From its beginning in 2002, the Dutch Journal of Safety Studies (JSS) has wanted to be a platform for Dutch and Belgian academic articles about all facets of safety and security. Furthermore the journal wants to be a platform for multidisciplinary articles in which safety and security issues are studied from different and complementary perspectives or academic fields.This article provides a content analysis of all 129 JSS-articles. The analysis shows that the focus of JSS is on matters of social safety (and less on the more ‘technical’ safety issues) and on the organization of safety (functioning of organizations or networks and/or the effectiveness of measures) and less on safety as such. Over the years, a few changes have taken place. (1) In the field of social safety the focus has shifted somewhat from ‘the organization of safety’ towards safety as such. (2) Although the proportion of articles from Belgium is small (5,4%), it has increased over the years. (3) Authors from Dutch universities of applied sciences have published no more than 4 articles (3,1%), the first one of which appeared in Volume 6. After some years, these authors discovered the JSS as a platform for their work.JSS covers a wide range of subjects in the field of safety and how it can be organized. Although most articles stem from criminology and/or public management, JSS contains articles from different academic fields such as criminology, communication, law, psychology, engineering, public management, medical science, etc. However, in one and the same article one does not often find a combination of really different academic perspectives, such as engineering and psychology or informatics and criminology. If the JSS aims to be a truly multidisciplinary journal, it should contain more articles of this kind over the next ten years. |
Zoekresultaat: 3 artikelen
De zoekresultaten worden gefilterd op:Tijdschrift Tijdschrift voor Veiligheid x
Artikel |
Tien jaar veiligheidsonderzoek in het Tijdschrift voor VeiligheidWeerspiegeling van een vakgebied in ontwikkeling |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Veiligheid, Aflevering 4 2011 |
Trefwoorden | safety research, security research, multidisciplinary research, Journal of Safety Studies |
Auteurs | Wouter Stol |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
Downloaders van kinderpornoEen overzicht van de literatuur |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Veiligheid, Aflevering 4 2010 |
Trefwoorden | Kinderporno, Downloaden, Zedencriminaliteit, Literatuurstudie |
Auteurs | Anton van Wijk |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Unlike the physical abusers of children, little is known about downloaders of child pornography. The key questions in this article are: who are the downloaders, what are their backgrounds, why and how they download child pornography, how they behave offline and online and what types of downloaders can be distinguished? A simple answer to these questions is currently impossible to give. There is more, preferably longitudinal, research needed on risk factors for downloading child pornography and the various types of downloaders. Combating the downloaders requires a lot of the police in terms of international cooperation and up to date knowledge and expertise. This also served the treatment practices, which is partly dependent on a properly conducted police investigation. |
Artikel |
Filteren op internetDe rol van de Nederlandse overheid in het blokkeren van kinderpornografische websites |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Veiligheid, Aflevering 4 2009 |
Trefwoorden | filteren, internet, kinderporno, politie |
Auteurs | Rutger Leukfeldt, Wouter Stol, Rik Kaspersen e.a. |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The distribution of child pornography on the internet is observed as a major social problem. In the Netherlands a lively political-social discussion has emerged concerning the manner in which this can be prevented. The discussion moves between two polarities. On the one hand the dangers of internet censure are emphasised and on the other hand the need for a clamp down in which every measure seems to be justified. The present government wants to combat child pornography and by doing so answer the moral indignation of society. A means that the Dutch government, and on her behalf the police, uses, is blocking websites with child-pornographic content. The possibilities of the Dutch government to filter effectively, however, are restricted. The accuracy of existing filters is low and it is easy to get around filters. In addition, opportunities are restricted by constitutional rights. A filter that stops all websites with child pornography is bound to stop legal internet traffic too. That is at odds with the constitutional rights of freedom of expression and freedom of information gathering. The realisation of a filter that respects fundamental rights and still is able to block child pornography requires a lot of police manpower. This comes at the expense of the tracking down of criminals who produce and distribute child pornography. Furthermore, it is unknown whether the use of the child-pornography filter leads to the purposes for which they are deployed, such as hindering the sale of child pornography or reducing the abuse of children. The police, therefore, is assigned to a task that requires a considerable amount of time, but the benefits of which are unclear. |