In ‘The Enemy of All Humanity’, David Luban provides an insightful and plausible account of the idea of the hostis generis humani (one that shows that the hostis need not be understood to be an outlaw), and of the distinctive character of the crimes against humanity that the hostis commits. However, I argue in this paper, his suggestion that the hostis is answerable to a moral community of humanity (in whose name the ICC must thus claim to speak) is not tenable. Once we recognize the intimate connection between criminal law and political community, we can see that the hostis should answer to the local, domestic political community in and against which he commits his crimes; and that the proper role of the International Criminal Court, acting in the name of the community of nations, is to provide a second-best substitute for such answering when the local polity cannot or will not hold him to account. |
Zoekresultaat: 7 artikelen
Jaar 2018 xArtikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2018 |
Trefwoorden | hostis generis humani, Luban, crimes against humanity, political community, international criminal law |
Auteurs | Antony Duff |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Artikel |
An Introduction to the Singapore Convention on Mediation – Perspectives from Singapore |
Tijdschrift | Nederlands-Vlaams tijdschrift voor mediation en conflictmanagement, Aflevering 4 2018 |
Trefwoorden | Singapore Convention, Dispute resolution, Uncitral, Enforcement |
Auteurs | Nadja Alexander en Shouyu Chong |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Following a retrospective of the road towards the Convention, incorporating some Singaporean inside views, the authors provide a detailed analysis of the envisaged grounds for refusal of mediated settlements. The authors also highlight various issues around the very concept, and proof, of mediation. These issues are fundamental, as only settlements ensuing from mediation are covered. Another significant aspect is the absence of any provisions pertaining to the status of agreements to mediate, the contract situated at the entry side of mediation. |
Recent |
Lili en Howick tonen het belang van een goede Kinderpardonregeling |
Tijdschrift | Advocatenblad, Aflevering 8 2018 |
Auteurs | Sabine Droogleever Fortuyn |
Case Reports |
2018/18 Preliminary questions to ECJ about Brexit implications for UK citizens? (NL) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 2 2018 |
Trefwoorden | Free movement, Work and residence permit, Other forms of free movement |
Auteurs | Jan-Pieter Vos |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Recently, the Court of Amsterdam decided to ask preliminary questions to the ECJ about EU citizens’ rights of British nationals, anticipating Brexit. However, two weeks later, it allowed an appeal against this decision. It is therefore unclear if and when these questions will be asked. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2018 |
Trefwoorden | Citizenship, Political Membership, Citizenship Rights |
Auteurs | Chiara Raucea |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This paper examines how the distribution of social goods within a political community relates to decisions on membership boundaries. The author challenges two renowned accounts of such a relation: firstly, Walzer’s account according to which decisions on membership boundaries necessarily precede decisions on distribution; secondly, Benhabib’s account, according to which membership boundaries can be called into question on the basis of universalist claims. Departing from both accounts, the author concludes that actual changes in the pool of participants in practices of creation and exchange of social goods pressure a political community to redefine its distributive patterns and, accordingly, the boundaries of its formal political membership. This claim will be supported by the analysis of threshold cases decided by the EU Court of Justice, in which EU citizenship is invoked with the atypical purpose of granting rights to a specific group of non-formal members. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 1 2018 |
Trefwoorden | substantive criminal law, excuses, insanity defense, status defense |
Auteurs | Johannes Bijlsma |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Michael Moore has argued that modern two-pronged tests for legal insanity are wrongheaded and that the insanity defense instead should be a ‘status defense’. If Moore is right, than the laws on insanity in most legal systems are wrong. This merits a critical examination of Moore’s critique and his alternative approach. In this paper I argue that Moore’s status approach to insanity is either under- or overinclusive. A new interpretation of the modern tests for insanity is elaborated that hinges on the existence of a legally relevant difference between the mentally disordered defendant and the ‘normal’ defendant. This interpretation avoids Moore’s criticism as well as the pitfalls of the status approach. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 1 2018 |
Auteurs | Dr. Beatriz Barreiro Carril |
Auteursinformatie |