-
Summary
National legislation which does not require an employer to consult individually the workers affected by projected collective redundancies, where those workers have not appointed workers’ representatives, and which does not require those workers to appoint such representatives, is not precluded, provided that that legislation makes it possible, in circumstances beyond the control of those workers, to guarantee the full effect of Directive 98/59/EC.
-
Question
Must Article 1(1)(b), Article 2(3) and Article 6 of Directive 98/59/EC be interpreted as precluding national legislation which does not require an employer to consult individually the workers affected by projected collective redundancies, where those workers have not appointed workers’ representatives, and which does not require those workers to appoint such representatives?
-
Ruling
Article 1(1)(b), Article 2(3) and Article 6 of Directive 98/59/EC must be interpreted as not precluding national legislation which does not require an employer to consult individually the workers affected by projected collective redundancies, where those workers have not appointed workers’ representatives, and which does not require those workers to appoint such representatives, provided that that legislation makes it possible, in circumstances beyond the control of those workers, to guarantee the full effect of those provisions of Directive 98/59/EC, as amended.
DOI: 10.5553/EELC/187791072023008003013
European Employment Law Cases |
|
Rulings | ECJ 5 October 2023, case C-496/22 (Brink’s Cash Solutions), Collective RedundanciesEl – v – SC Brink’s Cash Solutions SRL, Romanian case |
Trefwoorden | Collective Redundancies |
DOI | 10.5553/EELC/187791072023008003013 |
Toon PDF Toon volledige grootte Samenvatting Statistiek Citeerwijze |
Dit artikel is keer geraadpleegd. |
Dit artikel is 0 keer gedownload. |
Aanbevolen citeerwijze bij dit artikel
, "ECJ 5 October 2023, case C-496/22 (Brink’s Cash Solutions), Collective Redundancies", European Employment Law Cases, 3, (2023):151-151
, "ECJ 5 October 2023, case C-496/22 (Brink’s Cash Solutions), Collective Redundancies", European Employment Law Cases, 3, (2023):151-151
National legislation which does not require an employer to consult individually the workers affected by projected collective redundancies, where those workers have not appointed workers’ representatives, and which does not require those workers to appoint such representatives, is not precluded, provided that that legislation makes it possible, in circumstances beyond the control of those workers, to guarantee the full effect of Directive 98/59/EC. |
Dit artikel wordt geciteerd in
Inhoud