The Environment and Planning Act (EPA), which will enter into force in 2021, has been called the most influential legislative reform in the Netherlands since World War II. This article forms the introduction to a special issue devoted to the EPA, in which scholars from various disciplines reflect on the societal and legal ramifications of this new act. The authors introduce the different articles but also offer their perspective on the emergence of this new field of research. Socio-legal research into such a vast new regulatory field benefits from the application of multiple perspectives and different research methods. Conspicuously, the authors of the various articles differ on how to assess the new regulation of Dutch spatial planning. Some are pessimistic, others strike a more optimistic note. In this introduction two more perspectives on the law are offered. The perspective of prefigurative law (Davina Cooper) embodies the more optimistic view, whilst the perspective of outsourced law (Pauline Westerman) sides with the pessimists. |
Zoekresultaat: 3 artikelen
De zoekresultaten worden gefilterd op:Tijdschrift Recht der Werkelijkheid x
Redactioneel |
De empirische bestudering van het recht |
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 3 2021 |
Auteurs | Danielle Chevalier |
Auteursinformatie |
Inleiding |
De Omgevingswet: nieuw ruimtelijk recht(?) |
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 2 2019 |
Trefwoorden | Environment and Planning Act, Administrative Law reform, Spatial Planning, Prefigurative Law, Outsourced Law |
Auteurs | Dr. mr. Tobias Arnoldussen en dr. mr. Danielle Chevalier |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
“The production of law”: Law in action in the everyday and the juridical consequences of juridification |
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 3 2016 |
Trefwoorden | juridification, production of space, law in action, local bye-laws |
Auteurs | dr. mr. Danielle Chevalier |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In an increasingly diversifying society, public space is the quintessential social realm1x Lofland 1998. where members of that diverse society meet each other. Thus space is shared, whilst norms regarding that space are not always shared. Of rivalling norms, some are codified into formal law, in a process Habermas called juridification. Early Habermas regarded juridification a negative process, ‘colonizing the lifeworld’. Later Habermas argued juridification a viable pillar for conviviality in diversity. The shift in Habermas’ perspective invites the question how law works in action. In this article a frame is offered to scrutinize the working of law in action in public space, by applying the conceptual triad of spatial thinker Lefebvre to understand how law is “produced”. It argues that how law is perceived in action is pivotal to understanding how law works in action. Moreover, it discusses the possible ramifications of the perception of law in action for how the legal system as a whole is perceived. Noten
|