Zoekresultaat: 15 artikelen

De zoekresultaten worden gefilterd op:
Tijdschrift Nederlands-Vlaams tijdschrift voor mediation en conflictmanagement x Rubriek Artikel x

    Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) and Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) are on the rise in Europe and different Member States. In May 2013, the European Parliament and Council adopted an ADR Directive (n 2013/11) and ODR Regulation (n 524/2013) that will bring major changes in the European and national ADR landscapes. Both instruments are analyzed in this article. On the other hand, attention is also paid to the Belgian ODR-platform Belmed, that was created in 2011 and facilitates Belgian consumers to make an online ADR application. Finally, a plea is made for the exchange of data between ODR-platforms and national regulators, as a means to detect mass cases.

Stefaan Voet
Stefaan Voet is doctor-assistent aan de Faculteit Rechtsgeleerdheid aan de Universiteit Gent en advocaat bij de balie Brugge.

Quasivrijwillige mediation

Enkele kanttekeningen bij de Initiatiefwetsvoorstellen Mediation

Tijdschrift Nederlands-Vlaams tijdschrift voor mediation en conflictmanagement, Aflevering 2 2013
Trefwoorden mediation bills
Auteurs Annie de Roo en Rob Jagtenberg

    On 26 May 2013 Ard van der Steur, Netherlands MP for the liberal democrats, introduced a cluster of three mediation bills to secure the status of mediation as a sound alternative to traditional in-court adjudication in civil and administrative disputes. Although the starting point in these bills is that mediation should take place on a voluntary basis, there are some arrangements that may result in quasi compulsory mediation. One such arrangement is that the judge, on his own motion, may refer parties to mediation. Also parties have to proof that they first have attempted to settle their dispute through mediation and if not, why not.

Annie de Roo
Annie de Roo is verbonden aan de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam en is mediator.

Rob Jagtenberg
Rob Jagtenberg is docent aan de Erasmus Universiteit te Rotterdam en verricht aldaar vergelijkend onderzoek naar mediation en conflictmanagement in Europa. Tevens is hij redacteur van TMD.

Arbitrage in de Nederlandse bouwsector

Tijdschrift Nederlands-Vlaams tijdschrift voor mediation en conflictmanagement, Aflevering 2 2012
Trefwoorden arbitration law, arbitration act, Arbitration Board for the Building Industry, arbitration clause
Auteurs Monika Chao-Duivis

    This article contains a sketch of the use and organisation of arbitration in the Dutch construction industry. In Holland contractual issues in construction contracts are dealt with by arbitration in the vast majority of issues. There are several arbitration institutes of which the Arbitration Board for the Building Industry is the most important. This institute published (anonymously) over a 1000 judgments in 2011. The main issues of the Dutch arbitration act and of the new act are discussed in this article. The following important new developments are being described: the arbitration clause in general conditions in contracts with a consumer (the effectiveness of these clause will be severely limited in the new act); getting an arbitrational award annulled by the state judge (very difficult as it is) is limited since this will only be asked for in front of the appeal court and not (like the present situation) first in the district court and than in the appeal court; judgments do not have to contain a motivation any more if parties say they can do without (a dangerous development).

Monika Chao-Duivis
Prof. mr. dr. M.A.B. Chao-Duivis is directeur van het Instituut voor Bouwrecht, hoogleraar bouwrecht aan de TU Delft, arbiter bij de Raad van Arbitrage en raadsheer-plaatsvervanger bij het Hof Den Haag.

    Since 2001 Family Group Conferences are being organised in the Netherlands, and in Flanders since 2006. The Eigen Kracht Centrale, the Dutch forum organising Family Group Conferences, supported in 2011 research into the economic potential of Family Group Conferences, particularly in multi problem families. The results of the research are promising, meaning that Family Group Conferences may contribute to savings of costs for youth care.

Annie de Roo
Mr. dr. Annie de Roo is verbonden aan de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam en mediator.

    This contribution examines how the Directive 2008/52/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2008 on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters is transposed in various member states of the European Union, or how the discussion about the transposition is conducted or is still ongoing in some countries. The following seven countries are examined: Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxemburg, England, France, Germany and Austria.

Herman Verbist
Prof. dr. mr. Herman Verbist is gastprofessor aan de Universiteit Gent, advocaat bij de balies te Gent en te Brussel, voormalig adviseur bij het Internationaal Hof van Arbitrage van de ICC, erkend bemiddelaar en voormalig plaatsvervangend lid van de Bijzondere Commissie voor Burgerlijke en Handelszaken van de Federale Bemiddelingscommissie in België.

    On 21 May 2008 the European Directive on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters was adopted. The directive will have to be implemented in Dutch legislation before 21 May 2011. The objective of the Directive is to facilitate access to alternative dispute resolution and to promote the amicable settlement of disputes, by encouraging the use of mediation and by ensuring a balanced relationship between mediation and judicial proceedings (Article 1(1)). As a result of the arrival of the European Mediation Directive mediation the Netherlands will get a legal basis and thereby recognition. This article inter alia discusses the Mediation Directive from the NMI's perspective and discusses the articles from the Directive relevant to NMI step by step.

Esther Gathier
Mr. Esther Gathier is beleidsmedewerker bij het NMI.

De rechter als conflictmanager; een experiment uit de praktijk

Tijdschrift Nederlands-Vlaams tijdschrift voor mediation en conflictmanagement, Aflevering 2 2010
Trefwoorden conflictoplossing op maat, conflictdiagnose door de rechter, conflictdiagnose door de rechter, partijperspectief
Auteurs Machteld de Hoon

    Nowadays, court hearings play a central part in Dutch civil procedures. Until recently, little was known about how these hearings took place and how the parties involved experienced them. From the perspective of the parties involved, it is better if judges do not only resolve disputes legally, but also act as a conflictmanager. For this purpose, a method called ‘Conflictoplossing op maat’ (‘Customized conflict resolution’) was introduced by Machteld Pel (former director of The Netherlands court-connected mediation agency). In this paper I discuss the method as well as the results from an experiment in practice. In short, the results indicate that the method is, though not easy to implement, useful to improve the hearings of court procedures in disputes between civilians.

Machteld de Hoon
Machteld de Hoon is als universitair hoofddocent privaatrecht verbonden aan de Universiteit van Tilburg, in het bijzonder het onderzoeksinstituut TISCO. Daarnaast is ze rechter-plaatsvervanger bij de Rechtbank Den Bosch.

    The option of caucusing – i.e. one-on-one conversations between the mediator and one of the parties – is what makes mediation different from other types of conflict resolution. Both the view that all that is discussed in the caucus should remain confidential and the view that this should essentially be shared with the other party lead to suboptimal results. Economically inefficient outcomes caused by strategic actions by the parties can be avoided if the mediator communicates the information disclosed to him/her in the caucus to the other party in such a way (‘noisy translation’) that this other party cannot use this information to the disadvantage of the disclosing party.

M.A. Overman
M.A. Overman is advocaat te Rotterdam.

Zakelijk conflictmanagement in breed perspectief

Eisen en prikkels vanuit risicomanagement, kostenbeheersing, actualiteiten ADR/EDR en het juridisch kader

Tijdschrift Nederlands-Vlaams tijdschrift voor mediation en conflictmanagement, Aflevering 1 2010
Trefwoorden risk management, cost control, ADR/EDR, legal context
Auteurs Ellen van Beukering

    In this contribution an overview is given of the most recent developments with regard to commercial dispute management and its legal context, in particular in the Netherlands. Firstly, a focus is put on the importance of integral conflict management on the basis of ADR/EDR from the perspective of risk management and cost control. Secondly, recent developments with regard to effective dispute resolution, in particular in government policy, ADR/EDR and in the legal context are discussed. The judicial and the extrajudicial system offer conflict parties various possibilities to effective and efficient dispute resolution. Further, special attention is paid to mediation clauses in commercial contracts. With regard to the European Directive of 21 May 2008 on mediation in civil and commercial matters, Directive 2008/52/EC, its consequences to the Dutch legal system and its importance for commercial dispute resolution management are discussed.

Ellen van Beukering
Ellen van Beukering is docent, adviseur, auteur en redacteur van dit tijdschrift. E-mail: vanbeukering@gmail.com.

Deskundigenonderzoek in opdracht van de civiele rechter en conflictbemiddeling

Tijdschrift Nederlands-Vlaams tijdschrift voor mediation en conflictmanagement, Aflevering 04 2007
Trefwoorden Bemiddeling, Deskundigenonderzoek, Bindend advies, Deskundigenadvies, Mediation, Schikking, Benoeming deskundige, Rechtspraak, Conflictbemiddeling, Deskundigenbericht
Auteurs Groot, G. de

Groot, G. de

Vroegtijdige rechterlijke interventie? Een kwestie van afspreken en doen!

Tijdschrift Nederlands-Vlaams tijdschrift voor mediation en conflictmanagement, Aflevering 01 2006
Trefwoorden Tussenkomst, Mediation, Schikking, Comparitie van partijen, Dagvaarding, Aansprakelijkheid, Alternatieve geschille[...], Slachtoffer, Burgerlijke rechtsvord[...], Conclusie van antwoord
Auteurs Steenberghe, H.M.M.

Steenberghe, H.M.M.

Mediation naast rechtspraak: wederkerige verwijzing noodzakelijk

Tijdschrift Nederlands-Vlaams tijdschrift voor mediation en conflictmanagement, Aflevering 03 2004
Trefwoorden Mediation, Mediator, Rechtspraak, Vaststellingsovereenkomst, Schikking, Gerechtelijke procedure, Noodzakelijkheid, Bemiddeling, Dwingend recht, Procespartij
Auteurs Boelrijk, M.

Boelrijk, M.

De mediator in het nieuwe echtscheidingsrecht: nog onvoldoende basis, met Naschrift

Tijdschrift Nederlands-Vlaams tijdschrift voor mediation en conflictmanagement, Aflevering 02 2006
Trefwoorden Voorstel van wet, Mediation, Mediator, Bemiddelaar, Echtscheiding, Ouders, Ouderschap, Kind, Algemene maatregel van bestuur, Notaris
Auteurs Chin-A-Fat, B.E.S.

Chin-A-Fat, B.E.S.

Uw zakelijk conflict onder controle? Een korte beschouwing over waarom en hoe van integraal conflictmanagement naar aanleiding van twee recente boeken

Tijdschrift Nederlands-Vlaams tijdschrift voor mediation en conflictmanagement, Aflevering 02 2008
Trefwoorden Mediation, Gerechtelijke procedure, Contract, Arbitrage, Geschilbeslechting, E-business, Burgerlijke rechtsvordering, Schadevergoeding, Aansprakelijkheid, Juridisch adviseur
Auteurs Eijsbouts, A.J.A.J.

Eijsbouts, A.J.A.J.

Mediation: vertrouwelijkheid gegarandeerd?

De geheimhouding rond mediation bij burgerlijke geschillen

Tijdschrift Nederlands-Vlaams tijdschrift voor mediation en conflictmanagement, Aflevering 1 2009
Trefwoorden mediation, confidentiality, civil procedure, evidence
Auteurs Mr. Betty Santing-Wubs

    This article deals with confidentiality in mediation proceedings. Confidentiality is considered to be one of the key advantages of mediation. Usually the parties agree that they will not be compelled to produce evidence concerning the mediation, nor call the mediator as a witness in case of subsequent judicial proceedings. However, it is not sure how the court in civil judicial proceedings will handle such an agreement. The court will have to balance the interests of confidentiality and establishing the truth. In some cases it is clear that the court should not respect the confidentiality agreement, for example when there is an obligation to disclose evidence of a criminal offence. In other cases there might be proper grounds to let the confidentiality prevail, but there is no guarantee that the court will respect the confidentiality agreement. As part of the implementation of the European directive on mediation Member States are obliged to adopt provisions about admissibility of evidence in civil judicial proceedings in order to protect certain aspects of confidentiality of mediation proceedings.

Mr. Betty Santing-Wubs
Betty Santing-Wubs is universitair docent privaatrecht aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.
Interface Showing Amount
U kunt door de volledige tekst zoeken naar alle artikelen door uw zoekterm in het zoekveld in te vullen. Als u op de knop 'Zoek' heeft geklikt komt u op de zoekresultatenpagina met filters, die u helpen om snel bij het door u gezochte artikel te komen. Er zijn op dit moment twee filters: rubriek en jaar.