In a recent research study entitled Encountering ‘The Other’: Victim Offender Dialogue in Serious Crime the impact and outcomes for victims/survivors of meeting with the prisoner participants who had caused them harm were examined. In the vast majority of those cases, organised within the context of the Victim Offender Mediation Program (VOMP), forgiveness was offered by victims and received by offenders. This research, utilizing a qualitative multiple case study method, examined twenty-five randomly selected cases referred for victim/offender mediation over a 10-year period, in which victims/survivors, following a period of preparation, had participated in at least one day-long dialogue with their offenders facilitated by trained personnel. This article addresses only one of the research questions posited in this study, namely, the ways in which apology and forgiveness played a part in those dialogues and in the experience of the participants following their mutual encounters. It is argued that granting forgiveness can have great power in its effects when experienced by the participants. |
Artikel |
Vergeving en heel worden na afloop van zware geweldsdelicten |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Herstelrecht, Aflevering 3 2018 |
Trefwoorden | Vergeving, trauma, dialoog, verontschuldiging, vergelding |
Auteurs | David L. Gustafson |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
De gunfactor van herstelrechtClementie, compassie en de zorg om de dader |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Herstelrecht, Aflevering 3 2018 |
Trefwoorden | Clementie, Vergeving, recht doen, tweede kans |
Auteurs | Bas van Stokkom |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article discusses the willingness of the victim to judge the offender more mildly after the latter apologized for his wrongdoing and shows that he is involved in behavioral change. A large group of victims wants to help (young) perpetrators and offer them a second chance, even victims who have been treated violently. It is argued that these forms of compassion express a caring attitude, the wish that the offender will be rehabilitated and that a change in behaviour is more important than compensation. This attitude can also be referred to as ‘forbearance’, in terms that a less severe sanction is sufficient. This goodwill factor may well be the most important aspect of ‘doing justice’ in restorative meetings. |