This paper provides first of all the introduction to this special issue on ‘Legal constraints on the indeterminate control of “dangerous” sex offenders in the community: A European comparative and human rights perspective’. The issue is the outcome of a study that aims at finding the way legal control can not only be an instrument but also be a controller of social control. It is explained what social control is and how the concept of moral panic plays a part in the fact that sex offenders seem to be the folk devils of our time and subsequently pre-eminently the target group of social control at its strongest. Further elaboration of the methodology reveals why focussing on post-sentence (indeterminate) supervision is relevant, as there are hardly any legal constraints in place in comparison with measures of preventive detention. Therefore, a comparative approach within Europe is taken on the basis of country reports from England and Wales, France, Germany, The Netherlands and Spain. In the second part of the paper, the comparative analysis is presented. Similar shifts in attitudes towards sex offenders have led to legislation concerning frameworks of supervision in all countries but in different ways. Legal constraints on these frameworks are searched for in legal (sentencing) theory, the principles of proportionality and least intrusive means, and human rights, mainly as provided in the European Convention on Human Rights to which all the studied countries are subject. Finally, it is discussed what legal constraints on the control of sex offenders in the community are (to be) in place in European jurisdictions, based on the analysis of commonalities and differences found in the comparison. |
Zoekresultaat: 30 artikelen
Jaar 2016 xEditorial |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 2 2016 |
Trefwoorden | social control, folk devils, moral panic, dangerousness, sex offenders |
Auteurs | Michiel van der Wolf (Issue Editor) |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 2 2016 |
Trefwoorden | Supervision, twin track system, principle of proportionality, human rights, violent and sex offenders |
Auteurs | Bernd-Dieter Meier |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
After release from prison or a custodial preventive institution, offenders may come under supervision in Germany, which means that their conduct is controlled for a period of up to five years or even for life by a judicial supervising authority. Supervision is terminated if it can be expected that even in the absence of further supervision the released person will not commit any further offences. From the theoretical point of view, supervision is not considered a form of punishment in Germany, but a preventive measure that is guided by the principle of proportionality. After a presentation of the German twin track system of criminal sanctions and a glimpse at sentencing theory, the capacity of the principle of proportionality to guide and control judicial decisions in the field of preventive sanctions is discussed. The human rights perspective plays only a minor role in the context of supervision in Germany. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 2 2016 |
Trefwoorden | Dutch penal law, preventive supervision, dangerous offenders, human rights, social rehabilitation |
Auteurs | Sanne Struijk en Paul Mevis |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
In the Netherlands, the legal possibilities for post-custodial supervision have been extended considerably in recent years. A currently passed law aims to further increase these possibilities specifically for dangerous (sex) offenders. This law consists of three separate parts that may all result in life-long supervision. In the first two parts, the supervision is embedded in the conditional release after either a prison sentence or the safety measure ‘ter beschikking stelling’ (TBS). This paper focuses on the third part of the law, which introduces an independent supervisory safety measure as a preventive continuation of both a prison sentence and the TBS measure. Inevitably, this new independent sanction raises questions about legitimacy and necessity, on which this paper reflects from a human rights perspective. Against the background of the existing Dutch penal law system, the content of the law is thoroughly assessed in view of the legal framework of the Council of Europe and the legal principles of proportionality and less restrictive means. In the end, we conclude that the supervisory safety measure is not legitimate nor necessary (yet). Apart from the current lack of (empirical evidence of) necessity, we state that there is a real possibility of an infringement of Article 5(4) ECHR and Article 7 ECHR, a lack of legitimising supervision ‘gaps’ in the existing penal law system, and finally a lack of clear legal criteria. Regardless of the potential severity of violent (sex) offenses, to simply justify this supervisory safety measure on the basis of ‘better safe than sorry’ is not enough. |
Artikel |
Culturen van letselschadeafwikkelingIndrukken uit een vergelijkend onderzoek naar de wijze van afwikkeling van letselschades in Engeland, Noorwegen en Nederland |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Vergoeding Personenschade, Aflevering 4 2016 |
Trefwoorden | letselschade, schadeafwikkeling, personenschade, cultuurverschillen, rechtsvergelijking |
Auteurs | Mr. E.S. Engelhard en Prof. mr. S.D. Lindenbergh |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Onderzoek naar de wijze waarop letselschades worden afgewikkeld in Engeland, Noorwegen en Nederland brengt relevante verschillen in afwikkelingsculturen aan het licht. De Engelse wijze van afwikkeling is sterk gericht op afwikkeling in rechte en is vergaand vercommercialiseerd. De Noorse praktijk kenmerkt zich door een op sociale zekerheid gebaseerde afwikkelingscultuur buiten rechte, die in hoge mate is gebaseerd op onderling vertrouwen. De Nederlandse praktijk van schadeafwikkeling heeft met de Engelse gemeen dat zij vorm krijgt in een commerciële setting tegen de achtergrond van het civiele aansprakelijkheidsrecht. Met de Noorse praktijk heeft zij gemeen dat het proces van afwikkeling in hoge mate is gebaseerd op overleg buiten rechte en op onderling vertrouwen. |
Case Reports |
2016/55 New Supreme Court decision on the distinction between independent contractors and employees (NO) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 4 2016 |
Trefwoorden | Independent contractors, Employees |
Auteurs | Marianne Jenum Hotvedt en Anne-Beth Engan |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
EU employment protection is usually limited to “employees”, meaning that independent contractors are not covered. However, EU law often leaves it to Member States to determine the meaning of employee. The directives regulating transfers of undertakings, collective redundancies, written working conditions, information and consultation, part-time work, temporary agency workers etc. are all examples of protection covering only ‘employees’ as defined by each Member State. |
ECJ Court Watch |
ECJ 14 September 2016, case C-16/15 (Pérez López), Fixed-term workMaría Elena Pérez López – v – Servicio Madrileño de Salud (Comunidad de Madrid) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 4 2016 |
Trefwoorden | Fixed-term work |
Samenvatting |
Successive fixed-term contracts cannot be justified by legal provisions allowing renewal in order to ensure the provision of certain services of a temporary, auxiliary or extraordinary nature when, in reality, there is no obligation to create additional permanent posts in order to bring an end to the structural use of fixed-term work to fill permanent posts. |
Case Reports |
2016/56 Constitutional Court prohibits suspension pending disciplinary investigation (RO) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 4 2016 |
Trefwoorden | Suspension, Disciplinary investigation |
Auteurs | Andreea Suciu |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Article 52(1)(a) of the Romanian Labour Code allows an employer to suspend, without pay, an employee under a disciplinary investigation. However, the Constitutional Court has recently ruled Article 52(1)(a) unconstitutional. |
ECJ Court Watch |
ECJ 17 November 2016, case C-216/15 (Ruhrlandklinik), Temporary agency workBetriebsrat der Ruhrlandklinik gGmbH – v – Ruhrlandklinik gGmbH |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 4 2016 |
Trefwoorden | Temporary agency work |
Samenvatting |
The definition of ‘worker’ in Directive 2008/104 on temporary agency work includes those who are similar to employees, without having employee status under domestic law. |
Article |
|
Tijdschrift | Erasmus Law Review, Aflevering 3 2016 |
Trefwoorden | Prevention, pre-crime, pre-emption, risk, outlaw motorcycle gangs |
Auteurs | Teun van Ruitenburg |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
Fighting outlaw motorcycle gangs is currently one of the top priorities of many governments around the world. This is due to the notion that outlaw motorcycle gangs do not consist solely of motorcycle enthusiasts. Numerous cases reveal that these clubs, or at least their members, are involved in (organised) crime. In order to tackle these clubs, the former Dutch Minister of Security and Justice announced a whole-of-government strategy towards outlaw motorcycle gangs in 2012. As part of this effort, authorities such as the Dutch National Police, the Public Prosecution Service, the Dutch Tax Authority and local governments aim to cooperate in order to disrupt and restrict outlaw motorcycle gangs by means of Criminal, Administrative and Civil Law. Part of this strategy is to hinder club-related events. This article discusses the latter strategy in light of the distinction between prevention and pre-emption. As the latter two concepts are often used interchangeably, this article attempts to use a more strict division between prevention and pre-emption. Thereby, it becomes apparent that outlaw motorcycle gangs are to some extent governed through uncertainty. The author suggests that maintaining the ‘prevention–pre-emption distinction’ can offer an interesting and valuable point of departure for analysing today’s crime policies. |
Artikel |
The Netherlands Commercial Court - an attractive venue for international commercial disputes? |
Tijdschrift | Tijdschrift voor Civiele Rechtspleging, Aflevering 4 2016 |
Auteurs | mr. P.E. Ernste en mr. F.E. Vermeulen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
This article discusses the Netherlands Commercial Court from the perspective of lawyers and examines whether the NCC will be an attractive venue for international commercial discputes. |
Artikel |
|
Tijdschrift | Law and Method, oktober 2016 |
Auteurs | Lisa Webley |
Samenvatting |
This article examines the main assumptions and theoretical underpinnings of case study method in legal studies. It considers the importance of research design, including the crucial roles of the academic literature review, the research question and the use of rival theories to develop hypotheses and the practice of identifying the observable implications of those hypotheses. It considers the selection of data sources and modes of analysis to allow for valid analytical inferences to be drawn in respect of them. In doing so it considers, in brief, the importance of case study selection and variations such as single or multi case approaches. Finally it provides thoughts about the strengths and weaknesses associated with undertaking socio-legal and comparative legal research via a case study method, addressing frequent stumbling blocks encountered by legal researchers, as well as ways to militate them. It is written with those new to the method in mind. |
Article |
2016/35 What does Brexit mean for UK employment law? (UK) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 3 2016 |
Trefwoorden | Brexit, employment law |
Auteurs | James Davies |
Auteursinformatie |
ECJ Court Watch |
ECJ 30 June 2016, case C-178/15 (Sobczyszyn), Paid leaveAlicja Sobczyszyn – v – Szkola Podstawowa w Rzeplinie |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 3 2016 |
Trefwoorden | Paid leave |
Samenvatting |
A worker who was unable to take paid annual leave on account of sick leave retains his right to annual leave. |
ECJ Court Watch |
ECJ 20 July 2016, case C-341/15 (Maschek), Paid leaveHans Maschek – v – Magistratsdirektion de Stadt Wien – Personalstelle Wiener Stadtwerke |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 3 2016 |
Trefwoorden | Paid leave |
Samenvatting |
The fact that a worker retires voluntarily does not deprive him of the right to payment in lieu of paid annual leave he was unable to use up on account of sickness. |
Case Reports |
2016/37 More days of leave for employees over 50 is unjustified unequal treatment (GE) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 3 2016 |
Trefwoorden | Age discrimination |
Auteurs | Paul Schreiner en Jana Hunkemöller |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
If a collective agreement grants older employees a higher vacation claim solely because of their age, a younger employee is entitled to the same number of days of leave. |
ECJ Court Watch |
ECJ 14 July 2016, case C-335/15 (Ornano), Maternity leaveMaria Cristina Elisabetta Ornan – v – Ministerio della Giustizia, Direzione Generale dei Magistrati del Ministerio |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 3 2016 |
Trefwoorden | Maternity leave |
Samenvatting |
EU law does not give an employee on maternity a right to full pay while on leave. |
Case Reports |
2016/41 Employers must observe collective bargaining agreement-based restrictions on temporary agency work even if they are not justified (FI) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 3 2016 |
Trefwoorden | Dismissal, (un)justified restrictions |
Auteurs | Kaj Swanljung en Janne Nurminen |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
A company had leased some employees from a temporary work agency between 2008 and 2012 to work alongside its own employees on a continuous basis. The collective bargaining agreement that the company was bound by restricted the use of temporary agency workers to situations in which the work could not be performed by the company’s own staff. The trade union brought an action before the Labour Court claiming that the company had used temporary agency workers continuously to a greater extent than permitted by the collective bargaining agreement and that the employers’ association, of which the company was a member, had breached its supervisory duty. In a preliminary ruling, the ECJ held that the Temporary Agency Work Directive (2008/104/EC) does not oblige national courts to refuse to apply national law containing prohibitions or restrictions, even if those restrictions were not justified. Having confirmed that national restrictions may be applied, the Labour Court imposed a compensatory fine of € 3,000 on the company and € 4,000 on the employers’ association. |
Case Reports |
2016/49 French state held liable for failing to transpose Article 7§1 of the Working Time Directive (FR) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 3 2016 |
Trefwoorden | Working time, paid leave |
Auteurs | Claire Toumieux en Susan Ekrami |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
The French state was held liable by the Administrative Court of Clermont-Ferrand for failing to transpose Article 7§1 of EU Directive 2003/88/EC on working time. |
ECJ Court Watch |
EFTA Court 16 December 2015, case E-5/15 (M’bye), working timeMatja Kumba T M’bye and Others – v – Stiftelsen Fossumkollektivet, Norwegian case* |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 2 2016 |
Trefwoorden | Working time |
Samenvatting |
An 84-hour working week imposed on resident therapists at a care home may in certain circumstances be compatible with Directive 2003/88. |
Case Reports |
2016/23 Are employers obliged to provide childcare vouchers during maternity leave? (UK) |
Tijdschrift | European Employment Law Cases, Aflevering 2 2016 |
Trefwoorden | Maternity leave |
Auteurs | Catherine Hayes |
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie |
An employee challenged whether her employer’s refusal to provide childcare vouchers during maternity leave was discriminatory. The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) determined, somewhat tentatively, that where childcare vouchers are provided through a salary sacrifice scheme, it is not discriminatory for employers to cease to provide childcare vouchers during maternity leave. |