The author analyses and compares several distinct models of doing justice to find out which is serving ‘sustainable justice’ the best. Sustainable justice could be defined as justice that produces conflict resolutions that last for a long time and in this way contribute to a more sustainable society. Modern developmental methods for organisations make use of assessments to measure, compare and improve the effectiveness of organizational cultures. These methods are used in this contribution to analyse the organizational cultures of mediation, the traditional accusatorial (penal) procedure, problem-solving courts (with a focus on drug courts) and restorative justice conferencing. The comparison results in conclusions indicating that mediation and problem solving courts have a sound and effective organizational culture, due to healthy conflict management styles, characterized by managing both opposition and competition constructively and by a stimulating person-oriented focus. Restorative justice conferences bring together many stakeholders in a conflict and its resolution and facilitates in this way the awareness of the connections between many problems behind the actual conflict at hand: for this reason the resolutions may have a deeper societal impact and a greater sustainability. |
Artikel |
Duurzame rechtsplegingDoorlichten van conflictoplossingssystemen op duurzaamheid, en: hoe komt herstelrecht uit de bus? |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Herstelrecht, Aflevering 4 2012 |
Trefwoorden | sustainable justice, conflict resolutions, conflict managment styles |
Auteurs | Alexander F. de Savornin Lohman |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
Huiselijk geweld samen geweldloos de baasHerstel van verbindingen en (her)nemen van regie met een Eigen Kracht-conferentie |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Herstelrecht, Aflevering 2 2012 |
Trefwoorden | empowering victims, domestic violence, Family Group Conference |
Auteurs | Hilleke Crum |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Rooted in forty years of history and experience a new concept is developed in empowering victims of domestic violence. Sheltering is not the solution to stop the violence; domestic violence is a social problem instead of an individual issue. The Orange Houses is a Dutch women’s refuge shelter with a new approach: ‘sheltered in the open’. The Orange House is visible and recognisable and one of the consequences is working with all family members in order to stop the violence.Family Group Conference as a decision making model appears to be effective for families to make their own plans. When given responsibility of the situation and the solution, families, also in situations of domestic violence, create, according to themselves and professionals as well, safe and creative plans that fit.Illustrated by a personal story it becomes clear that family can and will make the positive difference for members of them in trouble.Research is an important key to ensure that civilians in comparable situations – for instance elderly abuse, abuse by professionals, divorce – do have the choice of making their own plans and decisions before or instead of professional intervention. |