Zoekresultaat: 11 artikelen

x
De zoekresultaten worden gefilterd op:
Tijdschrift PROCES x Jaar 2016 x
Artikel

Wetenschap, politiepraktijk en kennistransfer

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 5 2016
Trefwoorden Strategische onderzoeksagenda politie, Wetenschap, Kennistransfer, Politiepraktijk, Politieonderwijs
Auteurs Drs. Henk Huisjes
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    This article discusses relations between social science, education, and professional practice, and focuses on the impact of scientific research on police profession. The importance of knowledge transfer is clearly articulated in the strategic research agenda of the Dutch police. Police researchers are expected not only to do proper and relevant practice oriented research on aspects of security and policing, but also to contribute to the impact of scientific knowledge on the education of (future) professionals. This asks for an association with teachers, since they are in a key position regarding further knowledge transfer. Compelling examples of other sectors, like healthcare, may inspire the police to rethink key roles of teachers in that respect.


Drs. Henk Huisjes
Drs. Henk Huisjes MSM is bijzonder lector kennistransfer aan de Politieacademie.
Artikel

Roma en exemplarisch handelingsonderzoek

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 5 2016
Trefwoorden Handelingsonderzoek, Roma, Multiprobleemgezinnen, Beroepspraktijk, Hoger onderwijs
Auteurs Sjaak Khonraad
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Since ages Roma people, in a formal context often described as multi problem families from Roma origin, constitute a large minority in Europe, about 8 to 12 million people. For that reason alone they are an important subject of scientific research. Research, which according to critics, often suffers from unilateral thinking, simplification, speculation and generalization. However, the fact that scientific insights rarely find their way to or are used by professionals working with and for Roma people, is a serious omission which unfortunately is not only characteristic for this specific subject. In this case what we see is a Chinese Wall between theory on practice and theory in practice.
    In my belief, and also according to my experience, a way exists in which this wall can be torn down. There’s a method available in which theory and practice do not exist next to each other but take each other into account and strengthen each other. This paper presents an account of (exemplary) action research which started early 2012 and is still ongoing. It is a methodological reflection on a process which a team of professionals working with and for Roma people went through and which is based mainly on the thesis Handelingsonderzoek als exemplarisch leren (1987) by the late Harrie Coenen.
    First, the background and immediate cause of this research project are described. Followed by a short summary of principles, goals and characteristics of exemplary action research and a summary of the research process. Conclusively, I argue why this type of research is especially interesting for professional practice and consequently for Higher Vocational Education/Universities of Applied Sciences.


Sjaak Khonraad
Sjaak Khonraad is lector Integrale Veiligheid aan het Expertisecentrum Veiligheid van de Avans Hogeschool.
Artikel

Werkplaatsen ZSM: samenwerken bij betekenisvol sanctioneren

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 4 2016
Trefwoorden Zorgvuldig Selectief Maatwerk (Tailor-made, selective sanctioning), Betekenisvol sanctioneren (Meaningful sanctioning), Kernexpertise reclassering (Key-expertise of probation), Toekomstbestendige professionals (Sustainable professionals)
Auteurs Drs. Anneke Menger en Drs. Lous Krechtig
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    In the Netherlands two experiments are conducted with a new kind of collaboration between probation and prosecution. The experiments aimed for the development of meaningful, contextual and tailor-made sanctioning. As a result, the experiments reached a new group of citizens that probation nor social services ever reached before, people who commit very light offenses, but struggle with heavy social problems. The new method of working resembles short intensive case management (hit and run) and includes commitment of social context and close collaboration with social work and care. Based on the results, probation and prosecution decided to implement this method in all Dutch regions and the Ministry of Safety and Justice adapted their financing structure.


Drs. Anneke Menger
Drs. Anneke Menger is lector Werken in Justitieel Kader bij het Kenniscentrum Sociale Innovatie van de Hogeschool Utrecht.

Drs. Lous Krechtig
Drs. Lous Krechtig is senior ontwikkelaar en onderzoeker bij het lectoraat Werken in Justitieel Kader bij het Kenniscentrum Sociale Innovatie van de Hogeschool Utrecht.
Artikel

Een systematische literatuurreview naar de gevolgen van een slachtofferverklaring voor de straftoemeting

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 4 2016
Trefwoorden Spreekrecht, Slachtoffer, Slachtofferrechten, systematische literatuurreview, Straftoemeting
Auteurs Giulia De Groot en Mr. dr. Sigrid Van Wingerden
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    On July 1st 2016 a law entered into force that gives the victim or survivors of serious crimes the right to speak unrestrictedly in court. Where the victim or survivors used to be only permitted to make a statement on the consequences of the crime for them, the recent amendment of the law permits them to speak about the evidence, the legal qualification of the crime, the culpability of the offender and the appropriate punishment as well. Discussions on the introduction or extension of the victim’s right to speak mainly focused on the consequences of victim statements on the procedural consequences and on the consequences for the victim. Little attention is paid to the consequences for the offender. This article reports the findings of a systematic literature review on the relation between a victim statement and the imposed punishment. The findings from the American studies show that a victim statement aggravates sentencing outcomes. How desirable is that? For answering that question, more research is needed, which the legislator has not wanted to wait for.


Giulia De Groot
Giulia de Groot studeert rechten en criminologie aan de Universiteit Leiden.

Mr. dr. Sigrid Van Wingerden
Mr. dr. Sigrid van Wingerden is als universitair docent Criminologie verbonden aan het Instituut voor Strafrecht & Criminologie van de Universiteit Leiden. Zij is tevens voorzitter van de redactie van PROCES.
Artikel

De celdeur voor levenslang gestraften op een kier na de uitspraak op Brinkstraat nummer 4?

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 3 2016
Trefwoorden Levenslange gevangenisstraf, EVRM, prospect of release, EHRM
Auteurs Mr. Jeroen Koster
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    This article deals with the topic of the life imprisonment in the Netherlands. The court Noord-Nederland judged that life imprisonment in the Netherlands doesn’t meet the criteria of the ECtHR, especially the ‘prospect of release of life prisoners. In this article I place the court’s decision in a context of national law and case-law (national, and international). In my opinion, there is still a prospect of release, because of the many independent judicial bodies and procedures that are involved to the decision to grant (or not) a pardon and the new developments in the penitentiary law.


Mr. Jeroen Koster
Mr. Jeroen Koster is strafrechtjurist en op dit moment juridisch adviseur bij BinBang in Utrecht.
Artikel

Rechters en officieren van justitie willen maatwerk leveren met de voorwaardelijke straf

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 2 2016
Trefwoorden voorwaardelijke straf, Recidive, speciale preventie, Resocialisatie
Auteurs Dr. Joke Harte, Mr. dr. Marijke Malsch, Mr. drs. Doris van Dijk e.a.
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    In the Netherlands, the judge has the possibility to impose an entirely or partly suspended sentence. In this article, the perspective of judges and public prosecutors on the deterrent effect of the suspended sentence is investigated. For that purpose, 1000 court decisions were examined, and 15 judges and 15 public prosecutors were interviewed. The results show that the suspended sentence provides opportunities to intervene in the offender’s life regarding issues that are supposed to be related to recidivism. Judges and public prosecutors regard the suspended sentence as an important device to reduce the recidivism risk.


Dr. Joke Harte
Dr. Joke Harte is universitair hoofddocent bij de afdeling Strafrecht & Criminologie van de faculteit Rechtsgeleerdheid van de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, senior onderzoeker bij het NSCR en redactielid van PROCES.

Mr. dr. Marijke Malsch
Mr. dr. Marijke Malsch is senior onderzoeker bij het NSCR en rechter-plaatsvervanger bij de Rechtbank Noord-Holland en raadsheer-plaatsvervanger in het Hof Den Bosch.

Mr. drs. Doris van Dijk
Mr. drs. Doris van Dijk was ten tijde van het onderzoek als junior onderzoeker werkzaam bij het NSCR.

Bas Vergouw MSc
Bas Vergouw MSc was ten tijde van het onderzoek als junior onderzoeker werkzaam bij het NSCR.

Prof. dr. Peter van der Laan
Prof. dr. Peter van der Laan is senior onderzoeker bij het NSCR en bijzonder hoogleraar Reclassering aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Artikel

De rol van de strafrechter: van waarheidsvinder naar regisseur van de proceslogistiek

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 1 2016
Trefwoorden moderniseringstraject / modernisation project, strafvordering / Code of Criminal Procedure, strafrechter / criminal judge, waarheidsvinding / truth finding, rechtsbescherming / legal protection
Auteurs mr. drs. Egge Luining
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    The current legislative project aiming to modernise the Dutch Code of Criminal Procedure will have far reaching consequences for how criminal law is organised and therefore has implications for the criminal law practice. A large implication is the changing role of the criminal judge. As the judge traditionally has an important role to play with regard to truth finding and legal protection, this raises the question what the legislative project means for this role and whether complete and balanced truth finding and legal protection are sufficiently guaranteed. This article provides answer to this question and offers some recommendations.


mr. drs. Egge Luining
Mr. drs. Egge Luining is wetenschappelijk docent Strafrecht aan de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.

Dr. Jaap A. van Vliet
Dr. Jaap A. van Vliet is zelfstandig gevestigd adviseur en onderzoeker. Hij is tevens redactielid van PROCES.
Artikel

Opmerkingen bij de voorgenomen herziening van het stelsel geweldsaanwending politieambtenaren

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 1 2016
Trefwoorden geweld door politieambtenaren, Strafbaarstelling, strafuitsluitingsgrond, Rechtspositie
Auteurs Prof. mr. dr. Jeroen Ten Voorde
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    In a recent letter to parliament, the Dutch minister of Security and Justice announced a revision of the regulations concerning the use of force by members of the Dutch police. The police had requested such a revision, because they believe that the current regulations are not up-to-date and lead to an unacceptable criminalization of officers who have used force while on duty. The changes announced in the letter are the introduction of a new criminal offence, the introduction of a new defense type (specifically for police officers) and various changes in procedural law. This article critically examines several of these changes.


Prof. mr. dr. Jeroen Ten Voorde
Prof. mr. dr. Jeroen ten Voorde is universitair hoofddocent Straf(proces)recht aan de Universiteit Leiden en bijzonder hoogleraar Strafrechtsfilosofie (leerstoel Leo Polak) aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. Hij is tevens redactielid van PROCES.
Interface Showing Amount
U kunt door de volledige tekst zoeken naar alle artikelen door uw zoekterm in het zoekveld in te vullen. Als u op de knop 'Zoek' heeft geklikt komt u op de zoekresultatenpagina met filters, die u helpen om snel bij het door u gezochte artikel te komen. Er zijn op dit moment twee filters: rubriek en jaar.