Two new rulings by the European Court of Human Rights confirm earlier jurisprudence regarding the ‘burqa ban’, as such ban is justified on the basis of the principle of ‘living together’. Still, two points stand out in these rulings that need discussion. The first is that this is an example of how the Court applies its new ‘qualitative, democracy-enhancing approach’ that pays more consideration to domestic decision-making in the field of human rights. These rulings show the flipside of this laudable endeavour, however, as the Court sees no reason to evaluate, let alone critically assess, the outcome of these domestic decision-making processes. Second, the remarkable ‘concurring opinion’ by the president of the ruling judges, in which he states in very stern wordings that the ruling should not be considered a cart blanche for burqa bans elsewhere. Given the elaborate considerations why such ban would not be admissible, it is surprising that the Court has failed to elaborate why the burqa bans in France and Belgium are admissible. |
Jurisprudentie |
De geest en de fles van de nieuwe EHRM-uitspraken inzake het Belgische boerkaverbod |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Religie, Recht en Beleid, Aflevering 2 2017 |
Trefwoorden | Boerkaverbod, EHRM, Mensenrechten, margin of appreciation, islam in Europa |
Auteurs | Prof. dr. mr. Maurits Berger |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Jurisprudentie |
Winstgevende commerciële activiteiten door kerkelijke en levensbeschouwelijke organisaties bedreiging voor ANBI-status? |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Religie, Recht en Beleid, Aflevering 1 2017 |
Trefwoorden | ANBI-regime, ANBI-status, commerciële activiteiten, individueel belang, financiële buffers, Scientology |
Auteurs | Mr. dr. Richard Steenvoorde |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In August 2016 the Dutch Supreme Court (Hoge Raad) ruled that Scientology could not be recognised as a civil society organisation that can benefit from tax exemptions for donations (the so called: ANBI-status). The majority of the activities of Scientology consist of courses of auditing and training at high rates with the purpose of creating large financial buffers for Scientology. The Supreme Court agrees with the Court of Appeal, which adopted a comparative method using commercial rates, that these specific activities do not serve the general interest, but serve the individual interest of Scientology. |
Jurisprudentie |
Het Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens en nationale integratiedebattenZwitserse verplichting tot gemengd zwemmen in het primair onderwijs geoorloofd |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Religie, Recht en Beleid, Aflevering 1 2017 |
Trefwoorden | vrijheid van godsdienst, Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens (EHRM), Integratie, Pluralism, Islam |
Auteurs | Prof. dr. Sophie van Bijsterveld |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In a unanimous decision, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has accepted the refusal of an exemption of compulsory mixed swimming lessons for elementary school girls in Switzerland. The exemption was requested by the parents of the two girls as the requirement to let their daughters participate in those lessons was contrary to their religious conviction. The author discusses the decision in the light of national debates on integration and subscribes its outcome. Specific attention is paid to the ECtHR’s interpretation of the legitimacy of the aim of the Swiss authorities and the role of the numerical presence of Islam in the underlying Swiss court’s ruling which is upheld by ECtHR. |