Which human material forms the real basis of a democratic polity, i.e. of the preconditions of a ‘we’ that inhabits a ‘world’? How is a political ‘we’ related to the ‘we’ that is created by systemic processes of subjectivization? These questions presents themselves with new relevance in a ‘globalized’ world, in which democratic spurts and waves spread from other parts of the world to the West, and in which the liberal-democratic rule of law state appears to be undermining its own moral preconditions. The real task ahead is to find out what ‘we’ denotes politically. |
Discussie |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 3 2012 |
Trefwoorden | democracy, we, world, self-government, democratic impulse |
Auteurs | Evert van der Zweerde |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Redactioneel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 3 2012 |
Auteurs | Carel Smith en Derk Venema |
Auteursinformatie |
Discussie |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 3 2012 |
Trefwoorden | democracy, public sphere, civil society, Arab Spring, feminism |
Auteurs | Judith Vega |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Steven Winter’s argument is premised on a sharp contrast of individualist and social revolutions. I elaborate my doubts about his argument on three accounts, involving feminist perspectives at various points. First, I take issue with Winter’s portrayal of liberal theory, redirecting the focus of his concern to economic libertarianism rather than liberalism, and arguing a more hospitable attitude to the Kantian pith in the theory of democracy. Secondly, I discuss his conceptualization of democracy, adding the conceptual distinction of civil society and public sphere. Thirdly, I question his normative notion of socially situated selves as having an intrinsic relation to social freedom. I moreover consult cultural history on the gendered symbolics of market and democracy to further problematize Winter’s take on either’s meaning for social freedom. |
Discussie |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 3 2012 |
Trefwoorden | Enlightenment universalism, self-governance, freedom, moral point of view, political participation |
Auteurs | Ronald Tinnevelt |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Winter’s criticism of the conventional account of freedom and democracy is best understood against the background of the history of Enlightenment critique. Winter claims that our current misunderstanding of freedom and self-governance is the result of the strict dichotomy between subject and object. This paper critically reconstructs Winter’s notion of freedom and self-governance which does not adequately address (a) the details of his anti-collectivist claim, and (b) the necessary conditions for the possibility of a moral point of view. This makes it difficult to determine how Winter can distinguish between freedom and lack of freedom, and to assess the limited or radical nature of his critique of Enlightenment universalism. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 3 2012 |
Trefwoorden | democracy, radical freedom, free market economy, consumerism, collective action |
Auteurs | Steven L. Winter |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Two waves of democratization define the post-Cold War era of globalization. The first one saw democracies emerge in post-communist countries and post-Apartheid South Africa. The current wave began with the uprisings in the Middle East. The first focused on the formal institutions of the market and the liberal state, the second is participatory and rooted in collective action. The individualistic conception of freedom and democracy that underlies the first wave is false and fetishistic. The second wave shows democracy’s moral appeal is the commitment to equal participation in determining the terms and conditions of social life. Freedom, thus, requires collective action under conditions of equality, mutual recognition, and respect. |
Discussie |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 3 2012 |
Trefwoorden | globalisation, civic tradition, Enlightenment, free-market economy, autonomy |
Auteurs | Tinneke Beeckman |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Can globalisation lead to more democracy? And if so, what concept of freedom lies at the basis of this development? The ideal of liberal freedom, supposedly exercised by the autonomous, rational individual is no longer tenable. Finding a new way of interpreting self-rule beyond self-interested choice has become a crucial aspect of regenerating democratic spirit. This paper formulates three comments on Winter’s paper. The first comment concerns the resemblance between the attitudes of consumers and voters. A second comment reflects on the positive heritage of the Enlightenment. A third comment focuses on the recent Tahrir Square protests and reflects on the republican civic tradition. |
Discussie |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 3 2012 |
Auteurs | Steven L. Winter |
Samenvatting |
In this reply, Steven L. Winter adresses his critics. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2012 |
Trefwoorden | enforcement of morals, liberalism, liberty, political liberalism, Rawls |
Auteurs | Alex Bood |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article examines how a liberal public morality can be most successfully defended against perfectionism. First of all the five most important liberal arguments for freedom are taken from what is called the liberal canon: a number of characteristic works of John Locke, Immanuel Kant, John Stuart Mill, Isaiah Berlin, Joseph Raz, Ronald Dworkin, and John Rawls. These five arguments are identified as: social and political realism, respect for autonomy, fallibility of ideas, pluralism, and respect for reasonableness. Next, the persuasiveness of these arguments is assessed, starting with the argument of respect for reasonableness, which is at the heart of Rawls’s political liberalism. It is concluded that in itself this argument is not strong enough to persuade perfectionists. A powerful defence of a liberal public morality needs the other arguments for freedom as well. Finally, the paper outlines how these other arguments can strengthen the argument of respect for reasonableness in a coherent manner. |
Discussie |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2012 |
Auteurs | Irina Baraliuc, Sari Depreeuw en Serge Gutwirth |
Auteursinformatie |
Boekbespreking |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2012 |
Auteurs | Thom Holterman |
Auteursinformatie |
Boekbespreking |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2012 |
Auteurs | Jaap Hage |
Auteursinformatie |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2012 |
Trefwoorden | Messina, earthquake, state of exception, rule of law, progress |
Auteurs | Massimo La Torre |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Messina, a Sicilian town, was devasteted by an earthquake in1908. It was an hecatomb. Stricken through this unfathomable disgrace Messina’s institutions and civil society collapsed and a sort of wild natural state replaced the rule of law. In this situation there was a first intervention of the Russian Czarist navy who came to help but immediately enforced cruel emergency measures. The Italian army followed and there was a formal declaration of an ‘emergency situation.’ Around this event and the several exceptional measures taken by the government a debate took place about the legality of those exceptional measures. The article tries to reconstruct the historical context and the content of that debate and in a broader perspective thematizes how law (and morality) could be brought to meet the breaking of normality and ordinary life by an unexpected and catastrophic event. |
Boekbespreking |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2012 |
Auteurs | Geert Knigge |
Auteursinformatie |
Boekbespreking |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2012 |
Auteurs | Jaap Zwart en Femke Storm |
Auteursinformatie |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2012 |
Trefwoorden | general jurisprudence, globalization, global legal pluralism, legal positivism, analytical jurisprudence |
Auteurs | Sidney Richards |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Globalization is commonly cited as an important factor in theorising legal phenomena in the contemporary world. Although many legal disciplines have sought to adapt their theories to globalization, progress has been comparatively modest within contemporary analytical jurisprudence. This paper aims to offer a survey of recent scholarship on legal theory and globalization and suggests various ways in which these writings are relevant to the project of jurisprudence. This paper argues, more specifically, that the dominant interpretation of globalization frames it as a particular form of legal pluralism. The resulting concept – global legal pluralism – comes in two broad varieties, depending on whether it emphasizes normative or institutional pluralism. This paper goes on to argue that these concepts coincide with two central themes of jurisprudence, namely its concern with normativity and institutionality. Finally, this paper reflects on the feasibility of constructing a ‘general’ and ‘descriptive’ jurisprudence in light of globalization. |
Diversen |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2012 |
Auteurs | Anne Ruth Mackor |
Auteursinformatie |
Redactioneel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2012 |
Auteurs | Mireille Hildebrandt |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2012 |
Trefwoorden | Drittwirkung, horizontal effect of human rights, constitutionalisation of private law |
Auteurs | Stefan Somers |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article discusses whether the horizontal effect of human rights marks a new paradigm in legal systems or is merely a new style in legal rhetoric. In doing so, much attention is paid to the differences between direct and indirect horizontal effect. Departing from social contract theory the article explains that the protection of human right values in horizontal relations is an essential feature of modern constitutionalism. It also analyses whether these values in horizontal relations should be protected by private law or by human rights. This question is looked at from a substantial, a methodological and an institutional perspective. In the end, because of institutional power balancing, the article argues in favor of an indirect horizontal effect of human rights. |
Boekbespreking |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2012 |
Auteurs | Irawan Sewandono |
Auteursinformatie |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2012 |
Trefwoorden | John Rawls, Stuart White, compulsory labor, reciprocity, social law |
Auteurs | Anja Eleveld |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The author argues that normative questions in social law are in need of a more philosophical approach. This is particularly true for the evaluation of Work-first arrangements. She proposes to evaluate workfare policies from the perspective of the reciprocity principle as it is deployed in the work of the liberal egalitarians John Rawls and Stuart White. While Rawls’ interpretation of the reciprocity principle seems to be at odds with Dutch jurisprudence on workfare policies, which allows for Work-first arrangements within the boundaries that are set by article 4 of the European Convention on Human Rights (a prohibition on compulsory labor), White’s approach rather encourages work obligations for welfare recipients, on the condition that citizens acquire individual drawing rights on collective participation funds. |