ALGEMENE MEDEDELING

In de loop van januari 2025 wordt deze online omgeving geïntegreerd in Boomportaal (www.boomportaal.nl), waarna deze omgeving wordt opgeheven. Vanaf dat moment linkt deze URL automatisch door naar Boomportaal.

DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072023008003013

European Employment Law CasesAccess_open

Rulings

ECJ 5 October 2023, case C-496/22 (Brink’s Cash Solutions), Collective Redundancies

El – v – SC Brink’s Cash Solutions SRL, Romanian case

Trefwoorden Collective Redundancies
DOI
Toon PDF Toon volledige grootte
Samenvatting Statistiek Citeerwijze
Dit artikel is keer geraadpleegd.
Dit artikel is 0 keer gedownload.
Aanbevolen citeerwijze bij dit artikel
, "ECJ 5 October 2023, case C-496/22 (Brink’s Cash Solutions), Collective Redundancies", European Employment Law Cases, 3, (2023):151-151

    National legislation which does not require an employer to consult individually the workers affected by projected collective redundancies, where those workers have not appointed workers’ representatives, and which does not require those workers to appoint such representatives, is not precluded, provided that that legislation makes it possible, in circumstances beyond the control of those workers, to guarantee the full effect of Directive 98/59/EC.

Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in

    • Summary

      National legislation which does not require an employer to consult individually the workers affected by projected collective redundancies, where those workers have not appointed workers’ representatives, and which does not require those workers to appoint such representatives, is not precluded, provided that that legislation makes it possible, in circumstances beyond the control of those workers, to guarantee the full effect of Directive 98/59/EC.

    • Question

      Must Article 1(1)(b), Article 2(3) and Article 6 of Directive 98/59/EC be interpreted as precluding national legislation which does not require an employer to consult individually the workers affected by projected collective redundancies, where those workers have not appointed workers’ representatives, and which does not require those workers to appoint such representatives?

    • Ruling

      Article 1(1)(b), Article 2(3) and Article 6 of Directive 98/59/EC must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which does not require an employer to consult individually the workers affected by projected collective redundancies, where those workers have not appointed workers’ representatives, and which does not require those workers to appoint such representatives, provided that that legislation makes it possible, in circumstances beyond the control of those workers, to guarantee the full effect of those provisions of Directive 98/59/EC, as amended.


Print dit artikel