-
Samenvatting
Early this year, a bill was introduced proposing mandatory minimum sentences in the Netherlands. Despite harsh criticism from within the legal complex, the bill has not been withdrawn, instead its scope has been broadened. This article states that the reasons given for the introduction of mandatory minimum sentences have no empirical foundation and that the objectives of the bill will not be reached: mandatory minimum sentences will not contribute to the prevention of crime. The reason for the introduction of the bill is nothing less than a textbook example of penal populism.
PROCES |
|
| Artikel | Minimumstraffen en de dovemansoren van de wetgever |
| Trefwoorden | minimum sentences, sentencing goals, retribution, penal populism |
| Auteurs | Sigrid van Wingerden |
| Auteursinformatie |
Toegang tot dit losse artikel kopen
U kunt online toegang kopen tot dit artikel. Dit geeft u 24 uur toegang tot het artikel en kost € 9,95.
| 24 uur toegang | € 9,95 |
Uw aankoop activeren
Heeft u een activatiecode, dan kun u uw product hier activeren.
