International human rights law (IHRL) was established in the aftermath of the Second World War to prevent a reoccurrence of the atrocities committed in the name of fascism. Central to this aim was the recognition that out-groups are particularly vulnerable to rights violations committed by the in-group. Yet, it is increasingly apparent that out-groups are still subject to a wide range of rights violations, including those associated with mass atrocities. These rights violations are facilitated by the dehumanisation of the out-group by the in-group. Consequently, this article argues that the creation of IHRL treaties and corresponding monitoring mechanisms should be viewed as the first step towards protecting out-groups from human rights violations. By adopting the lens of dehumanisation, this article demonstrates that if IHRL is to achieve its purpose, IHRL monitoring mechanisms must recognise the connection between dehumanisation and rights violations and develop a positive State obligation to counter dehumanisation. The four treaties explored in this article, the European Convention on Human Rights, the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities and the International Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination, all establish positive State obligations to prevent hate speech and to foster tolerant societies. These obligations should, in theory, allow IHRL monitoring mechanisms to address dehumanisation. However, their interpretation of the positive State obligation to foster tolerant societies does not go far enough to counter unconscious dehumanisation and requires more detailed elaboration. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 3 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Dehumanisation, International Human Rights Law, Positive State obligations, Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities, International Convention on the Elimination of all forms of Racial Discrimination |
Auteurs | Stephanie Eleanor Berry |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
Over gewetensbeslissingen en het probleem van subjectiviteit bij rechterlijke oordeelsvorming |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Religie, Recht en Beleid, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | rechterlijke beslissing, Geweten, Subjectiviteit, Objectivering, Motivering |
Auteurs | Mr. dr. Tom van Malssen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article delineates the problem of judicial subjectivity in so-called ‘hard cases’. Decisions in such cases are essentially decisions of conscience, which in principle can escape the control mechanisms of objectivation and justification. This leads to the question as to the attributes of a good judge. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Law and Method, november 2019 |
Trefwoorden | case study, judicial opinions, empirical legal research, qualitative methods, research on judicial opinions |
Auteurs | Mateusz Stępień |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
There is a pressing need to develop a research methodology for studying judicial opinions that goes beyond both dogmatic analyzes and the established positions developed within philosophy of law and legal theory (e.g. the hermeneutic and argumentative approaches). One possible way is to adopt or modify methodologies developed within empirically oriented social sciences. Most social science textbooks devoted to methodology of empirical research deal with case studies. So far, this research framework developed within the social sciences has not been applied directly to judicial opinions, though they have been used for some empirical legal research studies. Even et first sight, case study research would appear to have potential for use with judicial opinions. The aim of the paper is to answer the question, how and to what extent can case study methodology developed within the social sciences be fruitfully used to examine judicial opinions? The general answer is undoubtedly positive (case studies can bring new, non-trivial threads to the research methodology on judicial opinions), though with many serious and far-reaching reservations. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 1 2019 |
Trefwoorden | international jurisdiction, English, court language, Belgium, business court |
Auteurs | Erik Peetermans en Philippe Lambrecht |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In establishing the Brussels International Business Court (BIBC), Belgium is following an international trend to attract international business disputes to English-speaking state courts. The BIBC will be an autonomous business court with the competence to settle, in English, disputes between companies throughout Belgium. This article focuses on the BIBC’s constitutionality, composition, competence, proceedings and funding, providing a brief analysis and critical assessment of each of these points. At the time of writing, the Belgian Federal Parliament has not yet definitively passed the Bill establishing the BIBC, meaning that amendments are still possible. |
Artikel |
Advisering door het EHRM in civiele zaken |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Civiele Rechtspleging, Aflevering 2 2019 |
Trefwoorden | 16e Protocol, EHRM, Hoge Raad, advies, prejudiciële vragen |
Auteurs | Johan Valk |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Vanaf 1 juni 2019 kan de Hoge Raad het EHRM in concrete zaken vragen om een (prejudicieel) advies uit te brengen. Wat betekent dit voor civiele zaken? Dit artikel biedt een overzicht. Aan de orde komen onder meer het adviesverzoek door de Hoge Raad, de procedure bij het EHRM en de procedure na advisering door het EHRM. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 3 2018 |
Trefwoorden | user generated content, public and private responsibilities, intermediary liability, hate speech and fake news, protection of fundamental rights |
Auteurs | Katharina Kaesling |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
These days, it appears to be common ground that what is illegal and punishable offline must also be treated as such in online formats. However, the enforcement of laws in the field of hate speech and fake news in social networks faces a number of challenges. Public policy makers increasingly rely on the regu-lation of user generated online content through private entities, i.e. through social networks as intermediaries. With this privat-ization of law enforcement, state actors hand the delicate bal-ancing of (fundamental) rights concerned off to private entities. Different strategies complementing traditional law enforcement mechanisms in Europe will be juxtaposed and analysed with particular regard to their respective incentive structures and consequential dangers for the exercise of fundamental rights. Propositions for a recommendable model honouring both pri-vate and public responsibilities will be presented. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 3 2017 |
Trefwoorden | same-sex marriage, gay marriage, European consensus, margin of appreciation, consensus-based analysis by the ECtHR |
Auteurs | Masuma Shahid |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This contribution assesses the consensus-based analysis and reasoning of the European Court of Human Rights in recent judgments concerning equal marriage rights and compares it to the Court’s past jurisprudence on European consensus and the margin of appreciation awarded to Member States regarding the issue of equal marriage rights. The contribution aims to analyse whether there is a parallel to be seen between the rapid global trend of legalisation of same-sex marriage and the development or evolution of the case law of the ECtHR on the same topic. Furthermore, it demonstrates that the Court’s consensus-based analysis is problematic for several reasons and provides possible alternative approaches to the balancing of the Court between, on the one hand, protecting rights of minorities (in this case same-sex couples invoking equal marriage rights) under the European Convention on Human Rights and, on the other hand, maintaining its credibility, authority and legitimacy towards Member States that might disapprove of the evolving case law in the context of same-sex relationships. It also offers insights as to the future of European consensus in the context of equal marriage rights and ends with some concluding remarks. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 3 2017 |
Trefwoorden | ECtHR, UNHRC, religious manifestations, religious minorities, empirical analysis |
Auteurs | Fabienne Bretscher |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Confronted with cases of restrictions of the right to manifest religious beliefs of new religious minorities formed by recent migration movements, the ECtHR and the UNHRC seem to opt for different interpretations and applications of this right, as recent conflicting decisions show. Based on an empirical legal analysis of the two bodies’ decisions on individual complaints, this article finds that these conflicting decisions are part of a broader divergence: While the UNHRC functions as a protector of new minorities against States’ undue interference in their right to manifest their religion, the ECtHR leaves it up to States how to deal with religious diversity brought by new minorities. In addition, a quantitative analysis of the relevant case law showed that the ECtHR is much less likely to find a violation of the right to freedom of religion in cases brought by new religious minorities as opposed to old religious minorities. Although this could be a hint towards double standards, a closer look at the examined case law reveals that the numerical differences can be explained by the ECtHR’s weaker protection of religious manifestations in the public as opposed to the private sphere. Yet, this rule has an important exception: Conscientious objection to military service. By examining the development of the relevant case law, this article shows that this exception bases on a recent alteration of jurisprudence by the ECtHR and that there are similar prospects for change regarding other religious manifestations in the public sphere. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2016 |
Trefwoorden | sub-state nationalism, referendums, sovereignty, deliberative democracy, Scottish referendum |
Auteurs | Stephen Tierney |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article uses the rise of referendum democracy to highlight the tenacity of modern nationalism in Western Europe. The proliferation of direct democracy around the world raises important questions about the health of representative democracy. The paper offers a theoretical re-evaluation of the role of the referendum, using the 2014 referendum on Scottish independence to challenge some of the traditional democratic criticisms of popular democracy. The final part of the paper addresses the specific application of referendums in the context of sub-state nationalism, addressing what might be called `the demos question'. This question was addressed by the Supreme Court in Canada in the Quebec Secession Reference but has also been brought to the fore by the Scottish reference and the unresolved issue of self-determination in Catalonia. |
Artikel |
Het nemo-teneturbeginsel en de verhouding met de Wet herziening strafbaarstelling faillissementsfraudeEen analyse naar de verhouding tussen het nemo-teneturbeginsel en nieuwe strafbaarstellingen van de meld- en inlichtingenplicht uit de Wet herziening strafbaarstelling faillissementsfraude |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Bijzonder Strafrecht & Handhaving, Aflevering 3 2016 |
Trefwoorden | Nemo-teneturbeginsel, faillissementsfraude, Wet herziening strafbaarstelling faillissementsfraude, meewerkverplichting, Artikel 6 EVRM |
Auteurs | E.M. van Gelder LLB en D.A.G. van Toor LLM BSc |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In dit artikel worden de nieuwe strafbaarstellingen uit de Wet herziening strafbaarstelling faillissementsfraude, inhoudende een inlichtingen- en administratieplicht, in het licht van het nemo-teneturbeginsel geanalyseerd. Deze strafbaarstellingen verplichten de failliet inlichtingen en administratie over te dragen aan de curator op straffe van een gevangenisstraf. De vraag is of deze strafbaarstellingen de Straatsburgse toets kunnen doorstaan. |
Artikel |
Een nieuwe Regeling beoordelingscommissie late zwangerschapsafbreking en levensbeëindiging bij pasgeborenenGoede inval of bedenkelijke manoeuvre? |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Gezondheidsrecht, Aflevering 6 2016 |
Trefwoorden | late zwangerschapsafbreking, levensbeëindiging pasgeborenen, beoordelingscommissie, meldingsprocedure |
Auteurs | Mr. dr. J.H.H.M. Dorscheidt |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In deze bijdrage wordt de nieuwe Regeling inzake late zwangerschapsafbreking (LZA) en levensbeëindiging bij pasgeborenen (LP) besproken en becommentarieerd. Daarbij wordt vooral nagegaan in hoeverre deze nieuwe Regeling eerder gesignaleerde knelpunten in de LZA/LP-praktijk daadwerkelijk kan verhelpen en hoe de keuze om de nieuwe beoordelingscommissie overwegend medisch in te kleuren past bij het te waarborgen belang van maatschappelijke zorgvuldigheid. |
This report discusses the interesting remarks and conclusions made by the speakers at the ERA seminar, ‘Recent Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights in Family Law Matters’, which took place in Strasbourg on 11-12 February 2016. The report starts with a brief discussion on the shifting notion of ‘family life’ in the case law of the ECtHR, then turns to best interests of the child in international child abduction cases, the Court’s recognition of LGBT rights and finally the spectrum of challenges regarding reproductive rights in the Court’s case law. The overarching general trend is that the Court is increasingly faced with issues concerning non-traditional forms of family and with issues caused by the internationalisation of families. How this is seen in the Court’s recent case law and how it effects the various areas of family law is discussed in this report. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Religie, Recht en Beleid, Aflevering 1 2016 |
Trefwoorden | dissenting opinions, Godsdienstvrijheid, margin of appreciation, EVRM |
Auteurs | Prof. dr. Sophie van Bijsterveld |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
What divides the ECtHR in religion cases? Study of dissenting opinions in religion cases of the ECtHR sheds a light on dividing lines within the ECtHR and deepens our understanding of the methods of reasoning of the ECtHR itself. Following an analysis of dissenting opinions in religion cases in the rulings of the Grand Chamber of the ECtHR, this article focuses on the Chamber. As in the previous analysis, a clear pattern in the dividing lines is brought to light. This article discusses and evaluates this finding. |
Artikel |
Het nemo-teneturbeginselRechtspraak van het Europese Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens en de Hoge Raad vergeleken |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Bijzonder Strafrecht & Handhaving, Aflevering 1 2016 |
Trefwoorden | nemo-teneturbeginsel, zwijgrecht, EHRM, Hoge Raad |
Auteurs | D.A.G. van Toor LLM BSc |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Het nemo-teneturbeginsel en het zwijgrecht zijn internationaal erkende onderdelen van het eerlijk-procesrecht. Deze rechten spelen een belangrijke rol in zaken waarin sfeercumulatie en/of -overgang bestaat van het bestuurs- en het strafrecht. Vaak gaat het dan om in een administratieve procedure verplicht afgelegde verklaring of overdragen document dat ook als bewijs voor een strafbaar feit in een strafzaak wordt gebruikt. De precieze betekenis van en afscheiding tussen het nemo-teneturbeginsel en het zwijgrecht wordt al jaren bediscussieerd. Daarom wordt in dit artikel de rechtspraak van het EHRM en de Hoge Raad met betrekking tot deze rechten vergelijken. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 4 2015 |
Trefwoorden | Israel, austerity, civil procedure, simplified procedures, small claims |
Auteurs | Ehud Brosh |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Israel was spared the worst of the world financial crisis of 2008-2009. However, austerity concerns are by no means invisible in the developments in the field of civil procedure. These concerns correlate heavily with the long-standing Israeli preoccupation with ‘speeding up’ justice. An array of simplified procedural tracks, aimed at addressing the perceived inadequacy of ‘standard’ procedure, have been developed in Israel over the years. The importance of simplified procedures in the Israeli system cannot be overestimated. Their development illustrates the dialectical tension between the values of ‘efficiency’ and ‘quality’ in the administration of justice. During periods of austerity, the scales are easily (or easier) tipped in favour of efficiency and general or particular simplification of procedure. In times of prosperity, on the other hand, concerns over ‘quality’, access to justice, and truth discovery predominate, and attempts at promoting efficiency and/or simplification at their expense tend to be bogged down. Such attempts also tend to lose their extrinsic legitimacy and are widely viewed as ‘cutting corners’. This is evident in the recent Israeli experience with civil procedure reform. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 4 2015 |
Trefwoorden | Belgium, small matters, simple matters, recovery of unchallenged claims, summary order for payment |
Auteurs | Stefaan Voet |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article is based on a national report that was written for the XVth World Congress of the International Association of Procedural Law that was held in Istanbul in May 2015 and that focused on Effective Judicial Relief and Remedies in an Age of Austerity. It first of all sketches the general judicial context in Belgium and some of its relevant features: the judicial organisation, the goals of the civil justice system, the course of an ordinary civil lawsuit, the role of the court, and the litigation costs. Next, a detailed and critical overview of the current and future procedures that offer relief in small and simple matters is given. The current summary order for payment procedure, which was introduced in 1967, did not meet its goals. The article concludes that a new trend is emerging in Belgium, namely keeping small and unchallenged claims outside the judiciary and providing for cheaper and more efficient alternatives. |
Artikel |
Een visie op de taak van de Hoge Raad in de 21e eeuw |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Civiele Rechtspleging, Aflevering 5 2015 |
Trefwoorden | kostenbeheersing, rechtsregels voor burgers, vereenvoudiging procesrecht, massaschadezaken, institutionele veranderingen |
Auteurs | Mr. drs. R.M. Hermans |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In deze bijdrage geeft de auteur vanuit zijn rol als cassatieadvocaat zijn visie op het functioneren van de Hoge Raad. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Religie, Recht en Beleid, Aflevering 3 2015 |
Trefwoorden | dissenting opinions, freedom of religion, margin of appreciation, ECHR |
Auteurs | Prof. dr. Sophie van Bijsterveld |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Religion cases of the European Court of Human Rights are much commented on. A systematic analysis of dissenting opinions in religion cases, however, does not exist. Such analysis can shed light on dividing lines within the ECtHR and deepen our understanding of the methods of reasoning of the ECtHR itself. This article contains analysis of dissenting opinions in the rulings of the Grand Chamber in religion cases. The analysis shows a pattern in the dividing lines. Contrary to the prior expectation, the margin of appreciation as such forms no such dividing line. The article discusses and evaluates the findings. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 1 2015 |
Auteurs | Adam Michał Dyrda |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
When discussing O. W. Holmes’s answer to the question What constitutes the law? Morton White underlines the fact that Holmes’s inquiry didn’t focus on developing the concept of law. White states: '…Holmes said little in The Path of the Law about the notion of legal authority, perhaps because he was interested not in what he called a "useless quintessence of all legal systems" but in "an accurate anatomy of one"'. Such ambition (or lack of ambition) is characteristic of many pragmatic enterprises in the field of jurisprudence. However, sometimes the opposition between legal pragmatism and other legal theories is built upon a reference to the notion of the 'nature' or 'essence' of law. Many legal philosophers who aim to reveal the very 'nature of law' (or 'the concept of law' as H. L. A. Hart did) try to interpret Holmes and other pragmatists as offering a competitive view to their own. I will follow White’s early intuition that such a construal of the controversy is simply wrong. Afterwards I will sketch a portrait of legal pragmatism in the context of White’s own inquiry and his version of 'holistic pragmatism'; thirdly, I will present in brief the main reasons for exploring the concept of law in the contemporary analytic philosophy of law. Then I will show that traditionally 'pragmatic' and 'analytic' efforts in legal theory are situated on different levels of generality and conceptuality. However, these efforts can be, at least to some extent, reordered under the aegis of holistic pragmatism. |
Artikel |
Grote diversiteit en enige rechtsgelijkheidJuridische samenlevingsvormen voor paren van gelijk geslacht in Europa |
Tijdschrift | Justitiële verkenningen, Aflevering 4 2015 |
Trefwoorden | family life, same-sex partners, registered partnership, cohabitation, non-discrimination |
Auteurs | Prof. mr. K. Waaldijk |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article gives a compact overview of developments in national and European law regarding same-sex partners. Over the last decades, new legal family formats (such as registered partnership and de facto union) have been made available in a growing number of countries. The number of countries that have opened up marriage to same-sex couples is also growing. Authors of comparative family law have proposed various classifications of the new legal family formats. Meanwhile, an increasing number of EU laws now acknowledge non-marital partners. The European Courts have been asked several times to rule on controversial differentiations between different legal family formats or between same-sex and different-sex partners. In the case law of the European Court of Human Rights one can find examples of affirmative eloquence which suggest that more steps towards full legal recognition of same-sex families could be expected. |