Zoekresultaat: 13 artikelen

x
Jaar 2009 x
Artikel

Burgerparticipatie in lokale veiligheidsnetwerken

Over ‘nodale sturing’ en ‘verankerd pluralisme’

Tijdschrift Justitiële verkenningen, Aflevering 1 2009
Auteurs R. van Steden
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Safety and security are increasingly provided by public-private partnerships. In this respect, commentators claim that we are witnessing a shift from ‘government’ (a hierarchically organized state) to ‘governance’ (a hybrid network of organizations) in the fight against crime and disorder. Criminologist Clifford Shearing interprets interactions within hybrid - public and private - networks in terms of nodal governance, implying that state coordination of partnerships is not given a priori significance. The state is but one actor among many. Ian Loader and Neil Walker criticize his position, taking the diametrically opposed view that the state is indispensable for the democratic regulation of public-private networks (anchored pluralism). Despite this fundamental disagreement, the perspectives of Shearing and Loader and Walker share an appreciation of citizen participation in local safety networks. However, at least for the Netherlands, it is hardly imaginable how such participation could flourish without any state interference.


R. van Steden
Dr. Ronald van Steden is als onderzoeker verbonden aan de leerstoel Veiligheid & Burgerschap en als docent aan de Faculteit der Sociale Wetenschappen van de Vrije Universiteit te Amsterdam

    Recent years have seen a surge in piracy in the Gulf of Aden, followed by growing international involvement in pursuing pirates off the Somali coast. The piracy problem is multifaceted and includes complex geopolitical, regional, legal and operational challenges. But the commitment demonstrated by a broad range of actors to fight piracy in Somali waters also offers unique opportunities. The unprecedented awareness of and attention to the region's insecurity provides international stakeholders with the momentum to strengthen their ties and address the root causes. This article gives a comprehensive account of the piracy issue and presents recommendations to nations engaged in counter-piracy activities.


B. van Ginkel
Mr. Bibi van Ginkel is verbonden aan het Clingendael Security and Conflict Programme van het Instituut Clingendael in Den Haag.

J. Hemmer
Drs. Jort Hemmer is verbonden aan het Clingendael Security and Conflict Programme van het Instituut Clingendael in Den Haag.

S. Kamerling
Drs. Susanne Kamerling is verbonden aan het Clingendael Security and Conflict Programme van het Instituut Clingendael in Den Haag.

F.-P. van der Putten
Dr. Frans-Paul van der Putten is verbonden aan het Clingendael Security and Conflict Programme van het Instituut Clingendael in Den Haag.
Artikel

De psychologisch geschoolde echtscheidingsbemiddelaar

Tijdschrift Nederlands-Vlaams tijdschrift voor mediation en conflictmanagement, Aflevering 4 2009
Trefwoorden Officer of the Court, Healer of the Family, onpartijdigheid, empowerment
Auteurs Donald Mac Gillavry
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    The legally trained divorce mediator, ‘the officer of the court’, can use the law as a frame of reference for his conduct, but the psychologically trained divorce mediator, ‘the healer of the family’ has no such device. His primary tools are techniques to improve the communication skills of parties, their decision-making process and respecting systemic regularities, in particular where it concerns the interests of the children, i.e. visitation rights.Divorce mediators without legal training are hampered by the absence of a clear frame of reference. They are susceptible to subjective interpretations of events, counter-transference phenomena and partiality. The divorce mediator is himself his most important instrument, but also the most vulnerable.


Donald Mac Gillavry
Donald Mac Gillavry is psycholoog, psychotherapeut en mediator.
Artikel

Achtergronden en determinanten van radicalisering en terrorisme

Een overzicht

Tijdschrift Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, Aflevering 4 2009
Trefwoorden radicalisme, terrorisme, radicaliseringsproces
Auteurs Wim Koomen en Joop van der Pligt
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    This article presents an overview of the main determinants of radicalization and terrorism. Experienced discrimination plays an important role, and can be seen as threatening. This could amplify the importance of ideology and religious convictions, and these both unify the group and direct the behavior of the group. Perceived threats also result in emphasizing group identity and increases the cohesiveness of the threatened group. This may lead to polarization between groups and radicalization. This radicalization is also affected by cognitions, such as perceived inequity and injustice, as well as emotions such as anger and contempt. In a later phase of radicalization group processes, such as groupthink, and support from the wider social group may further strengthen radicalization. Justification processes, like dehumanizing the opponent, are also likely to play a role. Finally, the transition from radicalization to terrorism is discussed.


Wim Koomen
Dr. W. Koomen is werkzaam bij de faculteit sociale psychologie van de Universiteit van Amsterdam, w.koomen@uva.nl.

Joop van der Pligt
Prof. dr. J. van der Pligt is hoogleraar sociale psychologie aan de Universiteit van Amsterdam, J.vanderPligt@uva.nl
Artikel

Hoe ondermijn je het radicale verhaal?

Overheidsbeleid en deradicalisering van Molukse en islamitische radicalen in Nederland

Tijdschrift Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, Aflevering 4 2009
Trefwoorden overheid, terrorisme, radicalisering
Auteurs Froukje Demant en Beatrice de Graaf
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    In this article we deal with the role of government in encouraging the decline of radical movements. We use the survey of factors promoting decline reported by Demant et al. (2008a). This overview will be further developed regarding the factor ‘official policy strategies’ on the basis of certain concepts taken from discourse analysis, adapted to counterterrorism and deradicalization strategies by De Graaf in 2009. The question posed is: ‘Which “narrative” can the government tell to encourage the decline of radical groups?’ We will therefore not address the different practical measures in this field, but focus instead on the perception of these official measures by the radicals. We will illustrate this process by means of a case-study: the deradicalization of South Moluccan youths in the 1970s. We will furthermore draw some lines to deradicalization of Jihadist radicals after 2001, also in the Netherlands.


Froukje Demant
Drs. F. Demant is onderzoeker bij de Anne Frank Stichting in Amsterdam, f.demant@annefrank.nl.

Beatrice de Graaf
Dr. B. de Graaf is onderzoeker bij het Centrum voor Terrorisme en Contraterrorisme van de Universiteit Leiden – Campus Den Haag, bdegraaf@campusdenhaag.nl.

    In this article the author summarizes the main arguments for and notions of a maximalist conception of restorative justice, as developed in his latest book: Restorative Justice, Self-interest and Responsible Citizenship.While using a rather limited, goal-oriented definition of RJ as ‘an option for doing justice after the occurrence of an offence that is primarily oriented towards repairing the individual, relational and social harm caused by that offence’, Walgrave aims at developing a full blown alternative for penal justice. In the restorative system it should also be possible to impose sanctions, when deliberative processes of mediation and conferencing are not feasible, although the latter have, of course, the greatest chance of achieving restoration.The sanctions of restorative justice are not punishments, because any intention to impose suffering is lacking at the side of the sentencing authorities. But RJ can be seen as a form of inverted retributivism, in the sense that the offender pays his dues back to the victim and the society, to a degree that has to be acceptable to all involved, and seeking a fair amount of proportionality that does not impose unrealistic or unfair obligations. Principles of due process of law should be adapted to fit the restorative process. The high degree of participation in restorative justice serves democracy and so should criminology, by studying the ways in which social capital can be increased.The concept of ‘common self-interest’ is explained as the fundamental understanding that self-interests are best served by serving the common self-interest in as far as that provides full possibilities of deployment to everyone.


Lode Walgrave
Lode Walgrave is emeritus hoogleraar (jeugd)criminologie van de Katholieke Universiteit Leuven en redactielid van dit tijdschrift.
Artikel

De Maritieme Arbeidsconventie van de IAO van 2006 en de Conventie nr. 188 over de arbeid in de visserij

Tijdschrift Arbeidsrechtelijke Annotaties, Aflevering 2 2009
Trefwoorden Internationaal arbeidsrecht, maritiem arbeidsrecht, arbeid in de visserij
Auteurs Dr. A. Charbonneau, Mr. G. Proutiere-Maulion en Prof. P. Chaumette
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    In deze bijdrage wordt de ontstaansgeschiedenis en de inhoud van de IAO Maritieme Arbeidsconventie (2006) en de IAO-Conventie nr. 188 over de arbeid in de visserij in kaart gebracht. Beide conventies worden geduid als de vierde pijler van het internationaal maritiem transportrecht. Historisch volgde de arbeidsrechtelijke pijler op de veiligheidspijler, de ecologische pijler en op een pijler die gericht was op de certificering van competenties en op de organisatie van de wachtdienst. De interactie tussen de Internationale Maritieme Organisatie en de Internationale Arbeidsorganisatie wordt onderzocht. De bijdrage gaat in op de eigenheid van de arbeidsverhoudingen in de maritieme sector. Ze illustreert de dilemma’s waarmee de IAO worstelt in haar streven naar een zo ruim mogelijke toepassingssfeer en een zo optimaal mogelijk niveau van bescherming in een economische sector waarin diversiteit troef is.


Dr. A. Charbonneau
Dr. A. Charbonneau is Docteur en droit, Droit et Changement social, UMR CNRS nr. 3168.

Mr. G. Proutiere-Maulion
Mr. G. Proutiere-Maulion is Maître de Conférences, HDR, en Directrice du Centre de Droit Maritime et Océanique EA nr. 1165.

Prof. P. Chaumette
Prof. P. Chaumette is Professeur, CDMO, Maison des Sciences de l’Homme Ange Guépin aan de Universiteit te Nantes.
Artikel

What Works in Probation?

Tijdschrift PROCES, Aflevering 3 2009
Trefwoorden probation, corrections, desistance, rehabilitation, resettlement
Auteurs Prof. Fergus McNeill
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    In this paper the author argues that, despite the apparently technical nature of questions of effectiveness, in fact any considered and critical analysis of the empirical evidence about desistance, rehabilitation and ‘what works?’ compel us to consider the moral character and context of criminal justice interventions.


Prof. Fergus McNeill
Fergus McNeill is Professor of Criminology & Social Work in the Glasgow School of Social Work (a joint venture of the Universities of Glasgow and Strathclyde) and a Network Leader in the Scottish Centre for Crime and Justice Research (at the University of Glasgow).
Artikel

Case study: the international CSR conflict and mediation

Supply-chain responsibility: western customers and the Indian textile industry

Tijdschrift Nederlands-Vlaams tijdschrift voor mediation en conflictmanagement, Aflevering 2 2009
Trefwoorden corporate social responsibility, international CSR conflicts, supply-chain responsibility, CSR
Auteurs Tineke Lambooy
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    In 2008, Ruud Lubbers led a mediation process to resolve the conflicts which had arisen between two Dutch campaigning organisations, various Indian non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and labour unions, two Dutch internet providers, an Indian clothing producer and a Dutch jeans brand. The mediation took place at the request of the disagreeing parties and the Dutch and Indian governments. The conflict related to corporate social responsibility (CSR) standards followed by the textile companies.In this contribution the effects of campaigning and litigating in issues concerning CSR will be examined. Limiting the analysis to CSR conflicts in the textile industry, the author will reflect on these new types of international conflicts in a globalising world and will share her view on appropriate ways to avoid them or, ultimately, to (re)mediate them if necessary.This contribution informs the reader about the events in India and the Netherlands which led to the escalation of the conflict. It provides an overview of the conflict resolution procedures and elaborates on the outcome of the ‘Lubbers Mediation’. The applicable legal and soft law labour standards are compared as well as the parties’ communication strategies. Lastly, this case is contrasted with other CSR conflicts in the textile industry, revealing a hidden conflict.


Tineke Lambooy
Tineke Lambooy is a Senior Researcher at Nyenrode Business University (Nyenrode) in the field of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and she lectures in Legal Aspects of Globalisation-CSR, and Mergers & Acquisitions at Utrecht University, the Netherlands. She is completing a PhD on the Legal Aspects of CSR. Ms Lambooy assisted Mr Lubbers as a mediator in the conflict discussed in this contribution. E-mail: T.Lambooy@nyenrode.nl or T.E.Lambooy@uu.nl.
Artikel

Vijftig jaar Tijdschrift voor Criminologie

Vooruitgang en verandering in de Nederlandstalige criminologie

Tijdschrift Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, Aflevering 2 2009
Trefwoorden Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, Nederlandstalige criminologie
Auteurs Dr. Jan Nijboer, Dr. Frank Weerman, Prof. dr. Edward Kleemans e.a.
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Fifty years ago Tijdschrift voor Criminologie, the Dutch Journal for Criminology, appeared for the first time. It has now developed into a peer reviewed journal with quantitative and qualitative research of high quality. Youth and life course criminology, research into organised and organisational crime, criminographical research, and research into violence are strongly represented nowadays. Changes in the journal reflect more general developments in criminology in the Netherlands and Belgium. In the last 10-15 years the discipline has become more internationally oriented and professional, and scientific backgrounds of criminologists have become more diverse.


Dr. Jan Nijboer
Dr. J.A. Nijboer is universitair hoofddocent, sectie criminologie, faculteit rechtsgeleerdheid, Rijksuniversiteit Groningen, j.a.nijboer@rug.nl.

Dr. Frank Weerman
Dr. F.M. Weerman is senior onderzoeker, Nederlands Studiecentrum Criminaliteit en Rechtshandhaving (NSCR), FWeerman@nscr.nl.

Prof. dr. Edward Kleemans
Prof. dr. E.R. Kleemans is waarnemend hoofd, afdeling criminaliteit, rechtshandhaving en sancties, Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek- en Documentatiecentrum (WODC) en hoogleraar zware criminaliteit en rechtshandhaving, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, e.r.kleemans@minjus.nl.

Dr. Andrea Donker
Dr. A.G. Donker is universitair docent, afd. criminologie en penologie, faculteit rechtsgeleerdheid, Universiteit Leiden, a.g.donker@law.leidenuniv.nl.

Prof. dr. Els Enhus
Prof. dr. E.A.M. Enhus is hoogleraar, eenheid criminologische wetenschappen, Vrije Universiteit Brussel en co-directeur, Onderzoeksgroep Sociale Veiligheidsanalyse (SVA), elsenhus@brutele.be.
Boekbespreking

L.G. Verburg, Het territoir van de (Nederlandse) ondernemingsraad in het internationale bedrijfsleven

Tijdschrift Arbeidsrechtelijke Annotaties, Aflevering 1 2009
Trefwoorden WOR, adviesrecht OR, grensoverschrijdende besluitvorming, toerekening, Europese ondernemingsraad, structuurregeling
Auteurs Mr. J. Lamers (red.) e.a.
SamenvattingAuteursinformatie

    Verburg signaleert in zijn proefschrift een spanningsveld tussen grensoverschrijdende besluitvorming en de invloed van de ondernemingsraad die tot het Nederlandse territoir beperkt is. Het proefschrift is een aanwinst voor de medezeggenschapsrechtspraktijk door de inzichtelijke wijze waarop Verburg de reikwijdte van het adviesrecht en de jurisprudentie over toerekening in de internationale context beschrijft. De recensenten beschrijven de onderwerpen van het proefschrift en verdiepten zich in de vraag hoe het gesignaleerde ‘medezeggenschapsgat’ kan worden verkleind. Dat leidde tot reflecties over de Europese dimensie van de medezeggenschap, aanbevelingen aan de wetgever en een actualisering van de literatuur en de jurisprudentie tot eind 2008.


Mr. J. Lamers (red.) e.a.
Mevrouw mr. J. Lamers is directeur/eigenaar Lamers ICM consultancy, gespecialiseerd in Europees sociaal recht en arbeidsverhoudingen (www.lamers-icmconsultancy.com).

Tobias Arnoldussen
Tobias Arnoldussen is a PhD Candidate in the Sociology of Law Department at the Erasmus School of Law in Rotterdam. The author would like to thank the two referees and the editors Ellen Hey and Roel Pieterman for their valuable and helpful comments.

Siri Gloppen
Professor of Comparative Politics, University of Bergen and Head of the Courts in Transition research programme at the Chr. Michelsen Institute, Bergen, Norway. The author would like to thank Ole Frithjof Norheim, Bruce M. Wilson and the anonymous referees for constructive comments.
Interface Showing Amount
U kunt door de volledige tekst zoeken naar alle artikelen door uw zoekterm in het zoekveld in te vullen. Als u op de knop 'Zoek' heeft geklikt komt u op de zoekresultatenpagina met filters, die u helpen om snel bij het door u gezochte artikel te komen. Er zijn op dit moment twee filters: rubriek en jaar.