In this contribution, the Dutch government’s acceptance of ethical hacking, by implementing a policy of responsible disclosure, is considered to be a beneficent development. Ethical hacking contributes to cybersecurity and is intrinsically desirable. The term positive incitement is proposed to describe the relatively new phenomenon of encouraging ethical hacking. Positive incitement will be analysed by making a comparison to the Dutch toleration policy regarding soft drugs, and to incitement by law enforcement. Positive incitement should not change into negative incitement, which would result in a serious breach of the rights of ethical hackers. Furthermore, it is argued that the intrinsic value of ethical hacking can justify searching for vulnerabilities in systems of organisations who do not approve of this in advance. |
Zoekresultaat: 11 artikelen
De zoekresultaten worden gefilterd op:Tijdschrift Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy x
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2017 |
Trefwoorden | ethical hacking, responsible disclosure, positive incitement, negative incitement, intrinsic desirability |
Auteurs | Karel Harms |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2015 |
Auteurs | Leni Franken |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
I will argue that it is possible to give a neutral or antiperfectionist legitimation for state support for religion, which I consider a perfectionist good that is not in the common interest. I will argue that state support for perfectionist goods (and thus also for religion) can, in some circumstances and under certain conditions, be allowed as a second-best option in order to guarantee an adequate range of valuable options to choose among - and this range of options is a necessary condition for autonomy. Subsequently, I will argue that the bottom line - which is also the limit - for support is a sufficient range of valuable options. Furthermore, I will argue that state support for religion is only allowed if there is a democratic consensus about the value of that particular perfectionist good. Finally, I will claim that state support for religion is only allowed under certain conditions. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2014 |
Trefwoorden | interactionism, Lon Fuller, interactional law, legal pluralism, concept of law |
Auteurs | Wibren van der Burg |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Two phenomena that challenge theories of law in the beginning of the twenty-first century are the regulatory explosion and the emergence of horizontal and interactional forms of law. In this paper, I develop a theory that can address these two phenomena, namely legal interactionism, a theory inspired by the work of Fuller and Selznick. In a pluralist approach, legal interactionism recognizes both interactional law and enacted law, as well as other sources such as contract. We should aim for a pluralistic and gradual concept of law. Because of this pluralist and gradual character, legal interactionism can also do justice to global legal pluralism and to the dynamic intertwinement of health law and bioethics. |
Redactioneel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2010 |
Auteurs | Mireille Hildebrandt |
Auteursinformatie |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 3 2009 |
Trefwoorden | law and politics, right to strike, exceptionalism, Benjamin, political action |
Auteurs | Dr. mr. Klaas Tindemans |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article discusses the right to strike, with special regard to Belgium. Referring to Walter Benjamin, Tindemans argues that strikes are rechtsetzend rather than rechtserhaltend; they constitute a legal order rather than preserve one. Strikes are exceptional phenomena within any legal system, as they do not fit normal criteria of legal validity. According to Tindemans, strikes are to be considered primarily as extralegal phenomena, as means in a political struggle, confronting the “police” of the core institutions of the state and the legal order. Strikes are political actions, moments of collective aspiration towards political equality, and as such threaten the “pureness” of the legal order in favour of a fragmented politics. |
Boekbespreking |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 3 2007 |
Trefwoorden | democratie, autonomie, schikking, vertegenwoordiger, aansprakelijkheid, auteur, idee, legitimiteit, levering, mandaat |
Auteurs | H.J. Boukema |
Boekbespreking |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2006 |
Trefwoorden | idee, armoede, repartitie, werknemer, introductie, bezit, gebrek, krediet, ontvanger, vervaardigen |
Auteurs | M. Buijsen |
Boekbespreking |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2005 |
Auteurs | M.A.J.M. Buijsen |
Boekbespreking |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2004 |
Trefwoorden | democratie, auteur, identiteit, noodzakelijkheid, verzamelwerk, aansprakelijkheid, autonomie, bedreiging, begiftigde, daderschap |
Auteurs | A. Ieven |
Boekbespreking |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2003 |
Auteurs | H.J.M. Boukema |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2002 |
Trefwoorden | democratie, nalatenschap, auteur, rechtsstaat, voorrecht, bewijslast, idee, levering, ouders, pleidooi |
Auteurs | J.M. Piret |