To overcome problems of juridification and formalization of administrative law, successful initiatives have been undertaken by professionals in the public administration and judiciary to improve administrative procedures. These initiatives have been inspired by theories of (perceived) procedural justice, as developed by Tyler and Lind (1988). Although the author acknowledges the importance of procedural justice, she argues that the strong focus on procedural aspects, based on subjective opinions of claimants, may unintentionally lead to a situation in which other important issues may be easily overlooked, such as the question why citizens would refrain from starting a lawsuit or the question what explains the low success rates of citizens in administrative law. |
Zoekresultaat: 5 artikelen
De zoekresultaten worden gefilterd op:Tijdschrift Recht der Werkelijkheid x
Artikel |
Voorbij procedurele rechtvaardigheidDe betrekkelijkheid van de beleving van respondenten |
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 2 2017 |
Trefwoorden | Procedural Justice, Administrative law, Access to Justice, Outcomes of legal proceedings |
Auteurs | Dr. Nienke Doornbos |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
Waarom schakelen burgers (geen) rechtshulp in? |
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 1 2017 |
Trefwoorden | Legal advice / assistance, Acces to justice, Income level, Judicial autonomy, Cost-benefit analysis |
Auteurs | Dr. Marijke ter Voert en Dr. Carolien Klein Haarhuis |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article serves to gain insight in the use and non-use of various types of legal advice, particularly in relation to income levels and legal costs. Based on (logistic regression) analyses involving survey data on 1,928 Dutch citizens who experienced a non-trivial problem in the period May 2009 to May 2014, main findings are as follows: (1) 37% of citizens facing a (potential) legal problem contacted various types of legal advisers once or repeatedly. (2) In the explanation of use/non-use of advocates, problem characteristics turned out to matter significantly, in contrast with the level of household income. Entitlements to subsidized legal aid (lower income groups) as well as legal expenses insurance have made income a factor of less importance. (3) Looking at the degree in which citizens reported (high) costs being a reason for not using legal advice, again no significant differences were found between income groups. Especially advocates were deemed too expensive, regardless of household income; a reason for non-use in half of the cases in which advocates had been considered. |
Artikel |
Digitalisering: kans of bedreiging voor wetgeving? |
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 2 2015 |
Trefwoorden | internet, governance, jurisdiction, legal theory |
Auteurs | Bart Schermer |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this article Bart Schermer, describes the difficulties in regulating the internet. The global reach of the internet, the fact that it is for the most part owned by private actors and creates opportunities for anonymity challenge regulators. The article describes issues related to sovereignty and jurisdiction, ambiguity in legal texts and dependence on private sector actors. Possible solutions lie in global internet governance, institutional innovation and the internet’s architecture itself. |
Artikel |
Wetgeving: uitdagingen, dilemma’s en vernieuwing |
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 2 2015 |
Trefwoorden | Legislation, quality of legislation, Policy, Offences |
Auteurs | Piet Hein Donner |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Legislation as we know it is a recent phenomenon, and its quality has been under debate for 40 years. It is not surprising or problematic that the place and function of legislation evolve under the influence of societal changes. It is, however, important to change the mechanistic view of legislation. Instead of viewing it as an instrument of policy, we must search for structures and institutions that create room for diversity without breaking the unity of law. In our dealings with inevitable risks and damage to society, rules too often take the place of ethics or professional judgment. Rules are essential, but they should leave room to dissent from them if justified: rules as a point of departure, not rules that must be respected on pain of sanctions. |
Boekbespreking |
Taalgrens als wetenschapsgrens |
Tijdschrift | Recht der Werkelijkheid, Aflevering 3 2012 |
Trefwoorden | book review |
Auteurs | Erhard Blankenburg |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this feature authors review recently published books on subjects of interest to readers of Recht der Werkelijkheid. |