Until recently, legal-dogmatic research stood at the undisputed pinnacle of legal scientific research. The last few years saw increasing criticism, both nationally and internationally, levelled at this type of research or at its dominant role. Some see this as a crisis in legal scholarship, but a closer look reveals a great need for facts, common sense, and nuance. Critics usually base their calls for innovation on a one-dimensional and flawed image of legal-dogmatic research. In this article, the author subsequently addresses the various critical opinions themselves and provide an overview of the innovations that are proposed. He concludes that there are a lot of efforts to innovate legal scholarship, and that the field is more multiform than ever, which is a wonderful and unprecedented state of affairs. This multiformity should be cherished and given plenty of room to develop and grow, because most innovative movements are still fledgling and need time, sometimes a lot of time, to increase in quality. It would be a shame to nip them in the bud now, merely because they are still finding their way. In turn, none of these innovative movements have cause to disqualify legal-dogmatic research, as sometimes happens (implicitly), by first creating a straw-man version of the field and then dismissing it as uninteresting or worse. That only polarises the discussion and gains us nothing. Progress can only be achieved through cooperation, with an open mind towards different types of legal research and a willingness to accept a critical approach towards their development. In the end, the only criterion that matters is quality. All types of research are principally subject to the same quality standards. The author provides some clarification regarding these standards as well. |
Zoekresultaat: 11 artikelen
Jaar 2012 xArtikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Law and Method, 2012 |
Trefwoorden | legal methodology, law as an academic discipline, ‘law and …’-movements, legal theory, innovative and multiform legal scholarship |
Auteurs | Jan Vranken |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Discussie |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 3 2012 |
Trefwoorden | democracy, we, world, self-government, democratic impulse |
Auteurs | Evert van der Zweerde |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Which human material forms the real basis of a democratic polity, i.e. of the preconditions of a ‘we’ that inhabits a ‘world’? How is a political ‘we’ related to the ‘we’ that is created by systemic processes of subjectivization? These questions presents themselves with new relevance in a ‘globalized’ world, in which democratic spurts and waves spread from other parts of the world to the West, and in which the liberal-democratic rule of law state appears to be undermining its own moral preconditions. The real task ahead is to find out what ‘we’ denotes politically. |
Discussie |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 3 2012 |
Trefwoorden | democracy, public sphere, civil society, Arab Spring, feminism |
Auteurs | Judith Vega |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Steven Winter’s argument is premised on a sharp contrast of individualist and social revolutions. I elaborate my doubts about his argument on three accounts, involving feminist perspectives at various points. First, I take issue with Winter’s portrayal of liberal theory, redirecting the focus of his concern to economic libertarianism rather than liberalism, and arguing a more hospitable attitude to the Kantian pith in the theory of democracy. Secondly, I discuss his conceptualization of democracy, adding the conceptual distinction of civil society and public sphere. Thirdly, I question his normative notion of socially situated selves as having an intrinsic relation to social freedom. I moreover consult cultural history on the gendered symbolics of market and democracy to further problematize Winter’s take on either’s meaning for social freedom. |
Discussie |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 3 2012 |
Trefwoorden | Enlightenment universalism, self-governance, freedom, moral point of view, political participation |
Auteurs | Ronald Tinnevelt |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Winter’s criticism of the conventional account of freedom and democracy is best understood against the background of the history of Enlightenment critique. Winter claims that our current misunderstanding of freedom and self-governance is the result of the strict dichotomy between subject and object. This paper critically reconstructs Winter’s notion of freedom and self-governance which does not adequately address (a) the details of his anti-collectivist claim, and (b) the necessary conditions for the possibility of a moral point of view. This makes it difficult to determine how Winter can distinguish between freedom and lack of freedom, and to assess the limited or radical nature of his critique of Enlightenment universalism. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 3 2012 |
Trefwoorden | democracy, radical freedom, free market economy, consumerism, collective action |
Auteurs | Steven L. Winter |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Two waves of democratization define the post-Cold War era of globalization. The first one saw democracies emerge in post-communist countries and post-Apartheid South Africa. The current wave began with the uprisings in the Middle East. The first focused on the formal institutions of the market and the liberal state, the second is participatory and rooted in collective action. The individualistic conception of freedom and democracy that underlies the first wave is false and fetishistic. The second wave shows democracy’s moral appeal is the commitment to equal participation in determining the terms and conditions of social life. Freedom, thus, requires collective action under conditions of equality, mutual recognition, and respect. |
Discussie |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 3 2012 |
Auteurs | Steven L. Winter |
Samenvatting |
In this reply, Steven L. Winter adresses his critics. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2012 |
Trefwoorden | Messina, earthquake, state of exception, rule of law, progress |
Auteurs | Massimo La Torre |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Messina, a Sicilian town, was devasteted by an earthquake in1908. It was an hecatomb. Stricken through this unfathomable disgrace Messina’s institutions and civil society collapsed and a sort of wild natural state replaced the rule of law. In this situation there was a first intervention of the Russian Czarist navy who came to help but immediately enforced cruel emergency measures. The Italian army followed and there was a formal declaration of an ‘emergency situation.’ Around this event and the several exceptional measures taken by the government a debate took place about the legality of those exceptional measures. The article tries to reconstruct the historical context and the content of that debate and in a broader perspective thematizes how law (and morality) could be brought to meet the breaking of normality and ordinary life by an unexpected and catastrophic event. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy, Aflevering 2 2012 |
Trefwoorden | general jurisprudence, globalization, global legal pluralism, legal positivism, analytical jurisprudence |
Auteurs | Sidney Richards |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Globalization is commonly cited as an important factor in theorising legal phenomena in the contemporary world. Although many legal disciplines have sought to adapt their theories to globalization, progress has been comparatively modest within contemporary analytical jurisprudence. This paper aims to offer a survey of recent scholarship on legal theory and globalization and suggests various ways in which these writings are relevant to the project of jurisprudence. This paper argues, more specifically, that the dominant interpretation of globalization frames it as a particular form of legal pluralism. The resulting concept – global legal pluralism – comes in two broad varieties, depending on whether it emphasizes normative or institutional pluralism. This paper goes on to argue that these concepts coincide with two central themes of jurisprudence, namely its concern with normativity and institutionality. Finally, this paper reflects on the feasibility of constructing a ‘general’ and ‘descriptive’ jurisprudence in light of globalization. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Law and Method, 2012 |
Trefwoorden | epistemology (‘scientific’ versus ‘critical’), rape in criminal law, normative classification, empirical evidence |
Auteurs | Nicolle Zeegers |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article answers the question of why and in what respects a ‘critical epistemology’, compared to a ‘scientific epistemology’, offers the better alternative for criminal law investigations into rape. By resuming the recent debate concerning the importance of scientific truth in criminal law investigations the author shows that this debate overlooks the cultural values that are necessarily involved in many criminal law cases. Such involvement of cultural values will be illustrated with a historical overview of law cases concerning rape in the context of a heterosexual relationship. Whereas value-free knowledge is the ideal strived for by a ‘scientific epistemology’, the basic idea of a critical epistemology is that knowledge is theory dependent and not free of values. Therefore this epistemology offers the best guarantees for acknowledging the values that are necessarily involved in many criminal law inquiries. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 1 2012 |
Auteurs | Marlies Galenkamp |
Auteursinformatie |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 4 2012 |
Auteurs | Bert Keirsbilck |
Auteursinformatie |