ALGEMENE MEDEDELING

In de loop van januari 2025 wordt deze online omgeving geïntegreerd in Boomportaal (www.boomportaal.nl), waarna deze omgeving wordt opgeheven. Vanaf dat moment linkt deze URL automatisch door naar Boomportaal.

DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072023008003012

European Employment Law CasesAccess_open

Rulings

ECJ 28 September 2023, case C-320/21 P and C-321/21 P (Ryanair v. Commission), Miscellaneous

Ryanair DAC – v – European Commission, EU case

Trefwoorden Miscellaneous, Freedom of establishment
DOI
Toon PDF Toon volledige grootte
Samenvatting Statistiek Citeerwijze
Dit artikel is keer geraadpleegd.
Dit artikel is 0 keer gedownload.
Aanbevolen citeerwijze bij dit artikel
, "ECJ 28 September 2023, case C-320/21 P and C-321/21 P (Ryanair v. Commission), Miscellaneous", European Employment Law Cases, 3, (2023):150-151

    It was not necessary for the aid measure of Denmark and Sweden in favour of the airline SAS to benefit all undertakings that suffered damages caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in

    • Summary

      It was not necessary for the aid measure of Denmark and Sweden in favour of the airline SAS to benefit all undertakings that suffered damages caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The ECJ’s summary of the case is available here: https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2023-09/cp230150en.pdf.

    • Order

      The Court:

      • In case C-320/21 P
        1. Dismisses the appeal;
        2. Orders Ryanair DAC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and SAS AB;
        3. Orders the French Republic and the Kingdom of Sweden to bear their own costs.

      • In case C-321/21 P:
        1. Dismisses the appeal;
        2. Orders Ryanair DAC to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission and SAS AB;
        3. Orders the French Republic and the Kingdom of Denmark to bear their own costs.


Print dit artikel