In 2008, Ruud Lubbers led a mediation process to resolve the conflicts which had arisen between two Dutch campaigning organisations, various Indian non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and labour unions, two Dutch internet providers, an Indian clothing producer and a Dutch jeans brand. The mediation took place at the request of the disagreeing parties and the Dutch and Indian governments. The conflict related to corporate social responsibility (CSR) standards followed by the textile companies.In this contribution the effects of campaigning and litigating in issues concerning CSR will be examined. Limiting the analysis to CSR conflicts in the textile industry, the author will reflect on these new types of international conflicts in a globalising world and will share her view on appropriate ways to avoid them or, ultimately, to (re)mediate them if necessary.This contribution informs the reader about the events in India and the Netherlands which led to the escalation of the conflict. It provides an overview of the conflict resolution procedures and elaborates on the outcome of the ‘Lubbers Mediation’. The applicable legal and soft law labour standards are compared as well as the parties’ communication strategies. Lastly, this case is contrasted with other CSR conflicts in the textile industry, revealing a hidden conflict. |
Zoekresultaat: 3 artikelen
Jaar 2009 xArtikel |
Reconsidering Conflicts over Land in the Sahel as Conflicts over Power |
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 03 2009 |
Auteurs | Karin Nijenhuis |
Auteursinformatie |
Artikel |
Case study: the international CSR conflict and mediationSupply-chain responsibility: western customers and the Indian textile industry |
Tijdschrift | Nederlands-Vlaams tijdschrift voor mediation en conflictmanagement, Aflevering 2 2009 |
Trefwoorden | corporate social responsibility, international CSR conflicts, supply-chain responsibility, CSR |
Auteurs | Tineke Lambooy |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2009 |
Trefwoorden | normative positivism, historic injustice, restitution of property rights, citation of foreign law, methodology debate |
Auteurs | Kees Quist en Wouter Veraart |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This interview with Jeremy Waldron covers three topics. Firstly, we dealt with the methodology debate, that is, the discussion about how to proceed in analyzing the nature of law. Does the question ‘What is law?’ require a descriptive analysis of the concept of law or, rather, a normative exercise in political philosophy? Secondly, we spoke about the role of law in response to historic injustice, especially in relation to the restitution of property rights. On this topic Waldron vindicates the ‘supersession-thesis’, the idea that, due to changed circumstances and the passage of time, historic injustices become superseded. The third section of the interview is devoted to Waldron’s perspective on the citation of foreign law by national judges. |