In criminology, it is generally assumed that the high social status of white-collar offenders prevents them of being targeted by criminal law enforcement. But when they do, they suffer greater social and economic damage because of this high social status. Empirical research on the consequences of criminal law enforcement and conviction for white-collar offenders is scarce, and limited to the US and the UK. This paper used biographies of convicted former executives in business and public office in the Netherlands, to analyse these consequences and the process of the ‘fall from grace’ of white-collar offenders. The consequences are described in four life-domains: health, the private sphere, the occupational sphere and the social sphere. The results show that Dutch executives, in line with findings for the Anglo-American white-collar offenders, experience status degradation and suffer much collateral damage of criminal law enforcement. After the initial horror of imprisonment, they endure prison life fairly well. Individual competences and remaining social and economic capital enable them to return to normal life, although they cannot return to pre-conviction levels of social status. |
Artikel |
Gevallen helden van bedrijfsleven en openbaar bestuurDe ‘fall from grace’ van witteboordencriminaliteit |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift over Cultuur & Criminaliteit, Aflevering 2 2018 |
Trefwoorden | white-collar crime, status degradation, sanctioning, executives, punishment |
Auteurs | Prof. dr. Wim Huisman en Drs. Dennis Lesmeister |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
Artsen en moreel ondernemerschap. De casus van de normalisering van verslavende opioïde pijnstillers in de Verenigde Staten |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift over Cultuur & Criminaliteit, Aflevering 3 2018 |
Trefwoorden | Opioid crisis, Addictive painkillers, Medical doctors, Moral entrepreneurs, Big Pharma |
Auteurs | Dr. Thaddeus Müller |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this article, I am using Becker’s concept of moral entrepreneur to analyse the role of pain specialists in the labelling process, which has led to the normalisation of the use of opioid painkillers in the United States and ultimately to the death over 200.000 Americans. In general, the literature on labelling centres on crusading reformers, and the criminalisation and stigmatisation of transgressive behaviour. Here I will focus on the moral entrepreneurship of medical experts. What was their role in the normalisation process of opioid painkiller use and are there any similarities with the strategies of crusading reformers? My findings, based on qualitative analysis of documents such as newspaper articles and academic publications, show that, with two exceptions, pain specialists use the strategies of moral crusaders. First, in their narratives, pain specialists represented themselves as neutral objective experts without the emotional stance of moral crusaders. The second exception, which is related to the first, is that there was less emphasis in their narrative on creating villains, as they could not blame openly standard medical practice because they needed the support of the established medical world in order to normalise and legalise opioid painkillers. |
Artikel |
Selectieve ‘culturalisering’ in de praktijk van de jeugdbescherming in België |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift over Cultuur & Criminaliteit, Aflevering 3 2017 |
Trefwoorden | youth justice, Roma, Caucasian migrants, refugees, selectivity, deviance |
Auteurs | dr. Olga Petintseva |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This paper focuses on the practice of youth justice (termed ‘youth protection’ in Belgium) in which professional actors ascribe deviant behaviour of youngsters to different cultural and migration backgrounds. Intra-European Roma migrants and refugees from the Northern Caucasus in Belgium are chosen as case studies. Discourse analysis of 55 youth court files and 41 expert interviews with professional actors show that deviant behaviour of these young people is explained in different manners. Two discourses are identified: ‘criminal vagabonds’ and ‘war torn children’. These discourses and their effects in practice differ tremendously for both groups. The broader discussion this article touches upon is the selective inclusion and exclusion in the institutions of formal social control, through social practices of culturalisation. |