as well as unusual stories presented in an tardy stadium of law. Therefor it is important for participants in law to focus on the (lack of) support and the (im)plausiblity of alternative stories, instead of (requesting) infinite search for discriminative evidence in merely suggested stories.


Drs. Berber Lettinga
Drs. Berber Lettinga is specialist opsporing bij de Nationale Politie.
Interface Showing Amount
U kunt door de volledige tekst zoeken naar alle artikelen door uw zoekterm in het zoekveld in te vullen. Als u op de knop 'Zoek' heeft geklikt komt u op de zoekresultatenpagina met filters, die u helpen om snel bij het door u gezochte artikel te komen. Er zijn op dit moment twee filters: rubriek en jaar.