Since Islam stands for a total way of life, it also includes a vision on crime and punishment. According to several (Muslim)scholars the Sharia contains not so much a message of revenge and retribution but rather one of compassion, forgiveness and mercy. Much depends on which sections of the holy sources of Islam are read and subsequently how these sections are interpreted. However, fact is that – in the context of quite a number of criminal offences – Islamic criminal law gives room for restorative practices. These practices prove to be more beneficial with regard to the realization of remorse, forgiveness and reconciliation than the regular criminal process. Since restorative practices form an intrinsic part of (pre-modern) Islamic criminal law and since more and more initiatives are being developed nowadays to incorporate such practices in (modern) Western criminal law, it is of fundamental importance to take note of Islamic criminal law. Before focusing in this contribution on the role of restorative practices, remorse and forgiveness in Islamic criminal law, first the position of victims in criminal law under influence of Islam and Christianity will be discussed on the basis of the ideas of the Dutch victimologist Jan van Dijk. Furthermore, attention will be paid to the decline of mysticism in Islam and to the possible consequences and risks thereof – also for the role of restorative practices, remorse and forgiveness in Islamic criminal law. |
Artikel |
Herstelgerichte praktijken, berouw en vergeving in het islamitische strafrecht |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Herstelrecht, Aflevering 3 2014 |
Trefwoorden | Islamic criminal law, forgiveness, Remorse |
Auteurs | Jacques Claessen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
Het Duitse recht op nevengeschikt aanklagenDe volledige integratie van het slachtoffer in het strafproces |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Herstelrecht, Aflevering 1 2014 |
Trefwoorden | Accessory prosecution, victims, Victim lawyers, Secondary victimization, punishment |
Auteurs | Michael Kilchling en Helmut Kury |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this article the German concept of accessory prosecution (Nebenklage) is discussed. The Nebenklage was implemented in the Code of Criminal Procedure of 1877. It had merely an accessory function in conjunction with the private prosecution and the Klageerzwingungsverfahren, two legal institutions which had little practical relevance. Nowadays, in the course of the modern victim movement, the Nebenklage has radically changed into an instrument that is clearly provided as the main participatory option for victims interested in actively contributing to the trial of ‘their’ criminal. Previous research findings are outlined and the results of an explorative survey are presented. The findings suggest that the mere presence of the victim lawyer can significantly change the atmosphere in the courtroom, thus enhancing the willingness of the defence to treat the victim more respectfully. |