-
Summary
It was not necessary for the aid measure of Denmark and Sweden in favour of the airline SAS to benefit all undertakings that suffered damages caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The ECJ’s summary of the case is available here: https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2023-09/cp230150en.pdf.
-
Order
The Court:
In case C-320/21 P
1. Dismisses the appeal;
2. Orders Ryanair DAC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and SAS AB;
3. Orders the French Republic and the Kingdom of Sweden to bear their own costs.In case C-321/21 P:
1. Dismisses the appeal;
2. Orders Ryanair DAC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and SAS AB;
3. Orders the French Republic and the Kingdom of Denmark to bear their own costs.
DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072023008003012
European Employment Law Cases |
|
Rulings | ECJ 28 September 2023, case C-320/21 P and C-321/21 P (Ryanair v. Commission), MiscellaneousRyanair DAC – v – European Commission, EU case |
Trefwoorden | Miscellaneous, Freedom of establishment |
DOI | 10.5553/EELC/187791072023008003012 |
Toon PDF Toon volledige grootte Samenvatting Statistiek Citeerwijze |
Dit artikel is keer geraadpleegd. |
Dit artikel is 0 keer gedownload. |
Aanbevolen citeerwijze bij dit artikel
, "ECJ 28 September 2023, case C-320/21 P and C-321/21 P (Ryanair v. Commission), Miscellaneous", European Employment Law Cases, 3, (2023):150-151
, "ECJ 28 September 2023, case C-320/21 P and C-321/21 P (Ryanair v. Commission), Miscellaneous", European Employment Law Cases, 3, (2023):150-151
It was not necessary for the aid measure of Denmark and Sweden in favour of the airline SAS to benefit all undertakings that suffered damages caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. |
Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in
Inhoud