The article analyses the jurisprudence of international tribunals on the education and housing of Roma and Travellers to understand whether positive obligations can change the hearts and minds of the majority and promote minority identities. Case law on education deals with integration rather than cultural specificities, while in the context of housing it accommodates minority needs. Positive obligations have achieved a higher level of compliance in the latter context by requiring majorities to tolerate the minority way of life in overwhelmingly segregated settings. Conversely, little seems to have changed in education, where legal and institutional reform, as well as a shift in both majority and minority attitudes, would be necessary to dismantle social distance and generate mutual trust. The interlocking factors of accessibility, judicial activism, European politics, expectations of political allegiance and community resources explain jurisprudential developments. The weak justiciability of minority rights, the lack of resources internal to the community and dual identities among the Eastern Roma impede legal claims for culture-specific accommodation in education. Conversely, the protection of minority identity and community ties is of paramount importance in the housing context, subsumed under the right to private and family life. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Roma, Travellers, positive obligations, segregation, culturally adequate accommodation |
Auteurs | Lilla Farkas en Theodoros Alexandridis |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 3 2017 |
Trefwoorden | access to justice, procedural law, courts, civil justice reform, comparative law |
Auteurs | Catherine Piché |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Canada has a complex system of courts that seek to serve Canadians in view of the traditional objectives of civil justice – principally accessibility, efficiency, fairness, efficacy, proportionality and equality. The Canadian court system is generally considered by its users to work well and to have legitimacy. Yet, researchers have found that ‘there is a tendency for people involved in a civil case to become disillusioned about the ability of the system to effect a fair and timely resolution to a civil justice problem’. This article will discuss the ways in which reforms of procedural law and civil justice have originated and continue to be made throughout Canada, both nationally and provincially, as well as the trends and influences in making these reforms. With hundreds of contemporary procedural reforms having been discussed, proposed and/or completed since the first days of Canadian colonisation on a national basis and in the Canadian provinces and territory, providing a detailed analysis will prove challenging. This article will nonetheless provide a review of civil justice and procedural reform issues in Canada, focusing principally, at the provincial level, on the systems of Ontario and Quebec. Importantly, I will seek to reconcile the increasing willingness to have an economically efficient civil justice and the increased power of judges in managing cases, with our court system’s invasion of ADR and its prioritisation of informal modes of adjudication. |
Artikel |
Waarom schakelen burgers (geen) rechtshulp in? |
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 1 2017 |
Trefwoorden | Legal advice / assistance, Acces to justice, Income level, Judicial autonomy, Cost-benefit analysis |
Auteurs | Dr. Marijke ter Voert en Dr. Carolien Klein Haarhuis |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article serves to gain insight in the use and non-use of various types of legal advice, particularly in relation to income levels and legal costs. Based on (logistic regression) analyses involving survey data on 1,928 Dutch citizens who experienced a non-trivial problem in the period May 2009 to May 2014, main findings are as follows: (1) 37% of citizens facing a (potential) legal problem contacted various types of legal advisers once or repeatedly. (2) In the explanation of use/non-use of advocates, problem characteristics turned out to matter significantly, in contrast with the level of household income. Entitlements to subsidized legal aid (lower income groups) as well as legal expenses insurance have made income a factor of less importance. (3) Looking at the degree in which citizens reported (high) costs being a reason for not using legal advice, again no significant differences were found between income groups. Especially advocates were deemed too expensive, regardless of household income; a reason for non-use in half of the cases in which advocates had been considered. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 3 2016 |
Trefwoorden | E-health, e-mental health, right to health, right to mental health |
Auteurs | Fatemeh Kokabisaghi, Iris Bakx en Blerta Zenelaj |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
People with mental illness usually experience higher rates of disability and mortality. Often, health care systems do not adequately respond to the burden of mental disorders worldwide. The number of health care providers dealing with mental health care is insufficient in many countries. Equal access to necessary health services should be granted to mentally ill people without any discrimination. E-mental health is expected to enhance the quality of care as well as accessibility, availability and affordability of services. This paper examines under what conditions e-mental health can contribute to realising the right to health by using the availability, accessibility, acceptability and quality (AAAQ) framework that is developed by the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Research shows e-mental health facilitates dissemination of information, remote consultation and patient monitoring and might increase access to mental health care. Furthermore, patient participation might increase, and stigma and discrimination might be reduced by the use of e-mental health. However, e-mental health might not increase the access to health care for everyone, such as the digitally illiterate or those who do not have access to the Internet. The affordability of this service, when it is not covered by insurance, can be a barrier to access to this service. In addition, not all e-mental health services are acceptable and of good quality. Policy makers should adopt new legal policies to respond to the present and future developments of modern technologies in health, as well as e-Mental health. To analyse the impact of e-mental health on the right to health, additional research is necessary. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Law and Method, april 2016 |
Auteurs | Ben C.J. van Velthoven |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Legal novices are generally not very well educated in the do’s and don’ts of empirical legal research. This article lays out the general principles and discusses the most important stumbling blocks on the way forward. The presentation starts at the formulation of a research question. Next, the methodology of descriptive research (operationalization and measurement, sampling and selection bias) is briefly addressed. The main part of the article discusses the methodology of explanatory research (causal inference, experimental and quasi-experimental research designs, statistical significance, effect size). Medical malpractice law is used as a central source of illustration. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 4 2015 |
Trefwoorden | Canada, small and simple matters, austerity, civil justice, access to justice |
Auteurs | Jonathan Silver en Trevor C.W. Farrow |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Canada is in the midst of an access to justice crisis. The rising costs and complexity of legal services in Canada have surpassed the need for these services. This article briefly explores some obstacles to civil justice as well as some of the court-based programmes and initiatives in place across Canada to address this growing access to justice gap. In particular, this article explains the Canadian civil justice system and canvasses the procedures and programmes in place to make the justice system more efficient and improve access to justice in small and simple matters. Although this article does look briefly at the impact of the global financial crisis on access to justice efforts in Canada, we do not provide empirical data of our own on this point. Further, we conclude that there is not enough existing data to draw correlations between austerity measures in response to the global crisis and the challenges facing Canadian civil justice. More evidence-based research would be helpful to understand current access to justice challenges and to make decisions on how best to move forward with meaningful innovation and policy reform. However, there is reason for optimism in Canada: innovative ideas and a national action plan provide reason to believe that the country can simplify, expedite, and increase access to civil justice in meaningful ways over the coming years. |
Artikel |
The legacy and current relevance of Cappelletti and the Florence project on access to justice |
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 3 2015 |
Trefwoorden | definition and dimensions access to justice, recommendations, historic context access to justice, current context access to justice |
Auteurs | Bernard Hubeau |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This contribution explains what access to justice can encompass and how the ideals about access to justice have developed in time. The way to do this is going back to the work of the famous scholars Cappelletti and Garth, who were responsible for a worldwide project on access to justice in the 1970s. Their main issue was to explain access to justice is more than the access to a judge and the organization of courts. Primarily, the system must be equally accessible to all, irrespective of social or economic status or other incapacity. But it also must lead to results that are individually and socially just and fair. Equal access and effective access are the central notions. Their work is put in perspective. The importance of their legacy and the question how we can get along with their work are stressed. Their definition is compared to a few other authoritative definitions. The waves in the history of access to justice are described and putting them in the current context illustrates why a fourth waved can be observed. The major question to be answered is how one can assess the challenges and obstacles of access to justice in the current context. Therefore, some recent dimensions and developments within access to justice are presented: the democratic dimension, the effectiveness of new social rights, the attention for poor and vulnerable people, further juridification, expanding frontiers of and monitoring access to justice, e-justice, and self-help. Finally, a few building blocks for reforms are presented. |
Artikel |
Tenant vs. owner: deriving access to justice from the right to housing |
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 3 2015 |
Trefwoorden | tenants’ rights, adequate housing, discrimination, effectiveness of law |
Auteurs | Nico Moons |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The right to adequate housing has since long been established in international and European human rights law and has been (constitutionally) incorporated into many domestic legal systems. This contribution focuses on the extent to which this fundamental right influences rental law and the horizontal relationship between tenant and landlord and how it contributes to the tenant’s access to justice. The right to housing certainly accounts for tenant’s rights, but since international and European human rights law evidently centres around state obligations, any possible impact on the position of tenants remains indirect. This is of course different on the national plane. In Belgium, the constitutional right to housing has been implemented through regional Housing Codes, complementing private law measures and creating additional protection to tenants. Nonetheless, many challenges still remain in increasing access to justice for tenants, both top-down and bottom-up: lack of knowledge and complexity of law, imbalance in power and dependency, discrimination, etc. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 1 2011 |
Auteurs | Carel Smith |
Auteursinformatie |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 4 2009 |
Auteurs | Kristin Henrard |
Auteursinformatie |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 4 2009 |
Auteurs | Siri Gloppen |
Auteursinformatie |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 4 2009 |
Auteurs | Jennifer Sellin |
Auteursinformatie |