This article contains a critical review of the provisions in the Dutch penal code regarding group defamation and hate speech. It is argued that not only these provisions themselves but also their application by the Dutch supreme court, constitutes a problem for the legitimacy and functioning of representative democracy. This is due to the tendency of the supreme court to employ special constraints for offensive, hateful or discriminatory speech by politicians. Because such a special constraint is not provided or even implied by the legislator, the jurisprudence of the supreme court is likely to end up in judicial overreach and therefore constitutes a potential – if not actual – breach in the separation of powers. In order to forestall these consequences, the protection of particularly political speech should be improved, primarily by a revision of the articles 137c and 137d of the Dutch penal code or the extension of parliamentary immunity. |
Zoekresultaat: 29 artikelen
De zoekresultaten worden gefilterd op:Tijdschrift Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy x
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2020 |
Trefwoorden | Freedom of speech, Separation of powers, Criminal law, Hate speech, Legal certainty |
Auteurs | Jip Stam |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2020 |
Auteurs | Leni Franken en François Levrau |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this article we elaborate on the place of religion in the workplace. Does the individual freedom of religion imply that employers must always accommodate the religious claims of employees or can they boast a number of arguments allowing them to legitimately limit that freedom? And, conversely, do employers not also have a right to freedom of religion and a right to formulate certain religious expectations for their employees? In this contribution, we deal with these and related questions from a legal-philosophical perspective. The overall aim is to illustrate the extent to which univocal answers are jeopardized because of conceptual ambiguities. We first make a normative distinction between two strategies (i.e. difference-blind approach and difference-sensitive approach) and subsequently illustrate and elaborate on how and why these strategies can lead to different outcomes in legal cases. We illustrate the extent to which a contextual and proportional analysis can be a way out in theoretical and practical conundrums. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2019 |
Auteurs | Thomas Jacobus de Jong |
Samenvatting |
In deze bijdrage staat de activiteit van bewijzen in strafzaken centraal. Betoogd wordt dat de vigerende rationalistische opvatting van strafrechtelijk bewijzen eraan voorbij gaat dat het bewijzen zich allereerst voltrekt op een vóór-reflectief niveau. Het primaire blikveld van de mens is namelijk niet het objectiverende kennen, zoals in de rationele bewijstheorieën wordt voorondersteld, maar de praktische relatie tot de wereld. In dit kader wordt eerst de filosofische achtergrond van de rationalistische bewijsopvatting in kaart gebracht, in het bijzonder de invloed van Aristoteles en Descartes. Vervolgens worden de daaruit voortkomende bevindingen aan de hand van ideeën en inzichten die zijn ontleend aan de existentiële fenomenologie kritisch gewaardeerd. Dit leidt tot de uiteenzetting van een hermeneutische opvatting van strafrechtelijk bewijzen. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2017 |
Trefwoorden | ethical hacking, responsible disclosure, positive incitement, negative incitement, intrinsic desirability |
Auteurs | Karel Harms |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this contribution, the Dutch government’s acceptance of ethical hacking, by implementing a policy of responsible disclosure, is considered to be a beneficent development. Ethical hacking contributes to cybersecurity and is intrinsically desirable. The term positive incitement is proposed to describe the relatively new phenomenon of encouraging ethical hacking. Positive incitement will be analysed by making a comparison to the Dutch toleration policy regarding soft drugs, and to incitement by law enforcement. Positive incitement should not change into negative incitement, which would result in a serious breach of the rights of ethical hackers. Furthermore, it is argued that the intrinsic value of ethical hacking can justify searching for vulnerabilities in systems of organisations who do not approve of this in advance. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2017 |
Trefwoorden | Virtuele grooming, Schade, Strafbaarstelling, Uitlokverbod |
Auteurs | Jeroen ten Voorde |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
As part of a package of legislative measures concerning cybercrime, the Dutch State Secretary for Security and Justice proposes to criminalize virtual grooming, that is the grooming of a person of minor age who, for example, does only exist as an online creature. The legislator’s principle argument for criminalization is based on the harm principle. This article examines the possibility of founding the criminalization of virtual grooming on this principle. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2017 |
Trefwoorden | rechtsfilosofie, politiek proces, onverdraagzaamheid, Wilders II |
Auteurs | Bert van Roermund |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Naar aanleiding van het optreden van Paul Cliteur in het Wilders II-proces rijst de vraag hoe de inzet van een rechtsgang zich verhoudt tot de eigen aard van de filosofie. Aan de ene kant vertolkt filosofie precies dat register van waarheid dat in het recht aan de orde is. Aan de andere kant is die vertolking zo oneindig open dat ze strijdt met het gesloten karakter van het recht als een proces dat conflicten moet beëindigen door gezagvolle beslissingen. Socrates’ optreden in zijn eigen proces toont aan: de slechtste dienst die de filosofie het recht kan bewijzen, is het verlengstuk te worden van het positieve recht en zich bij voorbaat beschikbaar te stellen als een vindplaats van argumenten wanneer de juridische argumenten op zijn. De slotparagraaf argumenteert dat Cliteur deze socratische les terzijde legt. Als gevolg daarvan geeft hij een geforceerde lezing van het Felter-arrest en mist hij de kern van het begrip ‘onverdraagzaamheid’. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2017 |
Trefwoorden | empirical legal studies, apologies, procedural justice, humiliation, victim rights |
Auteurs | Vincent Geeraets en Wouter Veraart |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The central question in this article is whether an empirical-legal approach of victimhood and victim rights could offer a sufficient basis for proposals of legal reform of the legal system. In this article, we choose a normative-critical approach and raise some objections to the way in which part of such research is currently taking place in the Netherlands, on the basis of two examples of research in this field, one dealing with compelled apologies as a possible remedy within civil procedural law and the other with the victim’s right to be heard within the criminal legal procedure. In both cases, we argue, the strong focus on the measurable needs of victims can lead to a relatively instrumental view of the legal system. The legal system must then increasingly be tailored to the wishes and needs of victims. Within this legal-empirical, victim-oriented approach, there is little regard for the general normative principles of our present legal system, in which an equal and respectful treatment of each human being as a free and responsible legal subject is a central value. We argue that results of empirical-legal research should not too easily or too quickly be translated into proposals for legal reform, but first become part of a hermeneutical discussion about norms and legal principles, specific to the normative quality of legal science itself. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2017 |
Trefwoorden | rechtssubject, natuurlijk persoon, rechtspersoon, staat, orgaan |
Auteurs | Robert Jan Witpaard |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In dit artikel presenteer ik een nieuwe ‘nominalistische’ theorie van de rechtssubjecten en laat ik zien waarom geen van de tot nu gepresenteerde theorieën de toets der kritiek kan doorstaan. Het artikel valt uiteen in een constructief en een kritisch deel. In het constructieve deel presenteer ik eerst de nominalistische theorie van de rechtssubjecten. Deze theorie richt zich op de persoonlijke elementen van het rechtssysteem en begrijpt rechtspersonen en organen als namen die uitsluitend bestaan binnen het rechtssysteem. In het kritische deel presenteer ik vervolgens een overzicht van de tot nu toe verdedigde theorieën van de rechtspersoon. Het gaat daarbij respectievelijk om de sociaal-biologische of organische leer, de sociologische leer, de sociologisch-juridische leer, de fictieleer en de leer van het (gepersonifieerde) normencomplex. Aan de hand van enkele algemeen geaccepteerde kenmerken van de rechtspersoon laat ik ten slotte zien waarom geen van deze alternatieve theorieën de toets der kritiek kan doorstaan. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2015 |
Auteurs | Jasper Doomen en Mirjam van Schaik |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In this article, we inquire the merits of criminalizing blasphemy. We argue that religious views do not warrant a separate treatment compared to nonreligious ones. In addition, freedom of speech must be balanced against the interest of those who may be aggrieved by blasphemous remarks. We conclude that penalizing blasphemy is undesirable. It is fortunate, in that light, that acts of blasphemy have recently been decriminalized in The Netherlands by removing blasphemy as an offense from the Criminal Code. Still, other provisions appear to leave enough room to reach the same result, making the removal a possibly virtually aesthetic change. In the international context, it would be regrettable for The Netherlands to forgo the opportunity to take a leading role. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2013 |
Trefwoorden | natural law, property, rights of the poor, extreme necessity, necessitas urgens et evidens |
Auteurs | Marc de Wilde |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article examines what limitations to private property John Locke recognizes to protect the rights of the poor. As has been pointed out in the literature, Locke’s ideas on the limitations to private property have been influenced by medieval discussions about the rights of the poor and the principle of extreme necessity. Confirming this interpretation, the article shows that Locke borrows the distinction between ‘ordinary need’ and ‘evident and urgent necessity’ from Thomas Aquinas. Taking position in a debate among Grotius and Pufendorf, Locke argues that the poor have a natural right to the ‘surplus’ of somebody else’s possessions, and that this right becomes legally enforceable in case of ‘evident and urgent necessity.’ |
Boekbespreking |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2012 |
Auteurs | Geert Knigge |
Auteursinformatie |
Diversen |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2012 |
Auteurs | Anne Ruth Mackor |
Auteursinformatie |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2012 |
Trefwoorden | banality of evil, Hannah Arendt, Adolf Eichmann, Holocaust studies, philosophy of international criminal law |
Auteurs | Klaas Rozemond |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In her book Eichmann in Jerusalem Hannah Arendt concluded that the Eichmann trial taught us the lesson of the ‘fearsome, word-and-thought-defying banality of evil’. Arendt explained the concept of banality as thoughtlessness: Eichmann did not realize what he was doing when he planned and executed the Final Solution of the Jewish Question in Nazi Germany. In this article Arendt’s analysis of Eichmann’s evil is criticized from an internal perspective: the conclusion that Eichmann was thoughtless cannot be founded on the information Arendt herself gives, especially her reports on Eichmann’s idealism, his knowledge of Kant’s categorical imperative, his Pontius Pilate feeling during the Wannsee Conference, and the two crises of conscience Eichmann experienced during the Holocaust. This information shows that Eichmann clearly realized what he was doing in a moral sense and consciously decided to go on with the Final Solution on the basis of his own convictions as a Nazi. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2011 |
Trefwoorden | populism, self-inclusion, vitalism, democracy, Lefort |
Auteurs | Bert Roermund |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Does populism add value to the political debate by showing that the ideals of Enlightenment are too abstract and rationalist to understand politics in democratic terms? The paper argues two theses, critically engaging Lefort’s work: (i) instead of offering valuable criticism, populism feeds on the very principle that Enlightenment has introduced: a polity rests on self-inclusion with reference to a quasi-transcendent realm; (ii) populism’s appeal to simple emotions feeds on the vitalist (rather than merely institutionalist) pulse in any polity. Both dimensions of politics are inevitable as well as elusive. In particular with regard to the vitalist pulse we have no response to the half-truths of populism, as both national and constitutional patriotism seem on the wrong track. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2010 |
Trefwoorden | Beccaria, criminal law, nodal governance, social contract |
Auteurs | Klaas Rozemond |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Les Johnston and Clifford Shearing argue in their book, Governing Security, that the state has lost its monopoly on the governance of security. Private security arrangements have formed a networked governance of security in which the criminal law of the state is just one of the many knots or ‘nodes’ of the security network. Johnston and Shearing consider On Crimes and Punishment, written by Cesare Beccaria in the 18th century, as the most important statement of the classical security program which has withered away in the networked governance of the risk society. This article critizes the way Johnston and Shearing analyze Beccaria’s social contract theory and it formulates a Beccarian theory of the criminal law and nodal governance which explains the causes of crime and the rise of nodal governance and defends the central role of the state in anchoring security arrangements based on private contracts and property rights. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 3 2009 |
Trefwoorden | law and hermeneutics, law and normativity, one right answer thesis, legal jurisprudence, legal doctrine |
Auteurs | Prof. dr. Arend Soeteman |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article is a comment on Carel Smith’s paper. Smith rightly argues that the study of law has a hermeneutic character. But his interpretation of legal hermeneutics includes the thesis that in hard cases there is no right or true legal decision. This seems to have negative implications for the scholarly character of the study of law: in hard cases any solution goes. This paper argues, against Smith, that the study of law defends right answers for hard cases. It is also normative in another sense: legal answers, in easy cases as well as in hard cases, always presuppose a normative interpretation of the legal sources. This contributes to the differences of opinion under lawyers. But it is no obstacle to the scholarly character of the study of law, as long as a rational debate about these legal answers and the underlying values and principles is possible. Smith’s rejection of the right answer thesis, however, prevents the possibility of such a rational debate. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2009 |
Trefwoorden | rechtszekerheid, in dubio pro libertate, Brouwer, rechtspositivisme, constructivisme |
Auteurs | Marc Loth |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This paper addresses the principle of legal certainty, which was central in the work of Bob Brouwer. He both regretted and disputed the decline of this principle in the theory and practice of law, trying to defend it against the spirit of the time. I argue that this attempt was in vain, because it opposes recent developments in law, as is illustrated by a notorious case of the European Court of Human Rights. Moreover, these developments invoke a constructivist account of legal certainty, which opposes Brouwer’s legal positivist account. Additionally, this meta-level shows that legal certainty in its classical form is indefensible, which – of course – does not mean that it is senseless altogether. On the contrary, the principle of legal certainty does have meaning in current legal systems, and it is the task of new generations of young scholars to try to get a grip on it. In doing so, they will undoubtedly make use of Brouwer’s work, which excels both in the depth of thinking and the clarity of writing. |
Boekbespreking |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2008 |
Trefwoorden | redelijkheid en billijkheid, kwaliteit, rechterlijke uitspraak, zorgplicht, ambtenaar, bestanddeel, confrontatie, Europees hof voor de rechten van de mens, gebrek, vrijheid van meningsuiting |
Auteurs | J. Zwart en F. Storm |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2007 |
Trefwoorden | film, kind, rechtspraak, vrijheid van meningsuiting, apparaat, auteur, re-integratie, verbod, voeging, aanhouding |
Auteurs | K. Vanhaesebrouck |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2006 |
Trefwoorden | strafrechter, gevangenisstraf, risico, misdrijf tegen de persoonlijke vrijheid, werkstraf, rechtsstaat, delinquent, herstel, schade, bekwaamheid |
Auteurs | E. Claes |