‘I felt so sorry for you, such a lovely tool, and then you have no users!’ This was one of the comments after my presentation of the eKantonrechter at ODR 2016, organized by HiiL in The Hague in May 2016. ODR, online dispute resolution, was presented as a tool to solve all problems in the 4th Trend Report by HIIL after the conference. Arno Lodder, in a weblog, commented that ODR had raised hopes in its early promoters, but had not really taken off. |
Zoekresultaat: 4 artikelen
De zoekresultaten worden gefilterd op:Tijdschrift Recht der Werkelijkheid x
Discussie |
KEI voorbij met ODR |
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 2 2016 |
Trefwoorden | ODR, Courts, court users, dispute resolution, digital court |
Auteurs | Dory Reiling |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
Digitalisering: kans of bedreiging voor wetgeving? |
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 2 2015 |
Trefwoorden | internet, governance, jurisdiction, legal theory |
Auteurs | Bart Schermer |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this article Bart Schermer, describes the difficulties in regulating the internet. The global reach of the internet, the fact that it is for the most part owned by private actors and creates opportunities for anonymity challenge regulators. The article describes issues related to sovereignty and jurisdiction, ambiguity in legal texts and dependence on private sector actors. Possible solutions lie in global internet governance, institutional innovation and the internet’s architecture itself. |
Artikel |
Wetgeving, empirisch-juridisch onderzoek en Legal Big Data |
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 2 2015 |
Trefwoorden | legislation, big data, empirical legal research, nudging |
Auteurs | Frans L. Leeuw |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
A second empirical revolution in law is in full swing: legal big data have made their entrance and will play an increasingly important role in the legal field. Legal big data, for example, increase the accessibility and transparency of files. They make it easier for legislators to find out how society views proposed legislation. Using big data, all jurisprudence can be processed very easily and judicial decisions can be predicted with a high degree of certainty. The contribution concludes with a number of legal and ethical issues and methodological challenges in relation to legal big data, such as ownership, privacy and representativeness. |
Discussie |
Rationaliteit en risicobeleid |
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 1 2010 |
Auteurs | Roel Pieterman |
Auteursinformatie |