Zoekresultaat: 11 artikelen

x
De zoekresultaten worden gefilterd op:
Tijdschrift PROCES x Jaar 2014 x

Prof. mr. dr. Jeroen ten Voorde
Prof. mr. dr. Jeroen ten Voorde is universitair hoofddocent Straf(proces)recht aan de Universiteit Leiden en bijzonder hoogleraar Strafrechtsfilosofie, leerstoel Leo Polak, aan de Rijksuniversiteit Groningen. Hij is tevens rechter-plaatsvervanger bij de Rechtbank Noord-Holland en redactielid van PROCES.
Artikel

Zwijgen is zilver, spreken is goud. De weigerende observandus en de voorgestelde wijziging van artikel 37a Sr

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 5 2014
Trefwoorden TBS, weigerende observandus, gedragsdeskundige rapportage, medische dossiers, wetsvoorstel forensische zorg
Auteurs Mr. Martine Valk
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    When a person commits a severe crime in the Netherlands, for which he cannot be (fully) held responsible because of a mental disorder, a judge may impose a hospital order in a secured psychiatric institution. To make this possible, behavioural experts have to assess whether the suspect suffered from a mental disorder at the time of the crime. However, during this assessment a suspect has the right to remain silent. Since recent years the number of non-cooperating suspects is increasing. To solve this problem, the Secretary of State of Security and Justice has submitted a legislative proposal, which makes it possible to force health professionals to submit past medical records of the suspect to the behavioural experts for their assessment without his consent. This breaches the professional law of confidentiality. Following case law of the European Court of Human Rights, this can only be justified, if it complies with the principles of proportionality, subsidiarity and necessity. The legislative proposal does not comply with these principles, as alternatives are available. These are: improvement of the forensic psychiatric care, reduction of the duration of the treatment and extension of the behavioral research period.


Mr. Martine Valk
Mr. Martine Valk is junior onderzoeker aan het VU medisch centrum, afdeling Metamedica.
Artikel

Draaideurvreemdelingen in de strafrechtsketen?

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 5 2014
Trefwoorden VRIS, illegale immigranten, strafrecht, terugkeer, migratie
Auteurs Daphne Huininga MSc en Mr. dr. Maartje van der van der Woude
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Irregular immigration is considered a big problem to Western societies. In the Dutch political discourse much attention is being attributed to dealing with a specific group of irregular immigrants: those who commit crimes and cause nuisance. Despite firm migration policies focusing on catching and deporting criminal undocumented immigrant, many seem to be coming back. By means of a exploratory study this article empirically explores the underlying rationales and traits of illegal immigrants returning to the Netherlands after they have been deported.


Daphne Huininga MSc
Daphne Huininga MSc is werkzaam als adviseur Bedrijfsvoering bij de Dienst Terugkeer en Vertrek.

Mr. dr. Maartje van der van der Woude
Mr. dr. Maartje van der Woude is universitair hoofddocent Straf- en strafprocesrecht bij het Instituut voor Strafrecht en Criminologie van de Universiteit Leiden en tevens voorzitter van de redactie van PROCES.
Artikel

Gevangenisstraffen van moeders en de belangen van kinderen

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 5 2014
Trefwoorden Imprisonment of mothers / Detentie van moeders, Alternative sentencing of mothers / Alternatieve straf voor moeders, Children’s interests / Belangen van kinderen
Auteurs Prof. dr. Doret De de Ruyter, Drs. Sanne Hissel en Prof. dr. mr. Catrien Bijleveld
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    A substantial number of children are confronted with the detention of their mothers. Empirical research shows that these children’s well-being is seriously affected, although no study has been able to assess whether a mother’s detention as such causes long-term damage. On the basis of children’s interests, this article defends the principle that mothers who are actively involved in raising their children should not receive a prison sentence but an alternative punishment, unless continuing care is detrimental to the children or if the legal order or interests of society and its citizens would be disproportionally threatened. The article ends with several practical implications.


Prof. dr. Doret De de Ruyter
Prof. dr. Doret de Ruyter is hoogleraar Theoretische pedagogiek aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam en opleidingsdirecteur Pedagogische wetenschappen.

Drs. Sanne Hissel
Drs. Sanne Hissel is postdoc onderzoeker bij het Nederlands Studiecentrum Criminaliteit en Rechtshandhaving (NSCR).

Prof. dr. mr. Catrien Bijleveld
Prof. dr. mr. Catrien Bijleveld is hoogleraar Onderzoeksmethoden in de criminologie aan de Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, adjunct professor aan het Griffith University Key Centre for Research en directeur van het NSCR.
Artikel

Probleemoplossingsgericht denken bij witwassen van uit eigen misdrijf afkomstige voorwerpen

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 4 2014
Trefwoorden Witwassen, Eigen misdrijf, Uitzondering, Poging tot witwassen
Auteurs Mr. Joost Verbaan en Mr. dr. Joost Nan
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    According to the text of the law and the meaning of the (international and) Dutch legislator, someone can also commit the crime of money laundering when the illegal proceeds originate from a crime he committed himself. The acquisition or possession of property that was derived from criminal activity is also considered as money laundering regardless whose criminal activity it was. The Dutch Supreme Court made an exception for situations in which the defendant has done nothing to conceal or disguise the criminal background of the property. This means that, for instance, when a drug dealer has hidden his ‘dirty money’ in or around his house, it cannot be qualified as money laundering. This poses problems for investigative authorities. In this article, the possibility of regarding the act of hiding and keeping hidden money as an attempt to launder money, based on the presumption that every act involving the hidden or kept money will result in money laundering, is researched.


Mr. Joost Verbaan
Mr. Joost Verbaan is docent Straf(proces)recht aan de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam en directeur van het Erasmus Centre for Penal Studies van die universiteit.

Mr. dr. Joost Nan
Mr. dr. Joost Nan is universitair docent Straf(proces)recht aan de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam en (cassatie)advocaat bij Gilhuis Advocaten te Dordrecht.
Artikel

Naar een vervanging van de unus-testisregel van artikel 342 lid 2 Sv

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 3 2014
Trefwoorden unus testis, bewijsmotivering, bewijsbeslissing, bewijsminimum
Auteurs Mr. dr. Joost S. Nan
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    The rule that a conviction cannot be based on the statement of just one witness, is codified in article 342 of the Dutch Criminal Procedural Code. The Supreme Court has recently demanded that such a statement finds sufficient support in other evidence and that sometimes the trial judge needs to specify why that statement is corroborated enough by other evidence. However, the Supreme Court has always given a very marginal meaning to this rule, by allowing convictions which basically are substantiated by only that one statement. The evidence supporting the story of the witness does not have to prove that the crime actually took place, nor that is indeed the defendant who has committed it. In this article, I propose the replacement of the rule with a well-founded motivated ruling of the trial judge on this subject.


Mr. dr. Joost S. Nan
Mr. dr. Joost S. Nan is universitair docent Straf(proces)recht aan de Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam en (cassatie)advocaat.

    Victims of violent crime who suffer from posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can request financial compensation from the Dutch Violent Offences Compensation Fund (VOCF). Problematic with this is that PTSD is amenable for malingering. Malingering involves the invention or exaggeration of psychological symptoms or the attribution of such symptoms to wrong causes. If malingered PTSD remains undetected, the VOCF will run the risk of compensating damages which do not exist. The literature suggests that malingering can be detected by focusing on extreme scores on symptom screeners. The results of the current study, however, seem to suggest that this may not be an adequate strategy.


Dr. Maarten Kunst
Dr. Maarten Kunst is universitair docent Criminologie bij het Instituut voor Strafrecht & Criminologie van de Universiteit Leiden.
Artikel

Het onderscheidende karakter van profielen bij vreemdelingentoezicht

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 1 2014
Trefwoorden etnisch profileren, vreemdelingentoezicht, discriminatie, crimmigratie
Auteurs Prof. mr. Peter Rodrigues
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    The main question of this contribution is whether the use of ethnic profiling in migration control is an infringement of the prohibition of racial and religious discrimination. To answer this question, the regulation on migration control is analyzed and the trend of mixing criminal law with migration law is criticized. The influence of quota of irregular migrants who should be expelled and penalizing of illegal residence is studied. Taken into account the jurisprudence on the issue, the author argues that profiling based on race and religion is forbidden, which is also the case if nationality is used in profiles against EU-citizens.


Prof. mr. Peter Rodrigues
Prof. mr. Peter Rodrigues is hoogleraar Immigratierecht aan de Universiteit Leiden en directeur van het Instituut voor Immigratierecht.
Artikel

Gezocht: rol voor de advocatuur bij ZSM

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 1 2014
Trefwoorden ZSM, advocatuur, ketenpartners, rechtsbescherming
Auteurs Mr. Ineke van den Brûle
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    ASAP: As Soon (or Selective, Smart) As Possible is meant to be a form of summary justice, in March 2011 introduced by the Dutch Public Prosecution Service (PPS). ASAP is meant to handle common criminality more rapidly and more effectively. So far, so good. However, the PPS seems to direct all efforts to velocity instead of quality. ASAP was established without interference of defense lawyers. Lawyers, criminal law scientists and National Ombudsman have been criticizing ASAP since its introduction. Values of legal protection, accuracy and sustainability are ignored by velocity. Nowadays, the PPS desires cooperation with defense lawyers in the ASAP method. First of all: it is not easy to climb aboard a driving train. Suspects must be advised and acquainted by lawyers, not by prosecutors or police officers. Equality of arms must be guaranteed. A quick access to the criminal file is one of the demands for a serious and active role of lawyers in the ASAP approach.


Mr. Ineke van den Brûle
Mr. Ineke van den Brûle is als advocaat verbonden aan advocatenkantoor Prinsegracht te Den Haag.

Mr. drs. Marije Jeltes
Mr. drs. Marije Jeltes is (jeugd)strafrechtadvocaat bij JSTW Advocaten te Amsterdam, voorzitter van de Vereniging van Jeugdrecht Advocaten te Amsterdam, en lid van de Commissie van Toezicht van Forensische behandelcentrum Amsterbaken.
Artikel

ZSM, Zo Selectief Mogelijk…

Triage in de strafrechtsketen

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 1 2014
Trefwoorden ZSM, selectiviteit, Openbaar Ministerie, ketensamenwerking
Auteurs Mr. dr. Johan Bac en Mr. Machiel Vink
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    The Dutch abbreviation ‘ZSM’ literally means ASAP. In the Dutch criminal justice system, it stands for a response to a crime ‘as speedy, selective, smart and supportive for victims as possible’. The project was initiated by the Public Prosecution Service and the Police, and it also involves the Dutch Probation Services, Victim Support Netherlands and the Child Care and Protection Board. The goal of ZSM is to assure meaningful and fast interventions, based on quality and effectiveness for society, including suspects and victims. To reach this goal, the Public Prosecutor is situated at the front of the criminal justice chain and triages the high volume crimes to determine the best procedure for a case, in cooperation with the partners.


Mr. dr. Johan Bac
Mr. dr. Johan Bac is hoofdofficier van justitie van het Parket Midden-Nederland en programmaleider van het Landelijk Programma ZSM.

Mr. Machiel Vink
Mr. Machiel Vink is landelijk ZSM-officier van justitie en lid van het landelijk programmateam ZSM.
Interface Showing Amount
U kunt door de volledige tekst zoeken naar alle artikelen door uw zoekterm in het zoekveld in te vullen. Als u op de knop 'Zoek' heeft geklikt komt u op de zoekresultatenpagina met filters, die u helpen om snel bij het door u gezochte artikel te komen. Er zijn op dit moment twee filters: rubriek en jaar.